Skip to main content

Advances in AI for Materials

Overview

Previous conferences and workshops covering artificial intelligence (AI) for Materials Science have mainly focused on introducing AI into materials simulations, which is only the first step in new materials discovery. These efforts have largely ignored AI’s promise for materials synthesis and translating research into high-volume industrial production.

On October 6-7, 2020, the New York Academy of Sciences hosted the AI for Materials symposium to provide a broader perspective on leveraging the benefits of AI in material simulations, experiments, and development efforts for high volume production. The symposium brought together materials scientists, industry experts, and AI researchers to cover the application of AI throughout the entire life cycle of new materials, from lab discovery to industrial production. These leaders also shape future research directions, identify urgent issues in this rising field, and foster interdisciplinary collaboration opportunities.

In This eBriefing, You’ll Learn

  • How machine learning is being applied to understand the physical processes behind materials science
  • Approaches to improve the data infrastructures used in materials science research to facilitate easier integration and promote a better data sharing environment
  • How AI is being applied to address industry-related issues in materials science, including the scalability of materials production from the lab to the factory and the synthetic and catalytic routes of new materials

Speakers

Muratahan Aykol, PhD
Toyota Research Institute

Léon Bottou, PhD
Facebook AI Research

Carla Gomes, PhD
Cornell University

Philipp Harbach, PhD
Merck KGaA

Michael Helander, PhD
OTI Lumionics

Phillip M. Maffettone, DPhil
Brookhaven National Laboratory

Nobuyuki N. Matsuzawa, PhD
Panasonic Corporation

Greg Mulholland
Citrine Informatics

Elsa Olivetti
MIT

Rampi Ramprasad, PhD
Georgia Institute of Technology

Tim Robertson, PhD
Schrödinger, Inc.

Sam Samdani, PhD
McKinsey & Company

Matthias Scheffler, PhD
The Fritz Haber Institute

Rama Vasudevan, PhD
Oak Ridge National Laboratory

James Warren, PhD
National Institute of Standards and Technology

Event Sponsors

AI Initiative Program Sponsor

Additional Sponsor

Promotional Partners

Physics and Causality in Machine Learning

Speakers

Léon Bottou, PhD
Facebook AI Research

Carla Gomes, PhD
Cornell University

Rama Vasudevan, PhD
Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Léon Bottou, PhD

Facebook AI Research

Léon received a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Université de Paris-Sud. His research career has taken him to AT&T Bell Laboratories, AT&T Labs Research, NEC Labs America, Microsoft, and now Facebook AI Research. The long-term goal of Léon’s research is to understand and replicate human-level intelligence. Because this goal requires conceptual advances that cannot be anticipated, Léon’s research has followed many practical and theoretical turns, including neural networks applications, stochastic gradient learning algorithms, statistical properties of learning systems, computer vision applications with structured outputs, and theory of large-scale learning. Léon’s research aims to clarify the relation between learning and reasoning, with focus on the many aspects of causation.

Carla Gomes, PhD

Cornell University

Carla is the Ronald C. and Antonia V. Nielsen Professor of Computing and Information Science and the Director of the Institute for Computational Sustainability at Cornell University. She received a Ph.D. from the University of Edinburgh. Her research area is artificial intelligence with a focus on Computational Sustainability. Computational Sustainability aims to develop computational methods to help solve some of the key challenges concerning environmental, economic, and societal issues to help put us on a path towards a sustainable future. Carla is a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), a Fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Rama Vasudevan, PhD

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Rama is the Research and Development Associate at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. His research focuses on utilizing scanning probe microscopy (SPM) at the mesoscopic and atomic level to unearth structure-property relations in various systems, including ferroics, manganites, and others. In parallel, as vast amounts of imaging and spectroscopic data are gathered, he develops and implements tools from existing computational science literature towards tackling materials science problems and unearthing physics from deep data analysis of SPM-acquired datasets. Rama received his PhD in Materials Science from the University of New South Wales.

Further Readings

General

Hill J, Mulholland G, Persson K, et al.

Materials science with large-scale data and informatics: Unlocking new opportunities

MRS Bulletin. 2016 May;41(5):399-409.

Bottou

Chen Z, Zhang J, Arjovsky M, Bottou L.

Symplectic Recurrent Neural Networks

arXiv. 2019 Sep 29;1909.13334.

Gomes

Gomes CP, Bai J, Xue Y, et al.

CRYSTAL: a multi-agent AI system for automated mapping of materials’ crystal structures

MRS Communications. 2019 Apr;9(02):1-9.

Data Infrastructures for Materials Science

Speakers

Rampi Ramprasad, PhD
Georgia Institute of Technology

Matthias Scheffler, PhD
The Fritz Haber Institute

Elsa Olivetti
MIT

Muratahan Aykol, PhD
Toyota Research Institute

Rampi Ramprasad, PhD

Georgia Institute of Technology

Rampi is the Michael E. Tennenbaum Family Chair and Georgia Research Alliance Eminent Scholar in Energy Sustainability at Georgia Tech. His area of expertise is developing and utilizing computational and data-driven (machine learning) methods to design and discover new materials. Materials classes under study include polymers, metals, and ceramics (mainly dielectrics and catalysts), and application areas include energy production and energy storage. Rampi received his B Tech in Metallurgical Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India, and a PhD in Materials Science & Engineering at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Matthias Scheffler, PhD

The Fritz Haber Institute

Matthias is Director of the NOMAD Laboratory at the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society. His research focuses on understanding fundamental aspects of physical and chemical properties of surfaces, interfaces, clusters, nanostructures, and bulk based on electronic-structure theory. In recent years, Matthias developed neural-network and compressed-sensing methods to detect structure and patterns in “big data of materials,” to create “maps of materials properties,” and identify “materials genes” that affect or even actuate materials properties. His “big-data” activities also include creating a FAIR data infrastructure (data are findable and AI-ready) and the largest data store for computational materials science data.

Elsa Olivetti, PhD

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Elsa is the Esther and Harold E. Edgerton Associate Professor in Materials Science and Engineering at MIT. She received her PhD from the same department in 2007. Elsa’s research focuses on improving the environmental and economic sustainability of materials in the context of rapid-expanding global demand. Her research addresses two major problems where solutions could yield significant environmental benefit: first, improving the sustainability of materials through increased use of recycled and renewable materials, recycling-friendly material design, and intelligent waste disposition; and second, understanding the implications of substitution, dematerialization, and waste mining on materials markets.  Her research spans three levels of materials production: operational-level, industrial network-level, and market-level strategies.

Muratahan Aykol, PhD

Toyota Research Institute

Muratahan is a Senior Research Scientist in Accelerated Materials Design and Discovery at the Toyota Research Institute. Before that, he was a postdoctoral research fellow at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, working on materials informatics and infrastructure. He received his BS and MS degrees from the Middle East Technical University and a PhD in Materials Science from Northwestern University. His research focuses on machine-learning, material computations, and network science for materials discovery.

Further Readings

Ramprasad

Kim C, Chandrasekaran A, Huan TD, et al.

Polymer Genome: A Data-Powered Polymer Informatics Platform for Property Predictions

J Phys Chem C . 2018 Jul 18;122:17575.

Scheffler

Ghiringhelli LM, Vybiral J, Levchenko SV, et al.

Big Data of Materials Science: Critical Role of the Descriptor

Phys Rev Lett. 2015 Mar 13;114(10):105503.

Goldsmith BR, Boley M, Vreeken J, et al.

Uncovering structure-property relationships of materials by subgroup discovery

New J Phys. 2017 Jan;19:013031.

Sutton C, Boley M, Ghiringhelli LM, et al.

Identifying domains of applicability of machine learning models for materials science

Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4428.

Olivetti

Kim E, Huang K, Saunders A, et al.

Materials Synthesis Insights from Scientific Literature via Text Extraction and Machine Learning

Chem Mater. 2017;29(21):9436.

Aykol

Aykol M, Herring P, Anapolsky A.

Machine learning for continuous innovation in battery technologies

Nat Rev Mater. 2020 June 15;5:725-727.

Montoya JH, Winther KT, Flores RA, et al.

Autonomous intelligent agents for accelerated materials discovery

Chem Sci. 2020 July 30;11:8517.

Aykol M, Hedge VI, Hung L, et al.

Network analysis of synthesizable materials discovery

Nat Commun. 2019 May 1;10:2018.

AI in Materials Production and Industry

Nobuyuki N. Matsuzawa, PhD
Panasonic Corporation

Michael Helander, PhD
OTI Lumionics

Phillip M. Maffettone, DPhil
Brookhaven National Laboratory

Nobuyuki N. Matsuzawa, PhD

Panasonic Corporation

Nobu obtained his PhD in computational materials science in 1994 from The University of Tokyo.  He started his career at Sony in 1987, developing various organic materials for electronic devices and lithography processes for semiconductor manufacturing. He served as a visiting research scientist at DuPont Central Research and Development in Wilmington, Delaware, and was the Senior Manager of Material Science Laboratories of Sony Europe from 2001-2004. In 2005, Nobu was named a Distinguished Engineer at Sony. Since 2016, he has been working for Panasonic, designing materials used in various electronic devices produced by Panasonic.

Michael Helander, PhD

OTI Lumionics

Michael is co-founder and CEO of OTI Lumionics, an advanced materials company he co-founded while pursuing his PhD at the University of Toronto in 2011. The company commercializes disruptive materials and process technology for OLED displays from headquarters in Toronto and offices in Asia. OLED is the leading display technology used in virtually all high-end consumer electronics and is the next generation of design-driven lighting. Dr. Helander received a BSc in Engineering Science and a PhD in Materials Science & Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has over 100 patents and peer-reviewed publications related to OLED materials, process, equipment, and displays.

