|
Imaging Neurodegeneration and Repair in Multiple Sclerosis
Imaging Neurodegeneration and Repair in Multiple Sclerosis
Keynote Speaker: David Miller (University College London)Presented by the New York Academy of SciencesReported by Kristen Delevich | Posted August 23, 2012 Overview
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. Current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques play a crucial role in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and advances in the technology are providing researchers with an increasingly nuanced picture of the disease and its progression. On June 15–16, 2012, a diverse group of researchers, physicians, and other professionals interested in how technological advances can improve the understanding and treatment of multiple sclerosis met at a New York Academy of Sciences conference titled Imaging Neurodegeneration and Repair in Multiple Sclerosis to exchange ideas and learn about the latest research in this field.
Researchers at the conference presented results on detailed visualization of grey matter, myelin, and regional connectivity. They demonstrated novel techniques to track the progress of lesions and metabolic changes in brain tissue, and to correlate changes in the physical structure of the CNS with disease symptoms. Clinicians discussed ways to translate these research techniques to patient care.
Use the tab above to find a meeting report and multimedia from this event.
Presentations available from: Sean Deoni, PhD (Brown University School of Engineering) Elizabeth Fisher, PhD (Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute) Matilde Inglese, MD, PhD (Mount Sinai School of Medicine) David Miller, MD (University College London) Govind Nair, PhD (National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke, NIH) Robert T. Naismith, MD (Washington University) Daniel Pelletier, MD (Yale University School of Medicine) Istvan Pirko, MD (Mayo Clinic) Daniel S. Reich, MD, PhD (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH) Shiv Saidha, MBBCh, MRCPI (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine) Klaus Schmierer, PhD, FRCP (Barts and the London School of Medicine & Dentistry) Erik M. Shapiro, PhD (Yale University School of Medicine) Bruno Stankoff, MD, PhD (Pierre and Marie Curie University, ICM, INSERM) Jerry S. Wolinsky, MD (University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston)
Image courtesy of D. Reich, G. Nair, and C. Pardo-Villamizar, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Silver Sponsor
Introduction to Multiple Sclerosis and MRI
Myelination and its role in neurological function
The central nervous system (CNS) employs electrical and chemical signals to carry out its functions. Myelin is a fatty tissue that forms a sheath around axons, the latter of which transmit electrical signals from the cell bodies out to a more distant terminus. The lipids in myelin give the tissue the properties of an electrical insulator, which ensures that charge is not dissipated over the axon length. The thicker the myelin sheath, the better insulated the axon is and the faster electrical impulses can be transmitted. Myelin is created and supported by oligodendrocytes; therefore, if either myelin or oligodendrocytes are damaged, the result is impaired electrical conduction along the axon and impaired neural communication and brain function.
What is multiple sclerosis?
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the CNS, including brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves, that attacks myelin. Damaged myelin is being replaced by scar tissue (sclerosis) that gives the disease its name. Demyelination disrupts electrical conduction along the axon and can ultimately result in the complete transection and destruction of the nerve fiber (axon) itself. People with MS experience a range of sensory, motor, and cognitive impairments as a result.
The average age at which MS is diagnosed typically ranges from 20 to 45. An MS diagnosis requires the dissemination of symptoms across time and space. The course of MS can be very unpredictable: most patients initially present with reversible neurological deficits. From this starting point, patients segregate in terms of the progression of their symptoms. In the most common form, called relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), patients experience flare-ups in their symptoms that remit but get progressively worse over the course of subsequent episodes. This is in contrast to the disease course known as primary progressive MS (PPMS). In these patients there are no periods of relapse or remission, but a steady worsening of symptoms and signs from onset. The cause of MS is unknown but given the role of inflammation and autoimmunity in the disease process, researchers hypothesize that MS occurs when some environmental agent (e.g., infection) interacts with a genetic makeup predisposed to immune dysfunction.
Basics of MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an invaluable tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with multiple sclerosis. MRI takes advantage of the fact that brain tissue contains a large quantity of water. When a person lies in the powerful magnetic field of the MRI machine, a majority of the positively-charged protons of the water molecules align with the magnetic field. Next, a radio frequency current—called the RF pulse—is turned on and produces a varying electromagnetic field. At the resonance frequency, the RF pulse can be absorbed and knocks the spin of protons off the main axis of the magnetic field. Directly after the RF pulse, the maximum number of protons are spinning in alignment. After this, the proton spins dephase and the majority of protons go back to spinning in the direction of the static magnetic field. During this relaxation, a radio frequency signal is generated that can be picked up by receiver coils. The MRI scans we can see are reconstructed via a mathematic transformation that extracts the distribution of protons from the radio frequency signal. What gives the MRI its contrast is the fact that protons in different part of the brain behave differently within the magnetic field, and protons return to their equilibrium spin state at different rates. A variety of RF pulse sequences are used in MRI scanners to alter image contrast.
There are several important techniques involved in imaging of MS:
T1-weighted imaging: this scan shows "black holes" or lesions that are dark areas on the MRI scan, also known as hypo-intensities. Acute T1 hypo-intense lesions can be transient areas of edema that later disappear on subsequent scans. Chronic T1 hypo-intense lesions are areas of permanent myelin loss and axonal damage.
T2-weighted imaging: this scan shows bright spots, or hyper-intensities. The total number of T2 lesions and/or the T2 lesion volume can be used as a proxy for disease burden.
Gadolinium enhancement: Gadolinium is a contrast agent that is administered prior to MRI scan. The presence of gadolinium enhancement indicates active lesions, meaning that there is a breakdown of the blood brain barrier and inflammation is present.
Magnetization transfer ratio: Magnetization transfer ratio is an MRI sequence that distinguishes between the macromolecular associated water (such as that found in myelin) versus the free water pool based on the fact that the free water protons have higher spin frequencies and fewer interactions with the environment that contribute to dephasing. Therefore, free water protons can be distinguished for bound, macromolecular pools of water by their increased T2 relaxation time.
Imaging the Brain Before Lesion Development
Speakers: Sean Deoni, Brown University School of Engineering Jeff Duyn, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Erik Shapiro, Yale University School of Medicine
Highlights
- mcDESPOT, a relatively myelin-specific MRI technique is successfully being used to track myelin development early in life and could provide insight into how demyelination in MS changes communication between brain regions.
- Ongoing research continues to push the limits of contrast:noise ratio in MRI, with the powerful magnetic susceptibility imaging exploiting how different structures in the brain affect the behavior of protons in a magnetic field.
- Magnetic, biodegradable nanoparticles show promise as a tool to specifically label single cells that invade the central nervous system in MS and destroy myelin.
Advancing MRI technology to visualize the healthy brain
To fully appreciate the changes wrought by multiple sclerosis, scientists must first understand the structure of the healthy human brain. Advances in imaging technology are allowing researchers to see more detail and to track changes in the features of the brain that matter most in MS.
Myelin insulation of axons allows for rapid communication between regions of the brain, which is essential for higher order processes such as speech and cognition. Sean Deoni of the Advanced Baby Imaging Group at Brown University School of Engineering is interested in how the myelin "wiring" develops early in life and its relation to cognitive and behavioral development. If myelination across co-active brain regions leads to new abilities in babies, the loss of myelin and resulting disconnect across brain regions could lead to impairment in MS patients. To address these questions, Deoni first had to devise a method that rapidly and unambiguously quantifies myelin.
Deoni's solution is mcDESPOT, a streamlined version of multicomponent relaxation analysis (MCR). The basic principle of MCR is that water protons behave differently depending on the microanatomic water compartment in which they are found. The space between the lipid bilayers of the myelin sheath, for instance, confers water protons with a rapid T2 relaxation that distinguishes them from surrounding "free" water. mcDESPOT saves time by collecting information about T1 and T2 relaxation from a single RF pulse and modeling data post hoc to estimate values for the myelin water fraction versus the free water fraction. This rapid technique in turn allows the researchers to image young children, who are not inclined to remain motionless in the machine for long periods of time.
