|
This two-day scientific conference will provide a neutral forum to critically examine the traditional role of pre-clinical animal models in drug discovery, how these models most effectively contribute to translational medicine and drug discovery, changes needed to increase the predictive power of various models for drug efficacy in humans, and ways in which to further refine, reduce, and replace animal models in biomedical research. By convening multidisciplinary clinical and basic science investigators, we hope to identify common hurdles and pathways to improving model systems for the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and toxicity in the areas of metabolic and cardiovascular disease, inflammation, and pain, among others. Sessions on the recent explosion of broadly applicable new technologies in bioimaging, biosimulation, bioinformatics, generating genetically modified animals, and phenotype screening, along with emerging non-rodent models, the use of embryonic stem cells, patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells, and humanized animal models will ensure that recent advances in basic science knowledge gained from improved pre-clinical animal models with good predictive validity readily become available to the pharmaceutical industry and clinical researchers so as to aid the discovery and development of new disease treatments as quickly as possible.
Registration Pricing
| |
By: 7/29/2011 |
After: 7/29/2011 |
Onsite: 9/15/2011 |
| Member |
$300 |
$350 |
$395 |
| Student / Postdoc / Fellow Member |
$200 |
$250 |
$295 |
| Student / Postdoc / Fellow Nonmember |
$200 |
$250 |
$295 |
| Nonmember Corporate |
$400 |
$450 |
$495 |
| Nonmember Not for Profit |
$350 |
$400 |
$445 |
Presented by
Bronze Sponsors
GlaxoSmithKline
Pfizer
Sanofi-aventis
The Global Medical Excellence Cluster (GMEC)
Wellcome Trust
Grant Support
Funding for this conference was made possible by the Office of the Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and grant number R13RR032638 from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention by trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
For a full list of sponsors, please view the Sponsors tab.
Agenda
* Presentation times are subject to change.
Day 1: Thursday, September 15, 2011
|
|
7:30 AM
|
Registration, Continental Breakfast & Poster Session 1 Set Up
|
|
8:15 AM
|
Welcome and Introductory Remarks Brooke Grindlinger, PhD, New York Academy of Sciences Ellis Rubinstein, New York Academy of Sciences Julia C. Buckingham, BSc, PhD, DSc, FBPharmacolS, Imperial College London
|
JOINT SESSION I: Keynote Lecture
|
|
8:35 AM
|
Have Animal Models of Disease Helped or Hindered the Drug Discovery Process? Ann Jacqueline Hunter CBE, PhD, OI Pharma Partners, Ltd.
|
SESSION II: Break Out into 3 Parallel Workshops
|
WORKSHOP 1: Highlights and Hurdles of Animal Models of Human Metabolic Disease
|
|
Chair: Simon Howell, PhD, King's College London & Kevin G. Murphy, BSc, PhD, Imperial College London
|
|
9:15 AM
|
Using Mouse Knockouts to Guide Drug Discovery: LX4211 a Novel Diabetes Drug Candidate Brian P. Zambrowicz, PhD, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
9:35 AM
9:55 AM
|
The Obesity Pipeline: Current Models and Strategies in the Development of Anti-Obesity Drugs Kevin G. Murphy, BSc, PhD, Imperial College London
The National Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Centers’ Contribution to Accelerating Pre-Clinical Research on Metabolic Disease Jason Kim, PhD, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center
|
|
10:15 AM
|
Panel Discussion What Characterizes Mouse Models That Have Proven Useful for Basic Science, Clinical Research, and Drug Discovery for Metabolic Disease, and What Measures are Needed to Improve New and Existing Models?
|
WORKSHOP 2: Highlights and Hurdles of Animal Models of Human Cardiovascular Disease
|
|
Chair: Sian Harding, PhD, Imperial College London &: Peter Kohl, MD, PhD, FHRS, Imperial College London
|
|
9:15 AM
|
Angiotensin II Promote Diverse Forms of Aortic Aneurysms Alan Daugherty, PhD, DSc, FAHA, University of Kentucky
|
|
9:35 AM
|
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Function in Genetically Manipulated Mice Amrita Ahluwalia, MSc, PhD, Barts & The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London
|
|
9:55 AM
|
Modeling NSAID Activity in the Cardiovascular System Jane Mitchell, BSc, PhD, Imperial College London
|
|
10:15 AM
|
Animals and Models: Interpretative Challenges and Drug Development Garret A. FitzGerald, MD, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
|
|
10:35 AM
|
Panel Discussion What Characterizes Mouse Models That Have Proven Useful for Basic Science, Clinical Research, and Drug Discovery for Cardiovascular Disease, and What Measures are Needed to Improve New and Existing Models?
|
WORKSHOP 3: The 'Animalgesic' Effect in Modeling Pain
|
|
Chair: Susan Brain, PSC, PhD, FBPharmacoIS, King's College London
|
|
9:15 AM
|
Modeling Inflammatory Hyperalgesia Julie Keeble, BSc (Hons), PhD, King's College London
|
|
9:35 AM
|
Use of Novel, Non-Reflex End Points for Detecting Analgesic Action in Rodents at Clinically Relevant Concentrations Nick Andrews, PhD, Pfizer Global Research and Development
|
|
9:55 AM
|
Does Fibromyalgia Have Four Legs and a Tail Jon Levine, MD, PhD, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine
|
|
10:15 AM
|
Pharmacokinetic Pharmacodynamic Correlations in the Translation of Efficacy from Animal Pain Models Garth Whiteside, PhD, Purdue Pharma
|
|
10:35 AM
|
Panel Discussion What are the New Frontiers in Modeling Pain in Rodents and Translating that Knowledge into Patient Therapies?
|
|
10:55 AM
|
Coffee Break
|
JOINT SESSION III: Regulations and Best Practices in Disease Modeling in Animals
|
|
Chair: Thomas Hartung, MD PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
|
|
11:20 AM
|
Animal Welfare and the 3Rs in European Biomedical Research Dominic Wells, MA VetMB PhD, The Royal Veterinary College
|
|
11:40 AM
|
US Public Policy and the Oversight of the Use of Animal Models in Biomedical Research and Testing B. Taylor Bennett, DVM, PhD, Foundation for Biomedical Research
|
|
12:00 PM
|
Best Practices for Using Animals for Toxicological Research and Testing William S. Stokes, DVM, DACLAM, U.S. National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH
|
|
12:20 PM
|
Joint Discussion: How Do We Effectively Model Human Disease? Discussion Lead: Margaret S. Landi, VMD, MS, Diplomate ACLAM, GlaxoSmithKline Panelists: • Dominic Wells, MA VetMB PhD, The Royal Veterinary College • B. Taylor Bennett, DVM, PhD, Foundation for Biomedical Research • William S. Stokes, DVM, DACLAM, U.S. National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH • Thomas Hartung, MD PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health • Ann Jacqueline Hunter CBE, BSc, PhD, OI Pharma Partners, Ltd. • Mike Kastello, DVM, PhD, DACLAM Global Head, Sanofi-aventis
|
|
1:20 PM
|
Networking Lunch
|
JOINT SESSION IV: Recent Advances in Generating Genetically Modified Animals for Therapeutic Discovery
|
|
Chair: Sandra Engle, PhD, Pfizer Inc.
|
|
2:20 PM
|
Diverse Types of Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Relevance for Animal Modelling Roger Pedersen, PhD, University of Cambridge
|
|
2:40 PM
|
Targeted Gene Disruption in Rats via Zinc Finger Nucleases Aron Geurts, PhD, Medical College of Wisconsin
|
|
3:00 PM
|
Porcine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells For Generating Swine Biomedical Models Steven L. Stice, PhD, University of Georgia
|
|
3:20 PM
|
The Next Generation of Humanized Mice for Antibody Drug Discovery Andrew Murphy, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc
|
|
3:40 PM
|
Panel Discussion What are the Pros and Cons of Creating Genetically Modified Animals for Therapeutic Discovery?
|
|
4:00 PM
|
Coffee Break
|
SESSION V: Break Out into 2 Parallel Workshops
WORKSHOP 4: Phenotype Screening and the Impact of Genetic Background
|
|
Chair: Kent Lloyd, DVM, PhD, UC Davis, KOMP & Dominic Wells, MA VetMB PhD, The Royal Veterinary College
|
|
4:30 PM
|
The Charles River Lecture The Knockout Mouse Project Repository (KOMP) Kent Lloyd, DMV, PhD, University of California, Davis
|
|
4:50 PM
|
Functional Genomics in the Rat and the Knockout Rat Consortium (KORC) Eric M. Ostertag, MD, PhD, Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
5:10 PM
|
Genetic Resource Populations for the Laboratory Mouse Gary A. Churchill, PhD, The Jackson Laboratory
|
|
5:30 PM
|
Minimizing Strain Influences in a Genetically Modified Mouse Phenotyping Platform Michael D. Hayward, PhD, Taconic
|
|
5:50 PM
|
Behavioral Differences among C57BL/6 Substrains Camron D. Bryant, PhD, University of Chicago
|
|
6:10 PM
|
Panel Discussion Has Phenotyping of Genetically Modified Models, Given the Large Numbers of Variables Involved, Provided Value in Predicting Therapeutic Efficacy?
