Skip to main content

Blog Archives

Older posts

The Last Strand

Winner of the Junior Academy Challenge – Fall 2024 “Upcycling & Waste Management”

Sponsored by Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA)

Published May 16, 2025

By Nicole Pope
Academy Education Contributor

Team members: Vedeesh B. (Team Lead) (India), Livia G. (Sweden), Muhammad Q. (New Jersey, United States), Syed R. (Florida, United States)

Mentor: Christine Yu (Hong Kong)

Our world’s growing waste problem is largely driven by the production and disposal of short-lived products, creating a “use-and-dispose” culture. The mass manufacturing of new products consumes significant resources such as raw materials, water, and energy while generating greenhouse gasses, chemical emissions, and other pollutants. Even when products are recycled, the costs remain high due to the energy and processes needed for collection, sorting, and recycling. As a Fall 2024 Innovation Challenge, students were tasked with designing a solution to reduce waste generation by encouraging long-term product use and taking into account product design, business model, and societal behaviors.

Two Overlooked Sources of Pollution

This international team of high-school students collaborated online to address two sources of waste and pollution that are often overlooked: human hair and chicken feathers. Through their research, the Junior Academy challenge participants discovered that every year, hair salons and barbershops worldwide discard 300,000 tons of human hair while the poultry industry generates four billion kilograms of feathers. When discarded in landfills, hair releases methane, a gas 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide, while incineration of these waste products directly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and increases CO2 levels. Yet both these materials are rich in keratin and offer largely untapped resources.

The students’ solution, The Last Strand, focuses on the considerable potential for upcycling hair and feathers by turning the rich biological elements they contain into high-quality, bio-derived amino acids supplements. “With our mentor Christine’s help, I developed better research techniques and uncovered valuable studies, allowing me to contribute more effectively to the project,” says team lead Vedeesh, who says he also honed his leadership skills in the course of this challenge.“ This process also deepened my understanding of genetic modification and the structure of human hair, concepts that were entirely new to me before this experience.”

The Growing Demand for Dietary Supplements

The team initiative responds to the growing demand for dietary supplements, particularly Branched-Chain Amino Acids (BCCAs), which are beneficial not only for athletes but also people who suffer from a decreased immune system, digestive problems, and various other health issues. In addition, it supports a circular economy that simultaneously reduces waste and turns discarded materials into a valuable resource.​ “At the core of this whole project lies the extraction of keratinases from hair, which combines, in beautiful ways, the precision of science with the principles of sustainability, and weaves together a powerful story of innovation and resourcefulness,” says team member Muhammad. “Hair is not a life byproduct, but a strong and intricate structure fully packed with keratin, one of those proteins which have great industrial and biological applications.”

The students outlined a process that first involves the collection of protein-rich hair and feathers from hair salons and poultry farms, and cleaning them to remove oils, dirt, and other contaminants. The next steps entail the use of sodium sulfide and enzymatic hydrolysis to break down the keratin and convert it into amino acids. Advanced filtration techniques are then employed to purify and separate essential amino acids like leucine, isoleucine, and valine before drying them. The method identified by the students proved cost-effective, potentially reducing the production cost of amino acid supplements by 50% and setup costs by up to 90% compared to existing systems, while the resulting products could be sold between $25 and $75 per kilogram, therefore offering a competitive alternative to current production systems. In addition, the team members also found that their process generates valuable byproducts, such as lipids, which could also be sold to industries like soap manufacturing. This could further offset costs and enhance the project’s sustainability. 

A Transformative Approach to a Global Waste Problem

“During this challenge and through our research I didn’t only learn about the technicalities of turning discarded hair into supplements, I also learned a lot about production costs, formulating a budget, and more,” says Livia. “I was also positively surprised by the receptiveness of the stakeholders in Florida. My fantastic teammate, Syed, was able to reach out to almost 15 hair salons in his local Florida and their impact was incredibly valuable to our project.” In addition, Syed reached out to 15 poultry farms in his state, who responded positively to the students’ project and declared their willingness to contribute to such an effort. Through these stakeholders, the project could collect approximately 30 tons of keratin waste monthly from local areas.

“From the initial brainstorming sessions to collaborating with teammates and our mentor, every step was a unique learning experience. I contributed by leveraging my background in (gene technology) CRISPR and gene editing to understand and refine the chemical and enzymatic processes for amino acid extraction,” says teammate Syed. “Engaging with stakeholders in Florida gave me a deeper appreciation for how science can drive real-world change. Most importantly, I’m proud of how we came together as a team to create something impactful, combining our strengths to address a critical global issue.”