The Advanced Baby Imaging Group has collected myelin imaging data in conjunction with neuropsychological data from over 200 healthy children. Deoni reported that the myelin-specific MRI data reveals a spatiotemporal pattern of development from ages 3–11 months that is consistent with previous histological findings. Unlike histology, longitudinal MRI in combination with cognitive behavioral research can be used to investigate the relationship between the appearance of myelin within brain regions and cognitive and behavioral milestones in a child's development. MRI data revealed early lateralization of myelin content in receptive and expressive language areas that correlated with language function. Deoni closed by highlighting how this normative work will help to lay the foundation for studies of both atypical neurodevelopment as well as neurodegeneration in diseases such as MS.
While Deoni's talk focused on an MRI method that is still in its infancy, Jeff Duyn from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the NIH went back to basics, explaining the physics underlying gains made in anatomical contrast. Duyn pointed out that there are two basic means by which to increase the contrast to noise ratio in MRI: 1) generate higher field strength, thereby increasing the number of proton spins that align with the main magnetic field and that can be detected and, 2) increase the number of coils, such that each coil picks up noise from a smaller area and, in turn, noise contributes less to the value of each pixel.
In particular, the advent of ultra-high field MR has made a contrast method called magnetic susceptibility contrast, also known as T2*, possible. Magnetization susceptibility imaging relies on the fact that brain structures are differentially magnetized and that the magnetic properties of a structure alter the magnetic field in its vicinity. The local magnetic fields are "seen" by water protons and reflected in changes of the T2* relaxation—the time it takes for protons that were aligned to a magnetic field to dephase. In MRI, following application of an external magnetic field (B0) a slight majority of hydrogen protons align with B0 and produce a net magnetization. Next, the MRI machine sends a radio frequency (RF) pulse that causes protons to absorb energy and tip their orientation away from the plane of the main magnetic field. Just after the RF pulse the maximum number of protons spin in phase but quickly begin to dephase. A major reason that the protons dephase is that they are "seeing" different local magnetic fields that are produced by the magnetic properties of brain structures.
Adapted from Duyn slides 6 and 8. The schematic in the top left depicts the physics behind T2* relaxation. In this example, a 90° RF pulse rotated the net magnetization to the transverse plane (indicated by black arrow). Immediately following the RF pulse the maximum number of protons spin in phase but soon spin at different frequencies due to differences in the magnetic field in their vicinity. This is represented in the bar magnet on the left: the magnetic field is higher within and to the top and bottom of the magnet, causing a higher spin frequency in protons found in these regions compared to the sides. Spin frequencies are richly distributed in the brain, as represented in grey scale in the image on the left: layer structure and vessels in the yellow box, while the spotty pattern in the white matter is believed to be iron.
As seen in the image collected from the hippocampal slice above, frequency distributions delineate macro features (e.g., anatomical regions) as well as micro-anatomical structures (e.g., blood vessels) in the brain. What contributes to the different magnetization seen in the brain? Duyn named deoxy-hemoglobin and iron as paramagnetic molecules that increase the magnetic field and myelin as a diamagnetic compound that decreases the magnetic field. Duyn's data suggest that iron staining is highly correlated with high R2* (1/T2*), though he did see correlation with myelin in regions with low iron and high myelin. Finally, Duyn cautioned that it is important to consider how spin frequency measures can be affected by components of structures down to the nanometer level. For example, at the nanometer level of myelin's structure, orientation of phospholipid chains can alter the strength of the magnetic field (and thus spin frequency). Fortunately, it is possible to pull out multiple components of the R2* signal decays from different micro-structural compartments, opening up the potential for extracting micro-structural information.
While most of the day was spent discussing means of imaging brain tissue damage, Erik Shapiro of Yale University School of Medicine discussed strategies for imaging culprits of that damage—the infiltrating peripheral lymphocytes that destroy myelin sheaths. If researchers could detect small numbers of invading immune cells early on in the process they would be better able to evaluate the causal link between immune cell invasion and plaque formation. According to Shapiro, early detection of this invasion will rely on identification of a label that will not perturb the behavior of the invading cells, is highly specific, and can be detected with great sensitivity.
Magnetic, biodegradable nanoparticles of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) may meet these specifications: Shapiro reported that cytokine release was not affected after monocytes were fed PLGA particles and that cell-specific labeling has been achieved in animal models for both classes of infiltrating immune cells. To magnetically label monocytes, the cells were removed from the blood and cultured in the presence of PLGA, which they conveniently ingest. Patrick Kochanek's lab at the University of Pittsburgh demonstrated in mice that macrophages will ingest magnetic particles in vivo and can be detected by MRI in the brain following brain injury. Conversely, T lymphocytes are non-phagocytic but can be targeted by nonactivating antibodies bound to PLGA. The antibody-PLGA complex binds to the surface of T lymphocytes, and eventually portions of membrane invaginate, leading to internalization of a few magnetic particles. The signal from these magnetic particles is strong enough to visualize a single immune cell in a mouse brain. To take immune cell imaging to the clinic would require ~200um resolution, which is almost in reach with 7T and dedicated surface coils. The issue of scaling up detection of labeled monocytes from mice to humans will pose the biggest challenge: as Shapiro pointed out, cell diameter doesn't increase from mice to humans though brain volume does greatly.
The Multiple Sclerosis Lesion
Speakers: Istvan Pirko, Mayo Clinic Daniel Reich, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH Klaus Schmierer, Barts and the London School of Medicine & Dentistry
Highlights
- High resolution serial in vivo MRI reveals four distinct groups of lesion dynamics in the TMEV-induced mouse model of MS.
- The presence of a central vein in white matter lesions is a promising diagnostic tool for MS, and the patterns of gadolinium enhancement at these central veins can provide specific hypotheses for how perivascular lesions form.
- Cortical white matter lesions are underreported in MRI scans compared to histology. Use of high-field MRI imaging on post-mortem brain tissue in combination with myelin histology could inform methods of in vivo detection of cortical white matter lesions.
Tracking the MS lesion
When lesions appear in the MRI scans of MS patients they do not remain stable. Lesions can expand and retract, enhance and not enhance. The subtle changes in lesion dynamics and other features are being studied in greater detail than ever before due to the advent of higher-field MRI. By tracking lesions across time, either in animal models or human patients, researchers are interrogating the link between changes in MRI signal and lesion appearance and the link between lesion characteristics and clinical outcomes.
Istvan Pirko of the Mayo Clinic discussed the use of mouse models of multiple sclerosis to test potential clinical methodologies and therapies. His lab uses a viral infection model of MS that induces a biphasic disease in susceptible mouse strains. Upon infection, the Theiler murine encephalitis virus (TMEV) replicates in neurons in the hippocampus, striatum, cortex, and spinal cord and is capable of converting to a chronic demyelinating disease in susceptible strains. With the onset of chronic demyelinating disease epitope spreading to myelin epitopes also occurs. Upon infection with a virus like TMEV, the body mounts a viral-specific T cell-mediated immune response that causes inflammation at the site of infection. Inflammation can damage host tissues like myelin, causing local spread of broken down tissue particles. The theory of epitope spreading is that an acute viral immune response can switch to a chronic autoimmune response when T cells recognize these damaged host particles as epitopes and initiate an attack on the host tissue. Pirko's lab used MRI to track lesion load and dynamics in the autoimmunity-prone interferon-γ receptor null mouse line (G129).