|
WORKSHOP 5: Vascular Inflammation and Pain — Understanding the Link
|
|
Chair: Maria Gabriela Belvisi, PhD, Imperial College London & Clive P. Page, BSc, PhD, King's College London
|
|
4:30 PM
|
Sensory Hyperresponsiveness of the Lung Maria Gabriela Belvisi, PhD, Imperial College London
|
|
4:50 PM
|
Modeling Inflammation and Microvascular Dysfunction Felicity N. E. Gavins, PhD, BSc Imperial College London
|
|
5:10 PM
|
Role of TRPV1 and TRPA1 Channels in Inflammatory Pain Susan Brain, BSc, PhD, FBPharmacoIS, King’s College London
|
|
5:30 PM
|
Developing TRP-Channel Blockers for Inflammatory Pain Odd-Geir Berge, DDS, PhD, AstraZeneca R&D
|
|
5:50 PM
|
Animal Models of Inflammatory Lung Disease Clive P. Page, BSc, PhD, King's College London
|
|
6:10 PM
|
Panel Discussion What Are the New Frontiers in Modeling Vascular Inflammation and Pain and Translating that Knowledge into Patient Therapies?
|
|
6:30 PM
|
Conference Reception and Poster Viewing 1 Poster Session 1 is generously sponsored by Taconic
|
|
8:00 PM
|
Poster Session 1 Breakdown and Adjourn
|
|
|
Day 2: Friday, September 16, 2011
|
|
8:00 AM
|
Registration, Continental Breakfast & Poster Session 2 Set Up
|
JOINT SESSION VI: New Technologies — Bioimaging, Biosimulation, and Bioinformatics
|
|
Chair: Felicity N. E. Gavins, PhD, BSc Imperial College London
|
|
8:30 AM
|
Novel MRI Techniques for Mouse Phenotyping and Cardiac Imaging Mark Lythgoe, PhD, University College London
|
|
8:55 AM
|
In vivo Imaging of Endocrine Gene Expression in a Humanized Transgenic Rat Julian R. Davis, MD, PhD, FRCP, The University of Manchester
|
|
9:20 AM
|
In vivo Imaging Reveals Effects of Fat Distribution on Metabolic Risk and Biomarkers in Obesity and Diabetes and their Response to Therapy Jimmy D. Bell, PhD, Imperial College London
|
|
9:45 AM
|
Evaluation of Alternative Omic Approaches and Technologies Thomas Hartung, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing
|
|
10:10 AM
|
Relating Human and Animal Phenotypes through Computational Analysis of Large Data Sets Eric B. Fauman, PhD, Pfizer Worldwide Research
|
|
10:35 AM
|
Coffee Break
|
|
Chair: Ravi Iyengar, PhD, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
|
|
11:05 AM
|
Systems Approaches to Understanding Drug Action Ravi Iyengar, PhD, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
|
|
11:30 AM
|
Cardiac Applications of the Systems Biology Approach Peter Kohl, MD, PhD, FHRS, Imperial College London
|
|
11:55 AM
12:20 PM
|
Novel Approaches to Assessing Cardiac Safety – in silico Cardiac Modeling to Predict the Proarrhythmic Safety of Drugs Gary Mirams, University of Oxford
Minipigs as Models for Toxicity Testing Kenneth L. Hastings, PhD, Sanofi-Aventis
|
|
12:45 PM
|
Panel Discussion Can Advanced Technology and Computational Data Mining Overcome the Inherent Issues with Current Animal Models?
|
|
1:15 PM
|
Networking Lunch and Poster Session 2 Poster Session 2 is generously sponsored by Taconic
|
SESSION VII: Emerging Pre-Clinical Models of Disease — Break Out into 3 Parallel Workshops
|
WORKSHOP 6: Alternatives to Rodent Models of Disease
|
|
Chair: Tony M. Plant, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
|
|
2:45 PM
|
Understanding the Predictivity of a Zebrafish Developmental Toxicity Assay Donald B Stedman, Pfizer Research & Development
|
|
3:10 PM
|
Animal Models Got You Puzzled? Think Pig Eric M. Walters, PhD, National Swine Research and Resource Center, University of Missouri-Columbia
|
|
3:35 PM
|
Modeling Neuroendocrine Control Systems Governing Reproduction in Non-Human Primates Tony M. Plant, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
|
|
4:00 PM
|
Panel Discussion Are Non-Rodent Models a Niche Market?
|
WORKSHOP 7: Emerging Use of Stem Cells as Disease Models and Therapeutic Agents
|
|
Chair: Roger Pedersen, PhD, University of Cambridge
|
|
2:45 PM
|
Use of Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Model Neural Development and Treatment of Rett Syndrome Alysson Renato Muotri, PhD, University of California San Diego
|
|
3:10 PM
|
Gene Expression Analysis of Prader-Willi Syndrome Neurons Derived From Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Marc Lalande, PhD, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute
|
|
3:35 PM
|
Embryonic Stem Cell−Derived Cardiomyocytes and Their Use in Cardiac Repair, Tissue Engineering, and Drug Discovery Sian Harding, PhD, Imperial College London
|
|
4:00 PM
|
Panel Discussion What is Needed for Stem Cells to Live up to their Promise to Reduce Animal Use and Provide Better Translatability?
|
WORKSHOP 8: Cell and Organ Replacement in Humanized Animal Models of Disease
|
|
Chair: Leonard D. Shultz, PhD, The Jackson Laboratory & Alexander Ploss, PhD, Rockefeller University
|
|
2:45 PM
|
Humanized Mice in Translational Biomedical Research Leonard D. Shultz, PhD, The Jackson Laboratory
|
|
3:10 PM
|
Engraftment of Humanized Mice for the Study of Type 1 Diabetes Dale L. Greiner, PhD, University of Massachusetts Medical School
|
|
3:35 PM
|
A Comparison of Genetic Modification and Transplantation Approaches to Study Hepatitis C in Humanized Mouse Models Alexander Ploss, PhD, Rockefeller University
|
|
4:00 PM
|
Panel Discussion Can Humanized Mouse Models Enhance Preclinical Screening and Safety Testing Throughout the Lead Identification and Optimization Process?
|
|
4:20 PM
4:40 PM
|
Coffee Break
Presentation of the British Pharmacological Society Poster Presentation Prize
|
JOINT SESSION VIII: Panel and Audience Discussion
|
|
Chair: Julia C. Buckingham, BSc, PhD, DSc, FBPharmacolS, Imperial College London & Ann Jacqueline Hunter CBE, BSc, PhD, OI Pharma Partners, Ltd.
|
|
4:45 PM
|
Panel (up to six panelists): • Sian Harding, PhD, Imperial College London • Simon Howell, PhD, King's College London • Garret A. FitzGerald, MD, University of Pennsylvania What Challenges Hamper Optimal Construction, Sharing, and Proper Utilization of Disease Models Among Academia, Clinicians, and Industry?
|
|
5:30 PM
|
Closing Remarks
|
|
5:45 PM
|
Conference Concludes
|
Speakers
Organizers
Imperial College London
King's College London
Julia Buckingham, BSc, PhD, DSc, FBPharmacolS
Imperial College London
Sandra Engle, PhD
Pfizer Inc.
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Ray Hill, PhD, DSc, (Hon), FMedSci
Imperial College London
Simon Howell, PhD
King's College London
Brooke Grindlinger, PhD
The New York Academy of Sciences
Kerstin Hofmeyer, PhD
The New York Academy of Sciences
Keynote Speaker
Ann Jacqueline Hunter CBE, BSc, PhD
OI Pharma Partners, Ltd
Speakers
Barts & The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London
Nick Andrews, PhD
Pfizer Global Research and Development
Imperial College London
AstraZeneca R&D
B. Taylor Bennett, DVM, PhD
National Association for Biomedical Research
Camron D. Bryant, PhD
University of Chicago
The Jackson Laboratory
University of Kentucky
The University of Manchester
Eric B. Fauman, PhD
Pfizer Worldwide Research
Imperial College London
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Kenneth Hastings
Sanofi-aventis
Medical College of Wisconsin
Imperial College London
Johns Hopkins University Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing
Michael D. Hayward, PhD
Taconic
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Mike Kastello, DVM, PhD, DACLAM,
Sanofi-aventis
Julie Keeble, BSc (Hons), PhD
King's College London
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Imperial College London
University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute
Margaret S. Landi, VMD, MS, Diplomate ACLAM
GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals
Jon Levine, MD, PhD
University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine
University of California, Davis
University College London
Imperial College London
University of Oxford
Andrew Murphy, PhD
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Imperial College London
Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
King's College London
University of Cambridge
University of Pittsburgh
Rockefeller University
University of California San Diego
The Jackson Laboratory
Donald B. Stedman
Pfizer Research and Development
University of Georgia
US National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods National Institite of Environmentel Health Sciences, NIH
Eric M. Walters, PhD
National Swine Research and Resource Center, University of Missouri-Columbia
The Royal Veterinary College
Garth Whiteside, BSc, MBA, PhD
Purdue Pharma
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
Abstracts
Day 1: Thursday, September 15, 2011
Joint Session I: Keynote Lecture
Have Animal Models of Disease Helped or Hindered the Drug Discovery Process? Jackie Hunter PhD, CBE, OI Pharma Partners Ltd.
In the past decades the amount of information on pathways and mechanisms of disease has increased exponentially. Although more and more of this information is derived from human studies, animal models clearly have an important role to play in confirming and expanding on these findings. However most animal models of disease only model certain aspects of disease and do not fully recapitulate the pathophysiology of the human disease state. Therefore, if a mechanism is deemed of potential therapeutic importance on strong physiological and clinical evidence, is it sufficient to show that a compound is active in an animal model of the mechanism for its progression to man? Have we ruled out potentially effective compounds on the basis of their activities in animal models of disease? Conversely has an over-reliance on animal models in other areas led to high attrition rates in the clinic?
