Skip to main content

New Developments in Pain Research

Overview

Can we stop the pain? It may be the oldest question in medicine, and it remains one of the most important. But with chronic pain afflicting billions of people worldwide, and few effective treatments besides highly addictive opioids, researchers are still searching for better answers.

On May 3-4, the New York Academy of Sciences, in collaboration with Science Translational Medicine, convened the Advances in Pain conference. Across the meeting’s two keynote presentations, nine sessions of talks, and concluding panel discussion, leading experts in many branches of pain research discussed the field’s biggest challenges and latest developments.

Highlights

  • Specific ion channels on neurons, such as Nav1.7, are critical components of pain sensing and potential drug targets for new analgesics.
  • Several novel laboratory models are revealing new details of nociception, or pain sensing.
  • Large databases of genetic and clinical records are helping researchers link specific genes with common pain conditions.
  • Neuroimaging and sleep studies may offer objective ways to measure the severity of chronic pain.
  • New mechanistic data are pointing researchers toward novel strategies for analgesic drug development.
  • A subset of gut epithelial cells is critical for sensing visceral pain.
  • The immune system links tightly to pain sensation, through multiple mechanisms scientists are now beginning to uncover.
  • Data mining reveals subsets of neurons with distinct responses to nerve injury, including chronic pain.
  • Understanding sex and ethnic differences in pain perception requires new strategies in experimental design and data analysis.
  • Besides neurons, Schwann cells can also carry pain signals.
  • Novel drug discovery platforms and trial designs can accelerate the development of new analgesics.

Part 1

Speakers

David Bennett, MB, PhD
Oxford University, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences

Sarah E. Ross, PhD
University of Pittsburgh

Jing Wang, MD, PhD
NYU Langone Health

Tuning into the pain channel

A life free of pain may sound ideal, but as David Bennett explained in the meeting’s opening keynote presentation, individuals with defects in pain sensing often suffer tremendous difficulties. Describing one 26-year-old man with such a condition, Bennett explained that “he had pretty much fractured every long bone in his body, he is stunted because he’s destroyed all the growth plates … and had severe burns and mouth injuries.” The patient’s sister, who had the same condition, died of undiagnosed sepsis.

Genetic analysis revealed that the patient had a rare set of loss-of-function mutations in the gene for Nav1.7, a sodium ion channel expressed in nociceptors, or pain sensing neurons. Using a sophisticated cell culture system that mimics pain signaling through nociceptors, Bennett and his colleagues have characterized Nav1.7 in detail, and determined that it acts early in the pain signaling process, amplifying the electrical signal in the nociceptors to ensure that it’s relayed to the central nervous system.

Patients with gain-of-function mutations that make Nav1.7 overactive have the opposite problem: incurable chronic pain. Bennett’s team studied the Nav1.7 mutations in these patients, and discovered that the degree of the biochemical defect in a patient’s channel proteins correlates directly with the time of onset of their pain condition.

Based on his findings in patients with these rare, extreme pain disorders, Bennett hypothesized that Nav1.7 could also drive more common conditions. As rates of diabetes skyrocket globally, millions of people are developing diabetic neuropathy, which causes chronic pain only in a subset of patients. In an effort to determine what distinguishes painful from pain-free diabetic neuropathy, Bennett’s team looked at Nav1.7 gene sequences for patients with the condition.

“The rare variants in Nav1.7 seemed to cluster much more in the painful versus the painless diabetic neuropathy groups, so this is now acting as a risk factor, in the sense that these people did not experience [chronic] pain prior to developing diabetes,” Bennett says.

Some variants of Nav1.7 apparently predispose people to develop chronic pain, but the condition doesn’t manifest itself until a second event, such as diabetes, triggers it. A closer look at clinical testing results in these patients revealed that those with the rare variants were also more sensitive to certain stimuli, such as burning pain and pressure pain.

Nav1.7 isn’t the only ion channel involved in pain, though. The researchers have also identified strong associations between pain disorders and mutations in the related channel proteins Nav1.8 and Nav1.9, highlighting the diversity of channelopathies that can derail pain sensing. Indeed, an analysis of data from the UK Biobank, which has whole genome sequences and medical records for 100,000 Britons, revealed that voltage-gated sodium channels were the largest group of variants associated with neuropathic pain.

Based on his findings, Bennett advocates using both clinical testing data and gene sequencing to stratify patients according to which treatments are most likely to work for them. In particular, sodium channel blocking drugs appear to work much better in patients with variant channels predisposing them to pain.

Where does it hurt?

The meeting’s first regular session focused on efforts to dissect the central pain circuits in the nervous system. For Sarah Ross, the dissection is literal: she carefully removes a piece of a mouse spinal cord, along with the sensory nerves connected to a patch of skin from the animal’s hind paw, keeping all of the neuronal connections intact. Using luminescent probes, her team can then watch the activation of specific neurons in response to stimuli.

“We can see some neurons respond to heat, other neurons will respond to cool, other neurons will respond to mechanical stimuli,” said Ross.

Many neurons also respond to multiple stimuli, and mapping these responses reveals that distinct classes of neurons function as amplifiers, tuners, and integrators of pain signals.

Jing Wang studies what happens to pain signals in the cerebral cortex of the brain. Using optogenetics, which allows him to stimulate specific neurons in the brains of mice with light, he has identified subsets of neurons in the anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex that respond to pain.

In mice with experimentally induced chronic pain, low-intensity stimulation of the prefrontal cortex restores normal pain control. Wang’s lab is now studying ways to achieve similar responses with less invasive methods, including the drug ketamine and brain-machine interfaces.

“The cortex processes and regulates pain, but its normal endogenous function can be impaired by chronic pain, and [restoring cortical regulation] has the potential to transform pain treatment,” said Wang.

Part 2

Speakers

Aarno Palotie, MD, PhD
Institute for Molecular Medicine, Finland

Luda Diatchenko, MD, PhD
McGill University

Irene Tracey, MA (Oxon), DPhil, FRCA, FMedSci
University of Oxford

Alban Latremoliere, MSc, PhD
Johns Hopkins University

The pains of the father

Aarno Palotie began the meeting’s session on the genetics of pain by discussing his results from large-scale studies on migraine. With the exception of some rare, strictly inherited forms of the condition, these sporadic, debilitating headaches usually stem from variations in numerous common genes. To identify those genes, Palotie and a large team of collaborators scrutinized genetic and medical data from hundreds of thousands of migraine sufferers.

The effort revealed over 100 gene loci linked to migraine, mostly in regulatory regions associated with genes expressed in cardiovascular tissue and the central nervous system. Tracking those variants in another large data set revealed a cumulative effect.

“We can see that those with a high polygenic risk score, meaning a high load of common variants, they seem to have an earlier onset of migraine,” said Palotie.

Using data from the 500,000 participants in the UK Biobank, Luda Diatchenko and her colleagues have performed a similar analysis to identify genetic variants linked to chronic pain. The investigators subdivided chronic pain patients based on the type of pain they experienced, such as back pain, hip pain, knee pain, and multi-site pain.

Analyzing gene sequences for these sub-groups showed that multi-site pain had the highest correlation with specific gene variants. The gene most strongly linked to multi-site pain encodes a receptor protein involved in guiding nerve axons in development.

“This is one example of how [genome-wide association studies] can show us a new mechanism which contributes to human chronic pain conditions,” said Diatchenko.

On a scale of one to ten

The meeting’s third session focused on one of the biggest challenges in studying pain: measuring it. Clinical studies attempt to quantify pain severity with patient questionnaires, while animal experiments rely on behavioral responses, but both methods are notoriously unreliable.

Ilene Tracey hopes to solve that problem with neuroimaging, linking specific patterns of neuronal activation to painful stimuli.

“We’ve got now quite a good array of tools that are reasonably well developed and robust, that allow you to look at … ways that patients will experience their pain,” said Tracey.

By combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with electroencephalography, video analysis, and other sensing methods, this approach could allow researchers to quantify patient responses to pain treatment more reliably than current, fundamentally qualitative methods. Using machine learning, Tracey’s team can now measure pain and also distinguish different categories of it, such as physical versus emotional pain.

Sleep disturbances might also provide a pain gauge.

“The vast majority of patients with chronic pain suffer from poor sleep quality,” said Alban Latremoliere, who has been studying this connection as a potential pain biomarker.

By tracking electroencephalography and other measurements in sleeping mice, he and his colleagues have found that nerve injury, which causes chronic neuropathic pain, also changes the animals’ sleep architecture. Compared to uninjured animals, those with injured nerves suffer multiple brief interruptions in the non-REM phase of their sleep. When the injury heals, the normal sleep architecture returns; Latremoliere now hopes to use these patterns to quantify neuropathic pain severity and treatment efficacy in humans.

Part 3

Speakers

Greg Scherrer, PhD
University of North Carolina

Venetia Zachariou, PhD, MBBS, MMed, MS
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Rajesh Khanna, PhD
New York University

David J. Julius, PhD
University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)

The hurt blocker

As Greg Scherrer pointed out in the meeting’s fourth session, the real problem with pain isn’t that it exists, but that it’s unpleasant.

“If we were to understand how our brain collects this information from sensory neurons and the spinal cord to make pain unpleasant … maybe we’ll discover new ways to treat pain,” said Scherrer.

Indeed, a patient whose basolateral amygdala was removed to treat epilepsy could still sense painful stimuli, but didn’t label them as painful; the unpleasantness was gone. Examining mice with various alterations to the same brain region, Scherrer and his colleagues believe they have identified the amygdala cells responsible for connecting pain to unpleasantness. The investigators are now trying to identify receptors on those cells that would be good drug targets for new pain treatments.

Venetia Zachariou is also dissecting cellular signaling pathways to target in pain treatment, and her lab has uncovered several promising leads in recent years. When the COVID-19 pandemic derailed that work, though, the scientists quickly pivoted to apply their skills and techniques to study the new disease’s neuronal pathogenesis.

In a hamster model, they found that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can acutely infect nerves in the dorsal root ganglia, which are also involved in pain sensing. Looking more closely at both the hamster model and a mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, Zachariou has identified distinct changes in neurons’ gene expression patterns after virus infection, including a signature similar to that seen in models of neuropathic pain.

One of the most popular targets for researchers trying to develop new pain therapies is the sodium channel Nav1.7, a “pain amplifier” that several speakers at the meeting discussed. Rajesh Khanna is also interested in Nav1.7, but instead of targeting the protein directly, his team is trying to identify proteins that interact with it. That work led them to focus on collapsin response mediator protein 2 (Crmp2), which regulates Nav1.7 signaling.

Mice lacking Crmp2 are resistant to chronic pain, suggesting that drugs inhibiting its action would be good pain therapy candidates. After conducting extensive mechanistic studies, Khanna started a company to identify such inhibitors. So far, the company has optimized a lead compound that appears to stop chronic pain in animal models, without causing detectable side effects or tolerance.

You feel it in your gut

The meeting’s first day concluded with a keynote presentation by David Julius, who discussed his work on chronic visceral pain. This subtype of chronic pain, which can be caused by gut infection or non-infectious conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, affects about 15% of the population. It’s three times more common in women than men, but nobody knows why.

“We’re interested in a particular aspect of visceral pain signaling, and that involves the interaction of sensory nerve fibers with the gut epithelium,” said Julius.

A subset of gut epithelial cells, called enterochromaffin cells, plays an outsize role in that interaction. Comprising only a fraction of a percentage of all gut epithelial cells, enterochromaffin cells make about 90% of the body’s serotonin, a potent neurotransmitter protein. They also fire electrical signals that could propagate to nearby neurons.

Julius wanted to analyze that process in live mice, but wasn’t happy with the standard mouse system for those types of experiments. That model involves putting irritants into a mouse’s gut to trigger a major inflammatory response, after which the animal remains hypersensitive to physical stimuli such as colon distention.

“Do we need to … put the mouse through all that, or can you have a model that’s simpler [and] does not require all the sequellae of an inflammatory episode?” asked Julius.

Instead, he and his colleagues first tried studying enterochromaffin cells in the context of cultured enteroids, pieces of intestinal epithelium that can mimic many aspects of gut biology in a petri dish. That system revealed that enterochromaffin cells respond to numerous compounds that fall into three general classes: ingested irritants, metabolites of common gut microbes, and endogenous regulatory hormones.

“So, we want to know how these cells integrate all this information, and what role this plays in maladaptive situations like [inflammatory bowel disease],” said Julius.

Based on those results, the researchers moved to a more complex system, an explanted piece of a mouse colon with its connecting nerves. Monitoring the electrical signals in the connected nerves reveals sensory signals from the explanted gut. In this setup, bathing the colon section with isovalerate, a bacterial metabolite that triggered a response from enterochromaffin cells in the enteroid experiment, makes it hypersensitive to subsequent physical or biochemical stimuli. This system also revealed different response patterns in guts from male and female mice.

Having demonstrated that isovalerate could induce gut hypersensitivity without the inflammatory response of harsher irritants, Julius’s team next tried looking at its effect in live mice. They used a small balloon in the colon, similar to an endoscope, as a stimulus, and monitored abdominal muscle contraction, a behavioral response to pain. Treating the mice with isovalerate increased the magnitude of subsequent pain responses potently in male mice, but less so in females, consistent with the explant results.

Subsequent experiments showed that enterochromaffin cells mediate these responses in live mice, apparently through both serotonin secretion and direct electrical signaling to neurons, and that these cells seem to respond differently in male and female mice.

Part 4

Speakers

Isaac Chiu, PhD
Harvard Medical School

Camila Svensson, MS, PhD
Karolinska Institutet

Alexander J. Davies, PhD
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences

Dana Orange, MD
Rockefeller University

Shrinivasan Raghuraman, PhD
University of Utah

Jeffrey S. Mogil, PhD
McGill University

Frank Porreca, PhD
University of Arizona

Roger Fillingim, PhD
University of Florida

Is antibody hurt?

Infections commonly cause pain, which researchers had long assumed was just a byproduct of the body’s inflammatory response. However, as Isaac Chiu explained in the meeting’s session on neuroimmune and autoimmune mechanisms in pain, infecting pathogens can also interact directly with nociceptors, or pain-sensing neurons. In one set of mouse experiments, for example, Chiu’s team found that nociceptors in the intestine can detect infection with Salmonella enterica, triggering a response that decreases the number of M cells, the specialized intestinal epithelial cells S. enterica preferentially infects.