Pirko saw no T2 lesions resolve in the G129 mice; instead, T2 lesion dynamics could be sorted into four groups: expanding, fluctuating, expanding-retracting, and stable. At time of death the expanding lesions accounted for the majority of total lesion volume. All fluctuating lesions showed gadolinium enhancement—indicative of blood brain barrier breakdown—when they appeared. However, after approximately 40 days enhancement was virtually unseen despite the ongoing appearance of new lesions.
The immuno-normal C57Bl/6 strain displays lesion dynamics that are distinct from the G129 line; 7 days post-TMEV infection they rapidly develop T1 black holes, regions of T1 hypointensity that indicate that axons and neurons themselves have been destroyed. Black holes weren't seen in mice that lacked an adaptive immune system, suggesting that infiltrating immune cells promote damage. T1 black holes were reduced to a greater extent when CD8+ immune cells were knocked out compared to CD4+ cells. Likewise, T1 black holes were reduced in mice null for perforin, the effector molecule of CD8+ T cells. When Pirko treated mice with TMEV viral capsid peptide prior to infection, it inhibited cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) antiviral response and protected animals from paralytic disease. The researchers were thus surprised that injection of the same peptide during ongoing antiviral CTL response had dramatically adverse effects, resulting in the development of profound hemorraghic demyelination leading to mortality within two days. Ongoing work is being done to investigate differences in immune response prior to infection, in the acute phase, and chronic phase of CTL response.
Charcot revisited
One can find in the hand-drawn illustrations of Charcot, the physician who first described multiple sclerosis, the intimate association of small capillaries within sclerotic patches of white matter. Today, Daniel Reich from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the NIH, and other researchers, are using high resolution MRI to study the relationship between blood vessels and MS lesions across time in patients. Studies looking at serial scans over time have reported changes in MR measures in normal-appearing white matter where focal-enhancing lesions form that are related to increased diffusion and perfusion. Postmortem data has established that acute inflammation occurs within gadolinium-enhancing lesions and that small veins are often at the center of these lesions.
Studies from the 19th century identified blood vessels in MS lesions. This illustration by JM Charcot depicts the phenomenon. (Image courtesy of Daniel Reich)
Lending further support to Charcot's original observation, Reich's group sees that small veins radiate out from the lateral ventricles and that lesions form around them. Furthermore, the presence of central veins in lesions may prove to be a useful diagnostic criterion for MS; a group in Nottingham found that patients who had veins within more than 40% of their lesions had MS. First collected at 7T, Reich has developed the FLAIR* sequence to collect small vein data in the clinical 3T scanner. The FLAIR* sequence combines FLAIR, a workhorse for finding lesions in MS, with a T2* sequence that is optimized to quickly scan and highlight veins during gadolinium enhancement. Reich measured vein diameter from inside and outside lesions within the MS brain and compared them to healthy controls. He observed significant decreases in the lumen diameter of veins found inside lesions compared to healthy control veins. However, veins outside of lesions in the MS brains appeared enlarged.
Reich's group performed serial and rapid scans immediately following gadolinium injection and found lesions exhibited two different patterns of enhancement, either a centrifugal (spread from inside the lesion, outward) or a centripetal (spread from outside the lesion, inward) pattern of enhancement. Reich hypothesized that this pattern depends on where contrast agent is sensing blood brain barrier breakdown. For example, breakdown at the central vein would result in a centrifugal enhancement. Reich's working model is that small veins become inflamed, leading to the formation of a perivascular inflammatory cuff. As soluble factors expand out from the cuff into tissue, they make other small vessels leaky. Meanwhile, repair occurs at the central vein, sealing up the blood brain barrier and causing a shift in the pattern of enhancement from centrifugal to centripetal.
How to interpret white matter lesions
Focal white matter lesions, like the perivenular ones Reich studies, are the most obvious feature of MS pathology. While clinicians can consistently detect them, it is still not clear what white matter lesions mean in terms of their cause and clinical significance. Klaus Schmierer of the Blizard Institute at Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry is performing high field MRI of lesions in post-mortem tissue followed by histology to understand specific features of lesions and mechanisms underlying their genesis.
Schmierer focused on normal-appearing white matter post-mortem slices to determine the concentration of neurofilaments—the principal cytoskeletal component of axons. Specifically, he measured levels of hyperphosphorylated neurofilament heavy chains (NfH) because phosphorylation of NfH reduces the rate of axonal transport and is believed to indicate that an axon is stressed or unhealthy. Schmierer wanted to determine whether the NfH phosphorylation levels correlated with the presence of white matter lesions and if they might even precede their appearance. Levels of hyper-phosphorylated NfH were found to be higher in acute white matter lesions than in chronic lesions, and in normal appearing white matter they correlated with increased T1 and reduced magnetization transfer ratio—together indicating an increase in the free proton pool. This makes sense considering that protons can no longer bind to NfH sites that are hyper-phosphorylated. Furthermore, a decrease in magnetization transfer ratio is believed to reflect a loss of myelin content due to a depletion of the pool of protons that are associated with its macromolecular structure. Therefore, Schmierer and colleagues' finding suggests that NfH hyperphosphorylation reflects changes in axonal structure that precede and may contribute to white matter lesion formation.
Schmierer next asked if similar measurements of mean water fraction could detect remyelination events. He presented 9.4T data that showed a half-moon pattern of darker intensity covering part of a lesion that appears to indicate ongoing remyelination. While this work is ongoing, other studies suggest that there is a good correlation between measures of myelin water fraction and histological staining for myelin. However there is discrepancy in the abundance of focal demyelinating lesions in cortex versus white matter when comparing 1.5T MRI data to postmortem histology. In 1.5T MRI the ratio of cortical:white matter lesions is anywhere from 1:4 to 1:12 depending on acquisition sequences used, while it approximately the inverse (4:1) according to histology. Schmierer outlined static and dynamic sources for the difficulty in detecting cortical lesions by MRI: static issues include the small size, low myelin content compared to white matter, and low contrast when comparing to surrounding cortex; dynamic issues include the frequent occurrence of remyelination in cortical matter, inflammation, and little persistent blood brain barrier disruption in the cortex.
In cortex his group found an association between T2 and myelin content and T1 and neuronal density at 9.4T MR of cortical grey matter lesions. Now they are taking what was learned from scanning post-mortem tissue blocks back into the clinic to image hemispheres in patients. Even at 7T, however only ~1/3 of cortical lesions were reported, stressing the need for further improvements in acquisition and post-processing techniques.
Imaging Multiple Sclerosis After and Around the Lesion (Part I)
Speakers: Robert Naismith, Washington University Govind Nair, National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke
Highlights
- Diffusion tensor imaging of the optic nerve shows promise for identifying optic neuritis patients who are at greater risk for axonal damage.
- When lesion volume was measured in the spine using the T1- magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (T1-MPRAGE) imaging technique, the contrast-to-noise ratio was improved and it correlated with clinical disability.
Use of imaging to detect damage to the optic nerve and spinal cord
Vision abnormalities are often the first symptom that brings patients who will be diagnosed with MS into the clinic, and impaired vision significantly impacts clinical disability and quality of life. The visual pathway is a prime target in MS, perhaps unsurprising considering that the optic radiations, the bundles of axons that relay visual information from the thalamus to the visual cortex, hug the ventricles and receive rich blood supply; as described in Reich's talk, white matter lesions are often intimately associated with the small blood vessels surrounding the ventricles. Robert Naismith of Washington University in St. Louis discussed the benefits of studying reparative or protective agents that could be used to treat MS in the context of optic neuritis. Optic neuritis has a clear and well-defined onset (often the first episode of demyelination), it occurs in a discrete tract, and its impact on vision is well studied. Optic neuritis is common in MS, and the ability of standard clinical MRI to detect the signs of optic nerve inflammation is high (66%–94%). However, MRI measures such as lesion length and optic nerve atrophy fail to predict long-term outcomes of visual acuity or therapy response.