The team members believe their solution could be fully implemented within five years. They are proud to have developed a project that promotes scientific innovation and sustainability. Their solution offers a transformative approach to a global waste problem that also contributes to human health and economic resilience.

Learn more about the Junior Academy.

Upgrading the Hydraulic System

Winner of the Junior Academy Challenge – Fall 2024 “Remediation in South Brooklyn”

Sponsored by The New York Academy of Sciences and Empire Wind 1

Published May 16, 2025

By Nicole Pope
Academy Education Contributor

Team members: Cameron A. (Team Lead) (New York, United States), Ohee S. (New York, United States), Cindy W. (New York, United States), Ankea C. (New York, United States), Ayten A. (New York, United States), Annika C. (New York, United States)

Mentor: Xiwei Huang (New York, United States)

As part of its climate strategy to reach a fully renewable electricity grid by 2040, New York City is turning to offshore wind energy. However, the development of offshore wind structures present environmental and community challenges, including construction noise, air pollution, and marine disruption. As a Fall 2024 Innovation Challenge, the Junior Academy offered its New York City based students the opportunity to tackle these problems by designing solutions to remediate the impacts of offshore wind development, focusing on land and water preparation.

This team, composed of six high school students from New York, won the Junior Academy challenge on Remediation in South Brooklyn with a project to upgrade the hydraulic systems in the South Brooklyn port area. The students considered that, as the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal undergoes reconstruction, effective stormwater management will be crucial to manage stormwater and prevent flooding, block debris and pollutants from reaching the water, and protect the surrounding environment.

Current Issues that Impact South Brooklyn’s Water Systems

Team members had lengthy discussions while selecting the problem they wanted to tackle and developing their solution. “Respect and inclusivity were a big part of our success. We found that discussing our differences and voting on decisions helped keep things fair and balanced,” explains Ayten, one of the team members. “This project also changed the way I approach challenges. It taught me to think like an engineer focusing on finding solutions instead of getting discouraged by obstacles.” The team explored the hypothesis that integrating a scaled-up version of advanced filtration technologies into the existing sewer infrastructure would significantly enhance the hydraulic system’s effectiveness.

“Through my research I have learned more about hydraulic systems and the current issues that impact South Brooklyn’s water systems. Hydraulic separators are a type of stormwater management system used to ensure fresh water enters bodies of water without pollutants, similar to the function of water filters,” explains teammate Cindy. “Brooklyn’s hydraulic systems are in need of an upgrade to ensure that the port can have a fully functional vessel transportation system. For this the waters must be clear of debris.”

Designing a Filtration System

Their project focused on designing a filtration system prototype on CAD Fusion 360 (Computer-Aided Design) and then using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to test the prototype. “This project has strengthened my belief in teamwork and the importance of improving New York City’s old infrastructure,” explains team member Ankea. “One of my favorite aspects of this project was the opportunity to improve my CAD skills. I already had basic knowledge of CAD software like Onshape and Fusion but this project allowed me to learn more about CAD, especially computational fluid dynamics, from my peers and I was able to apply these new skills to my personal projects.”

The students developed a dual hydraulic separator system, consisting of two connected units, to address the specific filtration challenges posed by the unpredictable weather conditions typical of New York City. The primary separator operates under normal conditions and provides basic filtration, while the secondary separator is larger and designed to handle heavy runoff water during storm events. A sensor-controlled gate between the two detects water flow and automatically opens when high pressure is detected. In emergencies, the gate can also be operated manually.

The team equipped the two separators with advanced filtration systems to remove sediments, oil, debris and other pollutants before they enter the water. When they tested their solution, the team discovered that a filtration system with multiple small holes was more efficient than one with a single large hole. Not only was it able to filter out more debris but it also allowed for a faster flow of water, which is crucial during extreme weather events. Their aim was also to improve efficiency and reduce the need for frequent system maintenance, therefore optimizing performance while also cutting costs.

Breaking Down Complex Problems

“One significant takeaway from this experience is that solving complicated problems requires dissecting them into more manageable, connected tasks,” explains Bronx-resident Ohee. “Even though we focused on hydraulic system optimization, our work was part of a larger plan to restore the port as a hub for trade and transit. A solution that strikes a balance between environmental and human interests was shaped in large part by important variables including marine habitats, the demands of the local people, and the system’s sustainability.”