“These neurons actually regulate cell numbers, [which] not only shuts down the number of gates for pathogen entry, it also helps a protective microbe … attach better on the surface of the epithelium,” said Chiu.

Camila Svensson discussed a pain condition that has baffled researchers and clinicians for decades: fibromyalgia. Characterized by pain hypersensitivity in soft tissues, sometimes coupled with neuropathic pain, the condition has long eluded efforts to uncover its etiology and underlying mechanisms.

After serendipitously discovering evidence for autoantibodies in fibromyalgia patients, Svensson has now developed human tissue and mouse models to characterize these antibodies in more detail. Transferring antibodies from fibromyalgia patients into mice causes pain hypersensitivity in the animals, and patients with higher levels of antibodies that react with human dorsal root ganglia cells have more severe disease.

“This suggests that there is an autoimmunity in subpopulations of fibromyalgia patients,” said Svensson, adding that besides suggesting a mechanism for the disease, autoantibody levels could help stratify patients in clinical trials.

The body’s own immune response is also a key contributor to chronic neuropathic pain, especially through neuroinflammation. Alexander Davies presented his work on another component of neuropathic pain: the cytotoxic cellular response.

Cytotoxic cells normally detect cancerous or virally-infected cells and target them for destruction, but they can also target injured neurons. Dissecting this response in an extensive series of experiments in mice, Davies and his colleagues have found that a specific receptor on cytotoxic cells allows them to target nociceptors after nerve injury, leading to degeneration of the damaged axons and resolution of pain hypersensitivity.

“So, our data suggest that intact sensory networks are a source of ongoing neuropathic hypersensitivity, and that by targeting those, we can help to resolve that,” said Davies.

Short, sharp shocks

Dana Orange gave the first of two short “data blitz” presentations, providing an overview of her group’s work on rheumatoid arthritis pain. Though inflammation of joints is a hallmark of this form of arthritis, Orange noticed an odd discrepancy.

“Patients who really don’t have a lot of inflammation were reporting a lot of pain,” she said.

Through a combination of human gene expression and mouse studies, she’s found that nerve development may play a bigger role than inflammation in driving rheumatoid arthritis pain.

Shrinivasan Raghuraman described his approach to characterizing chronic pain mechanisms, using a rat model. By collecting thousands of data points from individual rat neurons under different conditions, his lab has identified 19 different subsets of neurons with distinct responses to nerve injury. Raghuraman hopes that correlating the cells’ electrical responses with their gene transcription profiles will identify the underlying mechanisms driving chronic pain, and how different candidate drugs can influence it.

Sex and race

In the session on sex and ethnic differences in pain, Jeffrey Mogil began by pointing out a critical flaw in traditional pain research methods. Despite ample evidence that women experience more pain than men, “80 percent of preclinical studies use male rats or male mice only,” said Mogil.

That skew overlooks important differences in the biology of pain in males and females, though. In a mouse model of chronic neuropathic pain, for example, Mogil’s lab has linked chronic pain to premature shortening of chromosome ends, or telomeres – but only in male mice. Besides studying both sexes instead of just one, Mogil argued that researchers need to extend their animal studies to monitor chronic pain for longer time periods, to account for age-related phenomena such as telomere shortening.

Frank Porreca also looks at sex differences in pain, but focuses on the role of stress. Clinical data clearly show that stress exacerbates functional pain syndromes such as inflammatory bowel disease, migraine, and fibromyalgia, all of which are more prevalent in women than men.

To study such syndromes, Porreca’s team developed a mouse model in which they restrain the animals for a short time to induce stress, then treat them with a compound that causes headaches. These stress-primed mice develop allodynia, interpreting normally non-painful stimuli as painful, while controls that only got the headache-inducing compound didn’t.

While both male and female mice exhibited the same response, Porreca found that it operates through different biochemical mechanisms in the two sexes, underscoring the importance of studying both in preclinical research.

Unlike sex, race and ethnicity lack clear biological definitions.

“It’s important to keep in mind that race and ethnicity are not causal factors, but rather proxies for these many psychosocial and biopsychosocial factors, largely driven by systemic societal and environmental exposures,” said Roger Fillingim.

At the same time, the groups that suffer disproportionately from racial and ethnic health disparities are often the least-studied. That’s certainly the case in pain research and treatment. Indeed, experiments suggest that Black patients may experience more pain than white ones, but health data show they’re less likely to be treated for pain in hospitals and clinics.

Summarizing a large body of additional evidence for similar skews in various minoritized groups, Fillingim advocated more holistic approaches to pain research across and within sub-populations.

Part 5

Speakers

Alexander Chesler, PhD
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), NIH

Patrik Ernfors, PhD
Karolinska Institutet

Clifford Woolf, MD, PhD
Harvard Medical School

Bryan Roth, MD, PhD
University of North Carolina

Kelly Knopp, PhD
Eli Lilly

Get the sensation

The meeting’s penultimate session focused on how sensory signals such as pain propagate toward the central nervous system. Alexander Chesler started the session with a discussion of his work on peripheral sensory neurons.

To study these cells, Chesler and his colleagues initially developed an elegant system that allowed them to probe the responses of individual mouse cells in the trigenimal ganglion, a nerve cluster that receives sensory signals. That revealed a specific subset of neurons that responded only to a painful stimulus, while other subsets responded to gentle touches. By extending the system with gene expression profiling, and correlating responses in the mouse with those in a human patient who lacks a receptor critical for mechanical sensation, the scientists are now tracing pain-sensing pathways in unprecedented detail.

Neurons aren’t the only cells carrying pain signals, though, as Patrik Ernfors has discovered. In tracing sensory circuits, he and his colleagues discovered that Schwann cells, support cells closely associated with peripheral neurons, are also stem cells that form a sensory organ under the skin.

Using genetically modified mouse models that allowed them to selectively activate these Schwann cells, Ernfors and his colleagues discovered that both the Schwann cells and their associated neurons can initiate acute pain sensations. Further work revealed that the Schwann cells also appear to become sensitized during the development of arthritis.

“We believe that we have found the mechanosensory skin organ that is associated with [mechanical pain sensation],” said Ernfors, adding that these cells could contribute to allodynia in arthritis.

Something for the pain

Clifford Woolf began the meeting’s final session, on finding new ways to treat pain, with a summary of his team’s novel approach to drug discovery. Currently, most pharmaceutical companies focus on finding compounds that can target specific cellular molecules known to be involved in pain, then trying to develop them into drugs.

In 2010, Woolf advocated an alternative strategy, screening drugs to find those that inhibit stem cell-derived pain-sensing neurons, without worrying about their mechanisms of action.

“However, the question was how to execute on this,” he said.

After extensive effort, his team can now derive the correct neuron types from patients’ cells. Screening libraries of compounds against these cells has yielded several promising hits, which inhibit pain signaling in nociceptors without affecting other cell types.

Others hope to broaden the scope of target-based drug screening, which has focused on a large and diverse class of cell surface proteins called G-protein coupled receptors, or GPCRs.

“But … when we mapped the drugs onto the phylogeny of all the [GPCRs] in the genome, only a few targets actually came out as being targets of approved drugs,” said Bryan Roth, adding that “there are many, many other potential targets for treating pain and other serious conditions.”

To test those targets, Roth’s team developed an assay that allows them to test drugs against a library encompassing 90% of GPCRs encoded in the human genome. That has revealed several new targets, which the researchers are now testing with more specific screens, ultimately hoping to develop safer opioids.

Kelly Knopp began the meeting’s final talk with the grim statistics of chronic pain: affecting about one fourth of the global population, the direct and indirect costs of this condition add up to more than a trillion dollars.

“[Meanwhile,] the probability of technical success for pain [drugs] is worse than any other therapeutic area,” said Knopp.

To address that, she and her colleagues have focused on establishing standardized protocols for phase 2 proof-of-concept trials of pain treatments. Their approach uses sophisticated statistical techniques and uniform trial designs to enable testing of many more drug candidates, without exceeding available funding and medical trial capacity.

After the presentations, a panel of speakers from the meeting discussed several of the field’s biggest challenges. Chief among them are the immense burden of opioid addiction, and the difficulty of shifting real-world clinical treatment toward less addictive but possibly less effective therapies for chronic pain. Despite the difficulties, many researchers in the field remain optimistic.

As Ilene Tracey said in her presentation, “We’re often quite doom and gloom in the pain field, [but] we’ve actually got a lot of different tools at our disposal, [and] we should be more confident about where the field has got to and where it can go quite rapidly.”

From the Frontlines of Pandemic Research

Omicron, Mandates, Prevention, and a Pancoronavirus Vaccine: Leading scientists and public health experts share stories of their work amid global questions about the Omicron COVID-19 variant.

Published December 17, 2021

By Roger Torda

Discovery; The Story from Southern Africa

The discovery of the Omicron variant in Southern Africa started with what experts call a “spike gene dropout.”

“It was identified by colleagues in Botswana and by our sequencers in South Africa,” explained Penny Moore, PhD. “We’d just been through a third wave in South Africa that was driven by the Delta variant. And what happened was a local diagnostic laboratory…started noticing an uptick in infections, and associated with that, they noticed that the diagnostic test that we routinely use was not performing optimally.”

Moore, a virologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, described the fast-moving sequence of events during a webinar hosted by The New York Academy of Sciences (the Academy) on December 14. She explained that the PCR diagnostic test looked for four genetic markers typically found on the COVID-19 coronavirus. The tests in early November showed a reduced sensitivity; they were not detecting one of the targets. “That’s something we’d previously seen, with the Alpha variant in the UK,” Moore continued. “It’s called a spike gene drop out, or spike gene target failure.” It was a red flag.

“So that’s what led us in South Africa to start sequencing very deeply,” Moore explained. “We have a really excellent, next-generation genomics consortium here in South Africa, and they moved very rapidly to target those specific diagnostic samples that were behaving differently in the diagnostic tests. And that…showed us that we were dealing with a variant that had many, many more mutations that we were used to seeing in Delta.”

“Deluged in Data”

Moore, and her colleagues, soon were “being deluged in data” as they tried to answer questions from around the world about Omicron’s properties, including transmission rates, efficacy of vaccines, and whether the new strain causes more or less severe disease than others. As Moore earlier told Nature, “We’re flying at warp speed.”

Moore was one of four prominent scientists and public health officials participating in the webinar, What You Need to Know About Omicron and Future Coronavirus Variants. The others were: Rick Bright, PhD, who heads the Rockefeller Foundation’s Pandemic Prevention Institute; Dave A. Chokshi, MD, MSc, the Commissioner of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; and Drew Weissman, MD, PhD, a pioneer in mRNA vaccine research at the University of Pennsylvania. The program was moderated by the Academy’s Melanie Brickman Borchard, PhD, MSc.

Moore’s work, and that of her colleagues, has drawn praise from around the world. “Timing and speed is absolutely essential for getting in front of an outbreak and for saving lives,” Bright told the panelists. “And I believe the world owes a debt of gratitude to the researchers in Southern Africa for immediately sharing this virus sequence with the global GISAID community, and for rapidly notifying their government and the word of this variant.” (GISAID is a global initiative that promotes the rapid sharing of genetic sequence and epidemiological data associated with human viruses.)

New York City; Fighting Back with Multiple Responses, Exactly One Year Later

“I want to start by just recognizing that we are on, precisely, the one year anniversary of our vaccination campaign,” said Chokshi. “It was December 14 of last year when the first person in the United States, Sandra Lindsay, a nurse in Queens, was vaccinated.” The day of the webinar also marked an escalation in New York City’s measures to tamp down the pandemic. It was the first day of a vaccine mandate for children aged 5 to 11 who engage in indoor public activities.

“For New York City, we have about 160,000 children, five to 11, who are vaccinated with at least one dose so far,” Chokshi reported. “It’s a great start, but it’s only about a quarter of the total population.” He stressed that mask and vaccine mandates are only some of the tools at the city’s disposal: “We’re partnering with over 1,500 pediatrician offices. We’ve launched a school based vaccination clinic where we visited every single school that had children in that age range. And we have mobile vaccination units that are providing vaccination across the city.”

Yearning for Social Connection

Chokshi said the city would be working hard to support pediatric vaccination in the new year, including the vaccination of younger children, which he said he hoped would be approved in the first quarter. He also said that as a public health official and the father of a two-and-a-half year old daughter, he is closely following an early report out of South Africa of an increase in very young children hospitalized with COVID-19 infections.

While the Delta variant continues to circulate, and community spread of Omicron has begun in New York, Chokshi said he and his colleagues must address very human needs, as well as science.

“You know, as we are entering the holidays, people are yearning of the social connection that the holidays bring, particularly given the trials and tribulations that we’ve all been through over the past, almost two years,” Chokshi said. “And, I think as public health professionals, we have to recognize, that that is where our fellow New Yorkers, our fellow human beings, are. And so my job, and our job, is to provide the guidance and the tools to be able to facilitate people celebrating as safely as they possibly can.”

A Pancoronavirus Vaccine

Weissman, a pioneer in the development of a core technology that makes the mRNA vaccines possible, shared some background and a status report on his current efforts to create what he calls a “pancoronavirus variant vaccine”. “If you look at coronaviruses, there have been three epidemics in the past 20 years, Weissman said. “That tells us there will be more. And we can do what we did for COVID-19, which is rush and make a vaccine. But it still shuts down the world for a year and a half.” Weissman’s research focuses on another approach, creating a vaccine that prevents transmission of all coronaviruses and their variants.

Weisman said his lab’s challenge is to identify “conserved regions” of genetic sequences shared by all coronaviruses, and to direct the immune response against those targets. In the lab, Weissman said his vaccine has been effective against “all of the current variants that have appeared, and will likely work against any variants that appear in the future.” Plans are underway to begin clinical trials within about a year.

Vaccine Hesitancy

Moore described mistrust of vaccines in many communities in South Africa, including among people who work in hospitals who have a very high rate of exposure to Sars-CoV-2. “I think the barriers are in many cases the same barriers that have been faced across the rest of the world,” she said.