Turning to magnetization transfer (MTR) imaging, researchers compared the cross-sectional MTR of the optic nerve in the affected eye versus the unaffected; they found that MTR reductions in the affected eye correlated with measures of axonal loss such as thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer and prolonged visual evoked potential latency. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has also been used to study optic neuritis; the optic tract exhibits anisotropic diffusion, meaning that there is a preferred directional flow of water molecules in the vicinity of the optic tract. In a healthy optic tract there is a lot of myelin, which tightly packs and restricts the diffusion of water parallel to the tract, also known as axial diffusion. On the other hand, if the optic tract is demyelinated, water becomes free to diffuse radially into the extracellular space. Naismith's group found that radial diffusivity increases with worsening visual acuity following an episode of optic neuritis.
Increased radial diffusivity as detected by diffusion tensor imaging suggests that axons are no longer densely packed and surrounded by myelin. (Image courtesy of Govind Nair)
Naismith wanted to test if DTI could predict recovery, and if so, if it could be used to identify patients who are at risk for axonal injury. Naismith found that patients who did not fully recover visual acuity showed lower axial diffusivity at the time of optic neuritis presentation than the patients who fully recovered. This drop appears to be transient—axial diffusivity values didn't differ across groups over subsequent DTI scans (spaced 3 months apart). Meanwhile, there was a persistent increase in radial diffusivity over the course of the year-long study in the incomplete recovery group compared to the complete recovery group. The source of the transient drop in axial diffusivity at the onset of optic neuritis in some patients is unknown, but this finding suggests that low baseline axial diffusivity could identify patients who would benefit from a neuroprotection trial. Naismith hopes that ongoing trials investigating reparative and protective MS therapies will focus on this tractable system.
In the next talk, Govind Nair of the National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke drew attention to an important disease locus in MS that was not otherwise discussed at length during the conference—the spinal cord. It's well known that spinal cord lesions are prevalent in MS patients: 86% of patients exhibit them at time of autopsy and ~20% of MS patients present exclusively with spinal cord lesions. Cases of primary progressive MS—a course of MS that doesn't remit and involves less inflammation and more axonal damage—tend to have higher lesion load in the spinal cord than in the brain. The ability to visualize the spinal cord in high detail is necessary to get a complete picture of CNS involvement in MS.
The spinal cord presents difficulties for imaging because of the low signal-to-noise ratio inherent in detecting a small lesion within the small cross-sectional area of the spinal cord. In addition there are motional artifacts that result from respiration, heartbeat, and even CSF circulation. Imaging advancements in brain imaging cannot simply be turned towards the spinal cord; today what is high resolution in the brain may be insufficient to resolve small lesions in the spinal cord. Nair presented data demonstrating that the T1- magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (T1-MPRAGE) imaging technique exhibits the best contrast-to-noise ratio in the spine and that when lesion volume was quantified using T1-MPRAGE it correlated with clinical disability.
It was known previously that spinal cord atrophy correlated with clinical measures of disability in MS but it remains unclear if reduced cross-sectional area is mainly driven by the loss of white matter or grey matter. Several studies point to axonal degeneration as the major source of spinal cord atrophy. For example, a DTI study done in the EAE MS mouse model found that decreased axial diffusivity correlated with decreased axonal integrity in the spinal cord and disability. In addition Nair described spectroscopy results of decreased N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), a metabolite that reflects axonal integrity, in the spinal cord correlated with increasing clinical symptoms.
Imaging Multiple Sclerosis After and Around the Lesion (Part II)
Speakers: Daniel Pelletier, Yale University School of Medicine Elizabeth Fisher, Cleveland Clinic Matilde Inglese, Mount Sinai Medical Center
Highlights
- Data suggest that white matter lesions preferably form in fibers that project from the thalamus, a brain region that shows early atrophy in preclinical MS patients.
- T2 lesions moderately correlate with whole brain atrophy, but data suggest it's not the whole story.
- Spectroscopy data from brains of MS patients reveal a change in the oxidative status of the brain that is likely driven by a change in both energy demand and perfusion.
Drawing connections across time and space to uncover features of MS pathology
White matter (WM) lesions do not occur in isolation in the brain—they are one pathological feature of MS that happens to be readily detected by MRI. Multiple disease processes contribute to the formation of WM lesions, and these same processes may also drive changes in features such as grey matter volume and brain metabolism. To assess the relationships between white matter lesions and other features of MS pathology, researchers are testing correlations among different MRI markers across time and space in the brains of MS patients.
As Sean Deoni spoke about MS as a disease of brain disconnectivity, Daniel Pelletier of Yale University School of Medicine is interested in the downstream effect of white matter lesions for connected regions of grey matter. Levels of N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) are decreased in chronic lesions, indicating that axonal integrity is threatened. Furthermore, studies have reported that white matter lesion volume correlates with deep grey matter volume loss. In a study of pediatric cases of MS, the volume of the thalamus appeared to be especially correlated with white matter lesion volume. These findings beg the question of what happens to neurons that have their axons severely damaged or transected—is there retrograde degeneration of neurons that drives grey matter atrophy?
Pelletier's group looked at CIS patients (pre-MS diagnostic patients) to see if they had brain atrophy compared to control populations. They performed regional voxel-based morphology analysis, a technique in which each pixel possesses a volume and can be registered to a spatial location on a brain atlas. Pelletier found that at the time of CIS presentation thalamic volume was lower than normal on both sides in MS patients compared to controls. These data suggest that the thalamus is a sensitive location for detecting early grey matter loss. Next, Pelletier and colleagues used DTI fiber tracking to ask if white matter tracts that connect the thalamus to other brain regions is affected in CIS patients. They delineated thalamocortical projections, creating a template into which all patient lesion and diffusion data could be registered into the same coordinate system, and found that while thalamocortical projections account for 28% of the total white matter volume, 78% of the lesion volume was found there. This identified a 10:1 bias for white matter lesions to occur within thalamocortical projections.
Furthermore, Pelletier found that they could explain 66% of the variance of thalamic atrophy with three key features: thalamocortical lesion volume, DTI changes in thalamocortical white matter lesions, and DTI changes to the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) that connects lesions and thalami. The presence of abnormal NAWM outside of the thalamocortical pathway did not contribute to the prediction of thalamic volume. Pelletier highlighted findings that non-lesional neuronal volume is reduced in thalamic nuclei, supporting the idea that neuronal loss could be a retrograde event following axonal transection in white matter tracts projecting from the thalamus. Pelletier concluded that the thalamus could serve as a sensitive brain region in which to study neuronal degeneration in MS.
Pelletier and colleagues used diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking to delineate thalamocortical projections and created a template into which all CIS patient lesions and diffusion data were registered. This slide shows two fiber tracts projecting from the thalamus (in green) to the cortex. Note that the tracts are seeded through white matter lesions (shown in blue). Mean diffusivity is visualized on the tracts increasing from red to yellow, and there appear to be increases in diffusivity in the vicinity of the white matter lesion on the left. Pelletier found an overabundance of white matter lesions within the anatomically defined thalamocortical tracts. (Image courtesy of Daniel Pelletier)
Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis
Elizabeth Fisher from the Cleveland Clinic discussed how current imaging techniques are being used to determine the relationship between brain atrophy, pathology, and disease progression. Brain atrophy is a useful measurement because it can be assessed using conventional MRI machines found in most clinics today. Furthermore, it is present early on in disease progression and correlates moderately with disease severity. The prevailing thought is that brain atrophy is what happens "after and around the lesion." Fisher highlighted several assumptions that should hold if current thinking is true: 1) MS brains with lower lesion loads should show less atrophy, 2) MS patients should lose just as much white matter as grey matter, and 3) within an MS brain, regions with higher lesion load should be the most atrophied.
