Skip to main content

Climate Science: Decision-Making in a Warmer World

Overview

Climate change is a growing threat with global impact. Shifts in the climate present special challenges for urban areas where more than half of the world’s population lives. New York City residents, for example, are already feeling the effects through recurrent flooding in coastal communities, warmer temperatures across all five boroughs, and strains in the city’s infrastructure during heavy downpours and extreme weather events. As a result, cities like New York require the best-available climate science to develop tangible policies for resilience, mitigation, and adaptation.

On March 15, 2019, climate scientists, city planners, and community and industry stakeholders attended the Science for Decision-Making in a Warmer World summit at the New York Academy of Sciences to discuss how cities are responding to the effects of climate change. The event marked the 10th anniversary of a successful partnership between the New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC), the City of New York, and the New York Academy of Sciences. Established in 2008, the NPCC has opened new frontiers of urban climate science to build the foundation for resiliency actions in the New York metropolitan region.

Learn about the NPCC’s latest research findings and their implications for New York City and other cities seeking to identify and mitigate the effects of climate change in this summary.

Meeting Highlights

  • NPCC research provides tools to inform and shape climate change resilience in New York City and other cities around the globe. 
  • Shifts in mean and extreme climate conditions significantly impact cities and communities worldwide. 
  • Cities can move forward by adopting flexible adaptation pathways, an overall approach to developing effective climate change adaptation strategies for a region under conditions of increasing risk.
  • There is a growing recognition that resilience strategies need to be inclusive of community perspectives.

Speakers

Dan Bader
Columbia University, New York City Panel on Climate Change

Jainey Bavishi
New York City Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency

Sam Carter
Rockefeller Foundation

Alan Cohn
New York City Department of Environmental Protection

Kerry Constabile
Executive Office of the UN Secretary General

Susanne DesRoches
New York City Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency

Alexander Durst
The Durst Organization

Sheila Foster
Georgetown, New York City Panel on Climate Change

Vivien Gornitz
Columbia University, New York City Panel on Climate Change

Mandy Ikert
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group

Klaus Jacob
Columbia University, New York City Panel on Climate Change

Michael Marrella
New York City Department of City Planning

Richard Moss
American Meteorological Society

Kathy Robb
Sive, Paget, and Riesel

Seth Schultz
Urban Breakthroughs

Daniel Zarrilli, PE
New York City Office of the Mayor

Climate Change, Science, and New York City

Speakers

Alan Cohn
New York City Department of Environmental Protection

Susanne DesRoches
New York City Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency

Alexander Durst
The Durst Organization

Michael Marrella
New York City Department of City Planning

Daniel Zarrilli (keynote)
New York City Office of the Mayor

James Gennaro (panel moderator)
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Keynote: Preparing for Climate Change — NPCC and Its Role in New York City

Daniel Zarrilli, of the New York City Office of the Mayor, gave the first keynote presentation. In addition to outlining NPCC history, he emphasized the meaning of NPCC to the city. NPCC has provided the tools to inform policy since before Hurricane Sandy in 2012. Because of NPCC, Zarrilli stated, people now know that the waters around New York City are rising “twice as quickly as the global average” and that climate change will affect communities disproportionately. The city can and will take on the responsibility to protect those who are most vulnerable.  Zarrilli highlighted steps the Mayor’s Office is taking: fossil fuel divestment, bringing a lawsuit against big oil for causing climate change, and launching a new OneNYC strategic plan to confront our climate crisis, achieve equity, and strengthen our democracy. He concluded by saying that with “8.6 million New Yorkers and all major cities watching,” NPCC is providing the best possible climate science to drive New York City policy.

Panel 1: NPCC and Its Role in New York City

How are NPCC findings used in developing resiliency in New York City?

The first panel was moderated by William Solecki of Hunter College Institute for Sustainable Cities – City University of New York, and featured three city representatives, Susanne DesRoches, of the New York City Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency; Michael Marrella, of the New York City Department of City Planning; Alan Cohn, of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection; and one industry stakeholder, Alexander Durst, of the Durst Organization.

DesRoches noted that the NPCC research has made possible a proliferation of guidelines regulating building design in the city. In fact, the New York City Climate Resiliency Design Guidelines, released the same day that the panel took place, provide instruction on how to use climate projections in the design of city buildings. The Department of City Planning also uses NPCC data in its Coastal Zone Management Program to require that coastal site developers to disclose and address current and future flood risks. Marrella added that NPCC research tools allow public and private stakeholders to make informed decisions on how to shape policy. NPCC methods and approaches are also being used climate data is also being used for New York State and national projections.

Panelists also addressed how New York City’s mitigation goals enable resilience in the face of climate change challenges. DesRoches pointed to the city’s aggressive climate targets, including an “80% [emissions] reduction by 2050,” and a goal to limit temperature increase to 1.5°C, as targeted by the Paris Agreement (UN Climate Change 2015). She gave two examples of adaptations that align with the City’s mitigation goals: adapting high “passive house” and green building standards for a reduced carbon footprint; and diversifying how the city receives energy, including the development of a renewable energy grid. Cohn added that the Department of Environmental Protection aims to free up capacity in water conservation and implement the use of methane as an energy source. With resilience in mind, Durst stressed that energy models should be uniform and based on the future, not just today.

Further Readings

Zarrilli

Wallace-Wells D.

The Uninhabitable Earth: Life after Warming

New York: Tim Duggan Books; 2019

Panel 1

UN Climate Change. The Paris Agreement.

What is the Paris Agreement?

Dec (2015)

NYC Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency.

Climate Resiliency Design Guidelines.

March (2019)

Wuebbles DJ, Fahey DW, Hibbard KA, Dokken DJ, et al.

Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment

U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 2017;1-477.

Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, DeGaetano A, O’Grady M, et al.

Responding to climate change in New York State: The ClimAID integrated assessment for effective climate change adaptation in New York State

Final report, NYSERDA. 2011;1-149

Findings from the New York City Panel on Climate Change

Panelists

Dan Bader
Columbia University, New York City Panel on Climate Change

Sheila Foster
Georgetown, New York City Panel on Climate Change

Vivien Gornitz
Columbia University, New York City Panel on Climate Change

Klaus Jacob
Columbia University, New York City Panel on Climate Change

Julie Pullen (panel moderator)
Jupiter Intelligence

Panel 2: Latest Findings from the New York City Panel on Climate Change

What types of information are the most useful?

The second panel was moderated by Julie Pullen of Jupiter Intelligence, and featured four NPCC members who presented the latest NPCC3 report findings: Vivien Gornitz, Klaus Jacob, and Daniel Bader of Columbia University; and Sheila Foster, of Georgetown Law.

The latest NPCC3 findings confirmed climate projections from the 2015 report as the projections of record for New York City planning and decision-making. For example, by the end of the century, “ocean levels will be higher than they are now due to thermal expansion; changes in ocean heights; loss of ice from Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets; land-water storage; vertical land movements; and gravitational, rotational, and elastic ‘fingerprints’ of ice loss,” said Gornitz. Under the NPCC’s new Antarctic Rapid Ice melt (ARIM) scenario, there could be up to a 9.5 ft. increase in sea level rise by 2100 at the high end of the projections. The new report advises that levies or raised streets might reduce the effects that sea level rise will have on New York City’s coastline.

Vulnerability to climate change varies by neighborhood and socioeconomic status. Foster presented a new three-dimensional approach to community-based adaptation through the lens of equity: distributional, contextual, and procedural. Distributional equity emphasizes disparities across social groups, neighborhoods, and communities in vulnerability, adaptive capacity, and the outcomes of adaptation actions. Contextual equity emphasizes social, economic, and political factors and processes that contribute to uneven vulnerability and shape adaptive capacity. Procedural equity emphasizes the extent and robustness of public and community participation in adaptation planning and decision-making.

Echoing Mayor Bloomberg’s sentiment that “if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it,” Jacob presented the proposed NPCC New York City Climate Change Resilience Indicators and Monitoring system (NYCLIM). Through the new proposed NYCLIM system, NPCC recommends climate, impact, vulnerability, and resilience indicators for the City’s decision-making processes.