Joint Session II: Breat out into 3 Concurrent Workshops
Workshop 1: Highlights and Hurdles of Animal Models of Human Metabolic Disease
Using Mouse Knockouts to Guide Drug Discovery: LX4211 A Novel Diabetes Drug Candidate Brian Zambrowicz, PhD, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc, The Woodlands, Texas
We have utilized a large scale mouse knockout and phenotypic analysis approach to identify novel and first-in-class mechanisms for drug discovery. Knockouts can be considered as models of potential antagonist drug action. They model an antagonist with 100% potency and 100% specificity. However, judgment must be used in the interpretation of knockout data as it pertains to both efficacy and safety for a given drug target. We have knocked out and analyzed the phenotypes of 4,650 genes using a broad screen of physiology and behavior relevant to disease. I will describe the general strategy and illustrate the utility of this strategy by discussing the preclinical and clinical data surrounding one diabetes drug candidate currently in phase 2b clinical trials. LX4211 is a first-in-class dual SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibitor. In patients with type 2 diabetes, LX4211 produced large and rapid improvements in glycemic control that resulted in a 0.76% reduction in HbA1c over only four weeks of dosing. In addition, multiple metabolic and cardiovascular improvements were also observed. This dual mechanism of action results in improvements over SGLT2 selective compounds including the triggering of GLP-1 secretion by the gastrointestinal tract. This drug discovery and development work was guided by the knockout data for the two targets and supports the utility of the mouse for guiding the discovery and development of new drugs.
The Obesity Pipeline: Current Models and Strategies in the Development of Anti-Obesity Drugs Kevin G. Murphy, PhD, Imperial College London
Obesity is now a global pandemic. The World Health Organization estimates that more than half a billion people are obese worldwide. Obesity is associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to associated diseases including type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Dietary and exercise advice, and current pharmacotherapy, have proven relatively ineffective. Bariatric surgery effectively treats obesity, but is an impractical option to cope with the increasing prevalence of obesity. New anti-obesity drugs are thus urgently needed. Energy balance is a homeostatic system. Body weight is regulated by a complex neuroendocrine signaling system between the central nervous system, the gastrointestinal tract and adipose depots. It is difficult to model neuronal circuitry and the endocrine system in vitro, and in vivo models have proved critical to our understanding of the systems controlling energy homeostasis. The signals regulating appetite and body weight appear similar across mammals, and animal models of obesity are used to determine the efficacy of potential anti-obesity agents. Such models have limitations; energy expenditure is differently regulated in rodents, redundancy and developmental compensation can make knockout models unreliable, and side effects, a major concern for obesity drugs, may not be detected. Nevertheless, animal models have identified a number of agents with potential as treatments for obesity which are now at various stages of drug development. The future may see combinations of anti-obesity agents being used to prevent weight gain and treat obesity.
Workshop 2: Highlights and Hurdles of Animal Models of Human Cardiovascular Disease
Angiotensin II Promote Diverse Forms of Aortic Aneurysms Alan Daugherty, PhD, DSc, University of Kentucky, Lexington
Many laboratories have demonstrated that angiotensin II infusion into normo- and hyperlipidemic mice promotes the development of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Angiotensin II-induced AAAs are characterized by a focal medial rupture that leads to a thrombus with adventitial dissection. Thrombotic material gradually resolves and is replaced by fibrous material, while there is progressive lumen dilation. Continued infusion for 3 months leads to progressive expansion that can be monitored by high frequency ultrasound. Continued aortic expansion is associated with progressive macrophages accumulation at the site of medial rupture. Interruption of macrophage function in mice with deficiency of the adaptor protein, MyD88, abates the development of angiotensin II-induced AAAs. More recently, it has been observed that angiotensin II infusion leads to aneurysms that are highly localized to the ascending aorta. Within 5 days of initiating angiotensin II infusion, there is dissection of the outer layers of the aortic media, with blood accumulating between elastin layers. Aneurysms in these regions are characterized by progressive concentric lumen expansion with increased medial thickening and pronounced elastin fragmentation. The development of angiotensin II-induced aneurysms is ablated in mice lacking AT1a receptors. Surprisingly, the smooth muscle cell-specific deletion of AT1a receptors had no effect on aneurysms in either region. In contrast, depletion of AT1a receptors in the endothelium attenuated the development of ascending aortic aneurysms. Mechanisms of this protective effect have not been defined. Coauthor: Lisa Cassis, PhD, University of Kentucky, Lexington
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Function in Genetically Manipulated Mice Amrita Ahluwalia, BSc, PhD, Barts & The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London
Globally cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death accounting for 29% of all deaths in 2004. However, it is well-established that the incidence of CVD is significantly lower in females compared to age-matched males. Statistics show that this reduced susceptibility to CVD in females is lost following menopause when the rates of CVD are similar in both sexes (www.BHF.org). This sex-difference has been attributed, at least in part, to the protective effects of oestrogen. In particular, oestrogen-dependent upregulation of endothelial cell function has been implicated. The exact endothelial mediator(s) involved in this phenomenon is uncertain. I will discuss both the evidence in pre-clinical models implicating different endothelial pathways in sex-dependent protection and how these data correlate, or not, with human disease.
Modeling NSAID Activity in the Cardiovascular System Jane A. Mitchell, PhD, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom and Barts & the London School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, United Kingdom
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), used for the treatment of inflammation and pain, are the most commonly used over-the-counter medication worldwide. These drugs share the common property of reducing prostanoid biosynthesis by inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1 and/or COX-2. In man, this produces well-documented effects in the cardiovascular system. On one hand, NSAIDs, particularly aspirin, can produce anti-thrombotic and cardiovascular protective effects. On the other, both non-selective COX-1/COX-2 inhibitors (e,g. diclofenac), and selective COX-2 inhibitors (e.g.celecoxib) are associated with detrimental cardiovascular effects including an increased risk of thrombotic events, particularly myocardial infarction. The anti-thrombotic effects of NSAIDs are relatively straightforward to study in animal models, where aspirin or COX-1 gene-knock out reduces platelet reactivity. Hypertension and gastric injury can also be demonstrated and modeled in laboratory animals treated with NSAIDs. Data from knock out mice suggests that both COX-1 and COX-2 are important in mediating these effects. The pro-thrombotic effects of NSAIDs, which manifest in man as increased rates of myocardial infarction, are serious, but relatively rare and unpredictable. An improved understanding of the relative roles of COX-1 and COX-2 throughout the circulation, and how they interact with underlying contributing factors, such as vascular inflammation or hypertension, to influence thrombotic risk is required.
Coauthors: Nicholas S. Kirkby, PhD, Imperial College London & Barts & the London School of Medicine & Dentistry and Timothy D. Warner, PhD, Imperial College London & Barts & the London School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, United Kingdom
Animals and Models: Interpretative Challenges and Drug Development Garret A. FitzGerald, MD, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
A pivotal stage in drug development is the attempt to gain proof of concept in cells or more commonly animal models. The value of this exercise depends on both the strengths and limitations of the model and of the human beings who design the experiment and attempt to interpret its relevance. No model recapitulates the human condition, nor can any investigator interpret the human relevance of discrepancies between results in 3 monkeys versus 300 mice. Sometimes the end point of interest simply does not occur—spontaneous plaque rupture in hyperlipidemic mice. Other times, simulations of the clinical paradigm are artificial in the extreme—mice on a hot plate predicting the efficacy of analgesics in middle aged ladies with osteoarthritis of the knees. Commonly, there is a failure to appreciate the dynamic range of experimental paradigms as in studies of the thrombogenic vs antithrombotic effects of drugs. Finally, there is the general constraint of immunosuppression in assessing anticancer drugs in mice implanted with tumors. Here, the high spontaneous incidence of tumors in dogs offers and alternative approach to assessing chemoprevention strategies, albeit that frequently, tumor markers evident in humans may be incompletely recapitulated. Besides genomic differences relevant to drug action—for example in editing enzymes in dyslipidemia—gene deletion in mice may evoke counter-regulatory gene expression that may be absent with incomplete target blockade achieved by tolerated drug doses in humans. Finally, sufficient attention is rarely paid to measurements of drug exposure and their extrapolation to humans: what is a "low dose" of aspirin in a mouse? For these and other reasons, one seeks congruent information from distinct models, ideally crossing species and from both genetic and pharmacological manipulation of the target. In this setting, titration of drug exposure or the quantitative measure of drug effect (e.g. enzyme inhibition) can be related to functional impact in the model in a way that informs dose selection in humans. Knock in of gene variants may provide useful information on their potential functional importance in humans. Given all these potential limitations, it is unsurprising that some are totally dismissive of the value of animal models in drug development. However, when experiments are designed rationally and diversified evidence is obtained; animal models can be most useful in the prediction of drug response in humans and in the mechanistic elucidation of drug action.
Workshop 3: The 'Animalgesic' Effect in Modeling Pain
Modeling Inflammatory Hyperalgesia Julie Keeble, PhD, King's College London
Inflammatory hyperalgesia is characterized by increased sensitivity to a noxious stimulus, caused by inflammation. Such a state is clearly demonstrated by both humans, for example in osteo- and rheumatoid arthritis, and the respective animal models. Modeling inflammatory hyperalgesia in animals can be achieved by targeting specific receptors on sensory nerves, e.g. TRPV1 and TRPA1 agonists, which is very useful in the search for antagonists for such targets. However, it is far more difficult to model inflammatory hyperalgesia in animals where the aim is to reproduce human disease states where a variety of mediators are involved. The stimulus for inflammatory hyperalgesia in animal models is rarely the same as compared with human disease. The assessment of the role of specific mediators in animal models of hyperalgesia is therein stimulus led. Albeit, pro-inflammatory stimuli such as carrageenan and complete Freund's adjuvant produce highly reliable and reproducible models of inflammation in rodents that is associated with significant thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. Useful information can be gained from these models with respect to the potential role for different mediators/receptors in causing hyperalgesia in general, but not necessarily in relation to a specific disease state. Thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia are standard measures of pain in animal models, using techniques such as the Hargreaves test and Von Frey hairs. These have historically been very useful in identifying mediators/receptors that are involved in inflammatory hyperalgesia although new techniques are emerging that may be better tests of 'natural' pain behavior.