Fisher highlighted the apparent disconnect between the lesion dynamics and whole brain atrophy: while lesions appear to come and go across imaging sessions there appears to be a unidirectional expansion of the ventricles, particularly towards the end of the disease. In addition, it has been observed in clinical trials of anti-inflammatory drugs that even if the lesion load is greatly reduced, atrophy is reduced only 20%–50% above placebo. This strongly suggests that there is tissue loss that occurs independent of the lesion formation, and it supports a suspicion of researchers like Fisher that there is some source of positive feedback in neurodegeneration related to tissue damage. That is, it appears that "tissue loss begets more tissue loss."
Her group and others are trying to understand the causal connection between lesions and brain atrophy by looking for correlations of brain atrophy with other MRI markers. She reported that T2 lesions moderately correlated with brain atrophy. Fisher emphasized the importance of distinguishing true atrophy that originates from pathological processes such as demyelination, axonal loss, and neurodegeneration from normal age-related volume loss and artifacts stemming from dehydration at time of imaging.
Metabolism in the MS brain
Earlier talks mentioned using metabolites as markers that reflect changes in brain tissue but Matilde Inglese of Mount Sinai Medical Center, is interested in asking what spectroscopy can tell us more generally about the metabolic status of the MS brain. For instance, lactate, the end product of anaerobic glycolysis, and glutathione, a strong oxidizer, are elevated and decreased respectively in the brains of patients with MS. These changes suggest that there is an abnormal oxidative status in the MS brain. Changes in oxidative status can result from increased energy demands or decreased oxygen availability. Evidence suggests a combination of both factors is at play in MS—studies have found reduced blood perfusion in the brain as well as the compensatory redistribution of sodium channels along demyelinated axons that drives up energy demand.
Metabolites can signify changes to brain structures and potentially provide mechanistic insight into what drives brain alterations in the MS brain. As mentioned in other talks, a reduction in N-acetyl-aspartate is believed to indicate poor axonal health. Inglese stated that NAA levels provide additional information concerning the energy status of neurons because its synthesis is dependent on mitochondrial metabolism. Decreased function of the mitochondrial respiratory chain—consistent with a shift from aerobic respiration to glycolysis—would result in lower NAA levels. NAA is reduced in acute lesions, chronic lesions, normal appearing white matter, cortical grey matter, and subcortical grey matter in brains of MS patients. Furthermore, decreases in NAA levels were shown to correlate with clinical disability scores better than did lesion load. Inglese stated that while NAA is commonly used as a marker of axonal integrity, the correlation of NAA levels and grey matter atrophy has been weak. This suggests that there is more to the story of NAA than axonal health, and its link to metabolic status may provide mechanistic insight into MS pathology.
As mentioned previously, another change that could shift metabolism to anaerobic is a reduction in oxygen availability arising from poor perfusion. In arterial label spin imaging, arterial water is labeled in a proximal inversion plane and then after a delay (allowing for blood to flow there) the image is taken at a distal area. Findings from these experiments show white matter hypo-perfusion not only in active MS lesions but also in the normal appearing white matter of MS patients. A study found that in MS patients there was a reduction in the consumption of blood oxygen as detected by T2-relaxation-under-spin-tagging MRI. Finally, current studies are attempting to look at intracellular sodium atoms—the second most NMR sensitive nucleus, yet one of the least abundant nuclei in the brain. Measures of intracellular sodium concentrations could provide insight into sodium ion homeostasis in MS patients. There is evidence that the concentration of sodium channels increases in MS lesions and experimentally demyelinated axons, and in the EAE mouse model it was shown that partial sodium channel blockade prevented axonal degeneration. These finding hint that demyelinated axons compensate for a loss in axonal conduction by increasing the concentration of sodium. In turn, this sodium increase leads to an increase of intracellular calcium that is toxic to the cell and results in axonal degeneration. Preliminary studies suggest that intracellular sodium is increased in brains of MS patients.
Imaging in the Clinic: Practical and Experimental Applications (Part I)
Speakers: David Miller, University College London Shiv Saidha, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Highlights
- As promising new imaging techniques emerge, they will need to be put to the test in small cohorts to ensure their predictive power and be made accessible and easy-to-interpret if they are to become part of standard MS care.
- Measuring the thickness of the granule cell layer in the eye is reliable and holds promise as an outcome measure in neuroprotection trials for MS.
MRI in the clinic: translating the cutting edge to standard care
Keynote speaker David Miller from University College London began the second day of the conference by discussing how advanced or non-routine imaging techniques that fellow speakers are using in the laboratory could be implemented in the clinical setting. Starting from square one, Miller said, we want to image MS patients in the clinic to make diagnoses and to provide insight into prognosis, which may be useful in monitoring long-term treatment. What would make a technique worthwhile to a neurologist? Measures would need to be easily interpretable and clinically predictive, for instance, biological markers that underlie relapses and that can be detected by MRI. Methodological considerations such as sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, reproducibility, stability, and sensitivity to longitudinal changes will all be important for implementing advanced imaging techniques in the clinic.
What is the current status of routine clinical imaging? Lesion features detected by MRI have been incorporated in the diagnostic criteria of MS for over a decade, and this usage has led to earlier and more accurate diagnoses. Imaging has made it possible to more quickly identify MS following clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), or a single neurological episode caused by inflammation or demyelination. It took a lengthy period of time for the MS diagnostic criteria to reflect the CIS link because it was not until CIS patients were followed long term that it was confirmed that about two-thirds of CIS patients who had brain lesions that looked like MS lesions eventually developed clinically defined MS (80% versus 20% of CIS patients with normal T2 scans). Diagnostic criteria are now in place that allow for the diagnosis of MS within a few months of CIS presentation once MRI scans provide evidence for the dissemination in space and time of white matter lesions.
Miller highlighted the 7T high resolution T2* central vein imaging presented by Reich as a promising non-routine imaging tool for diagnosis, particularly now that the sequence is being modified for 3T scanners. Imaging of grey matter lesions is generally non-routine (and is still difficult in the research setting). More recently, advancements have been made in inversion recovery methods that suppress white matter and CSF signal and increase detectability of cortical lesions. Phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR), in particular, was shown to greatly increase the detection of curvilinear cortical lesions compared to the older double inversion recovery scan.
Comparison of higher resolution phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) vs. DIR. (Image courtesy of David Miller)
Clinical imaging has proved useful for prognosis in MS, particularly in relapsing-remitting cases. Miller showed data from the meta-analysis performed by Maria Pia Sormani of relapsing-remitting MS trials; her analysis showed that drugs that suppress the formation of new enhancing lesions were associated decreased relapses. Miller discussed a fairly large study that evaluated the efficacy of interferon beta treatment by looking at a combination of three activity measures that occurred in the first year: early relapse, new T2 lesions, and disability. The study found that patients who were positive for two or three of these variables (particularly if one variable was new lesions on MRI) after the first year had significantly higher risk of relapse or progression in the next year follow-up. This finding highlights the importance of incorporating both clinical and imaging data to determine treatment and prognosis.
Miller used data from the 20-year follow-up study of patients from CIS onset to determine effects of white matter lesion load on progression and disability. He found that after 20 years, patients with secondary progressing MS (SPMS) had the greatest white matter lesion load. Interestingly, they showed higher T2 lesion load at 5 years, before most were clinically defined as SPMS. A 21-year follow-up of the first interferon beta trial, found reduced mortality in patients who had an extra five years of treatment compared to placebo. This finding suggests that prolonged suppression of immune response reduces damage to the central nervous system in MS patients. Lower baseline T2 burden also improved survival.