Further Readings

Cities as Solutions for Climate Change and Closing Remarks

Keynote Speaker and Panelists

Jainey Bavishi
New York City Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency

Sam Carter
Rockefeller Foundation

Kerry Constabile
Executive Office of the UN Secretary General

Seth Schultz
Urban Breakthroughs

Mandy Ikert (keynote)
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group

Richard Moss (panel moderator)
American Meteorological Society

Keynote: Role of Cities in Achieving Progress

Mandy Ikert, of C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, gave the second keynote presentationThe Future We Don’t Want, a study recently released by C40, the Urban Climate Change Research Network (UCCRN), and Acclimatise found that billions of urban citizens are at risk of climate-related heat waves, droughts, floods, food shortages, and blackouts by 2050 (UCCRN 2018). Cities are situated at the forefront of these effects and urgently need to respond. Ikert stated that “we live in an urbanizing world,” where 68% of the world’s population will be living in cities by 2050, up from approximately 54% today.” Ikert stressed that “mayors and city agencies are directly accountable to their constituency” in order to protect and preserve their lives and livelihood. She also urged cities to reach out to researchers to obtain accurate modeling for extreme events. Cities have the potential to account for 40% of the emissions reductions required to align with the Paris Agreement’s goal to limit temperature rise to 1.5°C (UN Climate Change 2015). Therefore, the way a city responds to climate change, Ikert said, determines how livable and competitive it will be in the future.

Panel 3: City Stakeholders and Beyond

How can knowledge networks and city networks improve interactions to achieve climate change solutions?

The final panel was moderated by Richard Moss of the American Meteorological Society, and featured Corinne LeTourneau, of the North America Region, 100 Resilient Cities; Kerry Constabile, of the Executive Office of the UN Secretary General; Jainey Bavishi, of the New York City Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency; and Seth Schultz, of Urban Breakthroughs, spoke about the enormous value and knowledge of stakeholders.

In this session, all of the participants highlighted that many cities are playing a critical role in meeting the challenge of climate change, both through efforts to reduce their own greenhouse gas footprints, and to update infrastructure and programs to meet the needs of their citizens as climate change impacts occur.

Panelists discussed how finances are a major challenge to addressing climate change. For example, Constabile noted that a small percentage of megacities in developing countries have credit ratings. This lack of “creditworthiness” hinders cities from raising their own bonds and attracting private investment, both of which are significant sources of funding for climate-related projects. Schultz suggested that private money may jumpstart some climate resiliency and adaptation efforts, and stated that eight of ten of the world’s largest countries are funding research on climate change. LeTourneau and Schultz identified that without the climate data to assess risks, money will not be directed to the areas of greatest need. LeTourneau highlighted the importance of describing how climate change affects risks and “the bottom line” in a way that decision makers and citizens find compelling and relatable.

Panelists also highlighted that climate does not have boundaries, but government bodies do. As Bavishi pointed out, New York City is lucky that climate change adaptation has been codified into law. Chief resilience officers are retained even after city funding is spent, so continuity is in place. City governments around the country and the globe are following suit, but as the panelists pointed out, these ideas should spread more widely.

Closing Remarks

NPCC member Michael Oppenheimer remarked that the NPCC offers a “local picture at granular level with the best possible science.” Hurricane Sandy taught the City about its vulnerability and drove research on flood tides and rising coastal tides. With the 2010 NPCC report, he said, a firm research agenda was drafted that shifted the City’s view of climate change to resiliency. Oppenheimer stressed that NPCC science is useful for policy and praised New York City for utilizing NPCC data in policy decisions. In closing, Oppenheimer said that dissemination assures that communities worldwide are able to use NPCC data.

Further Readings

Ikert

Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Romero-Lankao P, Mehrtotra S, et al.

Climate change and cities: Second assessment report of the urban climate change research network

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Eds; 2018

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs

World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition

Population Division (2018)

Moss RH, Avery S, Baja K, Burkett M, et al.

Evaluating Knowledge to Support Climate Action: A Framework for Sustained Assessment

Wea., Clim., Soc. 2019 Apr 4(2019)

The New York City Mayor’s Proclamation

Whereas: Global issues are often felt most deeply at the local level, and in the face of worldwide threats to our environment, infrastructure, and economy, cities have the power and responsibility to lead our planet in the right direction.  After Hurricane Sandy, when the devastating effects of climate change hit home for far too many of our residents, New York City reaffirmed our commitment to building a sustainable path forward.  On the 10th anniversary of its founding, it is a great pleasure to recognize the New York City Panel on Climate Change for its exceptional leadership in this work.

Whereas: Since 2008, the NPCC’s innovations in urban climate science have propelled New York to the forefront of the global fight against climate change.  Its recommendations have informed ambitious policies that have helped the five boroughs recover from past damage and emerge stronger, and its successful partnership with the City of New York and the New York Academy of Sciences demonstrates the power of collaboration between the public sector, industry and local leaders, and the scientific community.  With the NPCC’s guidance, we are better prepared to anticipate and conquer the climate challenges that lie ahead.

Whereas: New Yorkers have always been known for their resiliency and boldness, and our city must meet concerns of this scale with solutions that our worthy of its residents.  From increasing our coastal resiliency to pioneering a global protocol for cities to attain carbon neutrality by 2050, my administration remains steadfast in our efforts to protect people of all backgrounds from the impacts of climate change.  As we continue to grapple with the grave risks that global warming poses, we are grateful to the NPCC for providing our city with the rigorous science needed to thrive in our rapidly changing world.  Today’s Summit offers a wonderful opportunity to applaud this organization for a decade of service to New York City, and I look forward to the progress its members will continue to inspire in the years ahead.

Now therefore, I, Bill De Blasio, Mayor of the City of New York, do hereby proclaim Friday, March 15th, 2019 in the City of New York as:

 “NEW YORK CITY PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE DAY”

Proclamation of the Mayor of New York City

Tackling Climate Change One City at a Time

A shot of the New York City skyline.

We caught up with New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC) member Michael Oppenheimer to discuss the importance of sound science informing effective policy.

Published February 22, 2019

By Marie Gentile, Mandy Carr, and Richard Birchard

Michael Oppenheimer, PhD

It will take more than a village — even when that “village” is the size of New York City — to find solutions to climate change, but that hasn’t deterred the New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC).

Consisting of leading climate change scientists, policy makers, and private sector practitioners the panel consists of leading climate change scientists, policy makers and private sector practitioners. Together, they are identifying and communicating the impacts of climate change. We recently sat down with NPCC member Michael Oppenheimer — head of Princeton University’s Center for Policy Research on Energy and Environment — to discuss the importance of sound science informing effective policy.

Why should NYC take the lead on identifying the impact of climate change?

Not only does NYC have the financial and intellectual capital to address climate change, it has the ability to deploy this capital to find solutions and consider what the looming risks and the options for dealing with these risks are. Its resources, in that way, are greater than any other city on earth.

Secondly, the city has a very high level of risk along its coast, compared to other places around the world. We are subject to both sea level rise and North Atlantic hurricanes and that’s a one, two punch. When it goes bad, you get Hurricane Sandy. So we have to learn to live in an already risk-laden world. If we can figure out how to deal with current risks and sustain the viability of the city through future, growing risks, that will be an important lesson for other places.

What role does the private sector have in helping to shape and implement NYC’s climate change response?

The private sector can be very helpful in terms of gathering the information we need to design potential options. A lot of the progress that’s been made in places like The Netherlands has been made with heavy private sector involvement. The private sector will have to be deeply involved in capital intensive solutions, like a surge barrier or the Big U, not as investors in the projects but because these will have significant implications for businesses. Their support could be a critical factor in the success of such efforts.

Conversely the private sector can create obstacles to progress by being resistant to the financial arrangements that are needed for adaptation and resilience building. NYC’s real estate industry is very politically influential and its preferences have often been quite visible. Sometimes their proposals are smart, and sometimes they are counterproductive and focused on rather narrow interests rather than the welfare of the city. Instead, I hope the industry provides forward-looking engagement that helps the city to protect its people at an affordable cost.