Use of Novel, Non-Reflex End Points for Detecting Analgesic Action in Rodents at Clinically Relevant Concentrations Nick Andrews, PhD, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich, United Kingdom
The methods historically used in laboratory animals for preclinical prediction of the efficacy of novel analgesics have recently been critically evaluated by several authors and behavioural assessment of animals is called for (Mogil, (2009); Rice et al., (2008); Rice, (2010)). Reflex withdrawal-based paradigms do not measure the global impact of pain per se and furthermore do not address ethological validity. Rather than trying to replicate clinical features related to human pain in the animal laboratory, predictive validity may be improved by looking to re-instate specific, innate behaviours suppressed by pain e.g. rearing (Matson et al., 2007).Furthermore, a major advantage of looking to re-instate suppressed behaviours, (rather than dampening enhanced reflexes), is that compounds that impair motor function do not appear as false positives. We have taken this philosophy forward in developing a burrowing assay and also a novel operant assay that measures rearing activity (without suffering from habituation as happens with the method of Matson et al) to measure the effect of chronic pain in rats. We have found that gabapentin reverses burrowing deficits (30 mg/kg sc) and rearing deficits (10 mg/kg sc) induced by peripheral nerve injury and ibuprofen reverses burrowing deficits (30 mg/kg sc) induced by CFA. These doses produce plasma concentrations in the rat more in line with effective clinical plasma concentrations than doses generally used in rodent reflex withdrawal assays. Though further work is needed, it is tentatively suggested that re-instating suppressed behaviours, relevant to the rat, may give improved clinical dose prediction.
Coaurthors: Sinead Harper and Yasmin Issop MSc, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich, United Kingdom
Does Fibromyalgia Have Four Legs and a Tail? Jon Levine, MD, PhD, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
The pathophysiology of chronic widespread pain remains poorly understood, and available therapies are only partially, and mostly unpredictably, effective. Progress has been seriously hindered by the lack of adequate experimental models. Given the strong clinical association between stress and diverse chronic widespread pain syndromes we have developed animal models based on this association and used them to evaluate pathophysiology. Depending on the nature of the stress, animals develop mechanical hyperalgesia and neuroplasticity in the primary afferent nociceptor. Our model, developed to study diffuse musculoskeletal pain (fibromyalgia syndrome), also demonstrates increased anxiety, and visceral hyperalgesia. The neuroplasticity in the nociceptor allows a response to levels of cytokines found after exposure to bacterial endotoxin. In addition, lesion of both neuroendocrine stress axes – the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and sympathoadrenal – markedly attenuates pain in these models. Importantly, electrophysiological recordings from muscle nociceptors suggest neuropathic changes capable of contributing to enhanced nociceptor function. Thus, animal models of chronic widespread pain, which reproduce many aspects of the clinical syndrome, validate a role of neuroendocrine stress axes and cytokines, as well as suggest a role for neuropathic changes in the primary afferent nociceptor in chronic widespread pain.
Pharmacokinetic Pharmacodynamic Correlations in the Translation of Efficacy from Animal Pain Models Garth Whiteside, PhD, Purdue Pharma, Cranbury, New Jersey
Consideration of pharmacokinetics in translating efficacy across species is essential. If the PK does not translate then the efficacy will also not translate. While clinical compounds are frequently used to validate preclinical models, as positive controls and to infer translatability from preclinical studies to clinical studies, consideration of the translatability of the pharmacokinetic parameters is all too often lacking. In addition, highly complex datasets, both clinical and preclinical, are frequently reduced to a one work summary—"worked", "didn't work", "failed" etc. To more fully understand preclinical and clinical datasets these one word summaries cannot reveal the full picture. In order to determine translatability and certainly to conclude a lack of translatability, one needs to more closely examine the data. This presentation focuses on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship between a number of compounds that are active in both clinical and preclinical pain states. In addition, and to exemplify how continuous discourse between clinical and preclinical can inform a mechanistic understanding of drug action, the relationship between efficacy of a bisphosphonate, pain and extent of joint damage in an osteoarthritis model will be presented.
Joint Session III: Regulations and Best Practices in Disease Modeling in Animals
Animal Welfare and the 3Rs in European Biomedical Research Dominic Wells, VetMB PhD, Royal Veterinary College, University of London
Historically the UK has had strict legislation governing the use of animals in research since 1876 and the 1986 Animals (scientific procedures) Act was enacted to ensure a strong animal welfare element was applied to the use of experimental animals. The main elements of this national licensing scheme are approval of the animal facility, approval for a specific set of experiments justified by a cost/benefit analysis and the licensing of individuals to perform specific techniques after approved training. It is a requirement of the Act that animal welfare is optimized wherever possible by consideration of the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) and the establishment of humane end points to procedures. The recently approved EU Directive 2010/63 aims to extend broadly similar protection across Europe although the success of this will depend on the effectiveness of implementation by the member states. There are significant differences between the current UK system and the EU Directive and a UK consultation exercise will be held in summer 2011 to consider whether additional parts of the UK system will be retained. An important element of the EU Directive is the requirement to spread best practice in the 3Rs and a number of existing bodies could take up this role. It is gratifying to note that several organizations are rising to this challenge and that there is every indication that implementation of the EU Directive will significantly improve the welfare of experimental animals across Europe, especially in biomedical research.
US Public Policy and the Oversight of the Use of Animal Models in Biomedical Research and Testing B. Taylor Bennett, DVM, PhD, National Association for Biomedical Research, Washington, DC
The oversight of animal use in biomedical research and safety assessment testing is provided by three agencies, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the National Institutes of Health's Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) and the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. Each of these agencies relies upon the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) to provide assessment and oversight of an institution's Animal Care and Use Program (ACUP) through regular review of that program, inspection of the facilities that compose the program, review of concerns involving the care and use of animals, and review and approval of proposed activities involving animals and subsequent modifications to that usage. The IACUC must include as a voting member the veterinarian with institutional authority and responsibility for the health and well-being of the animals cared for and used in the program—the Attending Veterinarian (AV). The IACUC and the AV usually report directly to the Institutional Official (IO) who has ultimate responsibility for the ACUP. This presentation will review how this three pronged approach provides effective oversight while facilitating research and highlight the need for sound public policy to support this system.
Best Practices for the Use of Animals in Toxicological Research and Testing William S. Stokes, DVM, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Laboratory animal models of human disease and injury are used in translational research to assess efficacy and pre-clinical safety of new medicines and vaccines. Animal models are also used to assess the safety of new chemicals and products like pesticides, industrial chemicals, consumer products, and food additives. However, disease or toxic injury can often result in significant pain and distress, and such studies can involve large numbers of animals. Welfare concerns have led to national policies and laws in the U.S. and other countries to ensure humane care and use of laboratory animals, and to require the consideration of ways to reduce, refine, and replace animal use before studies are approved. Continued advances in science and technology provide new opportunities to develop improved animal models and integrated safety assessment strategies that can reduce uncertainties in extrapolating from animals to humans, and can further reduce, refine, and in some cases replace animal use. Increased understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms and perturbed pathways leading to disease and injury are leading to earlier in vivo and in vitro safety biomarkers. Such biomarkers can often serve as the basis for earlier humane endpoints to avoid or reduce the duration and severity of pain and distress in animal studies, and have also reduced and replaced animal use for some studies. Continued development, validation, and use of scientifically sound models is expected to improve animal welfare and further reduce and replace animal use while ensuring and advancing the health of people, animals, and the environment.
Discussion: Can We Model Human Disease in Animals? Margaret S. Landi, VMD, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
This section of the seminar will set the stage for the debate, from the negative side, on the question if animals can be models of diseases in humans. Areas to be covered include, but are limited to, a brief history of animals in biomedical and behavioral research. Published reports on the challenges of efficacy models and toxicity testing in animals in drug discovery and development will also be reviewed.
Joint Session IV: Recent Advances in Generating Genetically Modified Animals for Therapeutic Discovery
Diverse Types of Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Relevance for Animal Modeling Roger A. Pedersen, PhD, University of Cambridge
Recent studies have revealed a distinction between the pluripotent stem cells that can be derived from the inner cell mass of mouse blastocysts and from the epiblast layer of later, post-implantation stage embryos. Blastocyst-derived mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) can contribute to all body tissues in chimeras, but do not form the trophoblast cells of the placenta. Mouse epiblast-derived stem cells (EpiSCs) scarcely contribute to chimeras but seemingly can form trophoblast cells. Intriguingly, the properties of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) derived from blastocysts mirror those of mouse EpiSCs derived from later stages. Thus, the properties of mESCs, EpiSCs and hESCs appear to reflect their developmental stage, rather than their species of origin. We studied the differentiation of hESCs and EpiSCs into mesoderm and found that they respond similarly to the epiblast layer of mouse embryos. Rather than forming trophoblast, however, they appear to form a sub-population of placental mesenchyme that expresses marker genes shared with placental trophoblast. Thus, ability for chimera formation is a defining feature of diverse types of pluripotent stem cells. Advances in methods for deriving and maintaining pluripotency of embryonic stem cells from other species have enabled researchers to establish rat ESCs. These are capable of contributing extensively to chimeras with rat or mouse embryos, thus resembling mESCs. This raises the possibility that human ESCs with properties similar to mESCs and rESCs could be derived, either from embryos or from hESCs. Asking whether such ESCs would participate in chimeras has both experimental and ethical challenges.