During the intense period they spent working together, the team members acquired new skills and a better understanding of teamwork. They also developed a new perspective on urban challenges. Among the major insights team member Annika gained through this challenge was “the broader implications of water treatment systems like hydraulic separators. These technologies extend beyond simply cleaning water—they prevent chemical runoff, safeguard marine ecosystems, and contribute to sustainable urban development,” she said. “Addressing New York City’s history of environmental challenges with innovative solutions is vital for both the city’s residents and its ecological future.”

Team lead Cameron felt that collaborating with the other participants on this challenge would help him in the future. “Working with my team over the last few months has allowed me to look at things from a new, more creative angle,” he said. “Being able to work on this project has been such a unique experience. I feel better prepared for when I start doing real research.”

Learn more about the Junior Academy.

fAIrify – Reducing BIAS in AI Models

Winner of the Junior Academy Challenge – Fall 2024 “Ethical AI”

Sponsored by The New York Academy of Sciences

Published May 16, 2025

By Nicole Pope
Academy Education Contributor

Team members: Emma L. (Team Lead) (New Jersey, United States), Shubh J. (California, United States), Darren C. (New York, United States), Aradhana S. (Pennsylvania, United States), Shreshtha B. (Kuwait), Jemali D. (New York, United States)

Mentor: Abdul Rauf (Pakistan)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is evermore present in our lives and affects decision-making in government agencies, corporations, and small businesses. While the technology brings numerous opportunities to enhance productivity and pushes the boundaries of research, predictive AI models have been trained on data sets that contain historical data. As a result, they risk perpetuating and amplifying bias, putting groups who have traditionally been marginalized and underrepresented at a disadvantage.

Taking up the challenge of making AI more ethical and preventing the technology from harming vulnerable and underrepresented groups, this winning United States and Kuwait based team sought ways to identify and correct the inherent bias contained in large language models (LLM). “[The Ethical AI Innovation Challenge] helped me realize the true impact of bias in our society today, especially as predictive AI devices continue to expand their usage and importance,” acknowledged team lead Emma, from New Jersey. “As we transition into a future of increased AI utilization, it becomes all the more important that the AI being used is ethical and doesn’t place anyone at an unjustified disadvantage.”

The team conducted a thorough literature review and interviewed AI experts before devising their solution. In the course of their research, they came across real-life examples of the adverse effects of AI bias, such as an AI healthcare tool that recommended further treatment for white patients, but not for patients of color with the same ailments; a hiring model that contained gender bias, limiting opportunities for women; and a tool used to predict recidivism that incorrectly classified Black defendants as “high-risk” at nearly twice the rate it did for white defendants.

AI Bias

Team member Shreshthafrom Kuwait said she was aware of AI bias but “through each article I read, each interview I conducted, and each conversation I had with my teammates, my eyes opened to the topic further. This made me even keener on trying to find a solution to the issue.” She added that as the only team member who was based outside of the USA, “I ended up learning a lot from my teammates and their style of approaching a problem. We all may have had the same endpoint but we all had different routes in achieving our goal.”

The students came together regularly across time zones for intense working sessions to come up with a workable solution, with support from their mentor. “While working on this, I learned that my team shared one quality in common – that we are all committed to making a change,” explained teammate Shubh. “We had all unique skills, be it management, coding, design, etc., but we collaborated to form a sustainable solution that can be used by all.” In the end, the team decided to develop a customizable add-on tool that can be embedded in Google Sheets, a commonly used spreadsheet application.

The students wanted their tool, developed with Python programming, to provide cutting-edge bias detection while also being user friendly. “A key takeaway for me was realizing that addressing AI bias requires a balanced approach that combines technical fixes with ethical considerations—augmenting datasets while engaging directly with underrepresented groups,” stated New York-based teammate Darren, who initially researched and produced a survey while his teammates worked on an algorithm that could identify potential bias within a dataset.

More Ethical AI

The resulting add-on, which can be modified to fit any set of training data, utilizes complex statistical analysis to detect if AI training data is likely to be biased. The challenge participants also paired the add-on with an iOS app they created in UI/UX language and Swift, which gives users suggestions on how to customize the add-on for their specific data sets. The students were able to test their tool on a job applicant dataset provided by a company that chose to remain anonymous.

“By using an actual dataset from a company and analyzing it through our add-on, I was shocked to see that there could be gender bias if an AI model were trained on that dataset,” said team member Aradhana. “This experience highlighted how AI can continue societal discrimination against women.” The enterprising team members were able to refine and improve their solution further after conducting a survey and receiving feedback from 85 individuals from diverse backgrounds. 