Why is scientific research critical to the development of good policy?

If we don’t have science, we have nothing. We have no evidence to provide a basis for rational decisions, we have no way to know whether it’s wise to retreat from certain areas of the city, or the effects of surge barriers versus more modest control efforts.

We have to understand these things as best we are able decades in advance, in order to implement cost effective solutions. Policymakers cannot make efficient decisions on any particular type of broad scale adaptation project, unless they have at least a vague idea of how fast the sea level may rise. For example, we won’t know whether to begin certain activities now or defer them for 10 years, without science.

If there was ever a problem where you need cutting edge science, climate change is it. The city has been very wise in engaging scientists in understanding what the risk is through the NPCC. That way, the city is in the position to make the best decisions that can be made today, even given significant uncertainty.

How can scientists more effectively communicate with policymakers to implements their findings in effective policy?

Scientists need to be honest with policymakers about what the uncertainties are, what might happen, and what the risks are of taking certain steps (or not taking them). Scientists have to be willing to engage in a two-way conversation, listening carefully to what policymakers need, so that they can better formulate their responses.

In general scientists are not brilliant communicators, but it isn’t necessarily their fault. It’s also difficult to decipher what politicians are willing to hear. Scientists have to talk to political leaders, as if they’re average people, and not in jargon. They need to understand when they approach politicians and policy makers, that in a democracy everyone involved in the decision process, including scientists, are ultimately responsible to the average citizen.

To learn more on this topic, read the full report published in our Annals Special Issue: Advancing Tools and Methods for Flexible Adaption Pathways and Science Policy Integration: NPCC 2019 Report.

The Need for Sustainable Development in Outer Space

2019 not only marks the 50th anniversary of the moon landings, but we’ll also see the first fleet of “space taxis” deployed.

Published December 1, 2018

By Jennifer L. Costley, PhD

Image courtesy of Ivan via stock.adobe.com.

Recently, Vice President Pence laid out an ambitious plan to establish a new military “Space Force” as soon as 2020. NASA has already outlined its plans to send humans to Mars in the 2030s. Private companies like Boeing, SpaceX and Sierra Nevada Corp., are investing heavily in commercial spacecraft. And Orion Span, Bigelow Aerospace, Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin are just a few of the players testing the space tourism waters as the ultimate vacation destination for those who have lots of disposable income and have already been everywhere on Earth, twice.

But what impact might increased human activity have on the fragile space eco-system? How will space travelers grow enough food to sustain a trip of months or years? Already some experts are sounding the alarm about the amount of “space debris” in orbit around the Earth. Who gets to own space and how will commercial and military use of space be governed?

2019 will mark yet another milestone for space travel. As we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the moon landings, the first fleet of private “space taxis” will be deployed. If all goes as planned, SpaceX’s Crew Dragon capsule and Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner are both scheduled to blast off on test flights with NASA astronauts on board.

A Tremendous Expansion in Scientific Knowledge

We have had nearly sixty years of space travel, and almost fifty years since the iconic “giant leap for mankind.” Human exploration of space has resulted in a tremendous expansion in scientific knowledge about our solar system, and orbiting satellites have provided critical knowledge about the Earth itself — continuously collecting data on global climate, environmental change and natural hazards.

But the scientific benefits of space exploration are only the tip of the iceberg. Our activity in space has improved nearly every aspect of quality of life on Earth. Early satellites contributed critical knowledge and capabilities for communication and global positioning. The challenges of energy efficiency for space exploration drove the development of solar cells, batteries and fuel cells. The precision and reliability required of robots for space have advanced robotic capabilities on Earth, such as a robotic glove developed as a grasp assist device, first for astronauts and then factory workers.

The International Space Exploration Coordination Group recently published an overview of the benefits stemming from space exploration, listing the following technological innovations: implantable heart monitors, light-based anti-cancer therapy, cordless tools, light-weight high temperature alloys for jet engines, cell phone cameras, compact water purification systems, global search-and-rescue systems and biomedical technologies.

An Exciting New Phase of Space Exploration

We are poised on the edge of an exciting new phase of space exploration — what Bloomberg Businessweek recently called “The New Space Age.” This new phase is characterized not only by a new mission — Mars and beyond — but by a new focus on sustainability. With years in an enclosed environment and on a planet without oxygen, a long-haul space mission will not get replenishments of food, water, equipment, clothing or anything else.

As astronaut Cady Coleman put it, “Sustainability, for someone like myself planning to go to Mars, is a closed loop system, not being able to go home or bring supplies. The things we need to think about are exactly the things we need to think about for a sustainable Earth.”

Sustainable space exploration promises to be an essential driver for exciting and dynamic discoveries. The possibilities of providing solutions to some of our most urgent problems, creating ecosystems of innovation, fueling job creation, and inspiring new generations of young people toward careers in science, engineering and technology are limitless.

And by overcoming the challenges of sustainable space travel, we have an opportunity to realize a whole new set of benefits for the 7.5 billion people here on Earth.

Also read: To Infinity: The New Age of Space Exploration

Antimicrobial Resistance in the Environment

A professor smiles for the camera inside her research lab,

Amy Pruden’s research examines the spread of antibiotic resistance, a major public health and environmental concern.

Amy Pruden, PhD

Published August 13, 2018

By Marie Gentile, Mandy Carr, and Richard Birchard

The spread of antibiotic resistance is a major public health concern, prompting a movement to reduce their use in food animal production, and prevent resistance buildup in people and the environment.

Amy Pruden, PhD, the W. Thomas Rice Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech, was among the first researchers to describe antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) as environmental “contaminants.”

Her research has laid a foundation for understanding why and how agricultural, wastewater, and water environments may represent key pathways for receiving and spreading antimicrobial resistance.

This interview has been edited for space and clarity.

What first led you to investigate water pathways as locations that contribute to the antibiotic resistant genes burden?

As a new faculty member at Colorado State University, there was this growing awareness of emerging pollutants – the trace chemicals that end up in our water. Things like pharmaceuticals, personal care products, etc.

Things that in the past, we thought, ‘Oh, it goes down the drain and it goes away,’ or, ‘I took that pill, it’s gone. My body broke it down.’ Now we know that isn’t the case.

At the time, my collaborator, Dr. Ken Carlson had begun looking at antibiotic residuals in Colorado’s Poudre River. Ken is a water chemist and had developed techniques to look for pharmaceuticals at trace levels in environmental water samples. He was able to distinguish between antibiotics typically found in livestock and in people.

This led me to think, ‘Antibiotics in the environment might not be much of a concern, unless they’re influencing the resident microbial communities and stimulating the spread of antibiotic resistance.’ At the same time, I was well-aware of the complexity of microbial communities in the environment and that culture-based methods would only provide information about a small fraction of a percent of the bacteria in the river.

It all came together, if we wanted to understand antibiotic resistance in these river sediments, we had to use the DNA-based tools, and not look at one culture or strain at a time.

What are some of the practical challenges of your work?

A big challenge is the lack of a standard agreed upon method for monitoring antibiotic resistance in the environment. Most of the antibiotic resistance work that’s been done, has been done in the clinic, but the single strain-based diagnostic methods used there are not necessarily appropriate for environmental monitoring.

Ideally, what is needed are tools and metrics that capture microbial ecological dimensions of antibiotic resistance, including types, mechanisms, and magnitudes of ARGs, and their potential to spread.

Assessing the potential for bacteria to share their ARGs, which they can do within and among members of microbial communities via horizontal gene transfer, is especially key.

Currently we’re working on methods using next-generation DNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis to gain a holistic “resistome” perspective: a full sense assessment of all the ARGs that are present, along with mobile genetic elements, like plasmids, transposons, and integrons and things that may facilitate development of multi-drug resistance and the capacity for ARGs to spread among bacteria.

How can we better control the spread of antibiotic resistance genes?

We need to get at the root causes, understanding how antibiotic resistance evolves and spreads in the first place. Identifying hotspots can be a useful way to achieve this.

