Biodefense
New York Academy of Sciences
Search
Introduction with Gregory A. Poland | Dec 6, 2004 [close]
 Clinical Perspectives  Research Perspectives
Smallpox
Donald A. Henderson | Dec 13, 2004
Smallpox
R. Mark Buller | Dec 20, 2004
Anthrax
Mary E. Wright | Jan 3, 2005
Anthrax
Theresa Koehler | Jan 10, 2005
Dengue
David Vaughn | Jan 24, 2005
Dengue
Alan Rothman | Feb 7, 2005
Plague
Paul Mead | Feb 28, 2005
Plague
Robert D. Perry | Mar 7, 2005
Lassa Fever
Joseph B. McCormick | Mar 28, 2005
Lassa Fever
Maria S. Salvato | Apr 4, 2005
Hantaviruses
C. J. Peters | Apr 18, 2005
Hantaviruses
Erich R. Mackow | Mar 21, 2005
 
print version Lectures

slides w/audio Smallpox: a research perspective
Speaker: R. Mark Buller, PhD
Saint Louis University School of Medicine
audio presentation

Highlights

The upper respiratory tract is the most frequent site of smallpox infection.
It is likely that a low dose, perhaps as little as one virion, is needed to cause infection.
More work is needed to clarify smallpox pathogenesis, including how the virus is transmitted from person to person and spreads from the upper respiratory tract to the rest of the body.
A number of vaccines and antivirals are in development to combat smallpox.
The virus’ potential use as bioweapon has revitalized interest in smallpox research.

In a comprehensive and insightful presentation on smallpox research, R. Mark Buller of the Saint Louis University School of Medicine in St. Louis provided a succinct look at our current knowledge of how smallpox is spread, the course of the disease, and vaccines and treatments in development.

Smallpox is caused by variola virus, which is a poxvirus that is in many ways similar to poxviruses that infect animals. Therefore, most of what is known about smallpox comes from various animal models. These include ectromelia virus (mousepox), cowpox virus, vaccinia virus, rabbitpox virus, and monkeypox virus. Studies of these poxviruses focus both on poxvirus biology and on testing of vaccines and antivirals to treat potential smallpox outbreaks.

“Currently, there are only two official repositories for the smallpox virus, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, and the VECTOR Institute in Kotsovo of the former Soviet Union,” Buller noted. Although work on variola virus at these sites has been restricted, two recent, albeit, preliminary, decisions by the World Health Organization (WHO) could open up new avenues of research, he said. One would allow the introduction into variola virus of a foreign gene—a reporter gene—to aid in the development of antivirals; the other would allow the recombination of variola virus genes into other orthopoxvirus species to evaluate their function. If approved, such work would help research “tremendously,” he observed. In the meantime, he focused in his talk on what is currently known about the virus.

topHow smallpox spreads

Smallpox is less contagious than such viral illnesses as influenza or measles, but it is still considered to be highly contagious. Person-to-person transmission most often occurs through exposure to large droplets of aerosol from an infected individual. The smallpox virus can also be spread through contaminated bedding and clothing. According to Buller, the upper respiratory tract is likely to be the most frequent site of infection.

Five factors contribute to transmission, Buller observed. Most important is the amount of virus produced in the upper respiratory tract of infected individuals. Other factors include whether or not the infected person is coughing and sneezing; the proximity of susceptible people to the infected person during the transmission period (two to five days after a rash appears see Henderson); how long the virion remains stable in the environment (the smallpox virus tends to be very stable regardless of temperature and humidity); and the form of the virus (virus particles in scabs and skin debris are less infectious than those in the air).

Smallpox is less contagious than influenza or measles, but is still highly contagious.

How much virus is needed to cause disease? Very little, Buller said. Studies in animal models suggest that perhaps as little as a single virion is sufficient. Two epidemiological studies seem to support this conclusion: one concerning the 1970 outbreak in Meschede Hospital, which involved the importation of smallpox from an endemic country into smallpox-free Germany (see Poland and Henderson); and another a 1971 outbreak in the Aral’sk region of Kazakhstan.

In 1971, in Aral'sk, a Russian biologist working on a trawler called the Lev Berg in the Aral Sea contracted smallpox. At the time, she was in an area that was not friendly to the Soviets, and was not allowed to leave the ship. Thus, said Buller, she must have been infected on board the ship—probably during periods on deck, where she spent considerable amounts of time. No other shipmates were infected. The source of the virus was likely the island of Vozrozhdeniye, where the Soviets maintained a biological weapons field testing facility that was 15 kilometers north of the Lev Berg. Therefore, the biologist's infection was deemed to be an example of long-distance transmission of smallpox, from the island to the trawler.