Phillip M. Maffettone, DPhil

Brookhaven National Laboratory

Phil is currently a Research Associate in Computational Science at Brookhaven National Laboratory, where he focuses on developing the laboratory of the future using artificial intelligence to combine simulation and autonomous experimentation. During his career, Phil has developed a healthy disregard for disciplinary boundaries by working at the intersection of physical and computational sciences. He earned a BS in Chemical Engineering at the University at Buffalo (2014), researching silicon nanoparticle synthesis and applications. After receiving a Marshall Scholarship, he completed his DPhil in Inorganic Chemistry at the University of Oxford (2018), focused on simulating disorder in diffraction where Bragg’s law breaks down in hard and soft matter. Phil recently returned home to New York from a role at the University of Liverpool, where he developed the AI for an autonomous mobile robotic scientist searching for new photocatalytic materials.

Further Readings

Matsuzawa
Maffettone

Burger B, Maffettone PM, Gusev VV, et al.

A mobile robotic chemist

Nature. 2020 Jul 8;583:237-241.

Automating Production from Lab to Factory

Moderator

Sam Samdani, PhD
McKinsey & Company

Speakers

Philipp Harbach, PhD
Merck KGaA

James Warren, PhD
National Institute of Standards and Technology

Greg Mulholland
Citrine Informatics

Tim Robertson, PhD
Schrödinger, Inc.

Sam Samdani, PhD

McKinsey & Company

Sam is a senior industry expert in the Global Chemicals & Agriculture Practice at McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm. His responsibilities include providing thought leadership across a range of complex knowledge domains in advanced/engineered materials, pharmaceutical ingredients, and specialty chemicals for the top management of many multinational chemical, pharmaceutical, and petroleum companies as well as government agencies and NGOs worldwide.  Before joining McKinsey, Sam worked at McGraw-Hill as an Associate Editor with Chemical Engineering, a monthly technical publication. He received his BS in chemical engineering from Yale University and his PhD in chemical engineering from the University of Rochester.

Philipp Harbach, PhD

Merck KGaA

Philipp is the Head of In Silico Research in the Digital Organization of Merck KGaA. There he focuses on the digitalization of chemical and experimental processes in R&D, production, and analytics with the help of modern computational modeling and data analytics methods. He is specifically interested in applying quantum mechanical methods to industrial problems and is leading first initiatives to adapt these algorithms to noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers as part of the Merck Quantum Computing Task Force.

James Warren, PhD

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Since 2010,  Jim has been focusing his energies on the US Materials Genome Initiative, a multi-agency initiative designed to create a new era of policy, resources, and infrastructure that supports US institutions to discover, manufacture, and deploy advanced materials twice as fast a fraction of the cost. As Director of the NIST Materials Genome Program, he works with a government-wide team to build out the materials innovation infrastructure need to realize the initiative’s goals.   He is also one of the co-founders and the current Director of the NIST Center for Theoretical and Computational Materials Science. Jim has a PhD in physics from the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Greg Mulholland

Founder and CEO, Citrine Informatics

Greg is the co-founder and CEO of Citrine Informatics and a recognized leader in the use of digital tools and digitization practices in the development of next-generation materials and chemicals products and the creation of next-generation business models. Under his leadership, Citrine has been recognized as a WEF Technology Pioneer, a member of the Cleantech 100, the World Materials Forum Startup of the Year, and CB Insights AI 100 in 2017 and 2020. Greg holds a BS in Electrical Engineering and a BS in Computer Engineering from NC State University, an MPhil in Materials Science from Cambridge University, and an MBA from Stanford University.

Tim Robertson, PhD

Schrödinger, Inc.

Tim is a full-stack software engineer with a doctorate in computational biology and extensive experience in applied machine learning.  He worked as a data scientist for companies such as Twitch and Yelp and founded two YCombinator-funded startups. Currently, Tim is Principal Scientist at Schrödinger, where he works in a hybrid scientist/engineer role, developing and applying deep learning and other AI techniques to problems in rational drug design.  He has a PhD in Computational Biology (Biochemistry) from the University of Washington.

Further Readings

Fostering Diversity and Inclusion in STEM

Overview

Diverse top leaders and problem-solvers are critical to fostering and accelerating creativity and innovation in STEM. This diversity is impossible unless we invest in making the STEM workforce more inclusive for women and those from underrepresented populations.

To achieve this, we need to promote diversity at all stages of the STEM pipeline and increase the number of people participating in scientific endeavors, inside and outside academia, as well as those who will help address the most pressing challenges of the 21st century.

This panel discussion, presented by the New York Academy of Sciences and Hudson River Park, features diverse STEM experts as they discuss their career paths and the importance of supporting diversity in the STEM workforce.

In this eBriefing, You’ll Learn:

  • The traditional and non-traditional routes panelists took into STEM and the nature of their work
  • The importance of mentorship and how to best leverage these relationships throughout your career
  • How individuals, especially people of color and members of other minority groups, can find and cultivate supportive communities
  • Why conversations about diversity and inclusion are meaningful in STEM
  • How both individuals and large organizations can address systemic inequality to create work environments where everyone can succeed

Speakers

Moderator:

Wanjiku “Wawa” Gatheru
Environmental Justice Advocate, Writer, and Rhodes Scholar

Mandë Holford, PhD
Hunter College/AMNH/Killer Snails, LLC

Ronald E. Hunter, Jr, PhD
Mérieux NutriSciences

Megan Lung
NYS DEC Hudson River Estuary Program & NEIWPCC

Tepring Piquado, PhD
RAND Corporation

Diversity and Inclusion in STEM: Leveraging Your Network and Skills

Wanjiku “Wawa” Gatheru

Wanjiku “Wawa” Gatheru is a 21-year-old environmental justice advocate passionate about creating a more inclusive environmental movement. As an emerging climate writer, she has bylines in VICE News and Glamour magazine. Wawa is also the first Black person in history to receive the Rhodes, Truman, and Udall Scholarships.

Megan Lung

NYS DEC Hudson River Estuary Program & NEIWPCC

Megan Lung is an Environmental Analyst at NEIWPCC serving the The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Hudson River Estuary Program in stream restoration. Megan coordinates the Culvert Prioritization Project, which seeks to restore stream habitat for migratory fishes and reduce localized flooding through field work, community engagement, and implementation.

Megan hails from the Great Lakes of Michigan and earned a BS in History and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology from the University of Michigan.

Ronald E. Hunter, Jr, PhD

Mérieux NutriSciences 

Dr. Ronald E. Hunter, Jr. is the Technical Director of Chemistry for North America at Mérieux NutriSciences. In this role, he directs quality control and technical functions of chemistry labs throughout North America to ensure performance meets corporate standards. Previously, Dr. Hunter was a scientist at The Coca-Cola Company, where he served as a subject-matter expert in beverage analyses, method development, and mass spectrometry.  He has over ten years of experience as an analytical chemist in the public, private, and academic sectors.

Dr. Hunter holds BAs in chemistry and Spanish from Mercer University and a PhD in analytical chemistry from Emory University.

Tepring Piquado, PhD

RAND Corporation

Dr. Piquado is a senior policy researcher at RAND Corporation, professor at Pardee RAND Graduate School, chief policy director at California Issues Forum, and CEO of The TMP Group.  Through her work, she leads complex, multi-site and multi-disciplinary projects to provide evidence-based guidance to federal, state and local decision-makers; provides advisory guidance and analysis on active bills and major issues being considered by state legislators; and works with institutional leaders to provide outcome-based solutions that advance diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Dr. Piquado earned her MS and PhD in neuroscience from Brandeis University and BS in computer science from Georgetown University.

Mandë Holford, PhD

Hunter College/AMNH/Killer Snails, LLC

Dr. Mandë Holford is an Associate Professor in Chemistry at Hunter College and CUNY-Graduate Center.  Her laboratory investigates the power of venom to transform lives when it is adapted to create novel therapeutics for treating human diseases and disorders. Dr. Holford is also actively involved in science education, advancing the public understanding of science, and science diplomacy. She is co-founder of KillerSnails.com, an award-winning EdTech company that uses tabletop, digital, and XR games about extreme creatures in nature to advance scientific learning in K-12 classrooms.

Dr. Holford received her PhD in Synthetic Protein Chemistry from The Rockefeller University.

Resources

Gibbs K Jr.

Diversity in STEM: What It Is and Why It Matters

Scientific American. 2014 Sept 10.

Forrester N.

Diversity in science: next steps for research group leaders

Nature. 2020 Sep 23;585: S65-S67.

Urbina-Blanco CA, Jilani SZ, Speight IR, et al.

A diverse view of science to catalyse change

Nat Chem. 2020 Sep;12(9):773-776.

Student Perspectives on the Shift to Remote Learning

Overview

Educational leaders, policymakers, teachers, and parents have deliberated over the return to school amid the COVID-19 pandemic. But few conversations include the voices of those at the center of it all—the students. As many schools have transitioned to virtual classrooms, students have adapted to their continuously changing learning environments. On August 25, 2020, the New York Academy of Sciences hosted a panel of high school and college students from GSA programs to discuss the transition to online learning, obstacles with adjusting to new technology, and suggestions for improving the virtual classroom experience.

Highlights

  • To adjust to online learning and avoid low motivation, students should establish a new routine by creating schedules.
  • Virtual learning in small groups, such as breakout rooms or during professor office hours, can encourage more participation and discussion among students.
  • Plans for successful distance learning must address the digital divide that prevents some students from accessing online classes and assignments and ensure that teachers have the resources they need to create engaging new lesson plans.

Speakers

Sthuthi Satish
Bangalore International School

Tina Sindwani
Arizona State University

Athena Yao
Duke University

Student Perspectives on Back to School

Transition to Online Learning

Tina Sindwani, a first-year student at Arizona State University (ASU), had a relatively easy transition to online learning when the university switched to virtual classes in the spring. ASU used Canvas, an online learning platform, for courses before the pandemic, and students were already using iPads in class. She praised the university for being organized—all course links are in one place—and hosting programs to help people shift to online courses. However, full-time virtual courses still required Sindwani to stay motivated and organize her virtual commitments on a calendar.  While at home, she shared her class schedule with her family and set reminders to take breaks, exercise, and eat meals.