A hotspot is a place where many factors come together to increase the chances that antibiotic-resistant pathogens can evolve. For example, wastewater treatment plants are potential hotspots, because they bring together everything that’s flushed down the drain, pathogens, ARGs, and antibiotics. Hotspots would be a useful target both for monitoring and mitigation.

The other big area is in agriculture. The majority of antibiotics used in the world, are for agriculture and livestock. Yet, we don’t have wastewater treatment plants on farms – that would be too costly and impractical.

Instead, there are opportunities to improve manure management. For this to work, we need simple, practical guidelines, that determine which antibiotics best protect livestock, but have the least effect on human health and lesser environmental impact. Then we need to decide how to handle manure from livestock treated with antibiotics.

Should it be composted or digested? What are the safest practices for land application as a soil amendment?

Also read: Getting Out the Facts on Public Health

Green is the New Black in Sustainable Fashion

Textile waste has been on the rise in recent years because of “fast fashion” trends. Companies are exploring ways to recycle these otherwise discarded materials.

Published June 1, 2018

By Mandy Carr

Image courtesy of Hilda Weges via stock.adobe.com.

How much stuff do you have in your closet? If you’re like most people, it’s way too much and with clothing you probably seldom wear. According to Mattias Wallander, CEO of USAgain, Americans purchase five times as much clothing as they did in 1980 — largely due to “fast-fashion” — low-quality, inexpensive fashions typically found at retailers like H&M and Forever 21. As a result, textile waste grew 40 percent between 1999 and 2009, according to the Council for Textile Recycling. In 2014 the EPA reported that 10,460,000 tons of textile waste was thrown into landfills.

In the State of Fashion 2018 report by Business of Fashion and McKinsey & Company, Dame Ellen MacArthur said, “Today’s textiles economy is so wasteful that in a business-as-usual scenario, by 2050 we will have released over 20 million tons of plastic microfibers into the ocean.” Those stats show a frightening trend, but according to a 2014 article in The Atlantic, of the clothing that is collected by charities: 45 percent is used for secondhand clothing, 30 percent is cut down and made into industrial rags, 20 percent is ground down and reproduced and five percent is unusable. Less than one percent is recycled into new textile fiber.

Barriers to Recycling Textiles

So why isn’t more disused clothing being recycled? According to Natasha Franck, the founder of EON, a collective focused on making fashion sustainable, the biggest barrier to recycling textiles is the lack of material transparency. Fabric cannot be recycled if its composition is unknown. Seventy percent of retailers plan to provide item level tagging by 2021 and EON is developing the first global tagging system for textile recycling, making it easier to sort through fabrics.

Some retail companies are developing their own solutions. International fashion retailer Zara, for example, is installing collection bins across all its stores in China, while Swedish retailer H&M, has invested in Re:Newcell the first garment in the world made from chemically recycled used textiles. C&A introduced a mass market price T-shirt that is “Cradle-to-Cradle” certified i.e. designers and manufactures have undergone a continual improvement process that looks at five quality categories; material health, material reutilization, renewable energy and carbon management, water stewardship, and social fairness. Each product receives a level of achievement in each category — basic, bronze, silver, gold or platinum.

Many cities have their own recycling programs. New York City has NYC Grow collection points to donate clothing. Unwanted clothes are picked up at collection stations and then taken to a facility to be sorted and recycled. Germany-based I:CO — short for I:Collect — provides global solutions for collection, reuse and recycling of used clothing and shoes. Their worldwide take-back system and logistics network currently operates in 60 countries and helps cities and retail outlets to develop recycling solutions.

Also read: Students Make Sustainable Fashion Statement

Scientists Step into New Roles to End Poverty

Scientists from across the globe are teaming up to lessen poverty and advance sustainability to make the world a better place for the next generation.

Published June 1, 2018

By Charles Ward

Image courtesy of Liudmyla via stock.adobe.com.

Based on aerodynamic laws bumblebees should not be able to fly, and yet they do. Similarly if past lessons of human history are reliable guides to future performance, ambitious global commitments to address poverty, inequality and sustainable development should quickly flounder amidst human foible. And yet, in the three years since their adoption, the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have already changed the conversation about what collective will can accomplish. The shift has taken place, thanks in part to members of the world’s scientific community, who have stepped into informal roles as conceptual interpreters, brokers between advocacy and realpolitik, and coalition builders.

The Power of Collective Effort

When 193 U.N. member states signed onto the SDGs in 2015, there was fresh evidence that seemingly intractable issues of poverty, growth and inequality could in fact yield to collective effort. The U.N.’s preceding framework, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), had met its most well known objective of “cutting extreme poverty in half” five years ahead of schedule. The SDGs raise the poverty goalposts even higher — by redefining poverty beyond purely monetary terms as a threefold condition that includes economic, social and environmental factors.

The SDGs have pulled in active participation from a growing spectrum of stakeholders that include governments, multi-lateral organizations, NGOs and private-sector actors. But with every stakeholder pressing ahead with its own SDG priorities, what actually addresses global poverty is the question that connects all parties. This common need for shared, fact-based understanding has put scientific disciplines into a position of de-facto referee. The perceived apolitical objectivity of scientific methods and the historic training of scientists in the transfer of knowledge offer a glue strong enough to hold together would-be SDG collaborators and partners, and dissolve tensions born out of perceived biases or competing agendas.

An Unfolding, Dynamic Entity

Scientists involved with the SDGs acknowledge they are a complex, even sprawling web of interdependent causes and effects. The scientific tearing apart of causes, conditions and valid findings would be challenging even before all the cultural, political and environmental variables that prevail across the globe are factored. “How do you talk to people when sustainability is an unfolding, dynamic entity?” asks Dr. Mark B. Milstein, who directs the Center for Sustainable Global Enterprise at Cornell University’s Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management. “The SDGs really capture that—they’re overlapping, they’re not clean, with sub-areas that are not mutually exclusive.”

A strategic management expert by training, Milstein straddles the intersection where situation-specific solutions and broad, transferable scientific insights merge or collide. Explicitly, Milstein specializes in framing the world’s social and environmental challenges as unmet market needs, often best addressed by the private sector. Tacitly, as someone who consults extensively with business entities to help them effect change, he’s a translator. “For somebody like myself, rigorous scientific inquiry means training to examine and analyze data sets, and look for trends,” says Milstein. “How do you go about doing work that can adhere to scientific rigor while still trying to move the needle on these critical issues that we believe have to be addressed?”

Immediate Problem Solving

The private-sector SDG actors who are making decisions and on-the-ground investments, Milstein notes, tend to be focused on immediate problem solving. They’re equally committed to their own SDG projects, he notes, but often working with shorter deadlines, and applied research that leans more to market needs and decisions. Part of his job, he elaborates, is using the kind of knowledge science can produce to help private business along.

“Since we’re talking about how it makes sense for the private sector to get involved and stay involved, we have to make sure the questions we’re asking are as clear as can be, that we’re being very specific about the language that we use and the data that we collect, and the conclusions that we draw from that,” he explains. “There’s no reason why applied research cannot be rigorous the way academic research is.”

For SDG scientist stakeholders, dynamic tension is built into the multiple roles they are asked to play. Working as a policy expert for the U.N. Development Program (UNDP), Dr. Esuna Dugarova walks a tightrope every day between scientific detachment and the realities of SDG realpolitik.

“Being part of the U.N. system, I’m here to promote the framework of the SDGs, and to provide recommendations to governments on how to implement the 2030 Agenda,” says Dugarova, emphasizing that her perspective on SDG multi-tasking is her own, and not that of UNDP. “On the other hand, in my capacity as a researcher, I do research and analysis. Sometimes, the recommendations are not always what governments want to hear. I’m also critical about what kind of data should be used, and how to incorporate that data to make good policy advice.”

Processing Data Mindfully

As one example, Dugarova points to her research work on unemployment and poverty in Central Asia. Accurate findings are difficult to obtain, she recounts, partly because large portions of local employment are not parts of formal economies, and thus underreported. Additionally, host governments are sensitive about their image, creating a delicate atmosphere for the presentation of the data. “One must be mindful about how to process data,” says Dugarova.