"Both epidemiological studies suggest that the infectious dose of variola is probably very, very low," said Buller, and if it were given in the form of an aerosol that was intentionally released, the efficacy of the aerosol could be "very, very high in the presence of a non-vaccinated population."

topUnder the microscope

As noted earlier, smallpox is thought to be transmitted primarily by large droplets of aerosol, and most frequently to the upper respiratory tract. After reviewing the complex processes involved in viral replication, Buller went on to give his vision of how human smallpox infection occurs, noting that there is still much work to be done in elucidating both the cellular pathogenesis of smallpox and host cell-mediated immunity to smallpox infection.

Virus infection of the upper respiratory epithelium is mediated by extracellular enveloped virus (EEV) and/or intracellular mature virus (IMV), he explained. The EEV is an IMV virion wrapped in a second membrane [SLIDES 7-9 provide a high-resolution electron micrograph of the binding of EEV to the cell], which disrupts the outer membrane of the EEV; this allows the attachment of the IMV particle and the fusion of its membrane with the cellular plasma membrane, which releases the core into the cytoplasm. The transcription machinery in the virion is then activated, and the virus replication cycle commences.

The life cycle of the virus occurs in entirely in cytoplasm, although it requires certain nuclear functions. During replication, the virus produces an array of molecules that modulate the internal and external host responses to infection, contributing to virus persistence at the site of infection and spread in the animal host. The virus has a very complex morphogenesis pathway [SLIDE 11 partially describes the morphogenesis pathway of smallpox virus].

Using the example of an ectromelia virus infection in the epidermis, Buller explained that infection induces a host response that leads to the production of a wide spectrum of cytokines, chemokines, and interferon. These proinflammatory substances activate the proximal epithelial cells as well as macrophages and NK cells in the dermis.

Next, the cytokines and chemokines form a gradient and upregulate the adhesion molecules ICAM-1, E-selectin, and VCAM, which normally would facilitate adhesion and movement of inflammatory cells into the tissue surrounding the site of infection; however, virus-encoded binding proteins for key cytokines and chemokines are thought to prevent this process.

In addition to encoding homologs of host cytokines and chemokines receptors, the virus also encodes other host-response modifiers that contribute to the inflammatory process: serpins (protease inhibitors), which can affect a wide range of biological processes; an initiation factor 2α homolog, which is thought to be important in allowing the virus to escape the antiviral effect of interferon; the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β-like antagonist; the inhibitor of complement enzyme, which may be an important virulence factor in variola; inhibitors of apoptosis to damp down apoptosis signals; CD47-like homolog, whose function is not yet known; inhibitors of the antiviral enzymes PKR and RNase L; and superoxide dismutase-like protein.

Host-response modifiers coded by the virus contribute to blocking the inflammatory process.

But although the factors that allow viral replication have been identified, how the virus spreads from the site of primary infection in the upper respiratory tract to the rest of the body is not clear, Buller emphasized. “The conventional wisdom is that the virus spreads through the body as cell-associated viremia, but there’s never been a very thorough study to support this. The pathogenesis scheme for variola is based on that of ectromelia [mouse poxvirus]. However, the two viruses are very different, and so this scheme really represents only our best guess.”

topCombating smallpox

Although the correlates for immunity in smallpox are not yet known, it is likely that protective approaches will need to focus on both cell-mediated and humoral (antibody-mediated) responses, Buller noted. Among traditional vaccines, Dryvax (dried, calf lymph type) is the “gold standard.” Also in development are derivatives of Dryvax, which include Acambis 2000, a Dryvax clone; MVA, which comes from a different strain of vaccinia virus and has not yet been tested against smallpox; and LC16m8, a live virus derived from the Lister vaccine strain that also has not been tested against smallpox.

Novel vaccine candidates include a conditionally lethal vaccinia virus with an inactivated E3L gene, which has been shown to be effective in a mouse model; a live recombinant Streptococcus gordonii vaccine that encodes certain protective antigens; and DNA and subunit vaccines that use antigens from the EEV or IMV forms.

Among the candidate antivirals, only cidofovir, which is licensed for treating human cytomegalovirus infections, has been tested for safety in humans and shown in vitro and in animal models to be active against variola virus. An orally available derivative of cidofovir, hexadecyloxypropyl-cidofovir (HDP-cidofovir), has not yet been safety-tested in humans, but is active against variola virus in vitro.

A third compound, ST-246, works by a different mechanism. It seems to block EEV formation, thereby blocking viral spread. It, too, has yet to be safety-tested in humans, although it has been shown in vitro to be active against variola virus. A fourth compound, TTP-6171, targets a protease, 17L, that is encoded by the vaccinia virus and conserved in the variola virus, so it has a high degree of specificity. “It hasn’t been tested for safety or for efficacy against variola virus, but it’s a very promising idea,” Buller concluded.

previous page next page