Members of the winning team believe addressing AI bias is critical to mitigate the risk of adverse impacts and build trust in the technology. They hope their solution will spearhead efforts to address bias on a larger scale and promote future, more ethical AI. Summing up, team member Jemali explained that the project “significantly deepened my insights into the implications of AI bias and the pivotal role that we, as innovators, play in ensuring technology benefits all individuals.”

Learn more about the Junior Academy.

The Junior Academy’s Impact on an Aspiring Engineer

Ruhi Samudra is a high school senior in Irvine, California. She was involved in the Junior Academy, igniting her passion for environmental science and inspiring her to start her science website, Bubbles & Beakers. She is starting at UC Berkeley this fall as a Bioengineering Major.

Published April 25, 2025

By Brooke Elliott
Education Communications Intern

Ruhi Samudra

Ruhi Samudra’s interest in STEM first began in eighth grade when she took part in her middle school’s Science Olympiad. Samudra tried out for the team and competed in the five main categories: Reach for the Stars, Water Quality, Dynamic Planet, Meteorology, and Rocks and Minerals. The events focused on environmental science, and though this wasn’t her initial interest, she and her team did well–advancing to regionals and placing second at nationals. “This (experience) gave me the motivation and encouragement to engage in science out of pure interest, way above the standard that was being taught in school,” Samudra said in reflection.

The Junior Academy

After her Science Olympiad season ended, Samudra learned about The New York Academy of Science’s Junior Academy. “It was a way for me to take what I learned at Science Olympiad to a larger and more research-oriented level,” she said.

Samudra knew science opportunities for high school underclassmen were relatively limited. She also had the misconception that most professional scientists are not willing to take a risk and work with high school students on a project. Being a member of the Junior Academy provided access to a global network of professionals and like-minded students around the world, jumpstarting her career. As part of the Academy, Samudra participated in The Flexible Use of Electricity, the Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems, and Exploring the Extremes Challenge. Out of everything she did, the aquatic ecosystems challenge was her favorite because it fit well with what she had learned during the Science Olympiad program.

Mentors-Peer and Professional

As a participant in the Junior Academy, Samudra met like-minded peers from all over the world representing a disparate population of cultures and beliefs. This made for thought-provoking video calls and learning about new ways to approach science. She looked up to the upperclassmen of her cohort, “They really guided me because I was new to the research process, and they made sure everyone’s ideas were heard,” she said.

Samudra’s virtual colleagues provided practical direction on how to run a research project, as well as high school life in general. Hearing advice from students only a couple of years older than herself, but already years ahead on their science research journeys, provided both inspiration and encouragement.

The professional mentors at the Academy helped Samudra in a different way. From her perspective, what makes a good mentor is the ability to encourage students to question what they think they know. Considering all ramifications and considerations of a potential project is an important skill that she took with her throughout high school. “You have to struggle with the idea of trying to find something that you may think is perfect, but knowing that nothing is ever really a perfect pitch,” she explained.

Bubbles & Beakers

All of this led her to start her own scientific website: Bubbles & Beakers. With an interest in advocacy and communications, Samudra learned how to write, interview, and produce videos about science. This passion project quickly grew. “I write when I feel inspired or excited by something in the scientific community. I know I want to continue this path of scientific journalism when I’m in college.” Whether it’s writing for the Berkeley Engineering Magazine or the Daily Californian, she plans to incorporate her passion for writing in her college life.

“The Junior Academy really showed me the process of creating a methodology, research questions, testing it, and analyzing the results. I took that with me for all the other conferences and research I’ve done since,” she said.

To jump-start her career path in scientific journalism, Samudra serves as co-editor-in-chief of her high school newspaper and president of the Model UN and the Biomedical Engineering Society.  A lover of the outdoors, she frequently hikes, swims, and bikes.

The Junior Academy is now accepting applications for Fall 2025. Apply today!

The Lasting Impact of the Junior Academy

Rebecca Zolotor, PharmD, currently serves as dean and vice president for the School of Health Sciences at Purdue Global. Her passion for public health can be traced back to her time at the Junior Academy more than 30 years ago.

Published April 16, 2025

By Brooke Elliott
Education Communications Intern

Rebecca Zolotor gives a presentation as a member of the Junior Academy in 1992.