Targeted Gene Disruption in Rats via Zinc Finger Nucleases Aron M. Geurts, PhD, Medical College of Wisconsin
Genetic engineering in laboratory model systems is the benchmark for investigation of functional mechanisms of the roles of genes in biological and disease traits. In practice, routine genetic engineering in vertebrate model systems has been generally limited to mice, due to the availability and protocols to manipulate embryonic stem cells. We recently demonstrated the use of Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs) for rapid genetic modification of the rat embryo genome by pronuclear microinjection as an alternative to stem cell engineering. Using ZFNs, we can generate both knock-out and knock-in modifications to the rat genome in a timeframe of a few months. Thus, direct manipulation of the embryo genome obviates the need for stem cells for several engineering approaches and reduces the time and effort necessary to produce a genetically modified animal. We have now applied this approach to generate variants in 100 rat genes in a span of two years and are beginning to uncover new and interesting insights into complex human disease. Improvements in the art of genetic engineering in the rat, partnered with its reputation as an excellent physiological and behavioral research model, offer great promise to impact discovery and intervention into human biology and disease. Coauthor: Howard Jacob, Medical College of Wisconsin.
Porcine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells For Generating Swine Biomedical Models Steve Stice, PhD, University of Georgia, Regenerative Bioscience Center, Athens, Georgia
Porcine induced pluripotent cells (piPSC) will be used to generate potentially complex animal models for human diseases and modeling allogenic pluripotent stem cell and tissue transplants in large animal models. Generated piPSC chimeric offspring demonstrated that piPSC can contribute to the in vivo development of multiple tissues. However transplantation of undifferentiated piPSC into a disease model is unlikely, given the potential for teratomas formation in the recipient animals. Conditions for guided differentiation of pluripotent stem cells, including induced pluripotent stem cells, into progenitors that do not generate teratomas has been developed using human pluripotent stem cells in our laboratory. Shortly after we isolated three of the initial of NIH registered human embryonic stem cells lines we generated neural progenitor lines. We used these to produce more uniformly differentiated neuronal cells ranging from motor neurons to dopaminergic neurons and now these have been successfully used in stroke and spinal cord injury rodent animal models. Traditionally, in vitro differentiation processes for embryonic stem cells often utilize embryoid body formation because this is a relatively easy procedure, but rarely results in a uniform population of germ layer specific progenitor cells. We have developed more defined conditions required to produce uniform human neural, and now mesenchymal and germ cell specified progenitor cells in adherent human embryonic and now induced pluripotent ESC cultures without embryoid body formation. The development of equivalent piPSC derived progenitor cells will allow us to test allogenic stem cell based therapies in large animal models. Coauthor: Franklin West, University of Georgia, Regenerative Bioscience Center, Athens, Georgia
Session V: Break out into 2 Parallel Workshops
Workshop 4: Phenotype Screening and the Impact of Genetic Background
The Knockout Mouse Project (KOMP) Repository K. C. Kent Lloyd, DVM, PhD, Mouse Biology Program, University of California, Davis, California
The NIH-funded KOMP Repository is the archive and distribution center for targeting vectors; ES cell clones, live mouse lines, and frozen embryos and sperm that have been produced for the 8500 knockout genes targeted by the KOMP Mutagenesis Program. The Repository conducts quality assurance procedures to ensure the viability, genotype, pathogen-free status, and genomic integrity of all KOMP products. In addition, the Repository provides investigators with value-added services, such as microinjection, germline transmission testing, cryopreservation, and colony management. The Repository currently holds 75,302 targeted ES cell clones for 6909 unique genes, and to date has received 3316 orders from investigators. The Repository itself has injected 659 ES cell clones to produce 446 knockout mouse lines (a 68% germline transmission rate), indicating that injection of 3 clones per gene will ensure a >96% chance of generating a genotypically-confirmed knockout mouse. Because the NIH intended the resource to become self-supporting, fees are charged to both academic and for-profit users to obtain KOMP products and services. The Repository maintains an easily navigable website (www.komp.org) where one can search, browse, order products and services, register interest in genes and receive automatic notices when products become available, access customer and technical services (1-888-KOMP-MICE, service@komp.org), receive news updates, follow the KOMP blog, view FAQs, and download relevant protocols. Besides ensuring the utility, longevity, and vitality of this unique resource, the KOMP Repository is key to the success of KOMP-Phase 2, which seeks to functionally annotate all protein coding genes in the mammalian genome.
Functional Genomics in the Rat and the Knockout Rat Consortium (KORC) Eric M. Ostertag, University of Kentucky and Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals Inc., Lexington
The laboratory rat has been the desired animal model for human disease over the past century. Rat relevance to human physiology coupled with its size, ease of manipulation, and breeding characteristics are attributes of this animal model. The Knockout Rat Consortium (KORC) is a repository of genetically modified rat models that were created using multiple technologies. The KORC website is www.knockoutrat.org and contains a database, news items, a discussion form, and useful links. The KORC now has over 300 genetically modified rats in its database. Examples of knockout rats available include a SCID model, a p53 knockout, a model of pain (Trpc4), a model of hydrocephalus (Myo9a), a new model of obesity (Mc4r) and a Sod3 knockout for hypertension. The SCID rat contains an insertional mutation within the adenosine deaminase (Ada) gene, which is an underlying cause of many cases of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in humans. A p53 knockout rat is also available with extensive phenotype information, including tumor spectrum data. The Trpc4 knockout rat is a novel model for pain research and demonstrates greatly reduced sensitivity to visceral pain. The Myo9a knockout enables researchers to study hydrocephalus in an animal model that allows facile surgical manipulation. Mc4r mutations are the single most common form of monogenic obesity in humans. The Sod3 knockout rat is hypertensive due renal failure from oxidative stress. On behalf of the KORC we invite all interested investigators to participate in our efforts to assemble a repository of knockout rats.
Coauthors: Aron M. Geurts, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and Edwin Cuppen, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
Genetic Resource Populations for the Laboratory Mouse Gary A. Churchill, PhD, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine
Genome-wide association studies in human populations have raised the bar for genetic mapping and analysis of Mendelian and complex traits. However, the genetic structure of human populations, uncontrolled environmental variables, and limitations on experimental interventions and phenotyping present significant barriers to investigations of biological processes in humans. If we could design an ideal model system for genetic studies, what properties would it have? High genetic diversity is desirable to enable the broadest possible scope of discovery. High mapping resolution is needed to identify causal genes with confidence and precision. Absence of population structure and rare alleles combined with full genomic sequences of ancestral haplotypes will substantially improve power and reduce required sample sizes. A good model system does not need to have a natural population structure but the evolutionary origin and context in which segregating variants arose should be understood. The ability to reproduce genotypes leads us to consider inbred models, but natural heterozygosity is also desirable. In depth phenotyping tools, a high-density genotyping platform, and methods to work with transgenic constructs are essential. An experimental system should allow for both discovery and validation. I will describe how the Collaborative Cross and Diversity Outbred mouse populations together fulfill these criteria and provide an ideal system for genetic analysis in a mammalian model organism.
Minimizing Strain Influences in a Genetically Modified Mouse Phenotyping Platform Michael D. Hayward, PhD, Taconic, Cranbury, New Jersey
The characterization of phenotypes in genetically modified mice are frequently performed as in-depth mechanistic studies but they can also be scaled up to serve as a discovery tool to identify novel physiological functions of genes or therapeutically relevant targets. The choice of ES cell and the choice of which strain to backcross to (congenic approach) should ideally yield data with the lowest possible standard deviation related to genetic heterogeneity. However, that approach can be complicated by the existence of substrains of the most popular strains used (e.g., 129 and C57BL/6) and genetic differences that exist among these substrains. Several differences between two of the more commonly used substrains, C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NTac have been identified, such as differences in nociception and insulin secretion. The characterization of cohorts on a mixed background (such as 129XC57BL/6) are frequently done, but less frequently recognized is that studies are also done on mixed substrains (such as C57BL/6J X C57BL/6NTac). In the case when a pure substrain congenic line is not practical, good statistical practices, such as power calculations, become critical. Since breeding of genetically modified mice is costly, attempts have been made to minimize that expense by balancing the need for statistical power, the costs of breeding and control of the background strain. An approach that we have used commercially (Xenogen Biosciences/Pfizer Agreement) and has also been used in some international phenotyping consortia (i.e., EMPREeSSslim), to a more limited extent, is to “multiplex” in vivo tests by conducting them serially. The serial design ensures that a majority of the resources go towards characterization rather than the breeding of the mice and allows for a larger group size in the assays, thus reaching a statistical power whereby even modest changes can be detected. Our approach, therefore, was to power studies to allow for detection of at least modest changes from a WT littermate control, include assays with overlapping physiological systems to provide cross-functional interpretive value and to employ challenge assays. Coauthors: Olesia Buiakova, David S. Grass, Taconic
Behavioral Differences Among C57bl/6 Substrains Camron D. Bryant, PhD, Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago
C57BL/6 ("B6") mice at the Jackson Laboratories ("J") and NIH ("N") represent the two core substrains of B6 mice, each of which have their own substrains. Investigators often assume that a B6 mouse is a B6 mouse but accumulating studies clearly demonstrate that this is a dangerous assumption. Specifically, there are large behavioral differences among B6 substrains, e.g., in motor coordination, pain sensitivity, fear learning, neuromuscular strength, anxiety-like behavior, depressive-like behavior, working memory, alcohol preference, psychostimulant sensitivity, aggression, startle, and prepulse inhibition. I will first highlight the main behavioral findings that have been replicated across laboratories. As an example, we and others have noted that the C57BL/6J strain shows a low level of fear learning relative to other B6 substrains and thus, it might be ill-suited to detect the effects of manipulations that would be expected to decrease this phenotype. Molecular genetic studies also document SSLPs, SNPs, and CNVs that distinguish the B6 substrains—I will briefly summarize this growing list of variants. Genetic variation among B6 substrains likely contributes to the behavioral variation and thus, it is crucial that investigators unambiguously document and carefully choose which B6 substrains to employ for forward and reverse genetic studies of behavior. Reference: Animal Models and Their Value in Predicting Efficacy and Toxicity. New York Academy of Sciences and Global Medical Excellence Cluster in collaboration with Imperial College London and King's College London.