Dugarova has a very definite point of view about one of the major levers that drive progress against poverty, inequality and towards sustainable development: gender equality. “There are certain universal accelerators. Gender equality is one of them, capable of achieving many goals at the same time, whether it’s economic development, food security, climate change or political participation.”

But here again, Dugarova is keenly aware of her role as an informal broker of facts to sometimes unreceptive national governments, who happen to be her major professional stakeholders. She can easily point to gender-equality progress. For example, two-thirds of developing countries have achieved gender equality in primary education, female political participation is growing strongly in Latin America and U.N. economic models show strong correlation between female labor force participation and economic growth.

Structural, Institutional, and Cultural Bottlenecks

She’s also aware of structural, institutional and cultural bottlenecks in the way of further progress, citing gender-based violence as an example. As a policy expert and advocate for gender equality, Dugarova realizes it’s one thing to know that 49 countries still have no legal framework to address domestic violence, it’s entirely another to go up against social and cultural norms that are often woven into national identity. “If you address gender norms that are embedded in national identity, you have to address or even change national identity, and these are deeply embedded in the nation-state,” she elaborates. Dugarova does not have to state the obvious, that the nation-state is the foundation of the U.N. system.

There does seem to be consensus among stakeholders that achievement of the SDGs will require unprecedented levels of cooperation, and entirely new models of partnership. Dr. Robert Lepenies is a Research Scientist at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Leipzig, Germany, and a member of the Global Young Academy. He has watched the specific ways in which the world’s scientific communities coalesce around the SDGs, and is an active participant in related coalition-building.

The SDGs, Lepenies points out, have put new initiatives in motion to bring together scientists, policy specialists and non-governmental actors, with impacts yet to be revealed. Lepenies mentions cooperation between statistical agencies worldwide to agree on metrics to determine whether the SDGs have been successfully met. In no way is this a finished process, notes Lepenies, and scientists must use the prestige of their positions to continue to press for accountability and statistical rigor. “I think the major advantage is that the discussion has been changed for good now,“ Lepenies says. “It is simply assumed that partnerships must be interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary, participatory and draw on different types of input.”

Processes, Methodologies, and Approaches

Lepenies is particularly optimistic about relatively new entities such as the Global Young Academy, and innovative hybrid frameworks such as Future Earth’s Knowledge-Action Networks. “I am personally very excited about the pioneering roles played by national science academies, particularly young academies in places like Africa, and even associations of science academies such as the InterAcademy Partnership,” Lepenies observes. “Poverty is back on the agenda, defined in ways that will contribute to huge capacity building for social, economic and environmental statistics around the world.”

The Holy Grail for SDG scientists who attempt to address the economic, social and environmental dimensions of poverty are universally applicable solutions — processes, methodologies and approaches — that are in fact sustainable, scalable and replicable.

But the reality seems to be much messier, with progress that takes the form of scalpels rather than hammers, and localized, population-specific solutions rather than sweeping antidotes. In the past three years, scientists invested in the success of the SDGs may have built or picked up an increasingly fine-grained understanding of what works, what doesn’t and why. They’ve learned new ways of communicating with SDG partners who think and speak in a different idiom. And they’ve demonstrated willingness to partner with each other and with non-scientist stakeholders.

A More Just World is Possible

Scientists are also learning, perhaps, to remain participants in an SDG universe of calibrated expectations and incremental advancements. The U.N.’s own SDG charter contains terms like “slow and uneven progress.” As Lepenies says, “The SDGs are primarily about the long-term vision we have for our planet. Even though the agreed-upon goals represent a non-binding consensus, I think we should look at the 2030 Agenda as the best chance to achieve a ‘realistic utopia,’ a global endeavor to bring about social and intergenerational justice. A more just world is possible, and the SDGs give us a pretty good shot at achieving this.”

Editor’s Note: The views expressed by the participants quoted in this article are personal and do not necessarily reflect the positions of their affiliated institutions or The New York Academy of Sciences

Also read: Sustainable Development for a Better Tomorrow

A Need for Sustainable Urban Ecosystems in the Future

A shot of the NYC skyline

Imagine an “Intellicity,” where neural networks ensure everything works together.

Published May 1, 2018

By Lori Greene

Today’s students will be the inhabitants of tomorrow’s cities, so they want more sustainable ways of living and working in urban ecosystems.

That was the premise behind United Technologies’ Future of Buildings Innovation Challenge. This event was created by The New York Academy of Sciences and launched in September 2017.

Fifty-two teams of students 13 to 18 years old from across the globe competed. Their goal: to conceive the most inventive green building solution.

Imagining an “Intellicity,” was the creation of one team. Here, neural networks run a building’s systems to ensure people, machines and the environment work in concert to adroitly use and conserve resources.

Reducing Waste

In the “Intellicity” paradigm, little is wasted.  Solar panels and wind turbines create an on-going source of clean, abundant, renewable energy. Rainwater collected from the roofs of buildings provide water for indoor plumbing and hydroponic systems. Once inside, hydroponic walls can repurpose rainwater for food growth. Intellicity’s student founders want to ensure that people are harnessing energy generated by city activity and putting it to use.

Floor tiles in larger structures convert footsteps into electrical energy, and waste is turned into fertilizer.  Solar panels on windows maximize sunlight and capture the energy to help run a building’s lighting and temperature systems.  Revolving doors connected to electric generators can be used to capture energy as people walk in and out. This creates another source to power the structure’s electricity, heating and cooling needs.

The Applications of Artificial Intelligence

Using artificial intelligence (AI), energy is redistributed to increase the comfort and productivity of building occupants. The AI system that would run the integrated interior and exterior building networks “learns” from several inputs and the resulting outputs.  For example, during high usage times, the power could go towards controlling lighting as well as heating and cooling rooms. Over time, the network records occupant preferences and automatically adjusts the room, heat and light depending on who enters and leaves.

Similarly, the team sought to give people an opportunity to interact with their building using a “neural network.” This computer system was developed around the human nervous system. It aims to allow the building to communicate back through an app detailing the energy being collected, used and wasted in the structure.

Retrofitting Existing Infrastructure

With the flexibility of AI, the team theorizes that this can also be implemented in a variety of structures. This includes transportation hubs such as airports as well as offices and apartment buildings. According to the plan, each section of the building could provide sustainable energy with minimal impact to the environment around it. Rather than redesigning structures, the team suggests using sensors in every room. They also suggested monitoring software that can help devise a customized solution to precisely redistribute energy.

Integrating neural networks into buildings to create an energy efficient sustainable future is Intellicity’s ultimate goal.

Check: nyas.org/challenges for information about the UTC Future Buildings and Cities Challenge winners.

Tales in New Urban Sustainability

From global data-sharing efforts to local educational campaigns, new urban sustainability projects are shaping the cities of a greener future.

Published May 1, 2018

By Alan Dove, PhD

In 1900, about 13 percent of the world’s population lived in cities. Today, well over half of it does, and that proportion continues to grow. Cities now account for three-fourths of global gross domestic product, and about the same fraction of human-generated carbon emissions.

Because they concentrate huge amounts of human activity into small areas, cities are ideal test beds for new sustainability efforts. Inspired by the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) new collaborations have sprung up between political leaders, scientists, communities and non-governmental organizations. From global data-sharing efforts to local educational campaigns, these new urban sustainability projects are shaping the cities of the future.

Christiana Figueres

The Political Climate

Nations formally sign international agreements such as the SDGs, but in the case of urban sustainability, it falls to the leaders of individual cities to implement relevant policies. Fortunately, compared to national or regional governments, “cities are much more in tune with the direct impact of their policies, and they are much more in tune with the quality of life of citizens … from day to day,” says Christiana Figueres, Vice Chair of the Brussels-based Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy.

Figueres’ group provides a global network through which city leaders can share their ideas and results in pursuing sustainability.