“There is a huge feeling of fear and helplessness in many of those communities and a lot of suspicion around vaccination…[T]here’s much talk in South Africa about the speed at which these vaccines have been developed. It’s something that we, as scientists, need to address very urgently. We need to explain that it may look like these vaccines have been develop really quickly, but it’s not true. You know, this comes out of decades and decades [of research]”

Concurrent Clinical Trials

Weissman spoke to the same issue:

“I joke with people about this because had we taken two years or three years to develop the vaccine, they would’ve yelled at us that we were too slow. What people have to understand is that RNA vaccines have been studied for 25 years. They’ve been in clinical trials for almost 20 years. This is not brand new technology,” he said.

“The nucleoside modified mRNA LMPs [lipid mRNA particles] that we’ve developed, they’ve been in clinical trials for over five years before COVID 19 hit. So even this exact platform isn’t new technology. What people have to understand is that no corners were cut in its development. What happened is the researchers, the pharmaceutical companies, the FDA, all got together and said, ‘how can we do these studies as fast as possible?’”

The answer, Weissman said, was to conduct Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials concurrently, rather than serially, which would have taken several years. “So there were no corners cut,” Weissman added. “More people were studied for COVID 19 than just about any other vaccine. It was done quickly because we have an emergency.”

Testing, Testing, and Testing

Bright, who heads the Pandemic Prevention Institute at the Rockefeller Foundation, told the Academy audience that the emergency of Omicron could prompt necessary global, coordinated action—especially the expansion of testing—to control the pandemic.

“This virus has now taken hold of the human population,” Bright said, adding:

It is not going to go away on its own. We need to fight it with every tool that we have, vaccines, therapeutics, high quality masks, ventilation, air filtration, and implementing a robust testing strategy that can trigger effective contact tracing and rapid access to therapeutics. The question now for, for us, for me, is whether Omicron will remind the world of the urgency we face and drive us to real collaborative action.

The four experts all agreed a heightened focus on healthcare equity is necessary to control the pandemic. “Vaccine inequity is prolonging the COVID-19 pandemic and it’s jeopardizing all the progress that we’ve made to date,” Bright said, pointing out that people who are unvaccinated remain significantly more likely to get sick from COVID-19, to pass it on to others, and to facilitate the emergence of new variants.

Equity: An Important Factor

Chokshi said equity has been an important focus of efforts in New York City, especially in lowering barriers to access. This means bringing vaccines “into people’s communities, into their neighborhoods.” He cited as examples: “Partnering with federally-qualified health centers. Moving to a decentralized approach where we use mobile sites, and also using in-home vaccination which is now available to anyone 12 and up across New York City.”

Another part of New York City’s efforts, Chokshi said, is building trust:

“We worked on building vaccine confidence with our partners across New York City, knowing that government is one messenger, but that often it is not the most trusted messenger within communities. So we are partnering with faith leaders and community based organizations to build vaccine confidence.”

The Mission of the Academy

An important point that emerged in the December 14 discussion aligns closely with the mission of the Academy, that while science plays a central role in the global response to the pandemic, scientists must partner with members of many other communities, and with experts from many disciplines.

“We have to also realize that science alone can’t keep us safe,” Bright said. “We need to ensure that governments and companies and communities, and even individuals such as ourselves, are working together. We’re sharing information, we’re making decisions based on science…to stop this outbreak.”

This type of collaborative effort is a goal of an important new Academy initiative, the International Science Reserve (ISR). The project aims to mobilize scientists and critical resources in the face of future global crises, whether a new pandemic, a cyber attack, flooding, or a massive wildfire.

The Academy’s program on the Omicron variant was just the latest in a broad series starting early last year, all designed to help meet the need for unbiased, scientific information on Sar-CoV-2. Next in line is a symposium on March 30 and March 31, The Future of Vaccinology. The program will feature speakers from the Bill and Melinda Gates Research Institute, Pfizer, Novavax, and the Human Vaccines Project.

Also read: Strong Vaccine Science Advances COVID-19 Research

New Developments in Human Healthspan and Longevity

Overview

Although advances made in health and safety have more than doubled life expectancy throughout much of the world since 1900, it hasn’t been without consequence. Disease, disability, and frailty have all impacted the quality of life associated with these later years. This unfortunate reality was recently illuminated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which severely affected this population, likely due to physiological changes and preexisting conditions. Fortunately, a primary goal of geroscience researchers is to attenuate age-related health issues so that older people not only enjoy an improved quality of life, but also maintain the resilience to survive severe diseases and infections.

While it’s irrefutable that we cannot avoid aging, it’s no longer within the realm of science fiction for us to temper and even reverse the aging process. On May 19, 2021, the New York Academy of Sciences hosted a virtual symposium that brought together geroscience experts spanning various disciplines, including genetics, endocrinology, gerontology, clinical psychology, and more. Speakers discussed targeting the key hallmarks of aging, developing biomarkers for geriatric therapies, and translating findings that extend healthspan and lifespan to the clinic.

Symposium Highlights

  • The Target Aging with Metformin study uses the FDA approved anti-diabetic metformin, which targets the hallmarks of aging, to investigate the prevention of age-related diseases.
  • Precluding the age-associated decline of chaperon-mediated autophagy restrains the aggregating effects of Alzheimer’s disease and extends lifespan in murine models.
  • Lower IGF-1 levels in older adults are associated with decreased cognitive impairment, age-related diseases, and mortality.
  • Epigenetic clocks can be applied to study biological aging differences, with accelerated epigenetic aging correlating with the prevalence and incidence of morbidity and mortality.
  • The metabolome is a powerful locus of opportunity to bridge the gap between genotype and age.
  • Alternative splicing is upregulated in response to declining mitochondrial function and increasing age.
  • Senescent cells upregulate pro-survival pathways, and their elimination alleviates diverse age-related conditions.
  • The mitochondrial-derived peptides humanin and MOTS-c are associated with increased longevity in animal models and humans.

Speakers

Nir Barzilai, MD
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Ana Maria Cuervo, MD, PhD
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Sofiya Milman, MD
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Morgan Levine, PhD
Yale School of Medicine

Daniel Promislow, PhD
University of Washington

Luigi Ferrucci, MD, PhD
National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health

James Kirkland, MD, PhD
Mayo Clinic

Pinchas Cohen, MD
USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology

Targetable Aging Processes

Speakers

Nir Barzilai, MD
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Ana Maria Cuervo, MD, PhD
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Keynote: Age Later: Translational Geroscience

Aging is the strongest risk factor for all age-related diseases, with diverse maladies accumulating during the later years of life. Hence, to abate or avert the relevant disorders, it’s critical to target the central driver—aging itself. Physician Nir Barzilai, the founding director of the Institute for Aging Research, investigates the genetics of longevity by studying centenarians and their offspring, interrogating the hypothesis that these individuals have genes that prolong aging and protect against age-related diseases.

Using Slow Off-Rate Modified Aptamer, Barzilai’s team assessed 5,000 proteins in a population of 1,000 individuals between the ages of 65-95, a period during which aging accelerates. Results demonstrated a significant change in the level of hundreds of proteins as a function of age. Among the top hits were proteins from collagen breakdown of tissue and cellular products, highlighting the pivotal role this process plays in aging, and suggesting that deterring disintegration may be a universal biomarker for geroprotection.

Metformin, a long-standing FDA approved anti-diabetic, targets the complement of aging indications.

A predominant challenge to translating advances made in geroscience from animal models to humans is the FDA, which currently doesn’t consider aging a disease indication or preventable condition. Barzilai and others are utilizing metformin, an FDA-approved anti-diabetic, to refute this contention. Various groups have shown that metformin has substantial effects on human healthspan, including delaying type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this patient subset, metformin also impedes cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, and Alzheimer’s and is associated with decreased cancer incidence, with population effects approaching 30% in all cases.

Barzilai’s team designed the Target Aging with Metformin, or TAME, study to investigate whether or not there’s a shift in the timeline of disease occurrence between a cohort receiving metformin versus a control cohort. Various biomarkers of aging and age-related diseases will be used to provide convergent evidence of broad, age-related effects, while also establishing a resource for innovation and discovery of emergent biomarkers.

“The most important thing for us is to develop biomarkers that will change when we use a gerotherapuetic,” Barzilai asserted, as this will expedite therapeutic prospects.

Targeting Selective Autophagy in Aging and Age-related Diseases

Physician-scientist Ana Maria Cuervo’s research seeks to understand the molecular basis of autophagy dysfunction with age and the contribution of defects in this cellular pathway to diseases such as neurodegeneration, metabolic disorders, and cancer. Autophagy belongs to the proteostasis network, which regulates protein content and quality control.

Chaperon-mediated autophagy (CMA) is a subset of the mammalian autophagy program that directly targets proteins to the lysosome for degradation. CMA has been shown to decrease with age in human and animal models. Cuervo’s lab developed a fluorescent murine reporter construct to visualize CMA and track the kinetics of its activity in different organs.

Blocking this pathway in neurons resulted in the aggregation of proteins like α-synuclein (α-syn), tau, and others that are causal in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Additionally, CMA reporter mice crossed with a mouse model of AD revealed that CMA activity dramatically decreases in the neurons of AD mice.

Leveraging these findings, Cuervo’s group generated a mouse model to restore CMA activity conditionally. Mice with preserved CMA exhibited an extended median and maximal lifespan compared to controls. Evaluation of the proteostasis network in mice with and without CMA restoration revealed major changes in the proteome. Mice in which CMA was preserved more closely resembled younger animals than their age-matched controls.

“By acting in one of these pathways, we can have an impact in the other hallmarks of aging… because of this interconnection among [them],” Cuervo emphasized.

A compound to selectively activate CMA was developed and tested in an AD model, with results illustrating a reduction in tau pathology and microglial activation in the presence of this agent.

Further Readings

Barzilai

Ismail K, Nussbaum L, Sebastiani P, et al.

Compression of Morbidity Is Observed Across Cohorts with Exceptional Longevity.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1583-91.

Sathyan S, Ayers E, Gao T, et al.

Plasma proteomic profile of age, health span, and all-cause mortality in older adults.

Aging Cell. 2020 Nov;19(11):e13250.

Lehallier B, Gate D, Schaum N, et al.

Undulating changes in human plasma proteome profiles across the lifespan. 

Nat Med. 2019 Dec;25(12):1843-1850.

Kulkarni AS, Gubbi S, Barzilai N.

Benefits of Metformin in Attenuating the Hallmarks of Aging.

Cell Metab. 2020 Jul 7;32(1):15-30.

Zhang ZD, Milman S, Lin JR, et al.

Genetics of extreme human longevity to guide drug discovery for healthy ageing.

Nat Metab. 2020 Aug;2(8):663-672.

Cuervo

Kaushik S, Cuervo AM.

Proteostasis and aging.

Nat Med. 2015 Dec;21(12):1406-1415.

Bourdenx M, Martín-Segura A, Scrivo A, et al.

Chaperone-mediated autophagy prevents collapse of the neuronal metastable proteome.

Cell. 2021 May 13;184(10):2696-2714.e25.

Kaushik S, Cuervo AM.

The coming of age chaperone-mediated autophagy.

Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018 Jun;19(6):365-381.

Dong S, Aguirre-Hernandez C, Scrivo A, et al. 

Monitoring spatiotemporal changes in chaperone-mediated autophagy in vivo. 

Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 31;11(1):645.

Dong S, Wang Q, Kao Y-R, et al.

Chaperone-mediated autophagy sustains haematopoietic stem-cell function.

Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7848):117-123.

Biomarkers for Therapies

Speakers

Sofiya Milman, MD
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Morgan Levine, PhD
Yale School of Medicine

Translational Geroscience: Role of IGF-1 in Human Healthspan and Lifespan

Physician Sofiya Milman conducts translational research to uncover the genomic mechanisms regulating the endocrine and metabolic pathways involved in age-related conditions like diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, and Alzheimer’s.

“The goal of geroscience is really to extend healthspan, and not necessarily lifespan,” Milman opened. “What we’re really trying to do is to compress the period of morbidity.”

To discover the biological pathways that allow humans to live long, healthy lives, Milman’s team focused on IGF-1: a reduction of this factor has been consistently shown to extend healthspan and lifespan in models. IGF-1 levels peak during the teenage years before gradually declining. If the reduction of IGF-1 protects from aging, Milman reasoned that lower IGF-1 levels would delay aging and prevent age-related diseases.

Examining a cohort of centenarians expressing lower levels of IGF-1 revealed a 50% reduction in cognitive impairment compared to higher IGF-1 level controls. Genetic studies demonstrated that centenarians were enriched for rare mutations in the IGF-1 receptor that diminished signaling. Additionally, individuals 65+ with low IGF-1 had less cognitive impairment, and delayed onset of cognitive impairment, multi-morbidities, and mortality.

Milman’s team also addressed the link between IGF-1 and age. Younger individuals with lower levels of IGF-1 were at an increased risk for mortality and age-related diseases compared to older individuals, while higher levels of IGF-1 in older adults were associated with increased risk. This suggests that the IGF-1 network aligns with the concept of antagonistic pleiotropy, wherein a factor that’s beneficial to individuals when they’re younger may become harmful when they’re older. It’s advantageous to maintain functionality of proteostasis and resilience as an individual gets older, but IFG-1 inhibits programs involved in these processes.

“So from this, we think it would be wise to maintain IGF-1 levels in youth, but to reduce them with aging,” Milman concluded.

Epigenetic Biomarker of Aging for Lifespan and Healthspan

Biological age is defined by changes or alterations in a living system that renders it more vulnerable to failure and is behind the age-related increase in susceptibility to chronic diseases. Unlike chronological age, it is very difficult to measure because it’s unobservable.

Morgan Levine integrates theories and methods from statistical genetics, computational biology, and mathematical demography to develop biomarkers of aging for humans and animal models. Among this work are efforts to establish systems-level outcome measures of aging to facilitate evaluation for gero-protective interventions.

“There’s some disagreement on how we actually quantify [biological age],” Levine started. “But I would argue that it’s really important to try and do so, because quantifying [this] will really help us in a number of endeavors in the field.”

Levin’s lab is particularly interested in epigenetic aging, as aging drastically remodels the DNA methylation landscape, with widespread increases and decreases as a function of age.

Senescent cells and cells with disrupted energy production show accelerated epigenetic aging.

Epigenetic clocks estimate DNA methylation across the genome and combine supervised machine-learning approaches to develop predictors of biological age.