Preventing relapses is not the only clinical outcome that will improve patients' quality of life. Outcomes, such as preventing disability following relapse, preventing progressive disability, and reversing disability are all active areas of research represented by those in attendance. Their work in optimizing emerging imaging techniques in order to detect features such as remyelination and grey matter atrophy will be required to assess how these processes occur in disease and correlate with clinical outcomes. As new imaging techniques are developed, it will be important to put them to the test in proof-of-concept mechanistic studies in small cohorts. Finally, Miller concluded that it must always be kept in mind that any imaging technique will be used in the clinic only if it is clinically predictable and feasible.
Optical coherence tomography in MS patients
Shiv Saidha of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine presented data suggesting that retinal degeneration in MS patients provides insight into global processes occurring throughout the CNS. As Robert Naismith mentioned, the optic nerve is a prime target of demyelination and inflammation in MS. It is believed that degeneration of the optic nerve propagates back along the axons to the eye, causing the death of cells from which they originated—the ganglion cells in the retina. The integrity of ganglion cell axons is reflected in the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)—a thinning RNFL indicates that there are fewer axons projecting from the eye to converge and form the optic nerve that relays visual impulses to the brain.
To date, researchers have primarily focused their attention on changes in the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer, finding that even outside the context of optic neuritis, RNFL thinning occurs in the eyes of MS patients and is correlated with clinical measures of disability and brain atrophy. Measures of RNFL thickness are collected using optical coherence tomography (OCT), an imaging technique based on the same principle as ultrasound. Instead of sound, near infrared light is sent to the eye and a reference mirror, and the difference in the way that light scatters upon penetrating eye tissue is used to reconstruct the structure of the eye.
Saidha presented OCT data collected every 6 months from MS patients and controls over the course of nearly 2 years. He used spectral-OCT, an OCT method with higher acquisition rate and resolution that allows for 3D reconstruction of the eye. This 3D data allowed Saidha to quantify cell loss in the granule cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIP), selected because GCIP thinning is a more reliable measure than RNFL thinning and also shows a better correlation with visual dysfunction and global disability in MS. Saidha found that the annual rate of GCIP thinning was 46% faster in MS patients than in healthy controls. The patients who showed the greatest GCIP thinning appeared to be those who display high disease process activity, such as new T2 and gadolinium-enhancing lesions, early in disease (duration <5 years). Saidha did not find the same effect of disease activity on RNFL thinning; this may be due to fluctuations in RNFL caused by inflammation. Saidha's findings suggest that GCIP thickness is a more reliable barometer for ongoing MS disease processes in brain, and its apparent sensitivity in early, active disease could make it a good outcome measure in neuroprotection trials.
Imaging in the Clinic: Practical and Experimental Applications (Part II)
Speakers: Bruno Stankoff, Pierre and Marie Curie University Jerry Wolinsky, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Highlights
- The PIB radioligand is a promising marker for myelin and may be a sensitive tool to monitor remyelination in patients with MS.
- Looking to the future, drug trials need to be thoughtfully designed to assess neuroprotective effects of drugs in MS for which acute and chronic, systemic mediators of tissue damage are so interrelated.
Look at the bright side: imaging neuroprotection and repair in the MS brain
Advancements in imaging techniques that sensitively and specifically quantify myelin are important not only for tracking demyelination in disease but also for looking for signs of improvement—the reappearance of myelin. Bruno Stankoff of Pierre and Marie Curie University emphasized that a tool that could effectively evaluate remyelination and repair must be specific, high resolution, reproducible, quantitative, sensitive, and available in a clinical setting.
Stankoff highlighted the ways in which existing methods for imaging myelin fail to meet these criteria. A decrease in magnetization transfer ratio is believed to reflect a loss of myelin content due to a depletion of the pool of protons that are associated with the rigid macromolecular structure of myelin. However, evidence that MTR is influenced by water content and neuroinflammation limits the specificity of this measure. Stankoff noted that researchers have proposed the use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to measure myelin content- a loss of myelin being reflected as an increase in radial diffusivity because demyelination leads to a reduction of water movement along the length of axonal tracts. However, it has been reported that axonal injury alters radial diffusivity, confounding specific measures of myelin integrity. Finally, he highlighted mean water fraction (MWF) measurements that previously raised questions of sensitivity and availability, but new developments like Deoni's mcDESPOT show promise.
Stankoff then described his own work imaging myelin by positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorescent thioflavin derivatives that bind protein structures with multiple beta sheets, such as amyloid and myelin basic protein. Stankoff reported consistent standardized uptake measures for radiolabeled Pittsburgh compound (PIB) in a study of healthy controls. Signal was enriched in white matter compared to grey matter and could not be detected when probed in mice lacking myelin basic protein, arguing for specificity. Preliminary data from a pilot study in MS patients shows an approximately 22% decrease in [11C]-PIB in white matter lesions compared to normal appearing white matter. At this point, the small sample size shows high heterogeneity across subjects, with some exhibiting as high as a 40% reduction and others showing virtually no change. Interestingly, across imaging sessions (mean duration between 10.6 weeks) Stankoff has observed examples of potential remyelination, loci showing an increase in PIB uptake >10%. PET imaging of myelin holds promise but quantification methods must be optimized.
Imaging to monitor therapies aimed at neuroprotection
It can be a humbling experience to step outside of one's research field to see how outsiders view it. This is what Jerry Wolinsky of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston did when he decided to look up the Wikipedia article for neuroprotection. Neuroprotection was defined as the effect of any molecule or therapy that protects the brain from neurodegeneration or brain injury. The article went on to list a large number of diseases for which there's great interest in developing neuroprotective treatments, none of which were MS. Wolinsky stated that for the time being, MS should be viewed as a special case for neuroprotection—the strict definition of neuroprotection refers to mechanisms that prevent the apoptosis, or programmed cell death, of neurons. It appears in MS that CNS damage is for the most part systemically initiated by immune responses and inflammation. Therefore, a treatment that minimizes damage to myelin and axons by reducing inflammation may be considered "protective" but not in the strict sense. Wolinsky believes that treatments focused exclusively on either the inflammatory or neurodegenerative aspects would fail in neuroprotection because the acute and chronic mediators of tissue damage are so interrelated.
What imaging measurements should be used to assess neuroprotective treatments for MS? Data from Sormani's research suggest that MRI can be used as a surrogate for relapse because drug treatments that effectively reduced annualized relapse rates and disability also showed parallel reductions in lesion activity on MRI scans. Wolinsky's lab has been looking at subtraction imaging of T2-weighted images in order to detect changes in lesion activity across scans (careful image registration is key!). Results showed that increased lesion activity predicted which patients would show the most brain atrophy four years later. Wolinsky pointed out that the frequency at which scans are collected is likely to be very important; it's easy to imagine that lesion activity counts could be missed, possibly explaining their finding that lesions that appeared to shrink or disappear in the subtraction image also predicted brain atrophy.
Subtraction imaging of T2-weighted images can detect changes in lesion activity over time. (Image courtesy of Jeremy Wolinsky)
Wolinsky showed data from a drug trial that reported what looked like the disappearance of T1 hypolesions, which at first glance seem to imply neuroprotection. However, Wolinsky stressed that MRI markers can't be looked at in isolation when trying to draw conclusions about tissue repair. He presented an example of a T1 black hole that seemed to resolve, but upon closer examination it was clear that nearby tissue also disappeared, indicating more profound atrophy and not regeneration at all. The recently concluded CombiRx drug therapy trial found that on average, all treatment groups of relapsing remitting MS patients had a 1% loss of tissue volume in the first year, two-thirds of which took place in the first 6 months. Other studies report that imaging measures of tissue destruction take 6–12 months from the time of insult to appear. Thus this early damage goes untreated because of the time elapsed between damage and the start of treatment after MRI findings. This suggests that the brain atrophy from the first 6 months of the CombiRx represents what was already set in motion before treatment onset that was potentially unpreventable. It will be important to recognize this confound when assessing whether or not a drug is neuroprotective.