Workshop 5: Vascular Inflammation and Pain — Understanding the Link
Sensory Hyperresponsiveness of the Lung Maria G. Belvisi, PhD, Imperial College London
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are inflammatory diseases of the airway characterized by airflow limitation. Asthmatics at the more severe end of the disease spectrum and COPD patients are not effectively managed with standard therapy (i.e., glucocorticoids and β2-adrenoceptor agonists). Furthermore, there are no treatments for COPD that can halt the progression of the disease. Cough is a common symptom of both diseases and also presents as a disease in its own right. Treatment options are limited and a recent meta-analysis concluded that OTC remedies are ineffective and there is increasing concern about their use in children. TRPA1 channels are non selective cation channels that are activated by a range of natural products (eg. allyl isothiocyanate), a multitude of environmental irritants (eg. acrolein which is present in air pollution, vehicle exhaust and cigarette smoke) and inflammatory mediators (eg. cyclocpentane prostaglandins). TRPA1 is primarily expressed in small diameter, nociceptive neurons where its activation probably contributes to the perception of noxious stimuli. Inhalational exposure to irritating gases, fumes, dusts, vapours, chemicals and endogenous mediators can lead to the development of cough. The respiratory tract is innervated by primary sensory afferent nerves which are activated by mechanical and chemical stimuli. Recent data suggests that activation of TRPA1 on these vagal sensory afferents by these irritant substances could lead to central reflexes including dyspnoea, changes in breathing pattern and cough which contribute to the symptomatology and pathophysiology of respiratory diseases. Coauthors: Megan Grace, Eric Dubuis, and Mark A. Birrell, Imperial College London.
Modeling Inflammation and Microvascular Dysfunction Felicity N.E. Gavins, PhD, BSc, Imperial College London
A hallmark of inflammation is the recruitment of blood-borne leukocytes in the microvasculature, which involves a complex set of events that can occur both locally and systemically. Both in vivo and in vitro evidence have demonstrated molecular and cellular pathways involved in this multi-step cascade. Inflammation and microvascular dysfunction can be visualized using intravital microscopy (IVM), a quantitative and qualitative in vivo molecular imaging technique that enables further understanding of the physiology and pathophysiology of different diseases, and the cellular and subcellular distribution of potential therapeutic compounds to be assessed. All of which results in a cost-effective approach to identify potential novel therapeutic drug targets for disease and accelerate preclinical drug development. We have used the technique of IVM to investigate the cardinal signs of inflammation and microvascular injury associated with ischaemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and sepsis. We, and others, have found increasing evidence suggesting that members of the for myl peptide receptor (FPR) family, in particular human FPR2/ALX play an important role in mediating the anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving effects of several peptides and non-peptidyl small-molecule compounds in a number of different disease models. This talk will review evidence and suggest that FPR ligands, particularly in the brain, could be novel and exciting anti-inflammatory therapeutics for the treatment of a variety of clinical conditions, including stroke and sepsis.
Role of TRPV1 and TRPA1 Channels in Inflammatory Pain Susan D. Brain, PhD, King's College London
Pain is a poorly controlled component of arthritis. We have been working at a fundamental level to develop models in which we can learn more of the crosstalk of inflammatory mediator and signalling systems. Our central hypothesis is that these results will in turn inform mechanisms by which pharmacological targets may offer therapeutic benefit. Mice deleted of the TRPV1 gene are protected from secondary thermal hyperalgesia in a CFA joint inflammation model, but TNFα levels remain high in the TRPV1 knockout mice, suggesting that TNFα generation occurs before TRPV1 activation (Keeble et al., Arthritis Rheum 2005 52:3248-56). We considered how we could learn more about the ability of TNFα to interact with the TRPV1 system. We simplified our model and studied slocal (ipsilateral and contralateral) effects after intraplantar administration into the ipsilateral paw. This allowed us to use genetically modified mice and also to give blocking drugs either locally or systemically. We realised that a complex downstream cascade of events occurred that involved cyclo-oxygenase products (Russell et al., Pain 2009 142:264-74). Progressing, we were well placed to learn of the distinct role of TRPA1, (through use of TRPA1 wildtype and knockout mice). We have now confirmed these results, using TRPA1 antagonists (Fernandes et al., Arthritis Rheum 2011 63:819-29). We thank the Arthritis Research Campaign and a BBSRC-led IMB capacity building award for support.
Developing TRP-Channel Blockers for Inflammatory Pain O-G Berge, DDS, PhD, AstraZeneca R&D, Södertälje, Sweden
The algogenic and desensitizing actions of capsaicin intrigued scientists for decades and inspired industrial programs to develop novel analgesics. These efforts accelerated with the cloning of the "capsaicin receptor" TRPV1 published in 1997 and identification of other members of the TRP ion channel family with potential roles in sensory functions. In recent years, several TRPV1 antagonists have been tested in man but mechanism-related as well as off-target effects have hampered their clinical development. The clinical utility of blocking TRPV1 is still unclear. Analgesic efficacy in man has been reported in experimental and acute postoperative pain but negative data have been announced in pain due to osteoarthritis. The list of TRP targets for drug discovery and development related to inflammatory pain includes TRPA1, TRPM8, TRPV3 and TRPV4. Other channels like TRPM2 and TRPM4 may influence immunological functions of relevance for inflammatory pain. As drug targets, the TRP channels are challenging due to extensive expression patterns and complex biology with tetrameric and in some cases heteromeric assembly of units and signaling associated with several activating and regulating mechanisms. Endogenous ligands and physiological functions are not fully identified for several potentially important channels and exogenous compounds activating the channels, however useful for physiological characterization, frequently have properties that make them unsuitable as tools for drug discovery. Poor species crossover in pharmacology and biology has been shown for several targets, posing difficulties for animal modeling. In spite of the challenges, the TRP channel family remains a promising field for drug development.
* Additional abstracts to come.
Abstracts
Day 2: Friday, September 16, 2011
Joint Session VI: New Technologies: Bioimaging, Biosimulation, and Bioinformatics
Novel MRI Techniques for Mouse Cardiac Imaging and Phenotyping Mark F. Lythgoe, PhD, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Effective methods for high-throughput screening and analysis are crucial for phenotyping the increasing number of mouse mutants that are being generated to investigate the role of genes in human diseases and development. Magnetic resonance imaging is an ideal phenotyping platform due to its inherent non-invasive and three-dimensional nature. In the University College London Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging we can image up to 40 embryos (E15.5) in a single scan, generating a 3D dataset of each embryo (or adult mouse brain at) 40µm resolution, which may be viewed on a slice-by-slice basis. Combined with advanced computational methods, this enables automated morphometric assessment of large MRI datasets. Segmentation propagation enables rapid and non-invasive calculation of tissue volumes in a population using an average, composite atlas. Tensor-based morphometry is a fully automated technique that enables unsupervised and unbiased detection of local, volumetric changes in a population on a voxel-wise basis, which are not visible to the human eye. Active staining techniques for MR histology, allow specific cellular structures to be targeted using MRI, and developing diffusion tensor imaging techniques in the mouse embryo to investigate local microstructure, which may not be visible using histological and standard MRI approaches. In addition, we use high time resolution in vivo MRI to characterise cardiac defects in transgenic mice and assess novel therapies following myocardial infarction.
In Vivo Imaging of Endocrine Gene Expression in a Humanized Transgenic Rat Julian R.E. Davis, MD, PhD, University of Manchester
Timing of gene expression in living cells is more dynamic than previously thought, but little is known about how individual cells behave within intact tissue. Patterned expression of key genes may be important to allow endocrine tissues such as the pituitary to mount either acute or sustained responses to environmental challenges. We developed transgenic rat models to study dynamic transcriptional regulation of the human prolactin gene in vivo, using large BAC transgenes to include extensive regulatory elements that are not present in the rodent locus. Bioluminescence or fluorescence imaging was used to study the spatio-temporal patterns of expression of luciferase or EGFP reporter genes. The transgenic rat model allowed us to analyse the co-ordination of cellular response in cultures of dispersed cells or in intact tissues. Co-ordinated patterns of gene expression were lost when tissue was disrupted by enzymatic dispersion, implicating a role for tissue architecture in transcriptional timing. Gene expression was highly pulsatile in newly emerging lactotroph cells in late gestation, but this pattern became stabilised as adjacent lactotroph cells formed a network of contiguous cells post-natally. Unlike the rodent family of prolactin gene paralogues, the single human gene locus displays alternative promoter control of extra-pituitary expression in immune tissues, which makes 'humanized' models valuable for studying its physiological regulation. Whole body in vivo imaging of transgenic animals revealed dramatic extra-pituitary expression of the transgene in response to inflammatory stress due to alternative promoter activation, indicating a novel endocrine system in inflammatory response. Coauthors: Sabrina Semprini2, Claire Harper1, Karen Featherstone1, Anne McNamara1, David Spiller1, John Mullins2, and Michael White1 1. University of Manchester. 2. University of Edinburgh.