“We think people who have a predicted [epigenetic] age that’s younger than their chronological age should be actually aging slower, whereas the opposite is true for people that have a genetic age that is predicted higher,” said Levine.

Applying these measures to diseased states yielded several pertinent findings. For example, individuals who have pathologically diagnosed Alzheimer’s post-mortem show accelerated epigenetic aging in their brain relative to their chronological age. Tissue differences were also captured, revealing that tissues seem to age asynchronously, with highly proliferative tissues and tumor cells having accelerated aging compared to slower aging brain tissue.

Levine’s group also evaluated cellular senescence and energy disruption, with results revealing that near senescent, HRAS oncogene induced senescent, and replicative stress senescent cells have an acceleration in epigenetic age compared to early parental control cells. Additionally, deletion of mitochondrial DNA accelerated epigenetic aging, while caloric restriction in mice stalled their epigenetic clocks.

Further Readings

Milman

Argente J, Chowen JA, Pérez-Jurado LA, et al.

One level up: abnormal proteolytic regulation of IGF activity plays a role in human pathophysiology.

EMBO Mol Med. 2017 Oct;9(10):1338-1345.

Gubbi S, Quipildor GF, Barzilai N, et al.

40 YEARS of IGF1: IGF1: the Jekyll and Hyde of the aging brain.

J Mol Endocrinol. 2018 Jul;61(1):T171-T185.

Levine

Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, et al.

Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates.

Mol Cell. 2013 Jan 24;49(2):359-367.

Levine M, McDevitt RA, Meer M, et al.

A rat epigenetic clock recapitulates phenotypic aging and co-localizes with heterochromatin.

Elife. 2020 Nov 12;9.

Horvath S.

DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types.

Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115.

Levine ME, Lu AT, Quach A, et al.

An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan.

Aging. 2018 Apr 18;10(4):573-591.

Liu Z, Leung D, Thrush K et al.

Underlying features of epigenetic aging clocks in vivo and in vitro.

Aging Cell. 2020 Oct;19(10):e13229.

Omics for Therapies

Speakers

Daniel Promislow
University of Washington

Luigi Ferrucci
National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health

Metabolomics in the Search for Biomarkers and Mechanisms of Aging

Daniel Promislow applies metabolomics and systems biology approaches to study aging, with a focus on understanding the evolutionary and molecular traits that shape fitness in the natural human population. Although genome-wide association studies have allowed researchers to identify thousands of polymorphisms associated with the complement of measurable traits, including aging, the disparities identified explain less than half of 1% of the phenotypic variations.

Many genes interacting with each other ultimately influence phenotypes, and the biological distance between the two is astronomical. To bridge this gap, researchers use endophenotypes—from the epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, and microbiome—along with various omics approaches. Promislow’s lab focuses on the metabolome, which integrates information from the environment and genotype to ultimately affect aging.

Promislow’s team utilizes translational metabolomics in various insect and animal models to understand and translate aging patterns to human populations. Applying this approach to Drosophila demonstrated that the metabolome could predict stress resistance, completely separating groups of sensitive or resistant flies to a metabolic stressor by principal component analysis. These effects could not be recapitulated with a whole fly genome sequence dataset. Evaluating response to diet restriction (DR) also revealed changes in metabolite levels with age. Among nearly 200 different inbred strains, roughly 75% showed a benefit to DR.

“Interestingly, the effect of specific genetic variants on the lifespan response was very weak,” Promislow began. “But we did find genes that were associated with metabolites, which were associated with the lifespan response, reinforcing this idea…that the metabolite profile can be a kind of bridge between genotype and phenotype.”

Promislow’s group also demonstrated that the metabolome could serve as a biological clock, revealing that shorter-lived genotypes appeared to have a higher biological age than expected for their chronological age.

Translational Potential of the Biology of Aging

As individuals age, the incidence of chronic disease increase, and disease progression quickens. Physician-scientist Luigi Ferrucci aims to interrogate the causal pathways that lead to progressive physical and cognitive decline in aging.

Cellular damage is accumulated during a person’s life, eventually reaching a pathology threshold that becomes clinically relevant when the damage presents as a disorder. Conventionally, the disease is often only addressed once it reaches this stage. The problem with this approach is that the present disease is often a marker of a more profound and invasive disorder to come.

“[Instead], we need to measure the underlying force that determines the emergence of diseases and their consequences,” Ferrucci argued.

By interfering with the basic mechanisms of aging to curtail it, broader effects of abating multiple chronic disorders can be achieved.

Cellular damage is accumulated over the course of an individual’s lifetime, with disease presenting once the clinical threshold for a given disorder is reached.

The rate of biological aging can be defined by the ratio of cellular damage accumulation to repair capacity. If the rate of damage accretion is fast, but the repair capacity is high, there won’t be an accumulation of damage, and aging will be slowed. However, when damage outpaces repair, aging accelerates.

Repair pathways require energy to operate effectively, and mitochondrial function declines dramatically with age. Ferrucci’s team discovered that this decline is associated with an upregulation of alternative splicing of mitochondrial proteins. Delving deeper into this mechanism, they applied gene set enrichment analysis to 5,325 RNAs with at least one splice variant significantly altered in response to changing mitochondrial function, as measured by AMPK and aging.

Among the top hits were GLUT4, VEGFA, IRS2, mTOR, PI3K, ULK1, ACC1, NRF2, and PGC1-α. Of note, the splice A variant of the topmost hit, VEGFA, appeared to be geronic, while the B variant appeared to be anti-geronic, with the ratio of these variants declining with age. Thus, alternative splicing is a method by which the body copes with energy decline due to mitochondrial dysfunction.

Further Readings

Promislow

Laye MJ, Tran V, Jones DP, et al.

The effects of age and dietary restriction on the tissue-specific metabolome of Drosophila.

Aging Cell. 2015 Oct;14(5):797-808.

Hoffman JM, Ross C, Tran V, et al.

The metabolome as a biomarker of mortality risk in the common marmoset.

Am J Primatol. 2019 Feb;81(2):e22944.

Nelson PG, Promislow DEL, Masel J.

Biomarkers for Aging Identified in Cross-sectional Studies Tend to Be Non-causative.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Feb 14;75(3):466-472.

Ferrucci

Fabbri E, An Y, Zoli M, et al.

Aging and the burden of multimorbidity: associations with inflammatory and anabolic hormonal biomarkers.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Jan;70(1):63-70.

Choi S, Reiter DA, Shardell M, et al.

31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Assessment of Muscle Bioenergetics as a Predictor of Gait Speed in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Dec;71(12):1638-1645.

Translational Research for Healthspan and Lifespan

Speakers

Pat Furlong, Panelist
Parent Project Muscular Distrophy

Roman J. Giger
University of Michigan School of Medicine

Senolytics: The Path to Translation

Physician-scientist James Kirkland studies the impact of cellular aging, specifically senescence, on age-related dysfunction and chronic diseases to develop methods for removing these cells and attenuating their deleterious effects. Senescent cells accumulate with aging and diseases, eliminating cells around them due to their senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which 30%-70% of senescent cells exhibit under most conditions.

Kirkland’s team applied a bioinformatics-based approach to analyze SASP proteomic databases, revealing that pro-survival networks are upregulated, with diverse senescent cells relying on different pathways. Several agents, termed senolytics, were identified that could target multiple nodes of these cascades.

“We’re moving away from the one drug, one target, one disease approach here,” said Kirkland,  “to try and use agents that have multiple targets, or combinations of agents, to go after networks, and to go after senescent cells by doing this, and thereby improve…multiple conditions.”

Dasatinib (D), a SRC kinase inhibitor, preferentially killed senescent preadipocytes, which relied on survival pathways that signal through this kinase. Quercetin (Q) eliminated senescent human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVECs), which partly act through the Bcl-2 family and others that this cell type is susceptible to.

In an in vivo experiment, combining Dasatinib with Quercetin (D+Q) cleared transplanted luciferase-expressing senescent preadipocytes from mice, explicitly targeting those cells with a SASP. A single dose of senolytics also alleviated radiation-induced gait disturbance in mice, with the effects persisting long-term. Bi-weekly dosing reduced physical dysfunction in older mice, as measured by parameters of maximal speed, including treadmill and hanging endurance, grip strength, and daily activity, with D+Q significantly increasing performance across the board.

Many conditions have now been shown to be alleviated by various senolytics in a range of mouse models, with D+Q delaying death from all causes, and increasing healthspan and median lifespan.

Keynote: Mitochondrial-derived Peptides (MDPs) and the Regulation of Aging Processes

The discovery of mitochondrial peptides (MDPs), encoded from small genes less than 100 codons in length, established the birth and advancement of the microprotein subfield. Physician Pinchas Cohen works to understand mitochondrial biology and characterize MDPs, exploiting findings to target aging. MDPs are secreted from cells and circulate within the body.

“Overall, they serve as protective factors, or hormones if you will, that act in the brain, the heart, the liver, the muscle, and other organs,” Cohen stated.

Among these MDPs, Cohen’s lab identified humanin, encoded from the 16S region of mtDNA, and MOTS-c, encoded from the 12S region.

Humanin has a strong protective effect on neurons and against atherosclerosis, mitigates the side effects of chemotherapy while enhancing its benefit, and is related to longevity in model organisms and humans. Cohen’s lab employs mitochondrial-wide association studies (MiWAS) to link the dysfunction of MDPs to disease. MiWAS identified a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in the humanin gene (rs2854128) associated with reduced levels and cognitive decline in humans and mice. Supplementing humanin in mice carrying this SNP improved their cognition.

MOTS-c is a novel exercise mimetic that has potential utility in numerous age-related diseases. Mice on a high fat diet receiving MOTS-c had dramatically lower weight compared to controls. MOTS-c treatment also improved exercise tolerance and performance in middle-aged and old mice, with older mice displaying the most dramatic improvement.

MOTS-c levels are diminished in older mice, and supplementation of MOTS-c in this cohort increases both median and maximum lifespan compared to controls.

Cohen’s group also identified a link between a SNP in MOTS-c–K14Q–which nullifies MOTS-c activity and the risk of diabetes in males of the Asian population. Evaluating Japanese males from three cohorts revealed a 50% increase in the risk of diabetes for carriers, with almost double the risk seen exclusively in men who were sedentary. Like other MDPs, MOTS-c is reduced with age, and its administration to mice significantly extends lifespan.

“I think that everything we do in the aging field can be reduced to trying to simulate the beneficial effects of a healthy lifestyle, particularly diet…and exercise,” Cohen said. “We think that…mitochondria are the main source of action [here] by inducing the production of peptides such as MOTS-c, humanin, and others.”

Further Readings

Kirkland

Zhu Y, Tchkonia T, Pirtskhalava T, et al.

The Achilles’ heel of senescent cells: from transcriptome to senolytic drugs.

Aging Cell. 2015 Aug;14(4):644-58.

Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T.

Senolytic drugs: from discovery to translation.

J Intern Med. 2020 Nov;288(5):518-536.

Ogrodnik M, Miwa S, Tchkonia T, et al.

Cellular senescence drives age-dependent hepatic steatosis.

Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 13;8:15691.

Xu M, Pirtskhalava T, Farr JN, et al.

Senolytics improve physical function and increase lifespan in old age.

Nat Med. 2018 Aug;24(8):1246-1256.

Justice JN, Nambiar AM, Tchkonia T, et al.

Senolytics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Results from a first-in-human, open-label, pilot study.

EBioMedicine. 2019 Feb;40:554-563.

Cohen

Mehta HH, Xiao J, Ramirez R, et al.

Metabolomic profile of diet-induced obesity mice in response to humanin and small humanin-like peptide 2 treatment.

Metabolomics. 2019 Jun 6;15(6):88.

Zempo H, Kim SJ, Fuku N, et al.

A pro-diabetogenic mtDNA polymorphism in the mitochondrial-derived peptide, MOTS-c.

Aging. 2021 Jan 19;13(2):1692-1717.

Yen K, Mehta HH, Kim SJ, et al.

The mitochondrial derived peptide humanin is a regulator of lifespan and healthspan.

Aging. 2020 Jun 23;12(12):11185-11199.

Miller B, Kim SJ, Kumagai H, et al.

Peptides derived from small mitochondrial open reading frames: Genomic, biological, and therapeutic implications.

Exp Cell Res. 2020 Aug 15;393(2):112056.

Zempo H, Kim SJ, Fuku N, et al.

A pro-diabetogenic mtDNA polymorphism in the mitochondrial-derived peptide, MOTS-c.

Aging. 2021 Jan 19;13(2):1692-1717.

STEM Supreme: Elizabeth Blackburn

Overview

In this pilot episode of the webinar series STEM Supremes: Conversations with Women in Science, the Academy’s Chief Scientific Officer, Dr. Brooke Grindlinger, interviewed the ‘queen of telomeres,’ Australian-American scientist Dr. Elizabeth Blackburn. Light years on from her early work sequencing the DNA of the pond scum protozoan Tetrahymena, Blackburn unraveled our understanding of the function of telomeres—the protective caps on the ends of chromosomes—and the role they play in aging and diseases such as cancer. She has pioneered a path for women scientists, and received the pinnacle of scientific achievement—the Nobel Prize—for unlocking secrets about how we age at a fundamental level. The conversation spanned Blackburn’s teenage fascinations with science, the anxieties of transitioning from student to independent investigator, cultural and gender barriers she navigated along the way, and what excites her on the horizon of aging research.

In this eBriefing, You’ll Learn:

  • How sleep quality, exercise, diet, and chronic stress impact the length of human telomeres and, in turn, our genetic heritage
  • Studies underway to understand the effect of severe stress on how individuals will respond, long-term, to COVID-19 vaccination
  • Tactics for managing the transition from PhD student to post-doctoral fellow, and from post-doc to junior faculty member
  • Tangible actions academic leaders can take to better support parents, particularly women, as they navigate the competing demands of family and a research career
  • Goals of the Lindau Declaration 2020 on Sustainable Cooperative Open Science

Moderator

Brooke Grindlinger, PhD
The New York Academy of Sciences

In Conversation with Elizabeth Blackburn

Speaker

Elizabeth Blackburn
University of California San Francisco

A full transcript of this conversation is available for download here.