Wolinsky believes it will be worthwhile to study whether treatments can limit increasing disability in progressive MS. Because of the duration of these trials—and with the best interest of the patients in mind—active comparator groups should be allowed. Wolinsky argues that functional definitions, such as Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores should be used instead of clinical classifications that are not always stable (e.g., sometimes patients classified as primary progressive suddenly remit). Patients should be older (>34) so that they will segregate in their disease progression, with patients crossing different EDSS thresholds during the course of the trial, lasting at least 5 years. Wolinsky closed by suggesting that adaptive seamless trial designs should be used. In the first 6–12 months outcomes could defined by MRI-defined lesion activity. The decision to keep trial arms can then be based on atrophy measures. Clinical outcomes would be defined by EDSS measures. Finally, he described the characteristics of a good candidate drug for such a trial: to be neuroprotective it should cross the blood brain barrier and should be administered on top of an anti-inflammatory platform in order to address systemic effects.
Journal Articles
General Resources
Pooley RA. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: fundamental physics of MR imaging. Radiographics 2005;25(4):1087-99. (see for basic principles of MRI)
Sean Deoni
Casey BJ, Giedd JN, Thomas KM. Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biol. Psychol. 2000;54(1-3):241-57.
Deoni SC, Mercure E, Blasi A, et al. Mapping infant brain myelination with magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2011;31(2):784-91.
Deoni SC, Rutt BK, Arun T, et al. Gleaning multicomponent T1 and T2 information from steady-state imaging data. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008;60(6):1372-87.
Jeff Duyn
Lee J, Shmueli K, Fukunaga M, et al. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010;107(11):5130-5.
Mainero C, Benner T, Radding A, et al. In vivo imaging of cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis using ultra-high field MRI. Neurology 2009;73(12):941-8.
vanGelderen P, de Zwart JA, Lee J, et al. Nonexponential T2 decay in white matter. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012;67(1):110-7.
Yao B, Bagnato F, Matsuura E, et al. Chronic multiple sclerosis lesions: characterization with high-field-strength MR imaging. Radiology 2012;262(1):206-15.
Elizabeth Fisher
Calabrese M, Agosta F, Rinaldi F, et al. Cortical lesions and atrophy associated with cognitive impairment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 2009;66(9):1144-50.
Fisher E, Rudick RA, Simon JH, et al. Eight-year follow-up study of brain atrophy in patients with MS. Neurology 2002;59(9):1412-20.
Riccitelli G, Rocca MA, Pagani E, et al. Mapping regional grey and white matter atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2012;18(7):1027-37.
Simon JH. Brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis: role as a surrogate measure of disease progression. CNS Drugs 2001;15(6):427-36.
Matilde Inglese
Ciccarelli O, Toosy AT, De Stefano N, et al. Assessing neuronal metabolism in vivo by modeling imaging measures. J. Neurosci. 2010;30(45):15030-3.
He J, Inglese M, Li BS, et al. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: metabolic abnormality in nonenhancing lesions and normal-appearing white matter at MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2005;234(1):211-7.
Inglese M, Adhya S, Johnson G, et al. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging correlates of neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28(1):164-71.
Paling D, Golay X, Wheeler-Kingshott C, et al. Energy failure in multiple sclerosis and its investigation using MR techniques. J. Neurol. 2011;258(12):2113-27.
David Miller
Fisniku LK, Chard DT, Jackson JS, et al. Gray matter atrophy is related to long-term disability in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2008;64(3):247-54.
Morrissey SP, Miller DH, Kendall BE, et al. The significance of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. A 5-year follow-up study. Brain 1993;116 (Pt 1):135-46.
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann. Neurol. 2011;69(2):292-302.
Río J, Castilló J, Rovira A, et al. Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS. Mult. Scler. 2009;15(7):848-53.
Seewann A, Kooi EJ, Roosendaal SD, et al. Postmortem verification of MS cortical lesion detection with 3D DIR. Neurology 2012;78(5):302-8. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
Govind Nair
Bot JC, Barkhof F. Spinal-cord MRI in multiple sclerosis: conventional and nonconventional MR techniques. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2009;19(1):81-99.
Freund P, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Jackson J, et al. Recovery after spinal cord relapse in multiple sclerosis is predicted by radial diffusivity. Mult. Scler. 2010;16(10):1193-202.
Nijeholt GJ, van Walderveen MA, Castelijns JA, et al. Brain and spinal cord abnormalities in multiple sclerosis. Correlation between MRI parameters, clinical subtypes and symptoms. Brain 1998;121(Pt 4):687-97.
Robert Naismith
Hickman SJ, Toosy AT, Jones SJ, et al. A serial MRI study following optic nerve mean area in acute optic neuritis. Brain 2004;127(Pt 11):2498-505.
Kapoor R, Miller DH, Jones SJ, et al. Effects of intravenous methylprednisolone on outcome in MRI-based prognostic subgroups in acute optic neuritis. Neurology 1998;50(1):230-7.
Klistorner A, Chaganti J, Garrick R. Magnetisation transfer ratio in optic neuritis is associated with axonal loss, but not with demyelination. Neuroimage 2011;56(1):21-6.
Kupersmith MJ, Alban T, Zeiffer B, Lefton D. Contrast-enhanced MRI in acute optic neuritis: relationship to visual performance. Brain 2002;125(Pt 4):812-22.
Naismith RT, Xu J, Tutlam NT, et al. Radial diffusivity in remote optic neuritis discriminates visual outcomes. Neurology 2010;74(21):1702-10.
Daniel Pelletier
Cifelli A, Arridge M, Jezzard P, et al. Thalamic neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2002;52(5):650-3.
Henry RG, Shieh M, Amirbekian B, et al. Connecting white matter injury and thalamic atrophy in clinically isolated syndromes. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009;282(1-2):61-6.
Kerbrat A, Aubert-Broche B, Fonov V, et al. Reduced head and brain size for age and disproportionately smaller thalami in child-onset MS. Neurology 2012;78(3):194-201.
Tao G, Datta S, He R, et al. Deep grey matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a tensor based morphometry. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009;282(1-2):39-46.
Vercellino M, Masera S, Lorenzatti M, et al. Demyelination, inflammation, and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis deep grey matter. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2009;68(5):489-502.
Istvan Pirko
Johnson AJ, Mendez-Fernandez Y, Moyer AM, et al. Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells mediate a peptide-induced fatal syndrome. J. Immunol. 2005;174(11):6854-62.
Pirko I, Gamez J, Johnson AJ. Dynamics of MRI lesion development in an animal model of viral-induced acute progressive CNS demyelination. Neuroimage 2004;21(2):576-82.
Pirko I, Nolan TK, Holland SK, Johnson AJ. Multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis and MR imaging features of T1 hypointensities in a murine model. Radiology 2008;246(3):790-5.
Pirko I, Suidan GL, Rodriguez M, Johnson AJ. Acute hemorrhagic demyelination in a murine model of multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroinflammation 2008 Jul 7;5:31.
Daniel Reich
Gaitán MI, Shea CD, Evangelou IE, et al. Evolution of the blood-brain barrier in newly forming multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann. Neurol. 2011;70(1):22-9.
