Support The World's Smartest Network

Help the New York Academy of Sciences bring late-breaking scientific information about the COVID-19 pandemic to global audiences. Please make a tax-deductible gift today.

This site uses cookies.
Learn more.


This website uses cookies. Some of the cookies we use are essential for parts of the website to operate while others offer you a better browsing experience. You give us your permission to use cookies, by continuing to use our website after you have received the cookie notification. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to change your cookie settings, see our Privacy policy and Terms of Use.

We encourage you to learn more about cookies on our site in our Privacy policy and Terms of Use.

Intellectuals and Counter-Politics: Between Reflexivity and Engagement


for Members

Intellectuals and Counter-Politics: Between Reflexivity and Engagement

Friday, March 21, 2014

The Graduate Center, CUNY, Room C415A

Presented By

Presented by the Anthropology Section at the New York Academy of Sciences


Dr. Gavin Smith argues that the forms capitalism takes is best seen in terms of the dominance of specific power blocs, rather than as an expression of neoliberalism — either as a form of governance or as a kind of capitalist market ideology. He suggests that in the major social formations the conditions for the reproduction of finance capital have to be secured by the hegemonic strategies of this fraction of capital. As a result, we have seen a shift from a kind of hegemony whose ideological authority rested on expansion through a population configured as ideally homogenous, to a kind of hegemony whose ideological authority rests on selectivity and distinctions among the population. The intellectual task for a philosophy of praxis has three foci: assessment of the conditions of possibility, of the potentialities for popular mobilization, and of appropriate strategic actions — identifying key points of leverage.

Smith argues that selective hegemony induces a /politics of negotiation/ between and among distinct groups. But finance capital as a means for capturing surplus value (rather than producing it) produces surplus populations less relative than absolute. Here the conditions of the political economic apparatus offer no benefits in their current form so that only a counter-politics that rejects the principles of politics as normatively practiced can arise. The threefold foci of intellectual engagement are likely to be qualitatively different for interventions in these two forms of politics. Public intellectuals have tended to relate to the former; the question arises as to what kinds of research agenda would contribute to the latter.

*A reception follows at 6:00pm in the Brockway Room (6402).

Registration Pricing

This meeting is free and registration is not required.

Travel & Lodging

Meeting Location

The Graduate Center, CUNY

Room C415A
365 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10016