Elizabeth Blackburn, PhD

University of California San Francisco

Dr. Blackburn earned her BSc and MSc degrees from the University of Melbourne, and her PhD from the University of Cambridge in England. She was a postdoctoral fellow in the Molecular and Cellular Biology Department at Yale University, and later joined the faculty at the University of California at Berkeley in the Department of Molecular Biology. She was Chair of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at UC San Francisco, and later served as the first female president of the Salk Institute for Biological Sciences. Among her many career honors, Blackburn shared the 2009 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with collaborators Carol Greider and Jack Szostak for the discovery of how chromosomes are protected by telomeres and the enzyme telomerase. Blackburn is currently Professor Emerita, Biochemistry and Biophysics, UC San Francisco.

Brooke Grindlinger, PhD

New York Academy of Sciences

Read more about Dr. Grindlinger, the Academy’s Chief Scientific Officer, here.

Further Readings

Psychedelics to Treat Depression and Psychiatric Disorders

Overview

Currently the FDA categorizes psychedelics such as LSD and psilocybin as Schedule I drugs, indicating that these substances have no medical value. Despite this classification, a resurgence of research in approved labs has demonstrated therapeutic benefits of psychedelics for treatment of psychiatric disorders.

Of note, a recent trial on the effects of MDMA-assisted therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) showed a reduction in the severity of patient symptoms compared with the placebo arm of the trial, providing hope for the future approval of MDMA for therapeutic use.  The exciting findings from this study as well as and investigations into other psychedelics are instigating a paradigm shift for treatment-resistant psychiatric conditions, along with increased public interest and efforts to legalize psychedelics for medicinal use.

The New York Academy of Sciences hosted a panel discussion bringing together leading scientists in the fields of pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychiatry to discuss how psychedelics work in the brain to produce therapeutic benefits for depression and other mood disorders.  The conversation commenced a description of the socio-political context of psychedelics research, spanning the rise of psychedelics research in the 1950s, restrictions in the 1960s, renewed interest in the 1990s, and present day clinical trials for patients with depression and various other mood disorders. 

The program continued by spotlighting the different types of classical and non-traditional psychedelics that are currently being investigated (e.g., psilocybin, MDMA, and ketamine) and how they work to produce therapeutic effects. Panelists concluded the conversation by sharing insights into the use of psychedelics in treatment settings, including explaining the process of facilitated treatment and the role of the therapist/guide during the psychedelic experience (including preparatory therapy, peak effects, and integration).

In this eBriefing, you will learn:

  • The socio-political history of psychedelic research for human health
  • The difference between classic and non-traditional psychedelics
  • The effects of psychedelics on the brain and targets
  • The role of the hallucinogenic experience
  • The role of psychological support during the psychedelic experience

Event Sponsors

Gold

Bronze

Psychedelics for the Treatment of Depression and Psychiatric Disorders

Moderator

John Krystal, MD
Yale School of Medicine

Speakers

Roland Griffiths, PhD
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

David E. Nichols, PhD
Heffter Research Institute

Rachel Yehuda, PhD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai

John Krystal, MD
Yale School of Medicine

Dr. John Krystal is the Robert L. McNeil, Jr., Professor of Translational Research; Professor of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Psychology; and Chair of the Department of Psychiatry at the Yale University. He is also Chief of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health at Yale-New Haven Hospital.  He is a graduate of the University of Chicago, Yale University School of Medicine, and the Yale Psychiatry Residency Training Program.

Dr. Krystal has published extensively on the neurobiology and treatment of schizophrenia, alcoholism, PTSD, and depression. Notably, his laboratory discovered the rapid antidepressant effects of ketamine in humans. He is the Director of the NIAAA Center for the Translational Neuroscience of Alcoholism and the Clinical Neuroscience Division of the VA National Center for PTSD. Dr. Krystal is a member of the U.S. National Academy of Medicine and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Currently, he is co-director of the Neuroscience Forum of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; and editor of Biological Psychiatry (IF=12.1).

He has chaired the NIMH Board of Scientific Counselors and served on the national advisory councils for both NIMH and NIAAA. Also, he is past president of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ACNP) and International College of Neuropsychopharmacology (CINP).

Roland Griffiths, PhD
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Roland Griffiths is Professor in the Departments of Psychiatry and Neurosciences and Director of the Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.  His principal research focus in both clinical and preclinical laboratories has been on the behavioral and subjective effects of mood-altering drugs and he is author of over 400 scientific publications.  He has conducted extensive research with sedative-hypnotics, caffeine, and novel mood-altering drugs.

About 20 years ago, he initiated a research program at Johns Hopkins investigating effects of the classic psychedelic substance psilocybin, the active component in “magic mushrooms.” Remarkably, many research participants rate their experience of psilocybin as among the most personally meaningful of their lives, and they attribute enduring positive changes in moods, attitudes and behavior months to years after the experience.  Completed and ongoing studies include those in healthy volunteers, in beginning and long-term meditators, and in religious leaders.

Therapeutic studies with psilocybin include treatment of psychological distress in cancer patients, major depressive disorder, nicotine addiction, anorexia nervosa, and various other psychiatric disorders. Related studies of brain imaging and drug interactions are examining pharmacological and neural mechanisms of action.  His research group has also conducted a series of survey studies characterizing various naturally-occurring and psychedelic-occasioned transformative experiences including mystical experiences, entity and God-encounter experiences, Near Death experiences, and experiences claimed to reduce depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders.

David E. Nichols, PhD
Heffter Research Institute

David E. Nichols previously held the Robert C. and Charlotte P. Anderson Distinguished Chair in Pharmacology and in addition was a Distinguished Professor of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at the Purdue University College of Pharmacy.  He was continuously funded by the NIH for nearly three decades and served on numerous government review panels.  His two principal research areas focused on drugs that affect serotonin and dopamine transmission in the CNS.

He began medicinal chemistry research on hallucinogens in 1969 and has been internationally recognized as a top expert on the medicinal chemistry of psychedelics (hallucinogens).  He has published more than 300 scientific articles, book chapters, and monographs.  In 1993 he founded the Heffter Research Institute, which has supported and funded clinical research with psilocybin and led the so-called “renaissance in psychedelic research.”

Rachel Yehuda, PhD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai

Rachel Yehuda, Ph.D. is the Director of the Center for the Study of Psychedelic Psychotherapy and Trauma, Vice Chair for Veterans Affairs for the Psychiatry Department and a Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai as well as the Director of Mental Health at the Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Director of the Traumatic Stress Studies Division.

Throughout her career her research has focused on the study of the enduring effects of trauma exposure, particularly PTSD, as well as associations between biological and psychological measures. She has investigated novel treatment approaches for PTSD and the biological factors that may contribute to differing treatment outcomes for the purpose of developing personalized medicine strategies for treatment matching in PTSD. This work has resulted in an approved US patent for a PTSD blood test.

Recently, Dr. Yehuda’s laboratory has used advances in stem cell technology to examine PTSD gene expression networks in induced neurons.  The Center for Psychedelic Psychotherapy and Trauma integrates sophisticated brain imaging and molecular neuroscience in PTSD with clinical trials using MDMA assisted psychotherapy and other related medicines. She has authored more than 450 published papers, chapters, and books in the field of trauma and resilience, focusing on topics such as PTSD prevention and treatment, molecular biomarkers of stress vulnerability and resilience, and intergenerational effects of trauma and PTSD.

Further Readings

John Krystal

Abdallah CG and Krystal JH

Ketamine and Rapid Acting Antidepressants: Are We Ready to Cure, Rather Than Treat Depression?

Behavioral Brain Research. 2020 July 15;(30): 112628

Charney D and Duman R

A New Rapid-Acting Antidepressant

Cell. 2020 April 2;1(181): 7

Abdallah CG, Sanacora G, Charney DS, and Duman R

Ketamine: A Paradigm Shift for Depression Research and Treatment

Neuron. 2019 Mar 6;101(5):774-778

Roland Griffiths

Scharper J

Crash Course in the Nature of Mind

Johns Hopkins University Magazine. Fall 2017

Griffiths RG, Johnson MW, and Carducci MA, et al

Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial

Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2016 Dec; 30(12):1181-1197

David E. Nichols

Nichols DE

How Does One Go About Performing Research with Psychedelics?

Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies Bulletin. Fall 1997

Nichols DE

Psychedelics

Pharmacological Reviews. 2016 April;68(2):264-255

Nichols DE

Studies of the Relationship between Molecular Structure And Hallucinogenic Activity

Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior. 1986 Feb;2:335-340

Nichols DE

Psilocybin: From Ancient Magic to Modern Medicine

The Journal of Antibiotics. 2020 May 12;73:679-686

Nichols DE, Johnson MW, and Nichols CD

Psychedelics as Medicines: An Emerging New Paradigm

Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2016 Nov 4;101(2):209-219

Rachel Yehuda

Vermetten E and Yehuda R

MDMA-assisted Psychotherapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Promising Novel Approach to Treatment

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Jan;45(1):231-232

Yehuda R

Mount Sinai: Five Things to Know About MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy for PTSD

Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) in the Media. 2020 Feb 20

Making STEM Education Accessible for All

Two young students participate in a simple science experiment.

STEM education is more important than ever. In our ever-changing, technology-driven world, students must be equipped with the knowledge and skills afforded by STEM learning—problem solving, critical thinking, curiosity, and persistence, among many others. STEM expertise is also desperately needed to address the many challenges facing our world, particularly those identified by the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Yet in many places throughout the world—in developed and developing countries alike—students lack access to meaningful STEM learning.

On February 23, 2021, The New York Academy of Sciences hosted a discussion between Chief Learning Officer Hank Nourse and Mmantsetsa Marope, Executive Director of the World Heritage Group. They explored the impacts of STEM education on individual, national, and global development.

In this eBriefing, you will learn:

  • What high-quality STEM education looks like
  • How STEM learning benefits individuals
  • The importance of STEM education to national and global development
  • How we might ensure equitable access to STEM learning, particularly in the face of growing inequities exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic

Advancing STEM Education for All

Speakers

Mmantsetsa Marope
World Heritage Group

Hank Nourse
The New York Academy of Sciences

Mmantsetsa Marope, PhD
World Heritage Group

Mmantsetsa Marope is widely regarded as a thought leader on education, the future of education and work, and learning systems capable of preparing students for rapidly changing and unpredictable futures. She is Executive Director of the World Heritage Group, an organization dedicated to building resilient, agile, and future-forward education systems. She is Honorary President of the Indian Ocean Comparative and International Education Societies and Lead Global Advisor for China’s Education and Innovation for Development EXPO.

Prior to founding the World Heritage Group, Dr. Marope spent four decades in the civil service and the nonprofit sectors, including senior roles at the World Bank and, most recently, UNESCO, where she served as Director of the International Bureau of Education. Dr. Marope holds a PhD in education from the University of Chicago, an MEd from Penn State University, and BA and CDE degrees from the University of Botswana and Swaziland.

Hank Nourse
The New York Academy of Sciences

Hank Nourse leads the Academy’s Global STEM Alliance (GSA), a bold initiative to advance science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education worldwide. With hundreds of partners, and reaching participants in over 100 countries, the GSA directly engages tens of thousands of students and teachers annually, providing mentorship, skill building, and professional development spanning K-12 and higher education.

Prior to joining the Academy in 2015, Hank spent more than 15 years developing online learning and assessment programs for the K–12 market, primarily at Scholastic, a global children’s publishing and media company. He holds a Master’s degree in International Educational Development from Teachers College, Columbia University, and a Bachelor’s degree from Gonzaga University.

Promising Immunotherapies over Toxic Chemotherapies

Macrophages can eat leukemia cancer cells when the cells are exposed to anti-CD47 antibodies.

Cancer immunotherapies utilize an individual’s immune system, providing alternatives to toxic chemotherapies.

Published April 22, 2021

By Ben Ragen, PhD

Cancer immunotherapies utilize an individual’s immune system to fight off or even prevent cancers— shifting the paradigm for cancer treatment and providing alternatives to toxic chemotherapies. Since the first immunotherapy cancer treatment was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in the mid-1980s, scientists have continued to explore the potential of drugs and other biomedical technologies to manipulate cytokines, neoantigens, immune cells, and stem cells to treat and even vaccinate against cancer.

Irving Weissman, MD, is a Virginia & D.K. Ludwig Professor of Clinical Investigation in Cancer Research at Stanford University and the Director of the Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. He has been studying cancer since 1957 and is a leader in the field of stem cell biology. Dr. Weissman will give the Keynote address at the upcoming 8th annual Frontiers in Cancer Immunotherapy conference, to be held by The New York Academy of Sciences on May 12-14, 2021.

The Academy recently spoke with Dr. Weissman about his entrance into the field of cancer immunotherapy and the advances he has made in treating leukemia by utilizing his groundbreaking findings of the link between cancer and the CD47 protein.

This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.

You have been researching stem cells and cancer for decades. What was your introduction to these fields?

I actually started in high school in a pathology laboratory in Montana where I was learning about immunogenetics in the context of normal tissue transplants and tumor transplants. So, from the age of 16 on, I’ve been thinking about the field.

My interest in stem cell biology came out of the idea that if you had immune rejection of a transplant, it turned out that it was the thymus, and T cells derived from the thymus, that were the main effectors of rejection.

My interest then shifted from T cells to bone marrow. I set up several experiments to find cells within the bone marrow and was able to isolate blood-forming stem cells from mice. Within two years of starting SyStemix, Inc., a company which I co-founded, we isolated the human blood-forming stem cell.

How did your stem cell research lead you to study cancer?

By 1996 we were treating cancer patients by giving them lethal doses of a combination chemotherapy and were then saving them by rejuvenating their blood-forming system with their own cancer-free stem cells. These treatments were done in women with metastatic breast cancer, which made me think more and more about cancer and how we could understand which cells might become malignant in acute myelogenous leukemia.

We had gotten samples from the Hiroshima Hospital Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission, which has frozen banks of live bone marrow cells belonging to people who developed leukemia after the atomic bomb. Reseachers found we could isolate the human leukemia stem cell from those samples.

We could then look at the gene expression differences between two types of purified cells: the leukemia stem cells and then either the same stage cells from normal bone marrow or from hematopoietic stem cells. It wasn’t until we had completed all of that work that we could say, for the first time, which genes leukemia stem cells were overexpressed and which ones were underexpressed.

Red blood cells express CD47 on their surface to prevent macrophages from eating them.