Grossman RI, Gonzalez-Scarano F, Atlas SW, et al. Multiple sclerosis: gadolinium enhancement in MR imaging. Radiology 1986;161(3):721-5.
Katz D, Taubenberger JK, Cannella B, et al. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging findings and lesion development in chronic, active multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 1993;34(5):661-9.
Tallantyre EC, Dixon JE, et al. Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions. Neurology 2011;76(6):534-9.
Shiv Saidha
Frohman EM, Fujimoto JG, Frohman TC, et al. Optical coherence tomography: a window into the mechanisms of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2008;4(12):664-75.
Saidha S, Syc SB, Durbin MK, et al. Visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis correlates better with optical coherence tomography derived estimates of macular ganglion cell layer thickness than peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Mult. Sclerosis 2011;17(12):1449-63.
Saidha S, Syc SB, Ibrahim MA, et al. Primary retinal pathology in multiple sclerosis as detected by optical coherence tomography. Brain 2011;134(Pt 2):518-33.
Syc SB, Saidha S, Newsome SD, et al. Optical coherence tomography segmentation reveals ganglion cell layer pathology after optic neuritis. Brain 2012;135(Pt 2):521-33.
Klaus Schmierer
Petzold A, Tozer DJ, Schmierer K. Axonal damage in the making: neurofilament phosphorylation, proton mobility and magnetisation transfer in multiple sclerosis normal appearing white matter. Exp. Neurol. 2011;232(2):234-9.
Schmierer K, Parkes HG, So PW, et al. High field (9.4 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of cortical grey matter lesions in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2010;133(Pt 3):858-67.
Schmierer K, Parkes HG, So PW. Direct visualization of remyelination in multiple sclerosis using T2-weighted high-field MRI. Neurology 2009;72(5):472.
Schmierer K, Tozer DJ, Scaravilli F, et al. Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;26(1):41-51.
Erik Shapiro
Foley LM, Hitchens TK, Ho C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of macrophage accumulation in mouse brain after experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 2009;26(9):1509-19.
Nkansah MK, Thakral D, Shapiro EM. Magnetic poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and cellulose particles for MRI-based cell tracking. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011;65(6):1776-85.
Shapiro EM, Skrtic S, Koretsky AP. Sizing it up: cellular MRI using micron-sized iron oxide particles. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005;53(2):329-38.
Bruno Stankoff
Chen JT, Collins DL, Atkins HL, Freedman MS, Arnold DL; Canadian MS/BMT Study Group. Magnetization transfer ratio evolution with demyelination and remyelination in multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann. Neurol. 2008;63(2):254-62.
Klawiter EC, Schmidt RE, Trinkaus K, et al. Radial diffusivity predicts demyelination in ex vivo multiple sclerosis spinal cords. Neuroimage 2011;55(4):1454-60. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
Song SK, Yoshino J, Le TQ, et al. Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain. Neuroimage 2005;26(1):132-40.
Stankoff B, Wang Y, Bottlaender M, et al. Imaging of CNS myelin by positron-emission tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006;103(24):9304-9.
Stankoff B, Freeman L, Aigrot MS, et al. Imaging central nervous system myelin by positron emission tomography in multiple sclerosis using [methyl-11C]-2-(4'-methylaminophenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazole. Ann. Neurol. 2011;69(4):673-80.
Jerry Wolinsky
Chataway J, Nicholas R, Todd S, et al. A novel adaptive design strategy increases the efficiency of clinical trials in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2011;17(1):81-8.
Lindsey J, Scott T, Lynch S, et al.; the CombiRx Investigators Group. The CombiRx trial of combined therapy with interferon and glatiramercetate in relapsing remitting MS: Design and baseline characteristics. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2012;1(2):81-86.
Sormani MP, Li DK, Bruzzi P, et al. Combined MRI lesions and relapses as a surrogate for disability in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2011;77(18):1684-90.
Organizers
Daniel Pelletier, MD
Yale University School of Medicine e-mail | website | publications
Daniel Pelletier is Associate Professor of Neurology and Diagnostic Radiology; Chief of the Division of Neuro-Immunology and the Yale University Multiple Sclerosis Center; and Director of the Advanced Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine.
Pelletier's research, which involves magnetic resonance spectroscopy at high and very high-field strength, has been funded by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS), the National Institutes of Health, and the Immune Tolerance Network. His research effort is to implement new and innovative neuroimaging projects aimed at defining predictive tools for monitoring and phenotyping the progression of multiple sclerosis. Potential MRI surrogate markers could then be applied to future clinical trials to measure drug efficacy and ultimately to improve patient care in clinical practice. His work has been published in the New England Journal of Medicine, Brain, Annals of Neurology, British Medical Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuroimage, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Human Brain Mapping, Neurology, and Human Molecular Genetics. After 3 years of advanced research training in multiple sclerosis at McGill University and at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Pelletier joined the Department of Neurology at UCSF in 2001. In 2005, he received the Harry Weaver Neuroscientist Scholar Award from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Before joining Yale University in early 2011, Pelletier was the Andy and Debbie Rachleff Distinguished Professor of Neurology at UCSF.
Daniel S. Reich, MD, PhD
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke e-mail | website | publications
After studying math and physics at Yale (1993), Daniel Reich earned a PhD in visual neurophysiology at The Rockefeller University (2000) and an MD from Cornell University (2002). He subsequently completed residencies in neurology and diagnostic radiology and a clinical fellowship in neuroradiology at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. He is currently board-certified in both neurology and diagnostic radiology. He performed postdoctoral research under the simultaneous supervision of Peter Calabresi and Susumu Mori at Johns Hopkins, during which he applied MRI, particularly diffusion-weighted imaging, to study multiple sclerosis. The focus of the Translational Neuroradiology Unit is to develop new MRI methods to investigate the origin of disability in multiple sclerosis and related disorders and to apply those methods to patient care and to clinical trials of new drugs.
Keynote Speaker
David Miller, MD
University College London e-mail | website | publications
Speakers
Sean C. Deoni, PhD
Brown University School of Engineering e-mail | website | publications
Jeff H. Duyn, PhD
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke e-mail | website | publications
Elizabeth Fisher, PhD
Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute e-mail | website | publications
Matilde Inglese, MD, PhD
Mount Sinai School of Medicine e-mail | website | publications
Govind Nair, PhD
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke e-mail | publications
Robert T. Naismith, MD
Washington University e-mail | website | publications
Daniel Pelletier, MD
Yale University School of Medicine e-mail | website | publications
Istvan Pirko, MD
Mayo Clinic e-mail | website | publications
Daniel S. Reich, MD, PhD
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke e-mail | website | publications
Shiv Saidha, MBBCh, MRCPI
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine e-mail | publications
Klaus Schmierer, PhD, FRCP
Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry e-mail | website | publications
Erik M. Shapiro, PhD
Yale University School of Medicine e-mail | website | publications
Bruno Stankoff, MD, PhD
Pierre and Marie Curie University, ICM, INSERM e-mail | publications
Jerry S. Wolinsky, MD
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston e-mail | website | publications
Kristen Delevich
Kristen Delevich is a graduate student in the Watson School of Biological Sciences at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Her work in Bo Li's laboratory focuses on the role of a schizophrenia susceptibility gene on synaptic physiology in the maturing rodent cortex. She earned her BS as a double-major in Neuroscience and Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh. Her previous research has spanned from human to monkey to mouse brains. When she's not at the rig patch-clamping, you can find her at her home-base in Brooklyn.
Sponsors
Silver Sponsor
Academy Friends
MediciNova
Trophos
Grant Support
This conference is supported by an educational grant from Elan.
Supported by an educational grant from Genzyme, a Sanofi Company.
Supported by a grant from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society.
|
|