In Vivo Imaging Reveals Effects of Fat Distribution on Metabolic Risk and Biomarkers in Obesity and Diabetes and their Response to Therapy Jimmy D. Bell, PhD, Imperial College London
Increased body adiposity is associated with a number of chronic conditions, including insulin resistance, type II diabetes and some forms of cancer. However, the molecular link between body adiposity and the development of these conditions has not yet been fully elucidated, although central obesity has been identified as a key contributory factor. Indeed, it is now becoming clear that it is not only the total body adiposity but also its distribution that is important in the development of certain chronic conditions. Indeed, an increasing number of studies have shown associations of variants in various genes with measures of body fat distribution, such as abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat, WHR, waist circumference. More recently, GWAs analysis has identify an IRS1 associated allele with reduced subcutaneous adipose tissue but increase metabolic risk, confirming the importance of elucidating the environmental and genetic factors that determine fat distribution. Thus, confident understanding of the long-term health outcomes of differences in abdominal fat content and associated metabolic, inflammatory and endocrine markers should drive innovative translational approaches directed towards better maintenance of health and quality of life. In this presentation I will be discussing the role that preclinical models are playing in helping us to elucidating the gene-environment interactions that lead to the development of specific fat distribution patterns, sub phenotypes, and their link to life-threatening conditions.
Evaluation of Alternative Omic Approaches and Technologies Thomas Hartung, MD PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Pubic Health, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Baltimore, Maryland
Safety assessment of drugs and chemicals is largely based on 40 to 80 years old animal tests, which do not meet our needs for throughput, cost efficiency and predictivity of humans. The 2007 vision document of the NRC Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: a Vision and a Strategy has created an atmosphere of departure in toxicology to embrace novel concepts based on mechanism, the pathways of toxicity (PoT). Omics technologies represent the prime opportunity to identify PoT, ultimately to map the Human Toxome, the entirety of PoT. This requires novel concepts, how to identify, annotate, share and validate PoT. A pilot project "Mapping the Human Toxome by Systems Toxicology" is under way in the NIH Director's Transformative Research Projects Program, focusing on endocrine disruption. Similar parallel work addresses developmental neurotoxicity. These initiatives could be the start of a Human Toxicology Project, ultimately developing PoT-based assays for high-throughput testing. A critical element for such developments is objective quality control, both of current practices and the novel approaches. Traditional validation of alternative methods has limitations as to duration, costs and also to accommodate change since the traditional animal test usually serves as point of reference. The role model of evidence-based medicine has been proposed, creating an evidence-based toxicology (EBT). The EBT collaboration was formed in 2011 to shape such a process.
Relating Human and Animal Phenotypes through Computational Analysis of Large Data Sets Eric B. Fauman, PhD, Pfizer Worldwide Research
Over the past decade, thousands of mouse knock-outs and other genetic variants have been phenotypically characterized. At the same time, hundreds of human genome-wide association studies have linked thousands of genes to hundreds of human disease and other phenotypic endpoints. The Mouse Genome Database, the GWAS catalog and other sources have collected these experimental results in a format suitable for large-scale data mining and computational analysis. By statistically analyzing the genes identified in these different studies we can find the phenotypes which have the greatest interspecies consistency. When applied to complex human diseases such as schizophrenia or diabetes, this approach identifies the most statistically significant mouse phenotypes, which may represent the mouse equivalents of these human conditions.
Systems Approaches to Understanding Drug Action Ravi Iyengar, PhD, Department of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics and the Systems Biology Center – New York Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
Most drugs act by regulating the activity of molecular targets that are nodes within cellular regulatory networks. Both the therapeutic and adverse effects of drugs arise from the propagation of effects from the molecular targets to cellular and tissue/organ level physiological functions. Understanding and predicting the balance between therapeutic potential and adverse event risk requires us to consider how the targets for current and potential drugs function in the context of the cellular regulatory networks that are part of the mammalian interactome. This understanding can be achieved through utilizing network algorithms like mean first passage time (MFPT) that measures the functional distance between nodes within a network and allows for inferences regarding modularity within networks. Such analyses allow us to develop predictions for new drug targets when the key molecular components of the pathophysiology of interest are known. This type of network analyses can also be used to predict the risk of adverse events on the basis of drug interactions with its targets and the proteins that in turn interact with these targets to form functional neighborhoods within the interactome. Results of our analysis and predictions will be presented. These studies show that the mammalian interactome, anchored in the genome may allow us to develop predictions of genomic characteristics for drug efficacy and adverse event potential.
Cardiac Applications of the Systems Biology Approach Peter Kohl, MD, PhD, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford
The 'systems approach' consciously combines reduction and integration to explore how behavior of an entity, such as the heart, arises from the mutual interactions of its parts. This builds on iteration between 'wet' experimental research for data input and hypothesis validation, and 'dry' computational studies for quantitative integration and prediction. Over the past half-century, biophysically-based cardiac modeling has developed from single-cell action potential simulation to histo-anatomically detailed representations of the whole organ. This talk will first introduce the authors' understanding of key definitions (such as system and model), highlight the utility and limitations of their application to cardiac model development, illustrate on specific examples how 'wet' and 'dry' modeling may advance insight into cardiac structure-function relations, and finish by a 'praise of failure' in basic bio-medical research as a means of improving translation into clinical studies and application development. Specific applications to drug development and toxicity assessment will be addressed in the subsequent talk by Gary Mirams and Denis Noble. Further reading: (i) Kohl P et al. Systems biology: an approach. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2010/88:25-33 (ii) Rodriguez B et al. Cardiac applications of the systems biology approach to drug development. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2010/88:130-134. Coauthor: Denis Noble, Department of Computer Science and Department of Physiology Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford.
Novel Approaches to Assessing Cardiac Safety — in silico Cardiac Modeling to Predict the Proarrhythmic Safety of Drugs Gary R. Mirams, PhD, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford
In silico modeling has begun to be utilized in industry for cardiac safety testing. In this talk we discuss tools used currently, and highlight some of the novel techniques developed by the Virtual Physiological Human preDiCT project and Network of Excellence. A method for predicting Torsade-de-Pointes (TdP) risk from early multiple ion-channel screening data has been developed, and applied to drugs associated with varied risks of TdP. To integrate the information on multi-channel block, simulations were performed with a human ventricular cardiac electrophysiology cell model. Simulation of action potential duration prolongation, at therapeutic concentrations, was found to provide improved prediction of the TdP risk associated with a compound, beyond that provided by screening hERG alone. In other work, our advances in computational techniques mean that close-to-real-time simulations for whole-organ models of cardiac electrical activity have been made possible. We demonstrate how multi-scale simulations may now be used to predict drug-induced changes on levels from ion currents to the human body-surface ECG. Further reading: Mirams et al. Cardiovascular Research, 2011, 91(1):53-61. Coauthor: Denis Noble, Department of Computer Science and Department of Physiology Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Session VII: Emerging Pre-Clinical Models of Disease
Workshop 6: Emerging Non-Rodent Models of Disease
Understanding the Predictivity of a Zebrafish Developmental Toxicity Assay Donald B. Stedman, Pfizer Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut
Currently, embryofetal developmental hazard assessment of drugs/chemicals for humans is based on in vivo studies, usually rat and rabbits. It has been estimated that < 4000 of the 60,000 to 90,000 commercial chemicals have been tested for their potential developmental toxicity. Doing so would require an unacceptably large number of animals. Additionally, risk assessors are considering adding in vitro data to the current risk assessment paradigm and the zebrafish embryo has the potential to become an important in vitro model for this use. In addition to the well-known advantages of the Zebrafish, we must include that it is an intact organism, a genetically-formed structure whose induced malformations can be characterized. We are evaluating a 120 hpf zebrafish embryo bioassay model with known positive and negative teratogens across wide range of physico-chemical properties. Zebrafish embryos, chorions intact, are exposed to test compounds continually starting at 6 hpf. After 5 days all embryos are assessed for dysmorphologies of heart, otic, tail, eye, fin, head morphology, viability, heart rate, liver, yolk and altered hatching). We compare the Zebrafish results to the existing data from laboratory animals and other in vitro models. Using two current Zebrafish ratio models, (LC50/EC50 and IC25/NOEAL) our data preliminarily support the use of Zebrafish embryos as an alternative model for predicting developmental toxicity, but there is plenty of room for improvement. This need was the driving force behind the formation of a 6 member consortium that has been established to further this work.