Were there any specific genes that warranted further investigation?

One of the first genes we observed was called CD47. So, I looked it up in the literature, and it said that CD47 was an integrin-associated protein. But CD47 is not only associated with integrin in the cell membrane. When another research group knocked out the Cd47 gene in mice, they could keep the mice alive, but when they looked at their red blood cells and transfused the red cells into healthy animals of the same antigenic type, those red blood cells had a two-hour lifespan instead of having a normal two- to three-week lifespan. This discovery showed that immune cells—called macrophages—found in the bone marrow, the spleen, and liver were “eating”, or destroying, these red cells prematurely.

How did the discovery of CD47 and its role in red blood cell lifespan extend to your research on cancer?

CD47 is a “don’t eat me” signal on red blood cells—that’s how it extends red blood cell lifespan—but when the expression of CD47 normally fades, then the red blood cells can be eaten. So, we said, “well, if it is a ‘don’t eat me’ signal for red blood cells by blocking macrophages from eating them, why does every mouse leukemia and every human leukemia that we study have upregulated expression levels of CD47?”

So, we obtained and then made anti-CD47 antibodies. We showed that we could incubate the anti-CD47 antibodies with the human patient leukemia stem cells that we had isolated, along with human macrophages. The anti-CD47 antibodies relieved the blockade, and the macrophages started to eat.

Within two hours, each macrophage that ate was stuffed full of five to ten leukemia cells; you let it go two days, and there’s no leukemia cells left on the dish. So, it was pretty clear that we were dealing with a system of macrophage recognition and that we had developed an immunotherapy.

Macrophages can eat leukemia cancer cells when the cells are exposed to anti-CD47 antibodies.

How close are we to seeing anti-CD47 antibodies as an available cancer treatment?

We have finished a Phase 1 and a late Phase 2 trial for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome, which is a disease that will often turn into acute myelogenous leukemia. We found that the anti-CD47 antibody alone didn’t eliminate the tumor.

When we added azacytidine—the drug used to hold myelodysplastic syndrome and some acute myelogenous leukemias at bay for a short time—we found that tumors regress in nearly 100% of patients with elderly-onset acute myelogenous leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. So far, we see over 50% complete regression, and it’s been two years.

Also read: Advancing Vaccines and Cancer Immunotherapy.

Inside the Quest for a COVID-19 Vaccine

Overview

When SARS-CoV-2—the respiratory virus that causes COVID-19—first emerged, most people did not anticipate that it would result in a global public health disaster. COVID-19 rapidly spread from person to person across all borders, bringing hospitals to the brink of collapse, causing a devastating loss of life, and shutting down global economies. Scientific researchers, biotechnology companies, and government agencies quickly mobilized to develop vaccines—which prevent disease in inoculated individuals and, in some cases, also block a pathogen’s transmission from person to person—against SARS-CoV-2. The unprecedented speed of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development reflects decades of previous research on similar coronaviruses and faster manufacturing techniques. Just over a year into the pandemic, there are already candidate vaccines for SARS-CoV-2, several of which are being rolled out worldwide. Many other vaccine candidates are currently being investigated and will hopefully become part of the toolkit in the fight against COVID-19.

On February 2-3, 2021, the New York Academy of Sciences hosted a historic symposium that brought together top virologists and vaccinologists, public health officials, and industry leaders. They reflected on the factors that contributed to the record-breaking speed of COVID-19 vaccine development, gave updates on vaccine candidates, reviewed strategies to stay ahead of future outbreaks, and discussed the many unanswered questions and challenges that lie ahead.

Symposium Highlights:

  • Decades of previous research in virology and vaccinology sped up COVID-19 vaccine development. Productive public-private coordination was also critical. >
  • Various vaccines using a range of technology platforms are currently being developed. >
  • Several COVID-19 vaccines have proven to be safe and immunogenic in Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. Some of them have met safety and efficacy standards in Phase 3 trials and are already in the market in several countries. >
  • The emergence of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 is a source of concern for vaccine experts, but they remain optimistic. More data is still needed, but the vaccines that are already being rolled out or close to it seem to confer some degree of protection against the known variants. >
  • Many questions remain unclear, such as the duration of the protective effects of vaccines or the effects of COVID-19 vaccines in children. >
  • Investing in research and prevention strategies to bridge the pandemic preparedness gap is essential in the effort to stay ahead of future outbreaks. >

Keynote Speakers

Anthony S. Fauci, MD
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), NIH

Moncef Slaoui, PhD
Operation Warp Speed

Speakers

Sara Gilbert, PhD
University of Oxford

Gregory Glenn, MD
Novavax

Kathrin Jansen, PhD
Pfizer

Kevin Olival, PhD
EcoHealth Alliance

Stanley Plotkin, MD
University of Pennsylvania

Melanie Saville, MD
CEPI

Hanneke Schuitemaker, PhD
Janssen Vaccines and Prevention B.V.

Xuefeng Yu, PhD
CanSino Biologics

Tal Zaks, MD, PhD
Moderna

Sponsors

Gold Sponsors

Bronze Sponsor

Latham BioPharm Group

Promotional Partners

Keynote Address – Slaoui

Speakers

Moncef Slaoui
Operation Warp Speed

Operation Warp Speed (OWS) and the Quest for a COVID-19 Vaccine

The Operation Warp Speed (OWS) program, initiated by the federal government, was designed to accelerate the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. Moncef Slaoui, former chief scientific officer of OWS offered a broad overview of the program, the status of candidate vaccines, and key lessons from the vaccine development process.

He declared the success of the ambitious mission, which allowed for the delivery of tens of millions of vaccines in the US by February 2021. “It is remarkable that we are at that level twelve months and a few days after the virus was described,” said Slaoui. He credited this success in part to the collaborative efforts of researchers around the world, as well as the cooperation between the various government agencies and private sector partners. “This level of coordination under one leadership was unprecedented,” remarked Slaoui.

The program’s “portfolio approach,” which supported simultaneous research for 6-8 candidate vaccines, was also critical to its effectiveness. This allowed for a high level of attrition and increased capacity of manufacturing doses. Under Slaoui’s leadership, OWS also maximized speed by enabling the development, clinical trial, and manufacturing processes to proceed in parallel. Typically, manufacturing plans are not decided until after conducting the clinical trials. This strategy proved to be worth the risk when the first Phase 3 trial results from the mRNA vaccines revealed an efficacy of 95%. Likewise, OWS facilitated rapid clinical testing with little lag time between the different trial stages, and it helped private companies develop the needed manufacturing capabilities.

Slaoui, who emphasized the need for better pandemic preparedness, pointed to the spread of misinformation on vaccines and public mistrust as an “extremely disappointing dimension” that can be blamed on the politicization of the pandemic. Although the veteran vaccinologist noted OWS’s inability to effectively manage the public’s expectations and anticipate problems with distribution and delivery of the vaccine at the state level, he believes the development of multiple candidate vaccines is a monumental success.

Further Readings

Slaoui

Slaoui M, Hepburn M.

Developing Safe and Effective Covid Vaccines – Operation Warp Speed’s Strategy and Approach

N Engl J Med. 29 Oct 2020;393(18):1701-1703.

Slaoui M, Greene SE, Woodcock J.

Bridging the Gap at Warp Speed – Delivering Options for Preventing and Treating Covid-19

N Engl J Med. vol. 383,20 (2020): 1899-1901.

Keynote Address – Fauci

Speakers

Anthony S. Fauci, MD
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), NIH

This Year in Review: A Vaccinologist’s Perspective

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), explained how it was possible to develop COVID-19 vaccines in months, when the time to develop other vaccines “had historically been measured in years.” The groundwork laid by decades of vaccine research deserves much of the credit. He traced the COVID-19 vaccine origin to 1996, when a conversation about HIV vaccine research he had with President Clinton led to the start of the NIAID Vaccine Research Center. The center—whose mission eventually grew to include other pathogens—started as an interdisciplinary effort for scientists to collaborate on research and clinical trials for an HIV vaccine.

Fauci discussed research by his colleague Peter Kwong, a structural biologist who, in 2014, mapped the envelope protein that could serve as a suitable target for a HIV-1 structure-based vaccine design. Kwong’s techniques were adapted for the development of a vaccine against other respiratory viruses. Thanks to his work, when SARS-CoV-2 appeared, researchers were able to quickly elucidate that a specially modified version of the coronavirus’ spike protein was the best antigen candidate for a vaccine.

Vaccine technologies that are being used in the COVID-19 vaccine had already been developed for other vaccines, allowing for ultrarapid COVID-19 vaccine development.

Additional platforms—including mRNA, recombinant proteins, genetically engineered viral vectors— currently used for COVID-19 vaccines were previously investigated and developed for other vaccines at the NIAID Vaccine Research Center. This scientific foundation, combined with the coordination of resources and agencies and a “harmonization of goals,” allowed for rapid vaccine development. To speed up clinical trials, “the extraordinary investments that were made decades ago in putting together the HIV clinical trial network were immediately adapted,” said Fauci.

Although Fauci recognizes the challenges of distribution, he remains optimistic. “The hope is that, when we get to the end of the spring and into the summer,” said Fauci, “we can have the overwhelming majority of people vaccinated.” He estimated that “75-80% need to be vaccinated and/or protected by previous infection” for herd immunity to be achieved. He also expressed concerns about the significant proportion of Americans that are hesitant about getting the vaccine.  “We need to respect that, but we need to try and convince them of the importance, for their own safety and the safety of their family and the American public, to get vaccinated,” he added. Fauci is confident that the techniques developed will allow for easy adaptions of the current vaccines to protect against SARS-CoV-2 mutations. The development of universal coronavirus vaccines, which is necessary to stay ahead of new coronaviruses, will hopefully be the next step.

Further Readings

Fauci

Pancera M, Zhou T, Druz A, et al.

Structure and immune recognition of trimeric pre-fusion HIV-1 Env

Nature. 2014;514(7523):455-461.

Wrapp D,  Wang N, Corbett KS, et al.

Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation

Science. 2020;367(6483):1260-1263.

Corey L, Mascola JR, Fauci AS, Collins FS.

A strategic approach to COVID-19 vaccine R&D

Science. 29 2020 May; 368(6494):948-950.

Giurgea LT, Han A, Memoli MJ.

Universal coronavirus vaccines: the time to start is now

NPJ vaccines. 28 May 2020;5(43).

Efficacy Studies, Part One

Speakers

Gregory Glenn, MD
Novavax

Kathrin Jansen, PhD
Pfizer

Tal Zaks, MD, PhD
Moderna

Efficacy Data Updates from Moderna’s mRNA Vaccine Candidate

Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, gave an overview of the company’s efforts to create and distribute a COVID-19 vaccine and ensure protection against new virus variants.

Zaks pointed to three factors he believes led to the creation of a vaccine in only 11 months. First, the science already existed. The mRNA platform’s central concept, which is that “you can teach a cell how to make a protein by providing it with mRNA,” was proven and shown to create neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Secondly, a sense of urgency due to the pandemic’s severity allowed the clinical trials to proceed quickly but, Zaks assured, “without cutting corners.” It is an unfortunate “paradox of vaccine development” Zaks explained, that the more cases occur, “the faster you will know if a vaccine works.” Finally, he credited the speed of development to Moderna’s government stakeholders. “The unsung heroes are the FDA,” he said.

Zaks then highlighted the Phase 3 clinical trial results. The trial, which was representative of minorities and included mostly frontline workers, showed 94.1% efficacy of the vaccine. He described the adverse vaccine effects as non-severe and expected. Anaphylaxis, a life-threatening allergic reaction to injectable drugs, is of concern with all vaccines. The reaction occurs at the rate of 2.5 per one million doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine administered.

Zaks also discussed new Covid-19 variants. Of most concern are viruses with mutations on the receptor binding domain or the N-terminal domain, which may “improve the virus ability to escape the immune response.” Researchers saw a drop in robustness of the vaccine in the B.1.351 variant, but the vaccine remained effective. Moderna will continue to monitor mutations over time while they research booster shots to combat new variants.

Efficacy Data Updates from the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA Vaccine Candidate

According to Kathrin Jansen, senior vice president of vaccine research and development at Pfizer, a vaccine that relies on an mRNA platform has many advantages. For example, mRNA vaccines do not use viral foreign proteins, making them safe and easy to produce at scale. Also, they generate a broad immune response, which is helpful because our knowledge of what immune responses best correlate with protection is still limited. Jansen presented data indicating that the breakthrough Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine is extremely safe and 95% effective, but she also highlighted the many challenges that lie ahead.

For instance, while the clinical trials conducted in Germany and the US captured a diverse sample from a range of ages and ethnicities, critical segments of the population were excluded due to age or clinical conditions. Clinical trials with children 12-15 are currently underway, but trials with younger children will have to wait. Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine needs to be kept between -80°C and -60°C, complicating storage and distribution. Jansen noted they are “making progress in a vaccine formulation that won’t require such cold temperatures.”

Data from a pseudovirus neutralization assay suggesting that sera from participants treated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine can efficiently neutralize SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 (the variant first detected in the UK).

Highly transmissible variants that have emerged in the United Kingdom and South Africa pose what is perhaps the biggest challenge. These variants include mutations in the spike protein that Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine uses as a target. One of the approaches they use to research efficacy against the new variants involves creating synthetic viruses that express the mutations of interest. Then, they examine the neutralizing potential of blood sera extracted from vaccinated participants. Jansen said that data from these studies suggests that “this vaccine will continue to perform well against at least the variants that have appeared here.” However, she cautioned that this data “needs backing up by vaccine efficacy surveillance as well as animal models.”

Further Readings

Jansen

Walsh EE, Frenck RW Jr, Falsey AR, et al.

Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates

N Engl J Med. 17 Dec 2020;383(25):2439-2450.

Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al.

Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

N Engl J Med. 31 Dec 2020;383(27):2603-2615.

Xie, Xuping et al.

Neutralization of N501Y mutant SARS-CoV-2 by BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited sera

bioRxiv. 7 Jan. 2021, Preprint.

Efficacy Data Updates from Novavax’s Protein-based Vaccine Candidate

Gregory Glenn gave an update on the progress of Novavax’s protein-based COVID-19 vaccine, which was not available to the public at the time of his presentation. Novavax’s recombinant nanoparticle technology produces a full-length prefusion spike protein. The protein is combined with a saponin-based Matrix-M™ adjuvant and encoded with the Sars Cov-2 spike, and produced in insect cells. Similar techniques have proven successful in Novavax influenza vaccines. Importantly, the vaccine can remain stable in a refrigerator for up to three months, lowering distribution and storage costs.