Dr. Rebecca Zolotor’s passion for science was ignited in ninth grade when she read The Double Helix by James D. Watson, his account of the discovery of DNA’s structure. This piqued an interest that led her to join The New York Academy of Science’s Junior Academy. There she was partnered with David Crandell, PhD, a researcher within the cardiovascular division of Lederle Labs.

Under the guidance of Dr. Crandall she quickly discovered a deep interest in research. At just 18 years old, she was included as a co-author on publications from her time working at Lederle Labs. Dr. Crandall also connected Rebecca to his mentor, the late Mario DiGirolamo, MD, a professor and researcher in the medical school, who was conducting research at Emory University. That connection was instrumental in her decision to attend Emory, where she continued to assist with research. “Their support allowed me to ask questions, make mistakes, and learn through observation and hands-on experience, shaping my growth and confidence in those formative years,” she said in reflection.

Applying Individual Skills to Team Success

Dr. Zolotor then worked under Keith Smith, EdD, for 15 years, who showed her how to combine diverse individual strengths to build a strong, cohesive team. He emphasized the importance of having a clear mission, where everyone understands how their contributions help drive the team’s success. “His guidance had a lasting impact on my professional growth and leadership approach,” she said.

The passion for science of the mentors and participants of the Junior Academy left a lasting impression on Dr. Zolotor. “I remember attending sessions at the beautiful building on 2 East 63rd Street (the home of the Academy from 1949 to 2006), surrounded by others who were just as eager to learn and make a difference,” said Dr. Zolotor, adding that it was “incredibly inspiring to be in that environment.”

Working Across the Globe

Dr. Zolotor’s time at the Junior Academy sparked a domino effect in her career. Her early experience with cardiovascular research opened her eyes to the critical role nutrition plays in overall health and quality of life, which inspired her to pursue an MS in nutritional science. This led to a post-graduate opportunity at the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS), where she co-led initiatives, including nutrition talks, supermarket tours, and cooking nights. From there, new opportunities led her to New Zealand, then Mexico, where she taught science courses at a university.

Rebecca Zolotor (seated, center) poses with her lab mates and Dr. David Crandell in the Lederle Lab in 1991.

Dr. Zolotor’s earliest research stayed with her throughout these experiences. When she returned to the U.S., she worked at the Miami Veterans Administration Hospital, managing a clinical trial focused on diabetes while earning her doctorate in pharmacy. As a pharmacist, she advanced her career in leadership roles in pharmacy management, where she gained valuable skills in team building, operations, and strategic leadership. Still, she was seeking a role where she could make a broader impact, prompting her return to academia.

A Passion for Education and Online Learning

As dean and vice president of the School of Health Sciences at Purdue Global, Purdue University’s online university for working adults, she helps students develop the knowledge and skills needed to make meaningful contributions to diverse communities.

Her commitment to scale and using technology to reach more learners aligns with her current role at Purdue Global. Their work, especially with veterans and military leaders resonated with her work on clinical trials at the VA hospital.

Career Advice from Dr. Zolotor

“Whether pursuing research, teaching, or administration, the most impactful careers are shaped by a willingness to explore new ideas, adapt to change, and learn from every experience, even ones that do not turn out as you might have desired,” said Dr. Zolotor. “Ground yourself in empathy, good communication skills, and a clear sense of purpose.”

Some of Dr. Zolotor’s career-defining moments came from people who believed in her while challenging her, which she says helped her grow. Though her initial career goals of being a researcher for a pharmaceutical company did not go as expected, she feels grateful for the many opportunities that have come her way. She advises others to remain open to possibilities even if they do not directly align with their original plan. “There was no online education when I started out, so I never could have imagined my current career. But my path has led me to incredibly meaningful work,” she said.

Outside of STEM, Dr. Zolotor enjoys staying active, whether it be working out or spending time outdoors. A native of Brooklyn, NY, she also loves cooking and baking bread and has recently begun creating a cookbook with her children’s favorite recipes, exploring food plating and food photography.

Dr. Zolotor’s experience exemplifies the value of the Junior Academy. The connections and experiences made through the Junior Academy continue today.

The Junior Academy is now accepting applications for Fall 2025. Apply today!