Modeling Neuroendocrine Control Systems Governing Reproduction in Non-Human Primates Tony M. Plant, PhD, University of Pittsburgh and Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh
The laboratory rat is generally the model most frequently used to examine actions on the reproductive system of chemicals that gain access to the environment as a result of human commercial and agricultural activity. Marked species differences exist in many of the control systems governing reproductive processes, and it is therefore relevant to examine the extent to which results obtained with rodent models may be translated to man. For the purpose of this presentation, the comparative aspects of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying ovulation will be examined. Ovulation is a discrete and robust event that is triggered during the middle of the ovarian cycle and one that has provided a quantifiable index with which to gauge the impact of environmental contaminants on reproduction. In the rat, ovulation depends on two modes of secretion of the hypothalamic releasing hormone, GnRH: namely, pulsatile and surge release, which are controlled respectively by a GnRH pulse generator in the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) and a GnRH surge generator resident in more rostral areas of the hypothalamus. Findings obtained with monkeys, together with limited studies of women, have resulted in a model for human ovulation that is confined to the MBH with the GnRH pulse generator as the critical component. To date, however, studies addressing neurotoxicological effects of various agents on ovulation have focused on surge generation. Based on the primate model, it is suggested that greater emphasis should be placed on the GnRH pulse generator, which also drives folliculogenesis and maintains the corpus luteum.
Workshop 7: Emerging Use of Stem Cells as Disease Models and Therapeutic Agents
Use of Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Model Neural Development and Treatment of Rett Syndrome Alysson R. Muotri, PhD, University of California San Diego
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are complex neurodevelopmental diseases in which different combinations of genetic mutations may contribute to the phenotype. Using Rett syndrome (RTT) as an ASD genetic model, we developed a culture system by deriving induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from RTT patients' fibroblasts. RTT patients' iPSCs are able to undergo X-inactivation and generate functional neurons. Glutamatergic neurons derived from RTT-iPSCs had significantly fewer synapses compared to controls. We also revealed reduced spine density, compact soma size, altered calcium signaling and electrophysiological defects in RTT neuronal cultures. Our data uncover early alterations in developing human RTT neurons. Finally, we used RTT neurons to validate the effects of drugs in rescuing synaptic defects. Our data provide evidence of an unexplored developmental window in RTT syndrome where potential therapies could be successfully employed. Our model recapitulates early stages of a human neurodevelopmental disease and represents a promising cellular tool for drug screening, diagnosis and personalized treatment.
Gene Expression Analysis of Prader-Willi Syndrome Neurons Derived From Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Marc Lalande, PhD, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, Farmington
Our goal is to create an in vitro model of Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) using induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology. Individuals affected with PWS suffer neonatal hypotonia and failure-to-thrive, followed by hyperphagia/obesity; small stature, hands, and feet; mild to moderate cognitive deficit; and behavioral problems. About 70% of all PWS cases result from deletion of chromosome 15q11-13, a region that is subject to genomic imprinting. We have generated iPSCs and derived neurons from PWS and control individuals to test the hypothesis that deletion of the paternal chromosome 15q11-q13 leads to abnormal expression of genes outside this chromosomal region. For this, we are performing next-generation sequencing (RNA-seq) of neurons derived from PWS and normal iPSCs. We are validating the PWS-specific transcriptional changes by qRT-PCR in iPSC-derived neurons as well as in patient and normal brain samples. We are also analyzing the RNA-seq data to determine whether abnormal RNA splicing contributes to the PWS phenotype via the loss of non-coding RNAs in the PWS 15q11-q13 deletion region. We believe that the identification of novel molecular abnormalities associated with PWS, as proposed here, is a necessary step to better understand the PWS disease mechanism and sets the stage for the development of therapeutic strategies. Coauthors: Stormy J Chamberlain, Pin-Fang Chen, Heather Glatt-Deeley, Brenton Graveley, Nicole Kummer, Kristen Martins-Taylor, Christelle Remus, and Alissa Resch, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, Farmington.
Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes and Their Use in Cardiac Repair, Tissue Engineering, and Drug Discovery Sian Harding, PhD, Imperial College London
Human embryonic stem cells (hESC) are presently the stem cell type with the greatest proven capacity for producing phenotypically authentic cardiomyocytes, and are therefore of great interest in terms of cardiac repair, or as a model system for cardiac physiology and pathophysiology. Based on their gene expression patterns, electrophysiological, morphological and contractile properties, the majority of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CM) initially resemble human immature cardiomyocytes, but have the capacity to mature in a number of respects. We have investigated both acute and long-term responses in hESC-CM and iPSC-CM, in comparison to adult human ventricular myocytes. Matching of excitation-contraction coupling between hESC-CM and adult myocytes is of particular concern with respect to the development of arrhythmias. Transition from the immature to mature cardiac phenotype was characterised by increasing dependence on intracellular calcium and development of a full suite of ion channels. Tissue engineered constructs allow loading of muscle and can accelerate this process. Over the longer term, hESC-CM retained their capacity for increase in size although proliferative activity decreased. Hypertrophic, apoptotic and inflammatory responses (important for modelling of drug toxicity) were well developed even in early hESC-CM, but innate immune signalling through key Toll receptors was undeveloped even after 4 months of differentiation. Overall, maturation is a multifaceted process, and matching of hESC-CM to the adult phenotype requires consideration of many aspects of long and short-term cellular regulation. These findings have implications for use of hESC-CM as a high-fidelity model system. Coauthors: Nadire Ali, Gabor Foldes, and Maxime Mioulane, Imperial College London.
Workshop 8: Cell and Organ Replacement in Humanized Animal Models of Disease
Humanized Mice in Translational Biomedical Research Leonard D. Shultz, PhD, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine
The study of human biology in vivo is severely limited by ethical and technical constraints. There is a growing need for animal models to carry out in vivo studies on human cells, tissues, and organs without putting individuals at risk. Humanized mice or mouse–human chimeras overcome these limitations. We have developed the NOD/SCID mouse strain harboring a null mutation of the IL2 cytokine receptor common g chain and have shown that these mice, referred to as NOD/SCID/Gamma (NSG) mice can efficiently support development of functional lymphoid and myeloid cells following human hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) engraftment. Our research has focused on mouse models for translational studies of human hematopoiesis, immunity, infectious diseases, cancer, transplantation tolerance, regenerative medicine, diabetes, muscular dystrophy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Development of NSG mice that are 'humanized' by engraftment of human HSCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and human tissues has provided an opportunity to study human biological processes in vivo that would otherwise not be possible. Our new generations of humanized mice expressing human HLA, cytokine, and other transgenes and carrying additional targeted mutations that further depress host innate immunity are powerful tools in the investigation of many human biological processes and diseases. Coauthors: Michael A. Brehm1, Fumihiko Ishikawa2, and Dale L. Greiner1. 1. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. 2. Riken Research Center for Allergy and Immunology, Yokohama, Japan.
Engraftment of Humanized Mice for the Study of Type 1 Diabetes Dale L. Greiner, PhD, University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester
Our understanding of type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been advanced greatly by studies carried out using mice and rats. However, rodents are not humans and progress in the understanding of the pathogenesis of T1D in humans has been impeded by the a lack of assays that permit the in vivo analysis of diabetogenic human T cell populations without putting individuals at risk. The availability of spleen and peripheral blood samples from T1D and islet autoantibody-positive donors provides an opportunity to analyze the diabetogenic function of these cell populations following engraftment in newly developed immunodeficient mouse models. These model systems are based on our recently developed NOD-scid IL2rgnull (NSG) HLA-transgenic humanized mice that have been optimized for human hematolymphoid engraftment and support high levels of engraftment with mature human lymphoid cells. These NSG mice that express HLA class I and II antigens are critical tools for investigation of the in vivo diabetogenic function of splenocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from T1D and autoantibody-positive donors. In addition, these mice are being used to investigate the in vivo function of human diabetogenic T cell lines and clones. The investigation of human diabetogenic cells in immunodeficient mice should permit increased understanding of the pathogenesis of T1D and the development of new approaches for preventing or curing the disease. Coauthors: Michael A. Brehm1, Sally C. Kent1, and Leonard D. Shultz2. 1. University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester. 2. The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
A Comparison of Genetic Modification and Transplantation Approaches to Study Hepatitis C in Humanized Mouse Models Alexander Ploss, PhD, Rockefeller University
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a major medical problem. Antiviral treatment is only partially effective and a vaccine does not exist. Development of more effective therapies has been hampered by the lack of a suitable small animal model. Here, I will discuss three independent but possibly complementary approaches to overcome current species barriers and generate a small animal model for HCV pathogenesis: 1. Adaptation of HCV genomes to infect hepatocytes of non-human primates, with the long-term goal of a simian tropic HCV strain (stHCV). 2. Humanization of the mouse liver and immune system by transplanting human hematopoietic stem cells or hepatocytes into a single murine recipient, thus allowing studies of pathology, immune correlates, and mechanisms of HCV persistence. 3. Genetic host adaptation to create an inbred murine model for HCV, based on our recent determination of the minimal set of human factors required for HCV entry and our ongoing efforts to identify and overcome additional species restrictions. Such small animal models open unprecedented opportunities for studying viral pathogenesis and immunity and comprising an effective platform for testing HCV therapeutics in vivo.
Travel & Lodging
Our Location
The New York Academy of Sciences
7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street, 40th floor New York, NY 10007-2157 212.298.8600
Directions to the Academy
Hotels Near 7 World Trade Center
Recommended partner hotel
Club Quarters, World Trade Center 140 Washington Street New York, NY 10006 Phone: 212.577.1133
The New York Academy of Sciences is a member of the Club Quarters network, which offers significant savings on hotel reservations to member organizations. Located opposite Memorial Plaza on the south side of the World Trade Center, Club Quarters, World Trade Center is just a short walk to the Academy.
Use Club Quarters Reservation Password NYAS to reserve your discounted accommodations online.
Other nearby hotels
Special Needs and Additional Information
For any additional information and for special needs, including child/family care resources available to conference attendees, please e-mail dvollmer@nyas.org or call Deanna Vollmer at 212.298.8611.
|
|