Glenn, the president of research and development at Novavax, explained that in the pre-clinical package, researchers showed protection in the lower and upper airways of Rhesus Monkeys and produced an antibody response in a trial with 131 clinically ill convalescent subjects. At the time of the presentation, Novavax was conducting its Phase 3 US/Mexico trial and did not have results. However, Glenn was able to report the results of trials in the UK and South Africa. In the UK, researchers found that the vaccine was effective at 94% for the ancestral Covid-19 strain, but decreased to 86% for the UK strain. In South Africa, where the new strain became dominant during the trial, the efficacy decreased but remained around 60%.

Based on these results, Novavax has started developing vaccines for the new variants. Glenn predicts that booster and bivalent vaccines “may become part of the annual influenza immunization regime.” The vaccines are even more important and urgent, Glenn argued, because their South African data showed that “herd immunity from previous infection is not working to protect against the new variant strain.” Glenn expressed optimism about their ability to scale up production, saying that “over the past year, we went from nothing to having eight manufacturing sites in seven countries.”

Further Readings

Glenn

Bangaru S, Ozorowski G, Turner HL, et al.

Structural analysis of full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein from an advanced vaccine candidate

Science. 27 Nov 2020;370(6520): 1089-1094.

Keech C,  Albert G, Cho I, et al.

Phase 1-2 Trial of a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine

N Engl J Med. 2020;383(24):2320-2332.

Efficacy Studies, Part Two

Speakers

Sara Gilbert, PhD
University of Oxford

Hanneke Schuitemaker, PhD
Janssen Vaccines and Prevention B.V.

Xuefeng Yu, PhD
CanSino Biologics

Update on ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222

The Oxford-AstraZeneca adenovirus vaccine has an important advantage that distinguishes it from other vaccines currently on the market: it can be stored in a regular refrigerator for up to six months. Sarah Gilbert, professor at the University of Oxford and head of the team that developed the vaccine, emphasized the vaccine’s affordability, explaining that her team envisioned it as “a vaccine for the world.” The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is being tested in clinical trials in many countries. “It was important to us to get the information on how the vaccine behaves in different populations across the world,” she said.

An early report indicated that the two-dose Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was about 70% efficacious at preventing COVID-19. Closer examination of the data, however, led Gilbert and her team to realize that the timing of the second dose was critical: efficacy was only 50%-60% when doses were administered less than two months apart, but waiting three months boosted efficacy levels up to 82.4%. Waiting three months to give the second dose is now the policy in the UK, the first country to grant emergency authorization for the vaccine. Gilbert and her team also found that the first dose alone is highly efficacious (76%) at protecting against COVID-19, but only for the first three months. This is enough time to reduce the risk of people contracting the disease while they wait for the booster dose.

The interval between the first dose and the booster dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine critically determines its efficacy.

Gilbert also suggested the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine may be able to help curb the transmission of the virus. During clinical trials in the UK, nasal swabs of all participants were collected weekly. The scientists found 67% fewer positive samples in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group, and that this included asymptomatic cases. The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine has obtained emergency approval in 23 countries so far, and the plan is to manufacture 3 billion doses by the end of 2021.

Further Readings

Efficacy Data Updates from CanSino Biologics’ Viral-Vector Vaccine Candidate

Xuefeng Yu, chairman of CanSino Biologics, provided an overview of their COVID-19 vaccine and described the China-based company’s efficacy and safety research. The CanSino Biologics’ Ad5-nCov vaccine is built on an adenovirus-based viral vector platform, a mechanism similar to the one used in the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines. Yu announced that, pending final analysis of its Phase 3 clinical trial, the company plans to file for emergency authorization in several countries soon.

The Ad5-nCov vaccine was approved for limited use by the Chinese military in June 2020. Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials conducted in Wuhan indicated the vaccine is safe and induced significant immune responses after a single dose. Over 150,000 members of the Chinese military have received a dose of the vaccine. “We haven’t had any severe adverse events in that population,” said Yu before explaining that efficacy is difficult to assess in China because “there are really no cases right now.”

CanSino Biologic’s Phase 3 clinical trial for the vaccine has been taking place in five countries since September, with Pakistan and Mexico providing the majority of the 40,000 participants. Yu explained the clinical trial results are not available to the company, which is still blinded to the treatment groups. However, recent data analyses by an independent committee has declared the vaccine meets primary safety and efficacy criteria.

The Phase 3 clinical trial for the Ad5-nCov vaccine differs from others in two critical ways. First, the vaccine’s long-term efficacy will be tested by tracking a subset of participants for one year. They are also testing a two-dose trial that includes children as young as six years old, but that data is not yet available.

Further Readings

Janssen’s Effort in the Development of an Ad26 Based COVID-19 Vaccine

The COVID-19 vaccine developed by Janssen, a pharmaceutical division of Johnson & Johnson, has just been authorized for emergency use in the US. Hanneke Shuitemaker, head of Viral Vaccine Discovery at Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., explained that their Ad26.COV2.S vaccine relies on a proprietary adenovirus technology that the European Commission first approved in July 2020, in the context of an Ebola vaccine.

Phase 1 and 2a clinical trials recruited adults of all ages, including 375 participants over 65 years old. These trials revealed that the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine is safe, and most side effects were mild or moderate. The participants who were more likely to experience adverse events were younger participants and those who received the higher dose of the vaccine. Notably, both dose levels demonstrated similar immunogenicity in all age groups. Hence, Shuitemaker and her team decided to test the lower dose of their Ad26.COV2.S vaccine in Phase 3 clinical trials.

Last September, Janssen launched a Phase 3 clinical trial called ENSEMBLE, which tested the efficacy of a single dose regimen across the US, South Africa, and Latin American countries. The ENSEMBLE trial revealed that a single-dose of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine had a 66% overall efficacy at preventing moderate to severe COVID-19. The vaccine was highly efficacious against severe disease (85%), and it provided 100% protection against COVID-19-related hospitalization and death. In the South African trial, where 97% of the infections from which SARS-CoV-2 sequence data was available, involved the new B.1.351 variant, the vaccine showed the same efficacy levels against severe disease and hospitalizations.

Although Janssen’s vaccine is not quite as efficacious against moderate COVID-19 as other vaccines already on the market, it is highly efficacious against severe COVID-19, hospitalization, and death. In addition, the one-dose vaccine does not need to be stored in ultracold temperatures and confers protection against new variants. “Overall, we are very happy with this outcome,” Shuitemaker said. “At the beginning of this journey, we had established that a single-dose vaccine with 70% efficacy would be a tremendous tool in the fight against this pandemic,” she added. A second Phase 3 clinical trial (ENSEMBLE 2), which tests the efficacy of a two-dose vaccine regimen, is currently underway.

Further Readings

Schuitemaker

Mercado NB, Zahn R, Wegmann F, et al.

Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques

Nature. 2020; 586(7830):583-588.

Sadoff J, Le Gars M, Shukarev G, et al.

Interim Results of a Phase 1-2a Trial of Ad26.COV2.S Covid-19 Vaccine

N Engl J Med. 13 Jan2021 NEJMoa2034201.

Outbreak Predictions and Future Considerations

Speakers

Kevin Olival, PhD
EcoHealth Alliance

Stanley Plotkin, MD
University of Pennsylvania

Melanie Saville, MD
CEPI

Challenges to Prediction and Prevention of the Next Pandemic Zoonosis

According to Kevin Olival, vice president of research at EcoHealth Alliance, the threat of emerging infectious diseases has been rising for the last 70 years. Most of these infectious diseases are viral and linked to interactions between humans and wildlife. He explained that wild animals may host a diversity of viruses and that some of these viruses have the potential to infect human cells, inducing what is known as zoonotic diseases. Identifying the viruses that are more likely to jump from other species to humans and interrupting interactions between humans and the animals that carry those viruses is a challenging yet promising strategy to prevent future pandemics. In fact, two years before the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, Olival and his team published a study warning about villagers in the Yunnan province (China) being highly exposed to bats that carried SARS-related coronaviruses.

Not surprisingly, predicting where a novel infectious disease will emerge is very difficult. For instance, cataloguing all the viruses that can potentially infect each animal species involves intensive fieldwork. “Often people make the analogy with weather prediction, which was very coarse 50 years ago and we couldn’t see hurricanes coming weeks in advance,” Olival said of this nascent and complex science.

Given the multi-disciplinary and global nature of this kind of research, a centralized data platform to allow researchers to share and combine their findings will be critical. “These disparate data sets need to be put together,” said Olival.

Finally, he advocated for the need to shift policy towards pandemic prevention. It’s critical to get “policymakers to realize that there are other ways to deal with emerging infectious diseases than waiting for them to emerge and then responding,” said Olival. Once a high-risk hotspot has been identified, low-tech behavioral interventions to prevent human-animal contact may be all that is need to prevent a potentially devastating global pandemic.

Further Readings

Olival

Wang N, Li S-Y, Yang X-L, et al.

Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China

Virologica Sinica. 2018 Feb;33(1):104-107.

Allen T, Murray KA, Zambrana-Torrelio C, et al.

Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases

Nature communications. 24 Oct 2017;8(1):1124.

Latinne A, Hu B, Olival KJ, et al.

Origin and cross-species transmission of bat coronaviruses in China

Nature communications. 25 Aug 2020;11(1):4235.

United Nations Environment Programme and International Livestock Research Institute.

Preventing the Next Pandemic: Zoonotic diseases and how to break the chain of transmission

6 Jul 2020.

Lessons Learned from COVID-19 Vaccine Development for Future Pandemic Preparedness

Melanie Saville, director of vaccine research and development at the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), outlined the organization’s journey through COVID-19 vaccine development and lessons learned. Created in 2017 in response to the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, CEPI seeks to “accelerate vaccines for emerging infectious diseases and ensure equitable access to the vaccines,” said Saville. Prior to COVID-19, CEPI focused mainly on MERS and rapid response platforms like mRNA. This put CEPI on good footing when they shifted focus to COVID-19 at the start of January 2020.

By April of 2020, CEPI had raised over $1.5 billion in funding and entered partnerships with nine entities using varied strategies to develop COVID-19 vaccines. “Speed, scale and access,” the career virologist said, were the main criteria in determining investments. For speed, they carefully chose their partners and made early investments to ensure manufacturing capabilities to meet their accessibility goals of 2 billion vaccine doses worldwide by the end of 2021. That they invested in a portfolio of vaccines meant that if a vaccine failed, facilities could then be used for another vaccine. This manufacturing investment also helped with scalability, which is a problem particularly for smaller companies that have to resolve supply chain issues with sufficient materials and facilities.

CEPI joined the ACT Accelerator, established by the World Health Organization, to speed-up development of vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics and launched their taskforce, “Agility,” to better track variants. Saville sees these coalitions and organizations as a model and foundation for future pandemic responses. Overall, she’s optimistic. The pandemic has created a global desire for countries to invest and work together. “We have seen a revolution in vaccinology,” said Saville.

The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) adopted a portfolio approach to vaccine development, supporting the development of many different vaccine types summarized in this slide.

Further Readings

Saville

Lurie N,  Saville M, Hatchett R, Halton J.

Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed

N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21): 1969-1973.

Thanh Le T, Andreadakis Z, Kumar A, et al.

The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape

Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020 May;19(5): 305-306.

The Plague Year of 2020 and Its Effect on Vaccinology

In the final talk of the symposium, vaccinologist Stanley Plotkin reflected on how SARS-CoV-2 has impacted vaccinology. He praised the “all hands on deck” approach that we witnessed in 2020, with experts around the world getting involved and collaborating to develop multiple highly effective vaccines. Plotkin was also optimistic about the effect that the pandemic has had on vaccine acceptance. “Now, most people in all countries are pleading for vaccines, and to me that is a positive thing,” he said.

He also highlighted the importance of virology and other basic sciences. He explained that a handful of coronavirus researchers did the work that became the cornerstone of COVID-19 vaccines. According to Plotkin, “we need to support all those basic sciences, so that when we need something practical, we have the information we need to start working on a solution.”

Plotkin also listed a series of unknowns that researchers will need to figure out going forward. For example, the issue of mucosal responses to the vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 is a mucosal pathogen that takes hold in the nasal pharynx before spreading to the lungs and other organs. It is still unclear to what extent the current vaccines prevent mucosal replication. “Understanding how well they [prevent mucosal replication] has terribly important epidemiological implications regarding herd immunity and the spread of the disease,” he said.

Due to the tendency of SARS-CoV-2 to mutate, Plotkin said we have to face the possibility of a yearly vaccination. He advocated for the creation of regional labs that can monitor and quickly report on mutations across the world, something that is done with influenza. He also emphasized that we need to learn more about veterinary viruses, as they “have caused problems, are causing problems, and will cause problems.”

Further Readings

Plotkin

WHO Ad Hoc Expert Group on the Next Steps for Covid-19 Vaccine Evaluation, et al.

Placebo-Controlled Trials of Covid-19 Vaccines – Why We Still Need Them

N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 14;384(2):e2.

Plotkin SA.

Vaccination Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 10 Nov 2020;9(5): 517-518.

Plotkin SA, Halsey N.

Accelerate COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout by Delaying the Second Dose of mRNA Vaccines

Clin Infect Dis. 27 Jan 2021;ciab068.

Plotkin S.

History of vaccination

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 26;111(34):12283-7. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

A Closer Look at the Next Moon Landing

Overview

We’re going to the Moon—again! In the next decade, NASA’s Artemis program will first orbit and then land on the lunar surface. What may seem like a rerun from the 1960s is designed to establish a more permanent human presence on the Moon. This will be used for both scientific and private aims, and it may serve as a stepping-stone to Mars. In this eBriefing, we’ll learn more about what’s planned, what we gain from human space exploration, and how we establish international agreements off-planet.