“We’re a very important platform for city officials to learn what has worked,” says Figueres, pointing to examples such as Seoul’s renewable energy campaign, Paris’ expanding bicycle infrastructure, and a multi-city effort in India that has exchanged over 700 million incandescent lightbulbs for high-efficiency ones.

The central focus of the Global Covenant of Mayors is helping cities design and implement ambitious climate action plans, but that remit intersects with many of the U.N.’s other SDGs.

“How we pursue building our cities for the future — such as using high-carbon or low-carbon infrastructure, the way we change our consumption and production patterns, the way we deliver economic growth — are all relevant to the sustainable development goals and will largely determine the quality of life on this planet,” says Figueres.

United by Common Problems, Divided by Different Regulations

While cities around the world face common problems, they’re also bound by the particular laws and circumstances of their nations. Figueres emphasizes that the Global Covenant of Mayors has neither the authority nor the desire to try to synchronize urban policies across national boundaries. Instead, the group serves as a clearinghouse for cities to share data, strategies and ideas and discuss their experiences and results.

Science is a central part of all of these efforts, in measuring greenhouse gas emissions, studying and predicting the potential impacts of future climate change and also identifying the most effective measures cities can take to reduce their environmental impact and mitigate risks. Figueres points to a project in Myanmar, where scientists are developing models that can predict storm surges from cyclones, and others that identify areas at the highest risk of earthquakes and fires.

That information will help local leaders plan disaster responses to focus on the areas with the greatest needs, while also guiding future infrastructure development. Data from that project could inform similar efforts in coastal cities around the world, as rising seas and temperatures will likely make natural disasters more frequent.

Fundamentally a Problem of Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry

Climate change is fundamentally a problem of physics and atmospheric chemistry, but responding to it will require many other disciplines. Figueres emphasizes that in cities especially, researchers need to focus on social aspects of sustainability.

“We have a tendency to dehumanize cities, as though the purpose of cities were to have buildings and infrastructure, [but] the purpose of cities is actually to be the home for human beings,” says Figueres.

For policymakers to make the best use of science, scientists also need to explain it in human terms. “It does no good to come with science, accurate as it may be, if it’s not made relevant and understandable,” says Figueres.

Melanie Uhde 
Photo: Sun Kim, skstudiosnyc

Hungry For Change

While the Global Covenant of Mayors is helping scientists and city leaders work together globally, individual researchers are also taking local action in their own towns. New York’s Urban17 Initiative exemplifies this trend.

“I wanted the students who are part of our team to focus on urban sustainability in New York City, because it’s a great city to model hypotheses,” says Melanie Uhde, Urban17’s founder and managing director.

Urban17 currently consists of about a half-dozen volunteer analysts, mostly graduate students and young researchers from different disciplines and universities around the city. Despite its small size and lack of funding, the ambitious group is already tackling a project with global relevance, studying the overlapping problems of obesity and hunger.

“We know that, for example, the rates of obesity and hunger in the Bronx are the highest [in the city], so they’re basically bedfellows, which is a very common phenomenon in urban environments throughout the world,” says Uhde.

The Paradoxical Overlap of Hunger and Obesity

It may seem paradoxical for hunger and obesity to overlap, but interconnected problems can yield exactly that result.

“It’s definitely poverty, but it’s unfortunately much more complicated,” says Uhde, adding “even if you have money, do you have access to food, do you have the education, do you know what’s actually good for you, [and] do you have the time to put effort into a nutritious meal?”

In poor urban neighborhoods, the answers to those questions are often ‘no,’ causing  synergistic deficits that can produce the entire spectrum of dietary problems. To address that, Uhde and her team are combining data on obesity and hunger with the locations of groceries, parks, fitness centers and schools.

The Impact of Obesity and Hunger on Education

Public schools provide good anchors for the project, not only in mapping the extent of obesity and hunger in some of the most vulnerable populations, but also in implementing solutions.

“Education is a very important factor to achieve sustainability, and we’re seeing [how] other factors like obesity or hunger influence education,” says Uhde. Malnourished students aren’t likely to learn well, which in turn can perpetuate poverty and poor health. Improving school meal programs and health classes could help break that cycle.

Uhde hopes other scientists will start tackling sustainability problems in their own towns. “Sustainability … affects everyone in every aspect of life,” she says, adding that “we’re living in this era where we have to do something no matter what.”


Jennifer Costley, PhD, Director, Physical Sciences, Sustainability and Engineering, New York Academy of Sciences contributed to this story.

Also see: Infrastructure Architecture Framework: A multi-sector approach to enterprise systems
engineering and management

Cultivating Better Health with Science

Researchers across the globe are doing their part to both fuel and sustain a healthy planet.

Published May 1, 2018

By Hallie Kapner

Patrick Schnable

To the untrained eye, the black dots speckling the corn leaves in the greenhouses at Iowa State University’s Plant Sciences Institute could be anything — blight, mold, rot. But to Patrick Schnable, the Institute’s director and the C.F. Curtiss Distinguished Professor and Iowa Corn Endowed Chair in Genetics at ISU, the dots are the future of precision irrigation — a simple and inexpensive window into how plants use a precious global resource: water.

Dubbed the “plant tattoo,” the dots are bits of graphene oxide deposited on a gas-permeable tape to form an easily applied sensor that precisely measures transpiration — water loss — on an individual-leaf basis. As leaves lose water, the moisture changes graphene’s electrical conductivity. By measuring those changes, Schnable and his collaborators can observe transpiration in real time.

“If you have a plant under drought stress and you water it or it rains, you can track water moving up through the plant,” Schnable said. “For the first time ever, we can observe plants reacting to an irrigation event as it happens.”

The plant tattoo is one of countless research initiatives underway worldwide that aim to conserve and maximize natural resources, improve access to nutrition, prevent and treat disease, and boost the health and well-being of the planet’s people and wildlife.

Schnable and his collaborator, Liang Dong, associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at ISU, envision a day when farmers can use plant sensors to guide irrigation decisions and breeders can use them to create drought-resistant varietals. The researchers are already adapting the technology for use beyond the Iowa cornfields. While the current version requires connection to a control box to provide both voltage and transpiration rate analysis, plant tattoo 2.0 will be wireless and smartphone-compatible. Such refinements will drop the cost of the system even further, making the sensors accessible for areas of the developing world where every drop of water counts.

Cultivating “Black Rice”

Ujjawal Kr. S. Kushwaha

Maximizing efficiencies in breeding and irrigation of agricultural crops is one key part of meeting the global goals related to hunger, nutrition and stewardship of the land. Equally critical are efforts to identify and promote staple crops that pack maximum nutrition, explained Ujjawal Kr. S. Kushwaha, PhD Scholar in Genetics and Plant Breeding at G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology in Pantnagar, India.

More than half of the world’s population relies on rice for at least 20 percent of their daily calories. If Kushwaha had his way, the typical white rice of subsistence would be replaced by black rice, an heirloom variety sometimes called “forbidden” rice, and one of nature’s nutritional powerhouses.

“No other rice has higher nutritional content,” Kushwaha said. “It’s high in fiber, anthocyanins and other antioxidants, vitamins B and E, iron, thiamine, magnesium, niacin and phosphorous. Consumed at scale, it could have a significant impact on malnutrition.”

Decades of effort to boost the nutritional content of rice have yielded biofortified varietals rich in iron, zinc and provitamin A. While addressing these highly prevalent micronutrient deficiencies is critical, Kushwaha contends that black rice could address both a broad spectrum of nutritional deficiencies as well as provide anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic benefits.

However, black rice is not widely cultivated outside of China, and most varietals are relatively low-yield, which drives the crop’s high cost. Kushwaha is working to shift that equation, spreading the black rice gospel with the hope of boosting demand and incentives for farmers to develop higher-yield varietals, which could make a crop once reserved for royalty as affordable as white rice.

Anticipating the potential hurdles of acceptance — factors such as taste and color often determine whether new varietals are adopted or rejected — Kushwaha and others cultivating nutrient-rich rices have determined that black rice could be bred to minimize color while preserving much of its nutritional value. “Some of the qualities could be reduced, but it’s still far better than white rice,” he noted.