Sthuthi Satish, a high school senior at the Bangalore International School in India, also had a fluid transition to online learning because the school already used Google Classroom. After a few months of online learning, she now feels well-equipped to manage her classes. It took a bit of trial and error to figure out what worked for her, but a calendar and a to-do list have helped.

Athena Yao, a high school senior at the start of school shut-downs, could not participate in end-of-the-year activities like prom or graduation. Instead, like so many of her peers, she ended her senior year using Google Classroom and taking quizzes online. However, when she matriculated at Duke University this fall, Yao found the start of the online learning process—with multiple platforms, logins, and websites—a bit difficult. “I have had some confusion. The university expected me to know how to use the online programs,” said Yao. “So eventually, I started to get it, but I had to explore the website on my own and look for the resources.” Clear, streamlined instructions can lessen the learning curve with new platforms needed to access materials for virtual classes. Yao is one of the limited number of first and second-year students in campus housing this semester, as all juniors and seniors are off campus. To ensure safety, the university tested all students returning to campus and is performing randomized COVID-19 testing each week.

The panelists compared how much time they previously spent in school to how many hours they were expected to allocate per day for distance learning. For Sindwani, this meant attending online lectures and assemblies, averaging out to about 4-5 hours per day. Satish estimated that she spends 5-6 hours a day in online classes, but with homework assignments and studying, school takes up 8-9 hours of her day. Yao averaged a similar number of hours per day, although she felt preparation for lectures and labs added additional time to her school day. However, now, she doesn’t have to rush out of bed to get to school and has more flexibility throughout her day.

Challenges with Distance Learning

The panelists adamantly stated that they have all experienced “Zoom burnout.” Students have had to adjust to a full day in front of the computer screen, where Zoom meetings blend together one after the other. A virtual school day involves attending live sessions, completing homework, and studying for exams. The long hours are tiring and repetitive, which can wear on personal motivation.

One subject area that has been particularly difficult to teach virtually is science labs. Most students are completing simulations online. In some cases, labs are opening back up with half the class at a time. In other schools, teachers are handing out kits so students can do the labs at home.

Motivation from Teachers

The panelists shed light on what teachers have done to engage students and help them avoid “Zoom burnout.” Some classes can be up to three hours, so designating breaks is essential to maintaining student focus. Additionally, using breakout rooms to talk in smaller groups has been extremely helpful. In fact, Sindwani said she has gotten more out of the small breakout room discussions than being in class in-person. Students are more likely to turn on their video feed and converse with other students in these smaller settings.  “The discussions in a smaller group are more conducive to learning than being in a room with 100 people and not being able to talk to everyone.”

Satish’s average class size is only five people, so she thrives on a lot of interactions. The teachers are also very open to feedback and learning about new ways to teach. Yao utilizes office hours to ask questions, because it is easier for her to talk one-on-one with a professor or teaching assistant. Having access to online meetings with an advisor or guidance counselor can also be helpful. Large recorded lecture videos are also useful, since the viewer can easily speed up, replay, or pause videos if needed.

Fostering collaboration between students has also been a component of successful online learning. For example, Kami has been a highlight of remote learning for Yao. With this online tool, students can all write on the board at the same time. Some of Yao’s memorable moments from her senior year of high school included teachers showing their pets on their videos and personally dropping off goodie bags for students before AP exams. Satish’s teachers have been very understanding about how monotonous this process can be for students. Kahoot has been a great game-based platform for multiple-choice quizzes. In her Spanish class, Satish and her classmates recorded themselves on Google Docs and made presentations together. They also talked about their favorite songs and played them during class. Incorporating games, breaks, and creative ways to facilitate participation and collaboration into the virtual classroom can be very effective. Incentives, such as bonus points, are highly motivating as well.

Updated Technology Platforms

Although all three panelists are fortunate to have personal laptops for distance learning, they mentioned that many colleges offer laptops, Wi-Fi hotspots, and internet for students who don’t have their own. Access, or lack thereof, has been a common issue for many families, especially those with multiple children at home, where there are not enough devices for everyone to work at the same time.

Sindwani mentioned a novel idea recently implemented in Mexico where students were able to use the television instead of laptops for their online learning. Many people have TVs in their homes, but may not have access to Wi-Fi or laptops. So using the television may help ensure that more children have access to education while at home. Students can tune in for live broadcasts on their televisions, however families with multiple children will still have the problem of not having enough screens.

When asked about the government’s involvement in education during the pandemic, the panelists all agreed that the government could be more involved. They believe the government should work to bridge the disparities between different socioeconomic groups so that everyone has access to the same online platforms and teachers have the necessary supplies for teaching. The students were aware of charitable organizations and nonprofits working to provide meals to students who usually get them from school.

Virtual Social Connections

While the COVID-19 pandemic may mean spending more time at home, some students have come up with creative ways to interact with their peers. Sindwani has widened her social circle using Slack, a communication platform. Yao has been doing workout videos with her friends and meeting her incoming Duke classmates over social media platforms. She also emphasized the importance of virtual connections around the globe. Now that most internships and non-profit work is online, students can connect with people all around the world, a unique opportunity that didn’t exist before the pandemic.

Safely Reopening Schools

The panelists shared optimistic visions for when students return to in-person classes after the pandemic. “The information hasn’t necessarily been different, but the way I learn it and my satisfaction with how I’ve learned it is definitely very different,” said Sindwani. “I would prefer to have in-person classes because that allows for more interaction with the professor and my peers.”

Yao also prefers in-person learning. She sees the pandemic as an opportunity to learn more about our society and take note that some of our current teaching methods might be outdated.

Satish agreed that one takeaway from the pandemic is that many meetings that would have been held in-person before the pandemic can be done virtually. Online education is an opportunity for her to look at different learning techniques and find what works best. However, she too prefers being in a physical environmental with her peers. “School is a lot more holistic than just the education itself,” said Satish. “The experience of living in a dorm room and [enjoying] take-away food from dining halls. Those are experiences I want to be able to have.”

Another important aspect of reinstituting in-person classes involves students feeling comfortable with returning to school. At the college level, many schools are requiring all students to get tested upon arrival on campus. After that, randomized testing will occur. While on campus, students are required to wear masks inside the buildings and to maintain social distancing at all times. Universities have put many additional provisions in place, including hand sanitizer stations throughout campus, a daily symptom self-check on an app, and take-out dining options. However, all these measures will only work if the students agree to and follow the guidelines. Schools are also are performing a great deal of contact tracing. Any student who tests positive or has come into contact with someone who tested positive, may be asked to self-quarantine. . The panelists agree that students have a responsibility to follow the rules that schools put in place to ensure a safe and comfortable learning environment. If at any point you don’t feel comfortable in an in-person situation with other students, the panelists suggest politely reminding people of the social distancing rules, and being open about why you’re concerned. Sometimes it’s necessary to share a bit of your personal situation for others to understand your concerns.

Further Readings

Misc.

Jackson, Drew, and Kate Murphy

Duke Will Only Allow Freshmen and Sophomores in Campus Housing for the Fall Semester

The News & Observer. July 26, 2020.

Linthicum, Kate

Instead of Returning to School This Fall, Mexican Students Will Watch TV

Los Angeles Times. August 4, 2020

How Climate Change Impacts Environmental Ecosystems

Overview

Climate change has had catastrophic effects on ecosystems throughout the world and has created long lasting and potentially irreversible damage. In this eBriefing, experts discuss how rising temperatures have increased the number and intensity of forest fires and expedited global ice sheet melting.

In this eBriefing, You’ll Learn:

  • How climate change can cause an increase in droughts and forest fires while also accelerating ice sheet melting and sea level rise;
  • How climate change affects tree physiology, which may contribute to droughts and forest fires;
  • The latest technological advances in measuring climate change impact on ice sheet melting and sea level rise
  • Potential solutions to improve forest health and reduce forest fire damage
  • The public’s changing views on climate change, scientific trust, and environmental racism.

Speakers

William Anderegg, PhD
The University of Utah

Eric Rignot, PhD
University of California, Irvine

Fire and Ice: The Impact of Climate Change on Environmental Ecosystems

Eric Rignot, PhD

University of California, Irvine

Eric Rignot, PhD, combines satellite remote sensing, geophysical surveys, and numerical modeling to understand the impact of climate change on ice sheets and its repercussions on global sea levels. Dr. Rignot is a Donald Bren Professor at University of California, Irvine, a Senior Research Scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and a Member of the National Academy of Sciences. He received his Engineer Degree at Ecole Centrale Paris and PhD at University of Southern California. He joined University of California, Irvine in 2007.

William Anderegg, PhD

The University of Utah 

William Anderegg, PhD, centers his research around the intersection of ecosystems and climate change. In particular, his research focuses on how drought and climate change affect forest ecosystems, including tree physiology, species interactions, carbon cycling, and biosphere-atmosphere feedbacks. He is an Assistant Professor at the University of Utah.  He received his BA and PhD at Stanford University and his postdoc at Princeton University.  He joined the University of Utah in 2016.

Further Readings

Anderegg

Anderegg WRL, Trugman AT, Badgley G, et al.

Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests

Science. 2020 Jun 19;368(497):eaaz7005

Yu K, Smith WK, Trugman AT, et al

Pervasive decreases in living vegetation carbon turnover time across forest climate zones

PNAS. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24662-24667

Schwalm CR, Anderegg WRL, Michalak AM, et al

Global patterns of drought recovery

Nature. 2017 Aug 10;548:202-205.