In this eBriefing, You’ll Learn:

  • NASA’s plans for the Artemis mission
  • Open research questions that will be addressed through exploration in deep space
  • Which international agreements are currently in place to help navigate governance in space
  • How space exploration affects life on Earth

Speakers

Timiebi Aganaba-Jeanty, PhD, LLM
Arizona State University

Dina Contella
NASA

Dorit Donoviel, PhD
Translational Research Institute for Space Health, Baylor College of Medicine

Moderator:

Kari Fischer, PhD
The New York Academy of Sciences

Our Lunar Future

Timiebi Aganaba-Jeanty, PhD, LLM

Arizona State University

Timiebi Aganaba, PhD, LLM, is an assistant professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society with a courtesy appointment at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. She is a fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) based in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Aganaba was previously executive director of the World Space Week Association, coordinating the global response to the United Nations 1999 declaration that World Space Week should be celebrated from Oct 4-10 annually. Dr. Aganaba was a space industry consultant for the leading space analyst firm in Montreal, Canada, a teaching associate at the International Space University in France, an associate at the Nigerian law firm Kayode Sofola and Associates, and a trainee legal officer at the Nigerian Space Research and Development Agency. In 2017, Dr. Aganaba was the recipient of a Space Leaders Award from the International Astronautical Federation (IAF). Her doctorate received the George and Ann Robinson Award for advanced research capabilities.

Dina Contella

NASA

Dina Contella’s tenure at NASA began while she was still in school through the cooperative education program in 1990. After graduating from Texas A&M University, Contella worked as an astronaut instructor specializing in the Shuttle onboard computers and software, as well as entry and landing navigation aids. Beginning in 1995, she served as a space shuttle and space station flight controller and instructor responsible for planning, training, and executing spacewalks. She subsequently served as the lead Extravehicular Activity Officer (EVA) liaison to Russia during early station construction. After the Columbia accident, she was instrumental in developing shuttle Thermal Protection System (TPS) repair tools and techniques. And in her nine years as Mission Control Flight Director, Contella oversaw the well-being of the International Space Station, space shuttles, and their crews for a host of missions, leading teams of people operating vehicle systems and guiding astronauts building the space station, performing research, and maintaining it both inside and out. Now the Gateway Program’s manager for operations integration and utilization, she uses her experience in operational leadership and risk management to develop how to best use the Gateway’s capabilities and plan for astronaut missions on the Moon.

Dorit Donoviel, PhD

Translational Research Institute for Space Health
Baylor College of Medicine

As director for the Translational Research Institute for Space Health (TRISH), Dorit Donoviel, PhD, leads a $0.25B NASA-funded innovation R&D program that finds, funds, and facilitates disruptive human health and performance solutions for astronauts traveling in deep space. In her previous role as deputy chief scientist of the National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI), Dr. Donoviel led both domestic and international research programs that bridged academic, industry, and government resources to deliver fast and cost-effective tangible results. She is the recipient of multiple honors, including recognition from NASA and the NSBRI Pioneer Award. A published research scientist and invited speaker, Dr. Donoviel is Associate Professor in the Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology and the Center for Space Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine (BCM). Before joining BCM, she led metabolism drug discovery programs at Lexicon Pharmaceuticals for eight years. Dr. Donoviel completed a Human Frontiers postdoctoral fellowship at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Canada; holds a Biochemistry doctorate from the University of Washington in Seattle, WA; and received her baccalaureate degree in Biochemistry and Cell Biology from the University of California, San Diego in La Jolla, CA.

Kari Fischer, PhD

New York Academy of Sciences

Kari Fischer, PhD, is a Senior Program Manager for Life Sciences at the Academy, facilitating the planning and execution of both scientific symposia and programming for the general public. Her portfolio of programming spans biomedicine—from microsatellite DNA expansions to hearing restoration to cancer metabolism. Kari has also led several events on the interface between science and society, including a series of bioethics colloquia on randomized controlled trials, big data in healthcare, and conflict of interest; and several programs on science misinformation and science engagement with the public. Her contributions were featured at South by Southwest 2019 in the panel, “Preventing the Cambridge Analytica of Health Data.” Her science writing has appeared in The Washington Post, The Scientist, and The New York Academy of Sciences Magazine. Dr. Fischer joined the Academy in 2016 after completing her PhD in Cell and Developmental Biology at Weill Cornell Medicine, where she studied breast cancer metastasis and the lung tumor microenvironment. For her work in lung cancer, she was awarded the Ruth L. Kirchstein National Research Service Award Individual Predoctoral Fellowship by the National Institutes of Health. She received the Julian R. Rachele Prize for Outstanding Graduate Student Research for her breast cancer metastasis study in Nature, an article with over 500 citations since its publication. Dr. Fischer’s undergraduate degree in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology is from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Further Readings

Solutions to Reduce Systemic Inequities in Academia

Overview

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, white males made up 53% of all full-time professors in 2018. And while the “STEM pipeline” is becoming more diverse–more than 40% of women and roughly 15% of people of color receive their PhDs in STEM fields–colleges and universities need to implement inclusive policies to initiate change on a large scale.

On October 9, 2020, the New York Academy of Sciences hosted a webinar with Georgetown University Medical Center affiliates to share their progressive efforts to decrease systemic inequities and improve workplace culture at their institution. In 2019, the university launched the Bias Reduction and Improvement Coaching (BRIC) program to raise awareness of unconscious bias and attenuate systemic barriers at institutions with the hope of promoting diversity and inclusion in STEM.

Highlights

  • Bias impacts application, hiring, and promotion processes, as people make decisions based on shortcuts, unconscious preferences, and assumptions.
  • The Bias Reduction and Improvement Coaching (BRIC) program brings together a group of individuals from various demographic backgrounds for training in the skills and language needed to raise awareness of bias.
  • This “train the trainer” model empowers people to feel confident starting conversations about prejudice and how to mitigate bias in their respective departments and workplaces.

Speakers

Susan Cheng, EdLD, MPP
Georgetown University Medical Center

Kristi Graves, PhD
Georgetown University Medical Center

Caleb McKinney, PhD, MPS
Georgetown University Medical Center

Reducing Systemic Inequities in Academia

Unconscious Bias in STEM

Search committees looking to fill a job should be as objective as possible, especially when studies have shown that teams made up of diverse people are more innovative and high-performing. However, people rely on mental shortcuts and assumptions when making hiring decisions. They often use reflexive habits and exhibit unconscious preferences without realizing it.

Caleb McKinney, who trained as a microbiologist, transitioned to science education, and is now an Assistant Professor and Assistant Dean for Graduate and Postdoctoral Training and Development, related this phenomenon of reflexive habits to a “hot pot.” You learn from previous experience to pull your hand away when a stove is hot. With the same mindset, you can use your prior knowledge to make quick assumptions and form preferences about someone. He urged everyone to take an Implicit Association Test online to learn more about unconscious bias.

But how does conscious and unconscious bias impact STEM community development? Assistant Professor and Senior Associate Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Susan Cheng, noted one example. STEM emphasizes innate intelligence over hard work, but in letters of recommendation, professors are more likely to refer to male scientists as “brilliant,” whereas female scientists are “productive.” The way a job description is written says a lot about what admissions may be looking for in a student or what faculty may desire during recruitment. Search committees may deem a person “not a good fit” for the institution. The only way to combat this is to use checkboxes to ensure job description criteria are followed systematically. “Implicit biases are always in the background, and you need to manage them actively,” said Cheng.

Kristi Graves, a clinical health psychologist and Associate Professor of Oncology, explained that bias also affects STEM professionals’ upward trajectories. For instance, scholarly productivity metrics are very numeric and usually include the number of papers published, impact factor for the journal in which you’ve published, and the amount of grant funding you’ve obtained. But faculty members don’t have access to the same opportunities. A male professor going to another male for a collaboration (because he is like him) is an example of similarity bias.

It’s critical to note that Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) make up a small percentage of faculty members. BIPOC faculty members often act as the representative BIPOC for diversity panels and mentoring groups, which takes time away from work and research. And the amount of time spent on essential work and research affects prospects for promotions. Graves believes that hiring committees should have explicit discussions about implicit bias throughout the year to increase faculty diversity. “Everyone has bias,” said Graves. “The trick is to try to become aware of the bias, and then when you notice it, you do something about it so the negative impact that flows from that bias is not sustained or perpetuated.”

Although many colleges and universities have increased awareness and implemented more inclusive policies, the culture has not shifted enough to facilitate a more diverse institutional community. Even representative images on posters and brochures should indicate that a university values different types of people in STEM and that the depicted individuals can serve as role models for scientists who want to know what the institution values.

Understanding the BRIC Program

All three panelists have been heavily involved in the Bias Reduction and Improvement Coaching (BRIC) program at Georgetown University. The program leaders selected people from different backgrounds in various departments across the university for the program. Supervisor or departmental approval was required to participate since the program would take away hours spent on “numeric success metrics.” The inaugural group of 27 coaches—five of whom are coach leads—went through four, three-hour immersive sessions held quarterly. During these meetings, which covered the science of bias and its impact on hiring, promotions, retention, and overall workplace culture, participants learned evidence-based strategies to raise awareness and reduce discrimination. Participants led presentations and department talks on what they learned and received feedback from the coach leads.

The program’s goal is to have many people who can confidently initiate conversations about bias in their workplace. It is designed to establish training across the medical center by providing a faculty learning environment, explained Cheng. The messenger is so important because having the information come from a colleague you know and trust to understand the institutional context you work in is invaluable.

Figure 1. The BRIC program schedule included three-hour sessions, with smaller pod meetings in between, and presentation feedback for the participants before disseminating the information to colleagues.

McKinney participated in the BRIC program and pinpointed three main attributes of the initiative. The training provided self-knowledge to reflect upon one’s personal bias, leadership skills to feel equipped to speak up about bias when necessary, and the ability to communicate these strategies when training others. Participants were asked to reflect on their time in the program and took surveys to assess its impact.  Additionally, audience members from BRIC coaches’ presentations were surveyed to see if it was scaled to the department, and follow-ups were conducted to see if departments made any significant changes.

Program Outcomes

Although the initial training was geared toward faculty and staff, post-docs and graduate students organized bias reduction workshops and helped create presentations for their departments. Cheng believes that many students have already developed these skills, while faculty and staff are trying to catch up by participating in the available programs. In addition, departments are asking for workshops on microaggressions, anti-racism, and bias. Graves explained that the program built tremendous confidence for those presenting the material in a safe and confidential space. She also shared a reflection from a participant in the program who felt BRIC was “an effective approach to raise awareness about unconscious beliefs and attitudes and to discover biases in a non-confrontational manner.”

By bringing in participants from different sections of the medical center, the BRIC program facilitated collaboration between faculty and staff from various departments who would not typically work together. This teamwork increased cognitive diversity and allowed participants to build on each other’s thoughts in a broad group discussion. McKinney emphasized that BRIC fostered peer mentorship and feedback, and helped strengthen a sense of community throughout Georgetown University Medical Center.

He was impressed with how much he learned about himself while participating in the program. “To be truly empathetic, you have to be self-aware. You have to recognize and challenge the assumptions you may have about people and situations,” McKinney said. “The BRIC programs allows you to put yourself in other people’s shoes. You learn from each other how people’s experiences and backgrounds shape their individual context, and that’s so important for building empathy.”

Metrics for Success

The panelists shared an essential set of standards that needed to be met for the BRIC program to be successful. Most importantly, improving diversity requires commitment from everyone. That commitment starts with raising awareness and then addressing the issues to create a sense of belonging in the workplace. “Once people are more aware of these biases and start to engage in mechanisms to reduce those biases, you can really [assess an] environment that’s hostile and not welcoming,” said Cheng.

Graves sought feedback from leadership at Georgetown before starting the program. “Until you enact specific behaviors and policy changes, it doesn’t mean a lot,” she said.  The institution is responsible for creating an inclusive environment for trainees, post-docs, and faculty and ensuring that people have equal opportunities to succeed. Establishing an inclusive environment doesn’t have to be a top-down method; valuable feedback can come from anyone.

Cheng also highlighted the importance of decisions and transparency. Critical decision making, which includes communicating news and defining expectations and limitations, should be collaborative. For example, department chairs should define a clear set of expectations, goals, and values before a selection process, and the selection committee should routinely review those criteria. “In STEM, we should be really good at creating objective definitions of how we know when we’ve made our goal,” said Graves.

In addition, all employees should periodically revisit training on inclusion and bias, not just at the onset of the job. McKinney advocated for structured mentorship for minority groups, including cross-cultural mentoring relationships. “Mentors from majority backgrounds have an opportunity to shape retention by fostering these welcoming environments for junior individuals to succeed,” he said. Mentorship also includes facilitating career identities for graduate students and post-docs.  While it is critical to have support and map out your trajectory on an academic career path, mentors can also highlight opportunities in industry and focus on broad career paths.

The Future of BRIC

Bias awareness is critical now, when many interviews and meetings are being held virtually due to the pandemic. Graves saw this as a positive because it allows institutions to create new networks and reach students early on in their academic trajectories. They can reach a wider talent pool, and recruit candidates from various backgrounds who were not previously reached. Companies should also reassess their open opportunities because the way job descriptions are written and where they are posted plays an essential role in who applies. Equal opportunity statements at the end of job descriptions show candidates that a company values diversity and inclusion.

Georgetown University is not the only institution spearheading programs for systemic inequity awareness. Cheng praised numerous universities, such as UCLA, UCSF, and The Ohio State University, who have been at the forefront of implicit bias research and training. All three panelists are eager to continue the BRIC program. They hope that by scaling this bias awareness across Georgetown, there will always be individuals on committees who have been trained and can challenge their colleagues’ assumptions.

Further Readings

Misc

Dutt K, Pfaff DL, Bernstein AF, et al.

Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience

Nat Geosci. 2016; 9(11):805-808.

Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G.

Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people.

Delacorte Press. 2013

Harvard University.

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/

Implicit Association Test. Project Implicit.

Walker L, Sabin JA.

http://kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/research

Understanding Implicit Bias. 2015.

Unconscious Bias in Interviewing and Letters of Recommendation

https://som.georgetown.edu/diversityandinclusion/knowyourbias/biasintheworkplace/

Georgetown University School of Medicine

Know Your Bias

https://som.georgetown.edu/diversityandinclusion/knowyourbias/

Georgetown University School of Medicine.

Cobb J, Ali W.

https://www.aspenideas.org/podcasts/how-to-talk-about-race-and-racism

How to talk about Race and Racism. Aspen Ideas.