Living in the Extremes

Overview

Our world is constantly changing; with the rise of severe natural disasters mainly due to climate change and our growing world population, we must explore ways to live in more extreme environments. What are these extremes and how can humans live there? How might we face the challenges of excessive heat, rising sea levels, or increased erosion due to torrential rain? What will it take to explore new avenues of living in space, living on different celestial bodies aside from our home planet, living in the deep sea, or in the middle of a desert? In this challenge, you will focus on one “extreme environment” and propose a comprehensive solution to sustain life there. Your team will be asked to consider how to reduce the effects of the “extreme environment” and must also consider society, ethics, and further impacts from your solution on earth.

Challenge

Design a comprehensive solution for living and thriving in a specific extreme environment.

Consider the following when designing your solution:

  • What could be considered an extreme environment?
    • What are the causes of these extreme environments?
  • What are the environmental challenges and risks of the extreme environment you have chosen?
  • How would your shelter, home, living environment address the issues that the extreme environment poses?
    • Would your solution help address issues related to climate change? World population growth? Food deserts? Etc.
  • How can you integrate Community Co-Design into your solution?

Success Evaluation Criteria

Solutions will be judged based on the following criteria:

  • Innovation and Design Thinking: Is the design and approach unique and/or innovative? Does the design show a high degree of originality and imagination?
  • Scientific Quality: Are the appropriate references and analytical methods used and are the insights derived correctly?
  • Presentation Quality: Is this concept concisely and clearly explained? Are the findings/recommendations communicated clearly and persuasively?
  • Commercial Viability/Potential: Does the solution have the potential to make a difference?
  • Sustainability: What is the social impact on local communities? How does the solution incorporate positive environmental or social objectives? Is the solution in line with a sustainable or justice focused future?
  • Teamwork and collaboration: Was the experience a collaborative endeavor? Was the knowledge gained from the experience reflected upon and tied back to a civic engagement mindset? (From Personal Reflections)

See the challenge rubric.

Sponsor

Air Quality & Health

Overview

Air quality has been a known health issue to people and cultures around the world for hundreds of years. Around 400 BC Hippocrates made the connection between disease and “miasma” (bad air). In 1952, the “Great Smog of London” reached peak pollution levels and precipitated the deaths of between 10,000 and 12,000 people as well as negative health outcomes for an estimated 100,000 people. Today air pollution is believed to account for 7 million deaths annually, most of which are the result of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including heart disease, lung disease, and cancer. In this challenge you will design a technical solution to address a key source of pollution in order to make a positive impact on NCDs. How could you take a scientific and design thinking approach to contribute to a sustainable and equitable shift in this ongoing environmental and health challenge? 

Challenge

Identify or target a specific source of pollution and design a technical solution that would reduce or eliminate air pollutants while also reducing the impacts of one or more non-communicable diseases.

Consider the following when designing your solution:

  • What pollution source will you address?
    • Fossil fuel combustion? Which fossil fuel? 
    • Wildfires? 
    • Industry (Food, Agriculture, Fashion? 
    • Something else?
  • What air pollutants will your solution minimize? Smog? Ozone? Carbon dioxide? Soot? Ammonia? Something else? 
  • How will you approach the problem? Will you take a community approach or an industry approach? What industry or industries will you tackle?  
  • How can your solution address equity issues in air quality and/or public health?
    • How might you integrate community co-design into your solution?
    • How might your solution be scaled to impact other regions or other countries? 
  • How can you keep the cost of your solution low enough to encourage implementation?
  • How sustainable is your solution? 
  • What region or community might your solution impact the most?
  • What public policy might be needed to support or implement your solution? 

Success Evaluation Criteria

Solutions will be judged based on the following criteria:

  • Innovation and Design Thinking: Is the design and approach unique and/or innovative? Does the design show a high degree of originality and imagination?
  • Scientific Quality: Are the appropriate references and analytical methods used and are the insights derived correctly?
  • Presentation Quality: Is this concept concisely and clearly explained? Are the findings/recommendations communicated clearly and persuasively?
  • Commercial Viability/Potential: Does the solution have the potential to make a difference?
  • Sustainability: What is the social impact on local communities? How does the solution incorporate positive environmental or social objectives? Is the solution in line with a sustainable or justice focused future?
  • Teamwork and collaboration: Was the experience a collaborative endeavor? Was the knowledge gained from the experience reflected upon and tied back to a civic engagement mindset? (From Personal Reflections)

See the challenge rubric.

Sponsors

The Junior Academy is implemented by The New York Academy of Sciences and is supported by the J. Christopher Stevens Virtual Exchange Initiative (JCSVEI). JCSVEI is a U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs program administered by the Aspen Institute.