Rignot

Rignot E, Mouginot J, Scheuchl B, et al

Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet Mass Balance: 1979-2017

PNAS. 2019 Jan 22;116(4):1095-1103

Morlighem M, Wood M, Seroussi H, et al

Modeling the response of Northwest Greenland to enhanced ocean thermal forcing and subglacial discharge

The Cryosphere. 2019 Mar 1;13(2):723-734

Weatherhead EC, Wielicki BA, Ramaswamy V, et al

Designing the Climate Observing System of the Future

Earth’s Future. 2017 Nov 2;6(1):80-102

Millan, R., Mouginot, J., & Rignot, E. (2017)

Mass budget of the glaciers and ice caps of the Queen Elizabeth Islands, Canada, from 1991 to 2015

Environmental Research Letters. 2017 Feb;12(2):024016

Links Between the Microbiome and Mental Health

Overview

The brain is affected by bodily changes—including microbiome composition—that influence cognition and behavior. This eBriefing will explore the interaction between the brain, gut & microbiome, with a focus on how the microbiome influences developmental, neuropsychiatric, and immune-related disorders, including socioaffective processing disorders such as autism.

In this eBriefing, You’ll Learn:

  • How the microbiome is seeded and maintained throughout life
  • How stress effects health of the microbiome
  • How changes in microbiome composition result in changes in behavior
  • The latest research in therapies targeting microbiome

Speakers

John Cryan, PhD
University College Cork

Kirsten Tillisch, MD
University of California, Los Angeles

Microbiome and Mental Health

John Cryan, PhD

University College Cork

John Cryan, PhD, is focused on understanding the interaction between brain, gut, and microbiome and how it applies to stress and immune-related disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome and obesity and neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism.  Dr. Cryan is a Professor & Chair of the Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience at the University College Cork in Ireland.  He spent four years at the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research in Basel Switzerland, as a LabHead, Behavioural Pharmacology prior to joining UCC and is a Senior Editor of Neuropharmacology and Nutritional Neuroscience and an Editor of British Journal of Pharmacology.

Kirsten Tillisch, MD

University of California, Los Angeles

Kirsten Tillisch, MD, was the first to demonstrate an effect of gut microbial manipulation with probiotics on emotional brain responses. Her ongoing research is focused on the role of the mind-body connection in chronic pain syndromes as well as the effects of mindfulness, hypnotherapy, and other non-drug therapies for irritable bowel syndrome. She is the Chief of Integrative Medicine at the Greater Los Angeles VA and a Professor of Medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

Further Readings

Cryan

Dinan TG, Cryan JF

Gut microbiota: a missing link in psychiatry

World Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;19(1):111-112

Minal J, Rea K, Spichak S, et al

You’ve got male: Sex and the microbiota-gut-brain axis across the lifespan

Front Neuroendocrinol. 2020 Jan;56:100815

Lyte JM, Gheorghe CE, Goodson MS, et al

Gut-brain axis serotonergic responses to acute stress exposure are microbiome-dependent

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 May 11; e13881

Bassett SA, Young W, Fraser K, t al

Metabolome and microbiome profiling of a stress-sensitive rat model of gut-brain axis dysfunction

Scientific reports. 2019 Oct 1;9(1):14026

Cyran JF, Dinan TG

Decoding the role of the microbiome on amygdala function and social behaviour

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Oct 19;44(1): 233-234

Tillisch

Tillisch K, Gupta A

The Role of the Microbiome in Mood

The Microbiome and the Brain, edited by D Perlmutter, CRC Press 2020, 107-120.

Tillisch K, Mayer EA, Gupta A, et al

Brain structure and response to emotional stimuli as related to gut microbial profiles in healthy women

Psychosom Med. 2017 Oct;79(8):905-913

Labus JS, Hollister EB, Jacobs J, et al

Differences in gut microbial composition correlate with regional brain volumes in irritable bowel syndrome

Microbiome. 2017 May 1;5(1):49

Tillisch K, Labus JS

Neuroimaging the microbiome-gut-brain axis

Microbial Endocrinology: The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Health and Disease, edited by M Lyte, JF Cryan, Springer 2014, 405-416.

Tillisch K, Labus JS, Kilpatrick L, et al

Consumption of fermented milk product with probiotic modulates brain activity

Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(7):1394-401.

Maternal, Neonatal, and Early Infancy Vaccine Developments

Overview

Newborns have a limited ability to fight infectious pathogens. As a result, morbidity and mortality are high during the first few months of life, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Active research is taking place, and great strides have been made to identify the factors that influence the risk of infection and disease in pregnant women and newborns. One promising approach—maternal, neonatal, and early infancy vaccines—has the potential to protect the health of mothers and children worldwide. Although several existing vaccines are safe and effective for use during pregnancy, no vaccines have been formally approved or licensed specifically for use in pregnant women.

On June 23, 2020, the New York Academy of Sciences hosted a symposium to explore challenges and achievements in the development and licensure of maternal vaccines. In a series of keynote and plenary presentations, the symposium covered recent findings regarding the maternal-to-newborn transfer of antibodies, lessons learned from the use of licensed vaccines during pregnancy, new targets for maternal immunization and contextual factors that influence the vaccination of pregnant women and their offspring.

Symposium Highlights:

  • Infectious disease is one of the leading causes of stillbirth and newborn death around the world.
  • Because antibodies can be transferred from the mother to the baby, boosting maternal antibodies can help protect the newborn against respiratory or invasive diseases.
  • Certain vaccines that are routinely used in the general population (e.g., influenza, pertussis), are also recommended for pregnant women to protect both mother and child.
  • Several pregnancy-specific vaccines, such as Group B Streptococcus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Human Cytomegalovirus, are currently in different stages of development.
  • Contextual factors, like access to health care during pregnancy and after birth, are important determinants in the success of maternal and neonatal immunization worldwide.

Speakers

Stephen L. Brusatte
The University of Edinburgh

Sinéad Farrington
The University of Edinburgh

John Marioni
European Bioinformatics Institute and University of Cambridge

David P. Mills
The University of Manchester

Artem Mishchenko
The University of Manchester

Matthew Powner
University College London

Themis Prodromakis
University of Southampton

Edze Westra
University of Exeter

Sponsors

Promotional Partners

Keynote: Protecting Infants with Maternal Vaccination

Speaker

Shabir Madhi
University Witwatersrand

Prospects of Maternal Vaccination to Protect Young Infants

One of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals is to reduce the global maternal mortality rate and eradicate preventable deaths in newborns and children under five by 2030. “Of all children under the age of five who die, roughly two thirds will in fact die within the first six months of life” explained vaccinologist Shabir Madhi. Hence, shielding newborns can really advance the fight against child mortality. Maternal and neonatal vaccines could prevent lethal infections at this vulnerable stage of life. However, to develop those vaccines, we need to understand the biological causes of early-life mortality.

Unfortunately, the quality of epidemiological and clinical data regarding child mortality is poor. Neonatal and fetal deaths are underreported and under-investigated, particularly in countries with the highest rates of early-life mortality. In low- and middle-income countries, autopsies of children are rare. As a result, our understanding of early-life mortality is still limited.

Top pathogens identified as the cause of death in newborns in a multi-country study conducted by the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network.

Madhi and his team are trying to fill this research gap. In a large study, Madhi and his colleagues collected tissue samples and clinical records of deceased children across seven countries in Africa and Southeast Asia. This diagnostic approach was sufficient to establish the chain of factors that may have ultimately caused the deaths of these infants. Madhi and his team also sought to ascertain the biological causes of stillbirth. Together, these studies revealed that infections accounted for about 20% of stillbirths and 54% of newborn deaths. Furthermore, the investigators were able to identify the top pathogens behind those infections, like K. pneumoniae, or E. coli. These findings can help inform the strategic development of maternal vaccines, a promising intervention in the fight against child mortality.

Further Readings

Madhi

Taylor AW, Blau DM, Bassat Q, et al

Initial findings from a novel population-based child mortality surveillance approach: a descriptive study

The Lancet Global Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e909-e919

Nunes MC, Aquil AR, Omer SB, Madhi S

The Effects of Influenza Vaccination during Pregnancy on Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Am J of Perinatol. 2016 Sept;33(11): 1104-1114

Madhi S, Briner C, Maswime S, Mose S

Causes of stillbirths among women from South Africa: a prospective, observational study

The Lancet Global Health. 2019 Apr; 7(4):e503-e512

Madhi S, Polack FP, Piedra PA, et al

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination during Pregnancy and Effects in Infants

N Eng J Med. 2020 Jul 30;383(5):426-439

Maternal-Fetal Immunology and Physiology

Pat Furlong, Panelist
Parent Project Muscular Distrophy

Roman J. Giger
University of Michigan School of Medicine

Altered Mother-To-Newborn Transmission of Pioneering Microbiota and Child Health

The human body is host to a large number of microbes, such as bacteria and fungi. This community of microorganisms, or microbiota, occupies the gut, skin, and cavities. It plays a role in essential functions, like the promotion of immune responses and the production of vitamins. So it’s not surprising that changes to the composition of the microbiota are associated with various diseases. In his research, epidemiologist Noel Mueller studies how the gut microbiota affects metabolic health during early development.

The first exposure to these microbes occurs in the birth canal. This mom-to-newborn transfer of microbiota provides the baby with a healthy collection of microorganisms. Mueller and his team have found that babies delivered by cesarean section (CS) have less of these protective microbes. Instead, opportunistic pathogens are more likely to colonize these babies’ microbiota. The proportion of cesarean-delivered babies continues to increase worldwide. As a result, “even if [CS] poses a small relative risk in health outcomes, it can have a large impact at the population level,” Mueller explained.

During “vaginal seeding,” cesarean-delivered babies are inoculated with their mothers’ microbiota.

CS is associated with a higher risk of developing allergies, obesity, and asthma. Lack of exposure to the mother’s microbiota in the birth canal may be at the root of some of these disorders. Mueller and his collaborators investigated a simple intervention called “vaginal seeding,” which consists of inoculating cesarean-delivered babies with their mother’s microbiota. In this “bacterial baptism,” maternal vaginal microbiota is wiped in the neonate’s face, mouth, and body. Preliminary data suggest that vaginal seeding can restore some beneficial microbes that may otherwise be lacking in these babies. A large randomized controlled trial assessing the efficiency and safety of this technique is currently underway.