Plant Power

Plants already do far more than just feed the world — we derive fuel, fabrics, medicinal compounds and much more from them. Yet over the past two decades, a new role for plants has emerged — one that may revolutionize one of the most important pipelines for global health: vaccine production.

Conventional vaccine manufacturing relies on primary cells — like chicken eggs — mammalian cell lines, yeast cells or bacteria. These approaches have well-known limitations, such as long production times, variable yields and risk of contamination by other human pathogens. As Kathleen Hefferon, a virologist and Fulbright Canada Research Chair of Global Food Security at the University of Guelph explained, plants are not merely viable alternative bioreactors for many types of vaccines — they are production superstars.

First-generation plant-made biopharmaceuticals were derived from transgenic crops, but public concerns about GMOs, as well as variability in the amount of vaccine protein produced per plant, drove the development of a second — and now dominant — production method. Plant virus expression vectors are used to deliver genes for producing vaccine proteins into the leaves of plants such as tobacco and potato, turning common crops into factories capable of churning out huge quantities of vaccine protein faster and more cheaply than any other method.

Plant-made vaccine proteins carry no risk of contamination with mammalian pathogens, and better still, plants can produce similar post-translational modifications to human cells, which increases biocompatibility. Hefferon believes plant-made biopharmaceuticals will grow exponentially over the next five years, due in part to increased interest in stockpiling vaccines against pandemic flu and other diseases.

“It’s hard to stockpile vaccines produced in mammalian systems, and it’s very hard to produce enough vaccine in time to be helpful in an outbreak,” she said. “Plants offer a clear advantage here.”

Several pharmaceutical companies have plant-made vaccines and therapeutics in clinical trials, but the public is already familiar with one experimental drug that made headlines in 2015 — ZMapp, which was used to treat several Ebola-infected healthcare workers in West Africa. Hefferon is also quick to emphasize that the lower-cost profile of plant-made vaccines has special relevance for cancer prevention in the developing world, where rates of cancers linked to vaccine-preventable viruses, including HPV, are skyrocketing.

“We’re already in the running to advance the science toward pharmaceutical production in plants,” she said. “The current systems have so many limitations and plants are an incredible alternative.”

On Land and Sea

Just as human health is inextricably tied to the health of the air, soil, water and environment, so too is the health of the animals we rely on for work and food. In the tropical regions of Mexico, scientists including veterinarians Felipe Torres-Acosta and Carlos Sandoval-Castro, and organic chemist Gabriela Mancilla, of Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan (UADY), are studying how sheep and goats regulate their own health through diet.

The team at UADY has been devising strategies to improve the health of ruminants in tropical environments for 30 years. One of their standout findings is that malnourished animals are less resilient to native parasites, and while farmers can boost resilience with supplemental food, access to native flora is critical for keeping the host-parasite relationship in balance.

The UADY team showed that sheep and goats left to forage on their own in the Mexican jungle feast on an astonishing 60 different plant species per day, adjusting their food choices based on seasonal availability. Diving deeper into the connection between diet and immune resistance, Torres-Acosta’s team collected samples of ruminants’ preferred foods, analyzing them for nutritional content and the presence of anthelmintic activity.

Stephen Frattinii
Photo: Hudson Rivers Fisheries Unit Staff

Analysis reveals that most local flora do contain anti-parasitic compounds, and Mancilla is working to discover the mechanisms by which they act to control parasite load. The team is investigating whether animals intentionally seek a diet rich in plants that naturally limit parasite infection. This work, as well as similar research in sheep and goats around the world, is already impacting how some small farmers treat infections.

“If animals have access to their native foods, they can keep parasites in check, which reduces the need for medication and allows farmers to treat only the sickest animals,” Torres-Acosta said. “The most interesting things we’re learning come directly from observing the animals — given the choice, animals know what they need to eat to stay healthy, and we can learn so much from their innate wisdom.”

Off the shores of Long Island, New York, Stephen Frattini, founder of the Center for Aquatic Animal Research and Management (CFAARM), is trying to bring a similar sensibility to the seafood industry, which supplies three billion people worldwide with their primary source of protein. Frattini, a veterinarian, focuses not just on how fisheries and aquaculture operations could improve fish welfare, though his passion for that subject runs deep.

His goals are bigger, and include uniting experts in animal welfare, engineering, health management, feed development and consumer psychology to transform the seafood industry from a profoundly siloed one, rife with inefficiencies and transparency issues, to an integrated one that places the health of the environment, people and fish front and center. Frattini believes that a more integrated seafood industry could revitalize coastal communities both in the United States and developing countries, as well as advance production strategies already known to improve fish health, such as emphasizing diversity over monoculture.

“We still need a much better understanding of fish behavior in captivity and what we can do to create happier, healthier animals, but I’m convinced we can increase efficiencies while increasing fish contentment, which is a win for animals, the environment and the industry,” he said.

A Matter of Will

William Haseltine

Decades of fast-paced discovery in medical research, coupled with high-tech advances in equipment, procedures and information technologies have yielded many of the solutions necessary to provide high-quality healthcare to all. No cohort in history has been better equipped than ours to identify problems, connect patients with preventative and acute care and measure and understand the outcomes. Yet nations around the globe, from the most developed to the least, struggle to manage the cost, logistics and delivery of basic human health services.

A desire to identify best practices and help spread their adoption drove William Haseltine, a biologist and former professor at Harvard Medical School, known for his pioneering research on HIV/AIDS and the human genome, to found the nonprofit ACCESS Health International 10 years ago.

ACCESS Health has since partnered with nations in every region of the world to better understand the systems that improve primary care, lower maternal and child mortality, and meet the needs of an aging population while maintaining affordability. From a revolutionary emergency-response system in India that serves 700 million people each year with greater efficiency and lower cost than any system in the West, to hospitals using information technology to implement radical transparency and accountability systems that are improving patient safety, Haseltine and the ACCESS Health team have found no shortage of strategies that save and improve lives within budget. Bringing them to bear on the global problem of healthcare access is mainly a matter of will.

“We have a lot of knowledge that can be deployed broadly across the globe, but there has to be a desire and incentive to change,” Haseltine said.

The 17 SDGs can be viewed as a tally of ways people and planet can suffer and struggle. But they can also be viewed as vision of hope, a commitment by 193 nations to alleviate pain and work toward a healthier, more equal future.

“We have come to the point where we have the ability to dramatically improve health outcomes, whether it’s in environmental health, or improving maternal and infant mortality,” said Haseltine. “It all comes down to the question: do we have the will to do it? When the answer is yes, it’s transformative.“

Drone Delivery Takes Off In Rwanda

Delivering goods via drones is not a new idea, but it’s providing an important sustainable lifeline to rural communities in Rwanda that are benefiting from the technology.

California-based automated logistics company, Zipline and the Government of Rwanda have collaborated on the world’s first national drone delivery service for on-demand emergency blood deliveries to transfusion clinics across the country. Since its launch in October, 2016, Zipline has flown more than 7,500 flights covering 300,000 km, and delivered 7,000 units of blood to physicians and medical workers in Rwandan villagers nationwide.

Zipline’s technology was developed for longer-haul flights than typical drones and have a round trip range of 160 kilometers. The drones can carry 1.5 kilos of cargo and cruise at 110 kilometers an hour.

More importantly the craft are built to handle the challenges of Rwanda’s mountainous terrain and extreme weather conditions. They look more like fixed wing airplanes than the typical quadcopter image, but it is one of the reasons why they are capable of flying faster and farther than standard craft; imperative for speeding-up the delivery of life-saving medical supplies to remote communities.

The airplanes are powered by lithium-ion battery packs. Two twin electric motors provide reliability at a low operating cost. Redundant motors, batteries, GPS and other electronics provide the safety features, in addition to a parachute-enabled landing system. The planes fly on predetermined routes and are monitored by a Zipline operator.