Ethical AI

Overview

AI is changing the landscape of the world as we know it. It offers opportunities to impact humanity in positive ways by minimizing human error, streamlining data analysis and decision-making, as well as lowering risk to human lives – to name a few benefits. At the same time, with deep-fakes, biased algorithms and the ethical questions around AI such as art generators and chat-gpt, we as a society must grapple with the challenges of AI. How can we maximize the benefits of AI while also implementing useful boundaries to minimize the disadvantages and dangers? Can we create systems or implement new technology to address ethical issues surrounding AI? In this challenge, you will develop a solution to address one specific issue that AI poses.

Challenge

Design a technical solution that addresses and considers one clearly outlined and defined issue that AI poses in our global society.

Consider the following when designing your solution:

  • What are some of the issues that AI poses in our society? What are the impacts or implications of those issues?
  • Focus on one specific issue that AI poses. How could your solution be used by society at large? How would you propose governments use your solution?
  • Are there any downsides to your solution? What else would you and your team have to consider to create an ethical solution?
  • Who is your solution calling upon to act or implement? How does your data or solution support that societal change or law?
  • How can you integrate community co-design into your solution?

See the challenge course syllabus.

Success Evaluation Criteria

Solutions will be judged based on the following criteria:

  • Innovation and Design Thinking: Is the design and approach unique and/or innovative? Does the design show a high degree of originality and imagination?
  • Scientific Quality: Are the appropriate references and analytical methods used and are the insights derived correctly?
  • Presentation Quality: Is this concept concisely and clearly explained? Are the findings/recommendations communicated clearly and persuasively?
  • Commercial Viability/Potential: Does the solution have the potential to make a difference?
  • Sustainability: What is the social impact on local communities? How does the solution incorporate positive environmental or social objectives? Is the solution in line with a sustainable or justice focused future?
  • Teamwork and collaboration: Was the experience a collaborative endeavor? Was the knowledge gained from the experience reflected upon and tied back to a civic engagement mindset? (From Personal Reflections)

See the challenge rubric.

Winners

The winning team, Reducing BIAS in AI models, had a futuristic approach in designing a technical solution that addresses and considers one clearly outlined and defined issue that AI poses in our global society.

Team members:

  • Emma L. (Team Lead) (New Jersey, United States)
  • Shubh J. (California, United States)
  • Darren C. (New York, United States)
  • Aradhana S. (Pennsylvania, United States)
  • Shreshtha B. (Kuwait)
  • Jemali D. (New York, United States)

Mentor: Abdul Rauf (Pakistan)

Read More

Sponsor

Upcycling and Waste Management

Sculpture made of glass bottles

Overview

Imagine you are going to the store and you make some purchases. How much of that purchase will end up in a landfill? Did that product contain recyclable packaging? Now think about all of the waste you produce, food waste, product waste, textile waste… It can be overwhelming to think about. Do you know how much waste you produce in one day, one month, one year? Is it more or less than what you were expecting? How can you reduce that consumption and encourage others to consume less?

In this challenge, you will be designing a comprehensive solution to waste management at a scale that makes a measurable impact. It’s not only us as individuals who waste and contribute to unmanageable waste sites but large companies and corporations too. In this challenge we will explore how we can make small and large changes that lead us all to a more mindful and resourceful future.

Challenge

Design a solution to reduce waste generation by encouraging long-term product use and shifting away from the “use-and-dispose” culture.

You will design an end-to-end/overall solution that takes into account product design, business model, and societal behavioral and mindset reset needed to make changes possible.

Your solution should focus on one specific product category, such as electronics, clothing, food containers, household items, and more.

When designing your solution, think about the following:

  • Durable Product Design: How can products be made more durable and repairable to ensure long-term use?
  • Behavioral Change: What educational or incentive-based approaches could encourage people to adopt waste prevention habits?
  • Sharing Economy: Could a platform be created to facilitate product sharing, renting, or second-hand exchanges within a community?
  • Repair and Maintenance: How can repair services be made more accessible and affordable to extend product life?
  • Data Tracking: How can technology monitor product usage and encourage responsible disposal only when necessary?
  • Business Model: How can sustainable practices be integrated into profitable business models that encourage long-term product use and reduce waste?

Whenever possible, consider whether your product can be upcycled and have a second life.

See the challenge course syllabus.