Antibody Transfer From Mother To Infant: The Physiology of Breast Milk

For Kirsty Le Doare, an expert in pediatric infectious disease, breast milk is like your grandmother’s chicken soup. “It contains all the nutrients that a baby needs to grow and thrive,” she said. In addition, breast milk also protects infants from infections. Hence, breastfed infants are less vulnerable to gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections than formula-fed infants. However, it is still unclear how breast milk modulates the infant immune response.

Le Doare wants to change that through her research on age-related immune response to infectious diseases. She, along with her team, conducted a study with Gambian mother/infant pairs. They found that IgA antibodies for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) in breast milk reduced the likelihood of GBS colonization days after birth and increased the likelihood of GBS clearance later in life. Interventions like maternal vaccines can harness this form of neonatal protection against pathogens.

After some forms of maternal immunization, antibodies against certain pathogens persist in the breast milk for at least six months, protecting the neonate. Le Doare and her team are using novel culture models to understand how these antibodies fight pathogens. Although breast milk antibodies are a critical protective agent for the neonate, oligosaccharides in breast milk have also been found to lower the risk of infection. For instance, these sugar molecules can act as a decoy for pathogens, which bind to them and stay away from intestinal cells. A better understanding of these mechanisms could be leveraged to develop therapies to protect neonates against invasive diseases.

The Structure of the Human Placenta Enables Humoral and Cellular Immune Defense

According to virologist Lenore Pereira, 1%-3% of infants are infected with Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) every year. In about 25% of infected babies, HCMV can cause congenital disorders such as cerebral palsy, microcephaly, and deafness. Mothers that have strong neutralizing antibodies due to prior HCMV infection are less likely to transmit the infection to the baby, and most infants born of seropositive mothers are asymptomatic. However, the immune mechanisms that help prevent infection are not well understood.

HCMV infects the developing baby by crossing the uterine-placental interface and replicating in the placenta. Using ex vivo explants of first-trimester placentas, Pereira and her team have been able to identify the mechanisms of infection as well as the protective potential of some antibodies. Neutralizing antibodies, namely those that target a specific complex of glycoproteins in the surface of HCMV, reduce viral spread, infection, and cell death in early-gestation placentas.

The investigators also demonstrated that, in the maternal component of the placenta, HCMV infection induces an increase in effector-memory T cells. These cells may confer protection to the babies of seropositive mothers. These findings could lead to the development of antibody treatments that restrict HCMV infection and associated pregnancy complications from congenital infection.

Further Readings

Mueller

Mueller NT, Bakacs E, Combellick J, et al

The infant microbiome development: mom matters

Trends Mol Med. 2015 Feb;21(2):109-17

Mueller NT, Shin H, Pizoni A, et al

Birth mode-dependent association between pre-pregnancy maternal weight status and the neonatal intestinal microbiome

Scientific Reports. 2016 Apr 1;6(23133)

Shao Y, Forster SC, Tsaliki E, et al

Stunted microbiota and opportunistic pathogen colonization in caesarean-section birth

Nature. 2019;574(7776):117-121

Mueller NT, Hourigan SK, Hoffman DE, et al

Bacterial Baptism: Scientific, Medical, and Regulatory Issues Raised by Vaginal Seeding of C-Section-Born Babies

Journal Law Med Ethics. 2019;47(4): 568-578

Le Doare

Andreas NJ, Al-Khalidi A, Jaiteh M, et al

Role of human milk oligosaccharides in Group B Streptococcus colonisation

Clin Transl Immunology. 2016 Aug 26; 5(8):e99

Le Doare K, Holder B, Bassett A, Pannaraj PS

Mother’s Milk: A Purposeful Contribution to the Development of the Infant Microbiota and Immunity

Front Immunol. 2018 Feb 28;9(361)

Pereira

Pereira L

Congenital Viral Infection: Traversing the Uterine-Placental Interface

Annu Rev Virol. 2018 Sep 29;5(1):273-299

Pereira L,  Maidji E, McDonagh S, Tabata T

Insights into viral transmission at the uterine-placental interface

Trends Microbiol. 2005;13(4):164-174

Lessons from Current Vaccines & New Targets for Immunization

Speakers

Janet Englund, MD
Seattle Children’s Hospital

Stanley Plotkin, MD
Vaxconsult LLC, University of Pennsylvania

Ajoke Sobanjo-ter Meulen, MD, MSc
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Maternal Vaccines Licensed for Adults: What Can Be Learned from Recent Experiences with Influenza, Pertussis and Tetanus Vaccines

Maternal immunization is not a new strategy, said pediatrician and infectious disease expert, Janet Englund. Englund discussed the history of maternal vaccines, whose popularity has ebbed and flowed throughout the years. As early as 1879, maternal immunization was used to confer protection from smallpox in infants.

For centuries, tetanus toxoid was one of the leading causes of neonatal death. A landmark study in New Guinea demonstrated that maternal immunization with tetanus toxoid protects newborns. As a result, this vaccine has been routinely administered to pregnant women for years. Thanks to this, Englund said, 45 countries have been able to eradicate maternal and neonatal tetanus, a testament to the potential of maternal immunization to fight global epidemics.

In 2012, an outbreak of pertussis was observed in the US and other developed countries, including the UK. In October of that year, the UK introduced the maternal pertussis vaccine, which was associated with a dramatic decrease in the rate of neonatal pertussis. While most health authorities recommend that pregnant women get this vaccine during the third trimester, recent studies have shown that earlier is better; maternal immunization during the second trimester maximizes pertussis antibody transfer to the infant.

Pregnant women, Englund explained, are at a higher risk of severe influenza infections than non-pregnant women. Influenza infection during pregnancy is associated with preterm birth and low birth weight infants. Maternal influenza immunization is safe and it effectively protects the mother and the newborn. However, less than 50% of pregnant mothers in the US get vaccinated. Along with issues of insufficient insurance coverage, “vaccine hesitancy plays a very important role”, Englund lamented.

Human Cytomegalovirus Vaccines

Physician and vaccinologist Stanley Plotkin gave another presentation on cytomegalovirus (CMV). While co-speaker Lenore Pereira focused on the mechanisms of transplacental CMV transmission, Plotkin looked at the factors involved in CMV infection during pregnancy, immunity, and the status of CMV vaccine development status.

Many people, particularly in developing countries, become infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV) at some point in their lives. CMV infection does not cause obvious disease in most healthy individuals. However, in pregnant women, CMV can cross the placenta and infect the fetus. This can lead to congenital disorders such as microcephaly or deafness. CMV infection is also more serious for adults with weakened immune systems.

Plotkin explained that CMV infection during pregnancy usually occurs when mothers are exposed to toddlers carrying the virus. In developing countries, CMV infects most women before they become pregnant, and newborns are less likely to suffer from congenital disorders upon their mothers’ CMV infection. “We think that natural immunity is protective,” said Plotkin. In a pioneering study, his team found that vaccinating kidney transplant recipients with a weak strain of CMV protected them from contracting severe disease.

Candidate vaccines that are currently being developed to combat human cytomegalovirus infection.

One of the most promising vaccine candidates is the glycoprotein-B (gB) with MF59 adjuvant. This vaccine induces a strong antibody response, and these antibodies protect against CMV infection. Other CMV vaccines are also in the research and development phase. As these vaccines become approved and licensed, some of the first populations to be vaccinated will probably be transplant patients, young girls, and women of child-bearing age who have not been previously infected by CMV.

Updates on Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Vaccine Development

Ajoke Sobanjo-ter Meulen, infectious disease and global health expert, shed light on the current state of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) vaccine development. GBS is a pathogen commonly found in the gut or lower vaginal tract. Because it can cause life-threatening infections in pregnant women, newborns, and immunocompromised adults, it is associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, preterm births, and stillbirths. Fatality rates due to GBS infection are higher in low- and middle-income countries.

If pregnant women in the US test positive for GBS colonization, they are treated with antibiotic prophylaxis, which significantly reduces disease during the first hours of life. However, a vaccine has a higher protective potential and it would be a much more feasible approach in low- and middle- income countries, where the diagnostic and therapeutic infrastructure required for that kind of treatment may not be available.

Burden of GBS disease around the world and the advantages of maternal GBS immunization over intrapartum antibiotic prophylactic (IAP) treatment

GBS vaccines given to women during pregnancy can significantly reduce maternal GBS colonization and disease, stillbirths and neonatal sepsis, and meningitis. In a modelling study, Sobanjo-ter Meulen and colleagues estimated that, by improving all of these health outcomes, a maternal GBS vaccine could prevent 90,000 infant deaths and 57,000 stillbirths worldwide. Several vaccine candidates are currently being developed. One challenge facing licensure trials is that, due to the low incidence, a sample size of about 40,000-60,000 pregnant women would be required to ascertain the efficacy of a maternal GBS vaccine.

According to Sobanjo-ter Meulen, public oversight and private investment could help overcome these challenges. That kind of partnership has helped advance the GBS6 vaccine, which demonstrated high safety and immunogenicity levels in healthy adults and is currently being evaluated in a phase-II trial in pregnant women in South Africa.

Further Readings

Englund

Steinhoff MC,  Katz J, Englund JA, et al

Year-round influenza immunisation during pregnancy in Nepal: a phase 4, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):981-989

Kozuki N, Katz J, Englund JA, et al

Impact of maternal vaccination timing and influenza virus circulation on birth outcomes in rural Nepal

Int J of Gynaecol and Obstet. 2018 Jan;140(1):65-72

Plotkin

Plotkin SA, et al

The Status of Vaccine Development Against the Human Cytomegalovirus

J Infect Diseases. 2020 Mar 5;221(Supplement_1):S113-S122

Manicklal S, Emery VC, Lazzarotto T, et al

The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus

Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jan;26(1):86-102

Bernstein DI, Munoz FM, Callahan ST, et al

Safety and efficacy of a cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine in adolescent girls: A randomized clinical trial

Vaccine. 2016 Jan 12;34(3):313-319

Sobanjo-ter Meulen

Infant Vaccination and Barriers to Maternal Immunization

Speakers

Barney Graham, MD, PhD
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), NIH

Ruth Karron, MD
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Approaches to Infant Vaccination for Respiratory Syncytial Virus

The Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a common cause of respiratory tract infections. In newborns, RSV infection can lead to severe disease, usually due to obstruction of small airways. One of the key goals in RSV vaccine development, said immunologist and virologist Barney Graham, is to protect children younger than six months of age from RSV infection.

