Industrial Ecology, Pollution Prevention, and the New York/New Jersey Harbor (The Harbor Project) | The New York Academy of Sciences
Main
Academy Conferences
Academy Meetings
Frontiers of Science
Science Alliance
Physical Sciences
Green Science
Scientists Without Borders
Channels
Human Rights
Science Education
Harbor Project
Publications and Related Materials
Harbor Project Resources
Collaborations
Executive Summary
Mayor's Award
Who We Are
Citation: Environmental Research (2004) in press.
Mercury in Canned Tuna: White versus Light and Temporal Variation
Joanna Burger(a,b) and Michael Gochfeld (b,c)
a
Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University,
604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8082,USA
b
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute
and Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation,
Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
c
Environmental and Community Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood
Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA
SUMMARY
Canned tuna is the most commonly consumed form of fish in the
United States. We conducted a survey of total mercury levels in
canned tuna over a period of five years 1998 to 2003. We analyzed
individual cans of solid white and chunk white tuna (Albacore; n=123
cans) and light and chunk light tuna (mainly Skipjack Tuna; n=45)
cans. Analyses were performed in the Elemental Analysis Laboratory
of the Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute,
Piscataway, New Jersey under a rigorous quality assurance protocol,
which included confirmatory analyses at two independent laboratories.
White tuna averaged 0.407 ug/g (parts per million on a wet weight
basis) of total mercury, compared with 0.118 parts per million for
light tuna. These results are similar to the FDA's 1991 study published
by Norma Yess in 1993. The maximum total mercury level in the present
study was 0.997 ppm but 25% of white tuna samples exceeded 0.5 ppm,
which FDA had originally established as its action level. Data suggest
a slight increase in levels since 1991, and mercury levels were
significantly higher in 2001 than in other years. Based on a separate
analysis, at least 89% of the mercury can be considered methylmercury.
The FDA lists a value of 0.17 ppm as an average for canned tuna,
but this is not appropriate information for people who have a consistent
preference for Albacore. There were no significant differences in
mercury levels in tuna packed in oil compared to water. Draining
contents had no effect on mercury levels, and the fluid, both oil
and water, contained little mercury. These data indicate that people
who eat canned tuna frequently can choose light tuna and reduce
their mercury intake. Since cans of white tuna frequently exceed
the FDA's original action level of 0.5 ppm, it would be prudent
to continue some systematic monitoring of the Nation's canned fish
supply, particularly as the targets of commercial fisheries inevitably
change as certain stocks become depleted.
Fish provide a healthful source of dietary protein, and are relatively
low in cholesterol and high in omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids. As the
nation has become more health conscious, many people have increased
their fish intake. We suggest that future advisories include data
on canned tuna that distinguishes white from light and allows consumers
to make informed choices.
May be cited as Burger and Gochfeld. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH "in
press" (2004)