Success Evaluation Criteria

Solutions will be judged based on the following criteria:

  • Innovation and Design Thinking: Is the design and approach unique and/or innovative? Does the design show a high degree of originality and imagination?
  • Scientific Quality: Are the appropriate references and analytical methods used and are the insights derived correctly?
  • Presentation Quality: Is this concept concisely and clearly explained? Are the findings/recommendations communicated clearly and persuasively?
  • Commercial Viability/Potential: Does the solution have the potential to make a difference?
  • Sustainability: What is the social impact on local communities? How does the solution incorporate positive environmental or social objectives? Is the solution in line with a sustainable or justice focused future?
  • Teamwork and collaboration: Was the experience a collaborative endeavor? Was the knowledge gained from the experience reflected upon and tied back to a civic engagement mindset? (From Personal Reflections)

See the challenge rubric.

Winners

The winning team, The Last Strand – Upcycling, had a creative and innovative approach of designing a solution to reduce waste generation by encouraging long-term product use and shifting away from the “use-and-dispose” culture.

Team members:

  • Vedeesh B. (Team Lead) (India)
  • Livia G. (Sweden)
  • Muhammad Q. (New Jersey, United States)
  • Syed R. (Florida, United States)

Mentor: Christine Yu (Hong Kong)

Learn More

Sponsor

Remediation in South Brooklyn

Overview

Offshore wind has the potential to reimagine the cityscape of New York City. With increased summer temperatures and the heavy reliance on an overworked cooling system, New York City will be the new home to a wind farm right in our backyard. The South Brooklyn Marine Terminal will be the new hub for Empire Wind 1 and Equinor’s wind farm. In this challenge you are asked to design solutions that remediate the building of offshore wind renewable energy infrastructure in New York City through the lens of STEM and the community, focusing on land and water preparation.

Challenge

At the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal in Sunset Park, there are areas on land and in the water that call for immediate remediation to prepare for the new offshore Empire Wind complex.

Focus on one of the following areas and design a comprehensive solution for remediation:

  • Preparation for building on land
    • Noise/traffic/actual construction/air monitoring
    • Current buildings from 1970s
    • Regrade hydraulics separator for run-off stormwater
  • Preparation in the water

Integrate the following into your solution:

  • Social justice 
    • A concept that asserts every person should have the same rights and opportunities, and that wealth and resources should benefit everyone – is not always integrated into remediation, making already disadvantaged communities even more vulnerable to negative impacts of climate change.
    • Think about how social justice can be included in your solution, looking at racial, urban, identity, accessibility, and/or environmental justice.
  • Community co-design
    • The shared mapping of a problem, identifying shared priorities, and designing, implementing and evaluating a potential solution together with those most affected by the issue (in this Challenge, residents of Sunset Park).
  • New or adapted technologies (AI, AR/VR, nanotechnology, materials, robotics),
  • Processes, steps (such as detecting seafloor anomalies/seafloor mapping, underwater sea vehicles) that are preliminary to your solution.

Innovative solutions may be completely new ideas or solutions that have worked in other regions but are adapted for New York’s unique needs and people. Solutions need to be tested to ensure they are effective for community needs as offshore wind infrastructure is built up in the near future.

See the challenge course syllabus.

Success Evaluation Criteria

Solutions will be judged based on the following criteria:

  • Innovation and Design Thinking: Is the design and approach unique and/or innovative? Does the design show a high degree of originality and imagination?
  • Scientific Quality: Are the appropriate references and analytical methods used and are the insights derived correctly?
  • Presentation Quality: Is this concept concisely and clearly explained? Are the findings/recommendations communicated clearly and persuasively?
  • Commercial Viability/Potential: Does the solution have the potential to make a difference?
  • Sustainability: What is the social impact on local communities? How does the solution incorporate positive environmental or social objectives? Is the solution in line with a sustainable or justice focused future?
  • Teamwork and collaboration: Was the experience a collaborative endeavor? Was the knowledge gained from the experience reflected upon and tied back to a civic engagement mindset? (From Personal Reflections)

See the challenge rubric.

Winners

The winning team, Remediation in South Brooklyn: Upgrading the Hydraulic System, had an innovative approach of finding ways to remediate the areas on land and in the water to prepare for the new offshore Empire Wind complex.

Team members:

  • Cameron A. (Team Lead) (New York, United States)
  • Ohee S. (New York, United States)
  • Cindy W. (New York, United States)
  • Ankea C. (New York, United States)
  • Ayten A. (New York, United States)
  • Annika C. (New York, United States)

Mentor: Xiwei Huang (New York, United States)

Learn More

Sponsor

Older posts