A failed vaccine trial in the 1960s stalled RSV vaccine development. In the study, vaccinated children became more vulnerable to RSV infection and were more likely to experience severe illness than control groups. According to Graham, the field of RSV vaccine development has only regained speed within the last 10-15 years.

Graham’s work in the structure of RSV fusion protein (F) has been critical in recent advances in RSV vaccine development. This glycoprotein on the surface of RSV mediates viral entry into host cells. During cell entry, the structure of F proteins undergoes a conformational change. The prefusion and postfusion forms of F proteins have different properties as vaccine antigens. Graham and his collaborators led a phase-I clinical trial using a stabilized prefusion F protein. In young adults, this vaccine elicited a potent neutralizing activity, and it is currently being tested in phase-II maternal immunization trials.

A similar strategy can be generalized across other virus families, including coronaviruses. In fact, his work in structure-based immunogen design allowed  Graham and colleagues to rapidly solve the structure of the new coronavirus and has greatly contributed to the current efforts to develop a candidate vaccine.

Maternal Immunization: Overcoming Barriers to Uptake and Access

Vaccine research and development is not the only obstacle in maternal and neonatal immunization. “In the end, vaccines are only useful if they can be delivered,” said global health expert Ruth Karron, before discussing contextual factors that influence the successful implementation of maternal vaccines.

When it comes to pregnancy-specific vaccines, medical, social, and economic considerations are paramount. These vaccines are usually administered in the context of antenatal care. Without a robust antenatal care system, implementing an effective maternal immunization program can be challenging. For instance, vaccines that can be administered with some flexibility throughout the second or third trimester will be more likely to lead to successful outcomes in cases when pregnant women have limited opportunities to go to the doctor. Also, attitudes surrounding maternal immunization need to be considered. Vaccine hesitancy can be particularly acute when it comes to pregnancy, as some believe it can be harmful for the child or negatively affect fertility in the future. Failing to understand the effects or the burden of a specific disease can also be an obstacle. These issues have to be addressed broadly with all stakeholders, which include the pregnant women but also other community members, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

Factors that influence the successful deployment of pregnancy-specific vaccines. Slide: Ruth Karron.

Karron and her collaborators created ethical guidelines to include the interests of pregnant women and their offspring in the development of vaccines . Some of these guidelines are very relevant in the context of epidemics. As the current COVID-19 pandemic has revealed, pregnant women and their offspring are among the most severely affected by outbreaks. They are more vulnerable to infections, but they are also disproportionately affected by an overburdened health care system. In her work, Karron advocates for the inclusion of women of childbearing age and pregnant women at every stage of vaccine development and deployment.

Further Readings

Graham

Johnson JE, Gonzales RA, Olson SJ, et al

The histopathology of fatal untreated human respiratory syncytial virus infection

Mod Pathol. 2007 Jan;20(1)108-19

Graham BS, Gilman MSA, McLellan JS, et al

Structure of RSV fusion glycoprotein trimer bound to a prefusion-specific neutralizing antibody

Science. 2013 May 31;340(6136):1113-1117

Corbett KS, Edwards DK, Leist SR, et al

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness

Nature. 2020 Aug 5

The Effects of Screen Time on the Developing Brain

Overview

Screens were ubiquitous before, but during the COVID-19 pandemic they became a lifeline for everyone’s professional and personal lives. Children spend more time on electronic devices than ever before—with virtual school, video streaming, social media, and multiplayer games. Many parents are concerned about the impact excessive screen time might have on the developing brain. In this e-Briefing experts discuss the pros and cons of screen time as well as its effects on the developing brain, and give practical tips for parents navigating the digital world with their children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In this eBriefing, You’ll Learn:

  • The content of digital media matters; parents should differentiate between types of screen time.
  • Shared engagement with digital media is important.
  • There are resources available to help parents navigate the digital world.
  • “Real-world” parenting strategies can and should be extended into the digital world.

Speakers

Sonia Livingstone, DPhil
London School of Economics and Political Science

Michael Preston, PhD
Sesame Workshop

Jenny Radesky, MD
Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School

Michael Robb, PhD
Common Sense Media

COVID-19: Screen Time and the Developing Brain

Sonia Livingstone, DPhil

London School of Economics and Political Science

Dr. Livingstone is a Professor of Social Psychology in the Department of Media and Communications at the London School of Economics and Political Science. She received her DPhil in Psychology from the University of Oxford. She has published 20 books on media, especially children’s rights, risks, and opportunities in the digital world and media literacy, including “The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age” (New York University Press, with Julian Sefton-Green) and most recently “Parenting for a Digital Future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children’s lives” (Oxford University Press, with Alicia Blum-Ross). Recipient of many honors, she has advised the UK and European government and the United Nations on children’s internet safety and rights in the digital environment. Dr. Livingstone currently directs the Digital Futures Commission (with the 5Rights Foundation) and the Global Kids Online project (with UNICEF). She is Deputy Director of the UKRI-funded Nurture Network and leads work packages for two European H2020-funded projects: ySKILLS (Youth Skills) and CO:RE (Children Online: Research and Evidence). Founder of the EC-funded 33 country EU Kids Online research network, she is a #SaferInternet4EU Ambassador for the European Commission.

Michael Preston, PhD

Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop

Michael Preston is the Executive Director of the Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, a research and innovation lab that focuses on the challenges of educating children in a rapidly changing media landscape. The Cooney Center conducts original research on emerging education technologies and collaborates across sectors to put this research into action. Prior to joining Sesame Workshop, Michael’s work focused on using technology to improve teaching and learning, drive student agency and interest, and create models for systemic change in K-12 and university contexts. He is a co-founder of CSforALL, the hub for the national Computer Science for All movement. He designed and led digital learning initiatives at the NYC Department of Education and at Columbia University’s Center for Teaching and Learning. He earned a PhD in Cognitive Science in Education from Teachers College, Columbia University and a BA in East Asian Studies from Harvard University.

Jenny Radesky, MD

University of Michigan

Dr. Radesky is a Developmental Behavioral Pediatrician and Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Michigan Medical School. She received her M.D. from Harvard Medical School, trained at Seattle Children’s Hospital and Boston Medical Center, and her clinical work focuses on developmental and behavioral conditions in low-income and underserved populations. Her NIH-funded research focuses on the use of mobile/interactive technology by parents and young children and how this relates to child self-regulation and parent-child interaction. She was the lead author of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy statements Media and Young Minds in 2016 and Digital Advertising to Children in 2020.

Michael Robb, PhD

Common Sense Media

Michael Robb is senior director of research at Common Sense, overseeing the research program, evaluation of organization impact, and program development research. Dr. Robb has been involved in issues involving media and children for over 20 years. He has published research on the impact of electronic media on young children’s language development, early literacy outcomes, and problem-solving abilities in a variety of academic journals. He also has supervised community educational outreach efforts, helping parents and teachers make the most of quality children’s programming. His work has been featured in the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Huffington Post, and many other news outlets. Dr. Robb received his B.A. from Tufts University and M.A. and Ph.D. in psychology from UC Riverside

Further Readings

Livingstone

Livingstone S, Blum-Ross A.

Parenting for a digital future: how parents’ hopes and fears about technology shape children’s lives

2020 July 1; New York: Oxford University Press

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)

The state of the World’s Children 2017: Children in a Digital World

2017 Dec

Livingstone S

Digital by default: the new normal of family life under COVID-19

Parenting for a Digital Future: A Blog about growing up in a digital world. 2020 May 13.

Preston

Sesame Street Resources to Support Children and Parents during COVID-19

Caring for Each Other

Preston M

Re-evaluating what matters during a time of crisis

Joan Ganz Cooney Center Blog. 2020 April 1.

Radesky

Radesky J, Christakis D, Hill et al.

Media and Young Minds

Pediatrics. 2016 Nov 1; 138(5).

Radesky J, Chassiakos YR, Ameenuddin N, Navsaria D.

Digital Advertising to Children

Pediatrics. 2020 July 1; 146(1).

Robb

Robb M

Screen Time in the Age of the Coronavirus

Common Sense Media Blog. 2020 April 7.

Common Sense Media Recommendation for Educational Apps

https://www.commonsensemedia.org/app-lists

Common Sense Media Quarterly Survey Series

How Teens Are Coping and Connecting in the Time of the Coronavirus

2020 April 8

Cancer Immunotherapy: Advances in Combination Therapies

Overview

Immunotherapy, which harnesses the immune system to target and attack cancer cells, has emerged as a revolutionary approach to cancer treatment. Despite its effectiveness for a wide range of cancers, eligibility for treatment is dependent on the patient’s immune system, age, and genetic profile, as well as how advanced the cancer is and whether it has responded to prior treatment. Current research aims to improve treatment strategies and better predict patient outcomes. On May 11-12, 2020, the New York Academy of Sciences hosted the annual Frontiers in Cancer Immunotherapy symposium. Experts in tumor immunology, cancer genetics, and computational biology discussed novel therapeutic targets, tumor evolution, and the mechanisms driving resistance to current treatment. Learn about the latest research advances in cancer immunotherapy in this summary.

