In an effort to support global initiatives to contain the spread of the new coronavirus (COVID-19), the Academy is presenting Spring 2020 events through online platforms and some of our previously scheduled events are being postponed to a later date. Please check our events listing for the latest information and contact our Customer Service team with any additional questions. For Academy programs and resources about COVID-19, click here.

We are experiencing intermittent technical difficulties. At this time, you may not be able to log in, register for an event, or make a donation via the website. We appreciate your patience, and apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

This site uses cookies.
Learn more.


This website uses cookies. Some of the cookies we use are essential for parts of the website to operate while others offer you a better browsing experience. You give us your permission to use cookies, by continuing to use our website after you have received the cookie notification. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to change your cookie settings, see our Privacy policy and Terms of Use.

Neurophysiological Markers for Emotion Regulation

Neurophysiological Markers for Emotion Regulation

Monday, April 16, 2007

The New York Academy of Sciences

Presented By

Presented by the Psychology Section


Speaker: Tracy Dennis, Hunter College

How we modify and control our emotions—or emotion regulation—has profound consequences for mental health and illness. Although many clinical disorders are characterized by excessive and poorly controlled negative emotions, both negative and positive emotions have been shown to promote adaptive behavior. To examine the complex links between emotion regulation and well-being, it is important to develop markers for adaptive emotion regulation. In this presentation, I will describe research that uses scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure neural markers for emotion regulation and emotion-attention interactions in children and adults. This work suggests that the degree to which cognitive resources are recruited in emotional contexts (both too much and too little) is related to the effectiveness of emotion regulation and to vulnerabilities for mood and anxiety disorders.