Also see: Innovation Challenge in Rwanda on “Green Schools, Green Homes, Green Communities”

Tech’s Messy Challenge: Finding the Rx for Global E-Waste

The components that were state-of-the-art two years ago are now obsolete in today’s world.

Published May 1, 2018

By Charles Cooper

In the decade following the debut of the first iPhone in 2007, Apple has released 18 different models of its iconic smartphone, some major, some minor — all designed with the idea of appealing to buyers thirsting for the latest and the greatest technology from Silicon Valley’s most iconic brand.

That’s the way our gadget-addicted economy works. Products rarely remain in their original owners’ hands for longer than a few years. Planned obsolescence is the rule as slick marketing campaigns encourage consumers to trade up to faster, cheaper and smaller devices that roll off assembly lines, because yesterday’s state-of-the-art technology won’t hold a candle to what’s coming tomorrow.

“The problem we run into in the IT industry is profound because the functionality of these devices advances so quickly,” said Dr. Matthew Realff, a professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology.   “The components that were state-of-the-art two years ago are now obsolete in today’s world. This is not a technological problem but a societal one. Replacing your phones every six months or every year or two, may not, from a sustainability perspective, be needed. The problem is that the industry wants to drive functionality at every step.”

So as digitization transforms how society communicates and does business, there are now billions of smartphones, personal computers and connected devices in use worldwide. But what happens when these and other high-tech appliances — televisions, printers, scanners, fax machines and other technology peripherals — reach the end of their useful lives? That darker side of the digital revolution is having a major impact on the lives of millions of people and their environment every day.

The Fastest-Growing Stream of Municipal Solid Waste

Electronic waste (e-waste) now constitutes the fastest-growing stream of municipal solid waste in the world, according to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. People now generate some 40 million tons of e-waste each year — up 20 percent in just two years, leading the United Nations to warn of a veritable “tsunami of e-waste” inundating the Earth.

The toxic threat to health is so severe that scientists warn of a global safety threat linked to the release of harmful substances such as lead, mercury, cadmium and arsenic, in discarded electrical devices and equipment. The implications are particularly acute for developing nations where older products often get dumped in  landfills. As more e-waste winds up in landfills, the exposure to environmental toxins creates health hazards for workers and residents, including greater risks of cancer and neurological disorders.

Alarm over the public health challenge has forced the issue onto the global agenda. In fact, one of the U.N.’s Sustainable Development Goals (#12) is a pledge to “substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse” by 2030. The success of that initiative will be closely intertwined with progress made battling e-waste.

Given the magnitude of the challenge, it’s too early to handicap the outcome. Experts in the field are guardedly optimistic, saying it will take a combination of smart engineering and equally smart public policies to help reverse a years-in-the-making problem paradoxically created by the very technology used to solve so many other societal problems.

Don’t Expect A Quick Fix

“Originally, you had a paradigm in which these products were never considered from an end-of-life cycle perspective,” said Nancy Gillis, Chief Executive Officer of the Green Electronics Council. “In fact, the IT sector was treated no differently from any other products in our consumer society. So when people asked the question, `What do we do with this stuff later on?’ the response was `We know … we’ll stick it all in a hole.’ Then we became aware of the fact that we don’t have enough holes. They’re not big enough and they’re costing us.”

Compounding the challenge, she said, is the incessant churn of new technology into the market. Projections vary, but tens of billions of IoT devices will be online by the end of this decade.

“When you start putting sensors in your shirts and shoes or when toys become as much IT as IT is considered, then we’re ill prepared for that also becoming part of the [e-waste] stream,” Gillis added. “It’d be great if technology just evolved along the same timeline as our understanding of its impact … we wouldn’t have a problem. But it’s not. This is a development cycle made up of many players and it involves an extremely complex supply chain.”

High-Tech Alternatives in Flux

Realff has thought a lot about how supply chain management could make a difference in controlling e-waste. One area where he sees potential is in the application of advanced computational methods, such as machine learning and mathematical programming to improve product tracking as materials flow through supply chains. By adding smart tags to products, companies will soon be able to wirelessly track items flowing through supply chains to customers to get a comprehensive picture.

“We’re getting to the point where our ability to label individual items and keep track of them is about to increase exponentially,” he said. “With the availability of inexpensive embedded sensors and ubiquitous wireless networks, we’ll know how long they are in use and when they eventually get retired.”

Big Data and the Internet of Things

As these and other technologies, including Big Data and IoT improve supply chain visibility, it should also clear the way for companies to do a better job retrieving value from discarded e-waste. There’s money to be made cleaning up e-waste as many products contain valuable materials — including gold, silver, copper and palladium — that can be resold. The International Telecommunication Union put the estimated value of recoverable material generated by e-waste in 2016 at $55 billion.

However, only 20 percent of that e-waste was found to have been collected and recycled despite the presence of those high-value recoverable materials. In other cases, perfectly fine machines still capable of productive service are getting discarded. That’s where better analytical insights into the data can give them a second life.

“We need to figure out how to reuse those systems in ways in which they benefit the less fortunate parts of the world,” said Realff. “We may not need top-of-the-line servers to do certain tasks, but how do we take servers that may not be used in a Google warehouse and use them where they could still have value? It’s less a technology issue, than an organizational issue.”

The Emergence of Nanotechnology and Synthetic Biology

From a sustainable development goal perspective, nanotechnology and synthetic biology are two emerging fields of science and technology that have attracted interest due to their broad applicability and their potential as alternative solutions.

Bart Kolodziejczyk, co-author of a recent paper on recycling standards to handle nanowaste, pointed to the history of polymers and plastic, which were originally hailed as game-changing developments. But they also led to unintended consequences.

“Not only are we surrounded by plastic waste that take decades to decompose in the environment, but only recently have we reached the point when the very first plastic waste finally starts degrading,” he said. “While we should be happy, there is another problem … the degradation of polymeric materials is incomplete; partially degraded plastic nanoparticles can be currently found in 83 percent of the world’s tap water, including most U.S. cities. You can imagine that these plastic fibers are not good for your health, cannot be easily digested and build up in your body.”

Similarly, he said there are still unanswered safety questions around nanowaste and synthetic biology waste.

“We certainly don’t know how to deal with hazards associated with these two very promising technologies. I am even more skeptical when I attend different workshops and conferences organized by international organizations because policy makers simply don’t know how to deal with this type of a threat.”

“Nanowaste disposal will be a big issue because different nanoparticles will require different and tailored waste treatment protocols,” Kolodziejczyk added. “While most organic nanoparticles, such as polymers, can be potentially digested by flame, inorganic nanoparticles, such as oxides known for high thermal stability will require more sophisticated methods.”

Reasons for Optimism

Despite the clear challenges, Gillis says that growing recognition of the e-waste problem is reason enough for optimism that things can improve.

“We’re starting to think seriously about end of life while designing products and there’s also a recognition that there’s money involved in getting those core resources back,” she said. “Companies are leaving money on the table which is foolish.”

As we wait for market forces and new technologies to come to the rescue, the easiest way to reduce the amount of e-waste would be for people and businesses to resist the urge to discard perfectly usable older products just because a newer, more robust version hit the market.

But is it reasonable to expect users to resist the siren call of advertising and change age-old consumption patterns? Maybe that’s asking for too much. For Realff, however, it’s a question that needs to get asked — if only to avoid the inevitable consequences of continuing along the current path.

“Maybe we can’t all have the latest and greatest,” he said. “And I’m not just referring to consumers here in the West but also to the billions of consumers in the rest of the world. We will not be talking about tsunamis of e-waste; we will be talking about a planet full of e-waste — which obviously is not feasible.”

Who Generates the Most E-Waste?

According to The Global E-waste Monitor 2017, a publication produced by the Global E-waste Statistics Partnership, Asia takes the lead followed by Europe and the Americas.

The Global E-waste Partnership is a collaborative effort of the United Nations University (UNU), represented through its Vice-Rectorate in Europe hosted Sustainable Cycles (SCYCLE) Programme, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the International Solid Waste Association (ISWA).


Also see:


Charles Cooper is a Silicon-valley based technology writer and former Executive Editor of CNET.