Symposium Highlights

  • Computational neoantigen model predicts cancer patient outcomes.
  • Combination immunotherapy produces new T cells that extend patient survival.
  • Personalized cancer vaccines demonstrate therapeutic benefits.
  • New computational genomics tools provide pediatric cancer insight.
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor associated toxicity yields new clinical syndrome.
  • Macrophage reprogramming can halt metastatic cancer progression.
  • Immune cell “neighborhoods” are altered during cancer progression.
  • Multi-specific CAR T cell therapy may reduce immunotherapy resistance.

Speakers

James Allison, PhD
MD Anderson Cancer Center

Mikala Egeblad, PhD
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Benjamin Greenbaum, PhD
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Crystal Mackall, MD
Stanford University

Elaine Mardis, PhD
Nationwide Children’s Hospital

Garry Nolan, PhD
Stanford University

Jeffrey Sosman, PhD
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University

Catherine Wu, MD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School

Event Sponsor

Iovance Biotherapeutics

Advances Immune Checkpoint Therapies

Speakers

James Allison, PhD
MD Anderson Cancer Center

Benjamin Greenbaum, PhD
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Modeling Immune-Mediated Evolution

Benjamin Greenbaum examines immune interactions that contribute to cancer progression. His lab uses statistical physics and computational biology to study the role of neoantigens in tumor evolution. Neoantigens are mutated peptides present on the surface of cancer cells that have the potential to be immunogenic, meaning T cell receptors can recognize them for an immune response. The Greenbaum lab developed a mathematical model to understand the role of neoantigens. “The goal of this framework is to try to quantify the immunogenicity of neoantigens in an evolutionary model to better predict response to therapy,” said Greenbaum.

Mathematical model predicts whether or not a patient is likely to have immunogenic neoantigens.

In this model, the tumor is characterized by the presence of neoantigens that are likely to provoke an immune response as well as the likeliness of that neoantigen progressing in forward evolution. Using this approach, the Greenbaum lab was able to separate patients who responded to treatment versus those who did not for both melanoma and small-cell lung cancer. The team will apply this model to predict patient outcomes in the clinic.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer Therapy: Historical Perspective, New Opportunities

A pioneer in the field of cancer immunotherapy, James Allison has devoted his career to studying T cell response regulation and developing strategies for cancer treatment. In 2018, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine jointly with Tasuku Honjo “for their discovery of cancer therapy inhibition of negative immune regulation,” as well as the Dr. Paul Janssen Award for Biomedical Research. One of Allison’s primary research areas is the role of immune checkpoint molecules, which help prevent the immune system from attacking healthy tissue. Early work in the Allison lab found that blocking a major immune checkpoint protein, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), allows T cells to target and destroy tumors. The FDA approved anti-CTLA-4 therapy, which demonstrated success in clinical trials. The effects have been significant: in metastatic melanoma, a disease with a median survival of seven months, anti-CTLA-4 therapy extended the survival of approximately 20% of patients by ten years after a single round of treatment.

Combination immunotherapy aims to extend the lives of a greater percentage of patients compared to mono-immunotherapies.

However, Allison wondered why this treatment wasn’t successful for all patients. After the discovery of another checkpoint inhibitor protein, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), Allison’s lab decided to use mass spectrometry to examine T cell populations before and after anti-CTLA-4 therapy, anti-PD1 therapy, and therapy combining both of these treatments. Although new T cell phenotypes arise following all three treatments, the combination therapy produces a synergistic effect that leads to the greatest increase in particular T cells that help target tumors. “It seems to be this that is responsible for the increase in efficacy, not just the combination of the effects of the monotherapies alone,” said Allison. His future work aims to enhance our understanding of combination checkpoint blockade therapy to extend the lives of more patients.

Further Readings

Greenbaum

Dudley JC, Lin M-T, Le DT, Eshleman JR

Microsatellite Instability as a Biomarker for PD-1 Blockade

Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(4):813-820

Balachandran VP, Łuksza M, Zhao JN, et al

Identification of unique neoantigen qualities in long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer

Nature. 2017;551(7681):512-516

Łuksza M, Riaz N, Makarov V, et al

A neoantigen fitness model predicts tumour response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy

Nature. 2017;551(7681):517-520

Sarkizova S, Hacohen N

How T cells spot tumour cells

Nature. 2017;551(7681):444-446

Allison

Wei SC, Anang N-AAS, Sharma R, et al

Combination anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade utilizes cellular mechanisms partially distinct from monotherapies

Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(45):22699-22709

O’Shea JJ, Paul WE

Mechanisms underlying lineage commitment and plasticity of helper CD4+ T cells

Science. 2010;327(5969):1098-1102

Wei SC, Sharma R, Anang N-AAS, et al

Negative Co-stimulation Constrains T Cell Differentiation by Imposing Boundaries on Possible Cell States

Immunity. 2019;50(4):1084-1098.e10

Wei SC, Levine JH, Cogdill AP, et al

Distinct Cellular Mechanisms Underlie Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade

Cell. 2017;170(6):1120-1133.e17

Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, et al

Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer

N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2443-2454

Leach DR, Krummel MF, Allison JP

Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade

Science. 1996;271(5256):1734-1736

Beyond Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Speakers

Elaine Mardis, PhD
Nationwide Children’s Hospital

Catherine Wu, MD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School

Driving T cells into Tumors: A Role for Personal Cancer Vaccines

Catherine Wu works to enable more specific tumor targeting. She explained that one critical challenge is increasing the number of patients—right now, approximately 30%—with lasting responses to immunotherapies. Therapeutic vaccines may provide a solution. Wu said that these vaccines would, “stimulate antigen-specific immunity against determinants that are expressed in the cancer, and in doing so, increase the breadth and diversity of tumor-specific T cells.” Toward this goal, her lab has developed personalized vaccines for patients. The process begins with identifying specific mutations in a patient’s tumor using DNA and RNA sequencing. Next, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing is performed, and then personalized HLA-binding peptides are predicted. Excitingly, these vaccines, in combination with checkpoint blockade therapy, have demonstrated success in high-risk melanoma and glioblastoma patients. To improve HLA predictions, her lab has also developed an approach using mass spectrometry to examine antigen processing. To date, they have expanded from 16 to 95 HLA alleles that cover different racial groups such that they have 95% global coverage. This work represents an unprecedented advancement in distinguishing tumor-presenting epitopes.

Immunogenomics and the TME in Pediatric CNS Cancers

Elaine Mardis uses genomics to understand cancer progression and advance immunotherapeutic treatments. Specifically, her work focuses on understanding pediatric cancers. Unlike adult cancers, pediatric cancers have few druggable targets and are generally less well understood. By using and innovating computational approaches to characterize the tumor microenvironment and cancer progression, the Mardis lab provides unprecedented insight into pediatric cancers. For example, patient tumors are analyzed using exome sequencing and RNA sequencing with multiple analyses. Mardis has also developed a platform for neoantigen prediction called pVACtools, which aims to identify neoantigens from genomic fusion breakpoints. This work led to the discovery that recurrent pediatric central nervous system cancers contain immune cells in the tumor microenvironment that have been recruited from the periphery. This likely provides an immune-suppressive context based on checkpoint blockade, but neoantigen alterations may allow for the immune system to be engaged. However, new approaches may be required to extend immunotherapy to pediatric cancers because there are significant differences in the immune system based on age.

Further Readings

Wu

Sarkizova S, Klaeger S, Le PM, et al

A large peptidome dataset improves HLA class I epitope prediction across most of the human population

Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(2):199-209

Purroy N, Wu CJ

Coevolution of leukemia and host immune cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7(4)

Keskin DB, Anandappa AJ, Sun J, et al

Neoantigen vaccine generates intratumoral T cell responses in phase Ib glioblastoma trial

Nature. 2019;565(7738):234-239

Ott PA, Hu Z, Keskin DB, et al

An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma

Nature. 2017;547(7662):217-221

Hacohen N, Fritsch EF, Carter TA, Lander ES, Wu CJ

Getting personal with neoantigen-based therapeutic cancer vaccines

Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1(1):11-15

Mardis

Hundal J, Kiwala S, McMichael J, et al

pVACtools: A Computational Toolkit to Identify and Visualize Cancer Neoantigens

Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8(3):409-420

Hundal J, Carreno BM, Petti AA, et al

pVAC-Seq: A genome-guided in silico approach to identifying tumor neoantigens

Genome Med. 2016;8(1):11

Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, et al

Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles

Nat Methods. 2015;12(5):453-457

Berger MF, Mardis ER

The emerging clinical relevance of genomics in cancer medicine

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(6):353-365

Toxicity, Tumor Response, and Microenvironment

Speakers

Mikala Egeblad, PhD
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Jeffrey Sosman, PhD
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University

Immune Related Toxicities: Mechanisms and Disease Outcome

Jeffrey A. Sosman is an oncologist and cancer immunotherapy researcher studying immunotherapy toxicity. Although cancer immunotherapies have transformed the therapeutic landscape, these treatments have a variety of toxic effects that limit treatment potential. Fairly common toxicities include rashes, joint and tissue diseases, colitis and hepatitis, while more rare toxicities include encephalitis and myocarditis. Dr. Sosman presented a case study on a patient that developed immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) associated myocarditis, which he defined as a new clinical syndrome. Immune checkpoint inhibitors prevent natural “brakes” in the immune system so that T cells can attack cancer cells. Although myocarditis is rare in ICI-treated patients (less than 0.1%), this toxicity has a 50% mortality rate. Sosman shared that onset of ICI-associated myocarditis is highly unpredictable, though it can occur early on in treatment. He also noted that patients treated with combinations of immune checkpoint therapies are at higher risk for developing this toxicity. Future work aims to better predict serious toxicity and to understand the relationship between toxicity and tumor response.

Regulation of Cancer Progression by the Tumor Microenvironment

Mikala Egeblad studies the tumor microenvironment in cancer. Her lab has examined the role of bacterially derived lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in cancer progression, which is understood to influence macrophages within the tumor phenotypically. Specifically, the effect of LPS depends on the presence of either pro-inflammatory signals (IFNγ), which create tumoricidal macrophages, or anti-inflammatory signals (IL-4 and -13, TGFβ), which produce tumor-promoting macrophages. However, LPS cannot be used to treat cancer because of its toxicity in humans. Considering a novel therapeutic approach, Egeblad said, “we wanted to see if we could take tumor-promoting macrophages and reprogram them to become tumoricidal.” Their approach involved the use of monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA), an LPS derivative that is already used as a vaccine adjuvant.

Macrophages can be programmed to become tumoricidal or tumor-promoting.

They hypothesized that if they delivered MPLA and IFNγ to tumors, macrophages would become tumoricidal. The lab observed that tumors from both mice and patients with breast cancer contained anti-tumor macrophages following treatment, which stopped metastatic progression. Egeblad and her team plan to elucidate how long lasting the responses are and whether they can be further improved by combining this treatment with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy.

Further Readings

Sosman

Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML, et al

Fulminant Myocarditis with Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade

N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1749-1755

Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD

Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade

N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):158-168

Pallin DJ, Baugh CW, Postow MA, Caterino JM, Erickson TB, Lyman GH

Immune-related Adverse Events in Cancer Patients

Acad Emerg Med. 2018;25(7):819-827

Weber JS, Kähler KC, Hauschild A

Management of immune-related adverse events and kinetics of response with ipilimumab

J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(21):2691-2697

Weber JS, Yang JC, Atkins MB, Disis ML

Toxicities of immunotherapy for the practitioner

J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(18):2092-2099

Egeblad

Barnes BJ, Adrover JM, Baxter-Stoltzfus A, et al

Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: Neutrophil extracellular traps

J Exp Med. 2020;217(6).

Zuo Y, Yalavarthi S, Shi H, et al

Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19

JCI Insight. 2020;5(11)

Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P

Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation

Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(3):159-175

Albrengues J, Shields MA, Ng D, et al

Neutrophil

traps produced during inflammation awaken dormant cancer cells in mice

Science. 2018;361(6409)

Immunopathology and Engineered Immune Cells

Speakers

Crystal Mackall, MD
Stanford University

Garry Nolan, PhD
Stanford University

Pathology from the Molecular Scale on Up

Garry Nolan has developed multiple technologies to improve our understanding of both normal immune function and immunopathologies. One such tool termed CODEX (CO-Detection by indexing) modifies traditional fluorescent microscopes for high-dimensional imaging so that users can obtain spatial and quantitative insight into cells within complex tissues. As a multiplexed imaging platform, CODEX allows users to stain tissue with 50-120 antibodies that have unique barcodes that can be annealed to fluorophores for visualization. Interestingly, Nolan’s lab has used this technology to identify specific “neighborhoods” of immune cells, defined as tissue regions within each cell that have a similar surrounding of cell types. They have also discovered that cellular neighborhoods communicate with each other and can change during various stages of cancer. This information provides critical insight into disease progression that may inform clinical outcomes in the future.

Next Generation CAR T Cells

Crystal Mackall studies the basis of tumor-immune interactions to develop new cancer immunotherapies. Specifically, her lab works to improve chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T cell) therapy, in which a patient’s T cells are engineered to express a synthetic receptor that recognizes an antigen on their tumor. Despite its effectiveness, some patients become unresponsive to this treatment over time. “As we think about the future of this field, we need to talk about the issue of resistance,” said Mackall, “we need to unpack it and identify where and how these cells are failing.” The loss of specific antigen expression has been identified as a significant contributor to resistance, as it can eliminate the ability of CAR T cells to recognize the tumor.

Challenges such as the loss of antigen expression can lead to immunotherapy resistance.

To address this problem, Mackall’s lab engineered a “multi-specific CAR” to simultaneously target two antigens. Even if one antigen’s expression is lost over time, the other will still be targeted which may reduce resistance. In a clinical trial, she found that this therapeutic strategy was well tolerated in both children and adults with leukemia and lymphoma. Mackall’s lab will further optimize the engineering of other multi-specific CARs to overcome resistance.

Further Readings

Mackall

Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, et al

Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia

N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):439-448

What Physics Tells Us About the World

Speaker

Jim Al-Khalili, PhD
University of Surrey

Overview

With his newly released book The World According to Physics as a point of reference, Jim Al-Khalili offers an illuminating look at what physics reveals about the world. Shining a light on the most profound insights revealed by modern physics, he invites us to reflect on what this crucially important science can tell us about the universe and the nature of reality itself. Educational and enlightening, this talk illustrates why physics is indispensable to understanding the world around us and invites us all to share in the profound adventure of seeking truth.

In This eBriefing, You’ll Learn:

  • How the three pillars of modern physics ― quantum theory, relativity, and thermodynamics ― must come together if we are ever to have a full understanding of reality
  • Relatable examples and thought-provoking analogies that elucidate the speculative frontiers of the field, and the physics that underpin our everyday experiences and technologies

Jim Al-Khalili, PhD

University of Surrey

Jim Al-Khalili is a British theoretical physicist, author and broadcaster. He is Professor of Theoretical Physics at the University of Surrey, a regular broadcaster and presenter of science programs on BBC radio and television, and the author of numerous books, including The World According to Physics, Quantum: A Guide for the Perplexed; and Life on the Edge: The Coming of Age of Quantum Biology.

He received his PhD in theoretical nuclear physics in 1989 and has published over a hundred research papers on quantum physics. He is a recipient of the Royal Michael Faraday medal and the Institute of Physics Kelvin Medal. In 2016 he received the inaugural Stephen Hawking Medal for Science Communication. He is a fellow of the Royal Society and lives in Southsea, England.

Resources

Al-Khalili

Al-Khalili, Jim

The World According to Physics

Princeton University Press, 2020

Al-Khalili, Jim

Quantum: A Guide for the Perplexed

Orion Publishing Co., 2012

Al-Khalili, Jim

Quantum Mechanics (A Ladybird Expert Book)

Penguin Books, 2017

Einstein, Albert

Relativity: The Special and General Theory

Methuen & Co Ltd, 1920

Al-Khalili, Jim

The Life Scientific

BBC Radio 4, 2020

Could we Genetically Protect Astronaut Health on the Mission to Mars? 

A screenshot from a virtual meeting.

Beyond Spacesuits and Pain Relievers: Could we Genetically Protect Astronaut Health on the Mission to Mars? On May 12, 2020, I hosted a virtual conversation for the New York Academy of Sciences with astrobiologist Kennda Lynch, PhD (Lunar and Planetary Institute), geneticist Christopher Mason, PhD (Weill Cornell Medicine), and planetary scientist Lucianne Walkowicz, PhD (The JustSpace Alliance; Adler Plantarium) exploring some of the physical—and ethical—obstacles to be surmounted for a successful human mission to Mars.

Published May 12, 2020

By Brooke Grindlinger, PhD

Much has been written about finding the next Earth—a planetary body to serve as future outpost for the human race as Earth’s life-sustaining natural resources dwindle. But Mars won’t exactly offer a warm welcome to unshielded humans: an average temperature of -80°F/-62°C, an atmosphere of 96% toxic carbon dioxide, a surface covered in fine red dust, and a hefty dose of radiation constantly tearing through your DNA. Hostile welcome aside, we first have to get there safely.

Are We There Yet?

With current jet propulsion technologies, and depending on the position of the red planet in its orbit, the shortest journey from Earth to Mars is estimated to take 6 months. As revealed by NASA’s study of identical twins Scott and Mark Kelly—undertaken before, during, and after Scott embarked on his one-year mission on the International Space Station—long-term space flight can exact a multitude of transient and permanent effects on the human body: from loss of muscle tone and bone density to changes in vision and the body’s ability to repair itself.

A round trip is expected to eclipse the lifetime maximum recommended dosage of radiation. We humans are hardy, but are we tough enough for the mission to Mars?

Beyond the Whims of Evolution

While we don’t yet know if there is life on Mars, or if it had life in the past, a peek at the vast diversity of life right here on Earth reveals lifeforms that can survive in harsh environments that resemble the Martian surface. Some extremophiles—organisms that thrive in high radiation or very dry, salty, acidic, hot or cold settings—may be better equipped than Homo sapiens for life on Mars. Could they serve as a genetic reservoir in which to fish for talents and traits that if introduced into humans would make us more resilient?

The gene editing technique CRISPR, or the synthetic redesign of organisms to engineer new abilities, could propel astronaut preparation forward through strategic genetic enhancement of the human body or the custom design of microbes that support daily life on Mars. Imagine a designer microbe that secretes materials that catalyze concrete production from Mars soil, or supports water production, waste disposal, or plant growth. Genes taken from the humble tardigrade—a microscopic creature genetically resistant to radiation damage—when inserted into human cells, have been shown to provide protection against radiation. Along with physical and pharmacological protections—from spacesuits to pain relievers—could we safely genetically protect astronaut heath? And if so, should we?

The Big Experiment

When human medical studies are conducted, patients must be fully apprised of the risks and willingly give their consent to participate. If at any time the patient wishes to leave the study, they can withdraw their consent and go home. No such U-turns will be available to astronauts when months into their journey to Mars. The risks associated with space travel are carefully calculated, and many regulations in place to protect astronaut health.

However, as we push the human body to, and perhaps beyond, reasonable limits, this begs the question: are the health risks so high that extreme methods of protection like gene editing or synthetic biology would be justified? Are we in fact ethically bound to pursue these methods of protection because the risk of not pursuing them is too great? While these technologies are still in exploratory stages today, it’s intriguing to think of the future possibilities, and ethical quandaries, that may be realized on the fourth or fifth generation missions to Mars.

Mars may only be half the size of Earth, but it will pack one heck of a sensory punch for the astronauts anticipated to touch down on the red planet by 2035. As the fantastic future of human space travel continues to unfold before us, the challenges of sustaining human life in space should, in parallel, drive us to live more sustainably here on Earth in the here and now.

This article was originally published on LinkedIn.

Also read: Big Questions for Our Journey to Mars